IPCS INCHEM Home




     INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMME ON CHEMICAL SAFETY



    ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CRITERIA 113






    FULLY HALOGENATED CHLOROFLUOROCARBONS










    This report contains the collective views of an international group of
    experts and does not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated
    policy of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International
    Labour Organisation, or the World Health Organization.

    Published under the joint sponsorship of
    the United Nations Environment Programme,
    the International Labour Organisation,
    and the World Health Organization

    World Health Orgnization
    Geneva, 1990


         The International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) is a
    joint venture of the United Nations Environment Programme, the
    International Labour Organisation, and the World Health
    Organization. The main objective of the IPCS is to carry out and
    disseminate evaluations of the effects of chemicals on human health
    and the quality of the environment. Supporting activities include
    the development of epidemiological, experimental laboratory, and
    risk-assessment methods that could produce internationally
    comparable results, and the development of manpower in the field of
    toxicology. Other activities carried out by the IPCS include the
    development of know-how for coping with chemical accidents,
    coordination of laboratory testing and epidemiological studies, and
    promotion of research on the mechanisms of the biological action of
    chemicals.

    WHO Library Cataloguing in Publication Data

    Fully halogenated chlorofluorocarbons.

        (Environmental health criteria ; 113)

        1.Freons - adverse effects 2.Freons - toxicity 
        I.Series

        ISBN 92 4 157113 6 0        (NLM Classification: QV 633)
        ISSN 0250-863X

         The World Health Organization welcomes requests for permission
    to reproduce or translate its publications, in part or in full.
    Applications and enquiries should be addressed to the Office of
    Publications, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, which
    will be glad to provide the latest information on any changes made
    to the text, plans for new editions, and reprints and translations
    already available.

    (c) World Health Organization 1990

         Publications of the World Health Organization enjoy copyright
    protection in accordance with the provisions of Protocol 2 of the
    Universal Copyright Convention. All rights reserved.

         The designations employed and the presentation of the material
    in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion
    whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the World Health
    Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory,
    city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation
    of its frontiers or boundaries.

         The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers'
    products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the
    World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar
    nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the
    names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital
    letters.

CONTENTS

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CRITERIA FOR FULLY HALOGENATED CHLOROFLUOROCARBONS

 1. SUMMARY                

     1.1. Identity, physical and chemical properties, analytical methods   
     1.2. Sources of human and environmental exposure  
     1.3. Environmental transport, distribution, and transformation    
     1.4. Environmental levels and human exposure  
     1.5. Kinetics and metabolism  
     1.6. Effects on the environment   
     1.7. Effects on experimental animals and in vitro systems     
     1.8. Effects on humans    
     1.9. Evaluation of human health risks 

 2. IDENTITY, PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES, ANALYTICAL METHODS 

     2.1. Identity     
           2.1.1. Technical product   
     2.2. Physical and chemical properties 
     2.3. Conversion factors   
     2.4. Analytical methods   

 3. SOURCES OF HUMAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE            

     3.1. Natural occurrence   
     3.2. Man-made sources 
           3.2.1. Production levels   
           3.2.2. Manufacturing processes 
           3.2.3. Loss during disposal of wastes  
           3.2.4. Release from transport, storage, and accidents  
                    3.2.4.1 Transport and storage   
                    3.2.4.2 Accidents   
     3.3. Use patterns     
           3.3.1. Major uses  
           3.3.2. Release from use: controlled or uncontrolled    

 4. ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPORT, DISTRIBUTION, AND TRANSFORMATION      

     4.1. Transport between media  
     4.2. Environmental transformation and degradation processes       
           4.2.1. Oxidation   
           4.2.2. Hydrolysis  
           4.2.3. Photolysis  
                    4.2.3.1 Photochemistry  
                    4.2.3.2 Environmental transformation    
           4.2.4. Biodegradation  
     4.3. Interaction with other physical, chemical, or biological factors
     4.4. Bioconcentration and bioaccumulation 

 5. ENVIRONMENTAL LEVELS AND HUMAN EXPOSURE    

     5.1. Environmental levels 
           5.1.1. Air     

           5.1.2. Water       
           5.1.3. Food and other edible products  
     5.2. Occupational exposure    

 6. ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE DEPLETION        

     6.1. Introduction     
     6.2. Terrestrial plants   
     6.3. Aquatic organisms    
     6.4. Research needs       

 7. KINETICS AND METABOLISM    

     7.1. Absorption       
     7.2. Distribution     
     7.3. Metabolic transformation 
     7.4. Elimination and excretion in expired air, faeces, and urine  
     7.5. Retention and turnover   
     7.6. Reaction with body components    

 8. EFFECTS ON EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS AND  IN VITRO TEST SYSTEMS  

     8.1. Single exposures 
           8.1.1. Acute inhalation toxicity   
           8.1.2. Acute oral toxicity 
     8.2. Short-term exposures 
           8.2.1. Inhalation exposure 
           8.2.2. Oral toxicity   
           8.2.3. Dermal toxicity 
     8.3. Skin and eye irritation; sensitization   
     8.4. Long-term exposures  
           8.4.1. Inhalation toxicity 
           8.4.2. Oral toxicity   
     8.5. Reproduction and developmental toxicity  
           8.5.1. Reproduction    
           8.5.2. Developmental toxicity  
     8.6. Mutagenicity and related end-points  
     8.7. Carcinogenicity      
     8.8. Special studies - cardiopulmonary effects    
           8.8.1. Cardiac sensitization in response to exogenous 
                    adrenaline-induced arrhythmia 
           8.8.2. Cardiac sensitization and asphyxia-induced arrhythmia   
           8.8.3. Arrhythmia not associated with asphyxia or adrenaline
     8.9. Mechanisms of toxicity - mode of action  

 9. EFFECTS ON HUMANS      

     9.1. Controlled studies with volunteers   
     9.2. Occupational exposure    
     9.3. Non-occupational exposures   
     9.4. Health effects associated with stratospheric ozone depletion
           9.4.1. Skin cancer effects 
           9.4.2. Immunotoxic effects 
           9.4.3. Ocular effects  

           9.4.4. Effects on vitamin D synthesis  
           9.4.5. Exacerbation of photochemical smog formation and 
                    effects

10. EVALUATION OF HUMAN HEALTH RISKS AND EFFECTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT    

     10.1. Evaluation of human health risks 
           10.1.1. Direct health effects resulting from exposure to fully
                    halogenated chlorofluorocarbons 
           10.1.2. Health effects expected from reduction of stratospheric 
                    ozone by chlorofluorocarbons   
     10.2. Effects on the environment   
     10.3. Conclusions      

11. RECOMMENDATIONS        

REFERENCES              

RESUME                      

EVALUATION DES RISQUES POUR LA SANTE HUMAINE ET EFFETS SUR L'ENVIRONNEMENT  

RECOMMANDATIONS             

RESUMEN                     

EVALUACION DE LOS RIESGOS PARA LA SALUD HUMANA Y DE LOS EFFECTOS EN EL
MEDIO AMBIENTE               

RECOMENDACIONES             


WHO TASK GROUP ON ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CRITERIA FOR FULLY HALOGENATED
CHLOROFLUOROCARBONS

 Members

Dr B. Gilbert, Company for the Development of Technology
   Transfer, Cidade Universitaria, Campinas, Brazil
    (Rapporteur)

Professor H.A. Greim, Institute of Toxicology and Biochem-
   istry, Association for Radiation and Environmental
   Research, Neuherberg, Federal Republic of Germany
    (Chairman)

Dr L. Hinkova, Toxicologist, Institute of Hygiene and
   Occupational Health, Sofia, Bulgaria

Dr Y. Lessard, Laboratory of Medical Physiology, Faculty
   of Medicine, University of Rennes, France

Dr M. Morita, Department of Legal Medicine, Sapporo Medi-
   cal College, Sapporo, Japan

Dr G. Neumeier, Federal Office for the Environment,
   Berlin, Federal Republic of Germany

Professor M. Noweir, Occupational Health Research Centre,
   Higher Institute of Public Health, University of
   Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt

Dr J. Sokal, Department of Toxicity Evaluation, Institute
   of Occupational Medicine, Lodz, Poland

Professor J.C. Van der Leun, Institute of Dermatology,
   State University Hospital of Utrecht, Utrecht,
   Netherlands

Dr K. Victorin, National Institute of Environmental Medi-
   cine, Department of Environmental Hygiene, Stockholm,
   Sweden

Dr W.D. Wagner, National Institute of Occupational Safety
   and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

Dr R.C. Worrest, Stratospheric Ozone Research Program,
   Office of Environmental Processes and Effects Research,
   US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.,
   USA

 Observers

Dr D. Mayer, Toxicology Department, Hoechst AG, Frankfurt
   am Main, Federal Republic of Germany

Dr H. Trochimowicz, E.I. Du Pont de Nemours, Haskell Lab-
   oratory for Toxicology and Industrial Medicine, Newark,
   Delaware, USA

 Representatives of Host Country

Dr U. Schlottmann, Federal Ministry for the Environment,
   Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, Bonn, Federal
   Republic of Germanyb

Dr V. Quarg, Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature
   Conservation and Nuclear Safety, Bonn, Federal Republic
   of Germanyb

 Secretariat

Professor F. Valic, IPCS Consultant, World Health Organiz-
   ation, Geneva, Switzerland (Responsible Officer and
   Secretary)a

Dr S. Lutkenhoff, Office of Health and Environmental
   Assessment, US Environmental Protection Agency,
   Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

Dr G. Quélennec, Division of Vector Biology and Control,
   World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland



-------------------------------------------------------
a  Vice-rector, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Yugoslavia.
b  Present for part of the meeting only.

NOTE TO READERS OF THE CRITERIA MONOGRAPHS

    Every effort has been made to present information in
the criteria monographs as accurately as possible without
unduly delaying their publication.  In the interest of all
users of the environmental health criteria monographs,
readers are kindly requested to communicate any errors
that may have occurred to the Manager of the International
Programme on Chemical Safety, World Health Organization,
Geneva, Switzerland, in order that they may be included in
corrigenda, which will appear in subsequent volumes.


                        *     *     *



    A detailed data profile and a legal file can be
obtained from the International Register of Potentially
Toxic Chemicals, Palais des Nations, 1211 Geneva 10,
Switzerland (Telephone No. 7988400 or 7985850).

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CRITERIA FOR FULLY HALOGENATED 
CHLOROFLUOROCARBONS


    A WHO Task Group on Environmental Health Criteria for
Fully Halogenated Chlorofluorocarbons met at the Institute
of Toxicology and Biochemistry, Neuherberg, Federal Repub-
lic of Germany, from 21 to 25 November 1988.  Professor
H.A. Greim opened the meeting on behalf of the host insti-
tute.  Dr U. Schlottmann spoke on behalf of the Federal
Government, which sponsored the meeting.  Professor
F. Valic welcomed the members on behalf of the three
cooperating organizations of the IPCS (UNEP/ILO/WHO).  The
Task Group reviewed and revised the draft criteria mono-
graph and made an evaluation of the risks for human health
and the environment from exposure to fully halogenated
chlorofluorocarbons.

        The drafts of this monograph were prepared by the
Office of Health and Environmental Assessment, US Environ-
mental Protection Agency, under the direction of Dr J.
STARA and Dr S. LUTKENHOFF. The chapter on the ecological
effects of stratospheric ozone depletion was prepared by
Dr R.C. WORREST and the section on the health effects
associated with stratospheric ozone depletion by Dr L.
GRANT, both of the US Environmental Protection Agency.
Professor F. Valic and Dr P.G. Jenkins (IPCS) were respon-
sible for the overall scientific content and editing,
respectively.

ABBREVIATIONS

ADI        Acceptable daily intake

ADP        Adenosine diphosphate

bw         Body weight

CFC        Chlorofluorocarbon

EC         Electron capture

ECG        Electrocardiogram

EEG        Electroencephalogram

FEV        Forced expiratory volume

FI         Flame ionization

GC         Gas chromatography

HCFH-22    Chlorodifluoromethane (CHClF2)

LDH        Lactate dehydrogenase

LOEL       Lowest-observed-effect level

MS         Mass spectrometry

NMR        Nuclear magnetic resonance

NOEL       No-observed-effect level

ppb        Parts per billion

ppm        Parts per million

ppt        Parts per trillion

SGOT       Serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase

SGPT       Serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase

TWA        Time-weighted average

UV         Ultraviolet

v/v        Volume per volume

w/v        Weight per volume

1.  SUMMARY

1.1.  Identity, physical and chemical properties, analytical methods

    This monograph concerns only those chlorofluorocarbons
(CFCs)  that are derived from the complete substitution of
the  hydrogen atoms in methane and ethane with both fluor-
ine  and chlorine atoms.  Many  of these compounds are  of
commercial significance and some of them are known to con-
tribute  to ozone depletion.  Compounds considered in this
report include: trichlorofluoromethane (CFC-11), dichloro-
difluoromethane (CFC-12), chlorotrifluoromethane (CFC-13),
1,2-difluoro-1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane (CFC-112), 1,1-difluoro-
1,2,2,2-tetrachloroethane (CFC-112a), 1,1,2-trichloro-1,2,2-
trifluoroethane (CFC-113), 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2,2-trifluoroeth-
ane (CFC-113a), 1,2-dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane (CFC-
114), 1,1-dichloro-1,2,2,2-tetrafluoroethane  (CFC-114a), and
1-chloro-1,1,2,2,2-pentafluoroethane  (CFC-115). Compounds
not  containing chlorine have  not been considered.  Those
compounds containing hydrogen will be reviewed in  a  sub-
sequent report.

    Commercial  chlorofluorocarbons rank among the highest
purity  organic  chemicals  available.  They  are  usually
characterized  by high vapour pressure and density and low
viscosity,  surface  tension, refractive  index, and solu-
bility  in  water.   The degree  of  fluorine substitution
greatly  affects the physical properties  and, in general,
as  fluorine  substitution increases,  the vapour pressure
increases,  and the boiling point, density, and solubility
in water decrease.

    The chlorofluorocarbons reviewed in this monograph are
reasonably  stable chemically and, in the absence of metal
catalysts,  exhibit  low  rates of  hydrolysis.   They are
highly  resistant  to  attack  by  conventional  oxidizing
agents  at temperatures below 200 °C.  In general, chloro-
fluorocarbons  show a high degree of thermal stability and
are  extremely resistant to almost  all chemical reagents.
However,  they  will  interact violently  with  chemically
reactive metals.

    Several  analytical methods are available  for the de-
termination of chlorofluorocarbons in various media. These
include spectrophotometry, gas chromatography with several
quantification   methods,  and  mass   spectrometry.   The
majority   of  methods  utilize  gas  chromatography  with
various  detection  techniques,  and detection  limits are
often  of the order of 1 part per trillion (ppt).  Methods
for  sample  collection  have  been  modified  to  achieve
greater selectivity and sensitivity.

1.2.  Sources of human and environmental exposure

    The  chlorofluorocarbons  discussed in  this monograph
are not known to occur naturally in the  environment,  but
practically  all chlorofluorocarbons, except those used as
chemical intermediates, are released into the environment.
The  estimated  world  production of  the important poten-
tially  ozone-depleting chlorofluorocarbons (CFC-11,  CFC-
12,  CFC-113) in 1985 was at least a million tonnes. Manu-
facture  is not limited  to major industrial  nations;  it
occurs  in at least 16 countries.  With the implementation
of  the Montreal Protocol, the present growth trend in the
production  of these chlorofluorocarbons will  probably be
reversed.

    The  most important method for manufacturing the major
chlorofluorocarbons  is  the  catalytic  displacement   of
chlorine from chlorocarbons with fluorine by reaction with
anhydrous  hydrogen fluoride. Most release to the environ-
ment  occurs  during  the disposal  of  waste refrigerant-
containing equipment, and not during manufacture, storage,
or handling. The release of propellant chlorofluorocarbons
has decreased as a result of legislative  restrictions  on
their  use in many countries,  and the release of  blowing
agents is small.  Because of the high vapour  pressure  of
these compounds at ambient temperatures, almost all of the
amount  released  into the  environment eventually accumu-
lates  in  the  atmosphere.  The  estimated  total  annual
release  of  about one  million  tonnes consisted  in 1985
largely of CFC-11 and CFC-12, and the  cumulative  release
of these chlorofluorocarbons from 1931 to 1985  was  about
13.5 million tonnes.

    The  approximate world use pattern of chlorofluorocar-
bons  in  1985 was  as  follows: refrigerants,  15%; foam-
blowing  agents,  35%;  aerosol propellants,  31%; miscel-
laneous, 7%, and unallocated, 12%. In the USA, the aerosol
propellant use was much lower because of restrictions.

1.3.  Environmental transport, distribution, and transformation

    The  commercial chlorofluorocarbons are  persistent in
the  environment because of their chemical stability.  The
average residence times in the atmosphere are estimated to
be 65, 110, 400, 90, 180, and 380 years for  CFC-11,  CFC-
12,  CFC-13, CFC-113, CFC-114, and  CFC-115, respectively.
These  long residence times will ensure diffusion into the
stratosphere  where, via photochemically-produced chlorine
atoms,  the chlorofluorocarbons will react  with the ozone
layer.   Additionally, these compounds will  contribute to
the greenhouse effect.

1.4.  Environmental levels and human exposure

    The  global  distribution  of chlorofluorocarbons  has
been  reported by several investigators.   Recent measure-
ments of latitudinal variations of chlorofluorocarbon con-
centrations  indicate little difference in CFC-11 and CFC-
12  concentrations between the northern and southern hemi-
spheres. Also there is no significant variation with alti-
tude up to 6 km above the Earth's surface.   The  measured
concentrations  of  chlorofluorocarbons in  urban/suburban
air are higher than those in rural/remote areas because of
contributions from local sources of emission.

    Atmospheric  levels  of  CFC-11 and  CFC-12  increased
steadily  up to 1985, when  combined levels for these  two
compounds  in  the USA  were 9120 ng/m3 in  urban/suburban
areas  and 2720 ng/m3 in  rural/remote areas for both com-
pounds.  From these data, human inhalation intake has been
estimated  at 182  and 54 mg/day  in these  two  types  of
areas.

    The  mean surface ocean  concentrations of CFC-11  and
CFC-12,  reported  from three  mutually distant locations,
were of the order of 0.2 ng/litre. However, 0.62 ng CFC-11
per  litre was measured in  the Greenland Sea in  1982 and
values  of  up  to  0.54 ng/litre  have  been  measured in
Japanese  coastal  waters.   The highest  value for CFC-12
reported  was 0.33 ng/litre in these  same coastal waters.
Much  higher levels have been  measured in fresh water  in
Lake Ontario where 249 mg CFC-11 per litre and 572 ng CFC-
12 per litre have been recorded.  Chlorofluorocarbons have
not been detected in drinking-water, but have  been  found
in  snow and rain water in Alaska, in Lake Ontario, and in
the Niagara river. CFC-11 has been detected at  levels  of
0.1-5 µg/kg  (ppb) (dry weight basis) in various organs of
fish  and molluscs. However, the presence of chlorofluoro-
carbons in processed food has not been documented.

1.5.  Kinetics and metabolism

    Chlorofluorocarbons  may  enter the  human organism by
inhalation,  ingestion, or dermal contact.   Inhalation is
the  most common and important  route of entry, and  exha-
lation is the most significant route of  elimination  from
the  body. Controlled studies with  volunteer subjects and
experimental  animals have provided substantial  data from
exposures  to a number of  the chlorofluorocarbons.  These
data indicate that chlorofluorocarbons:

*   can  be absorbed across the alveolar membrane, gastro-
    intestinal tract, or the skin;
*   are  absorbed rapidly into the  blood, following inha-
    lation;
*   are  absorbed into the blood  at a decreasing rate  as
    blood concentration increases;

*   once in the blood, are absorbed by various tissues;
*   will  reach a stable blood  level if exposure is  suf-
    ficiently  long, indicating an equilibrium between the
    air   containing   the  chlorofluorocarbons   and  the
    blood;
*   are still absorbed by body tissue, after  the  initial
    blood  level stabilization, and continue  to enter the
    body.

    Studies with animals indicate that chlorofluorocarbons
are  rapidly absorbed after inhalation and are distributed
by  blood into practically  all tissues of  the body.  The
highest  concentrations  are  usually found  in  fatty  or
lipid-containing tissues. However, chlorofluorocarbons are
also  found in  organs with  a good  blood  supply,  e.g.,
heart, lung, kidney, muscle.

    Results  from animal and human  metabolic studies have
demonstrated  the  resistance  of  chlorofluorocarbons  to
breakdown  or metabolic transformation in  biological sys-
tems.  These results suggest that  chlorofluorocarbons, in
general,  are metabolized to  a very small  degree, if  at
all, following exposure.

    Regardless  of the route of entry, chlorofluorocarbons
are  eliminated almost exclusively through the respiratory
tract  via exhaled air. No significant recovery of chloro-
fluorocarbons  or their metabolites  has been reported  in
studies  attempting  to identify  metabolic transformation
products via elimination in urine or faeces.

1.6.  Effects on the environment

    Certain  chlorofluorocarbons,  including  CFC-11,  12,
113, 114, and 115, are extremely stable  under  conditions
found  in the  lower atmosphere.   It is  not until  these
gases  migrate into the high-energy  radiation environment
of  the upper stratosphere that photolytic processes split
the  chlorine  off  from the  chlorofluorocarbons.   These
chlorine  radicals  catalytically destroy  ozone.  Strato-
spheric  ozone absorbs solar ultra-violet radiation (UV-B:
280-320 nm  wavelength)  allowing only  reduced UV-B radi-
ation to penetrate to the surface of the earth.

    Experimental  evidence  suggests  that increased  UV-B
irradiation  at the Earth's surface,  resulting from ozone
depletion,  would have deleterious effects on both terres-
trial  and aquatic biota.  Despite uncertainties resulting
from  the complexities of field experiments, the data cur-
rently  available suggest that crop yields and forest pro-
ductivity are vulnerable to increased levels of solar UV-B
radiation.  Existing data also suggest that increased UV-B
radiation  will modify the  distribution and abundance  of
plants, and change ecosystem structure.

    Various studies of marine ecosystems have demonstrated
that  UV-B radiation causes damage to fish larvae and juv-
eniles,  shrimp larvae, crab larvae,  copepods, and plants
essential  to the marine food web.  These damaging effects
include  decreased fecundity, growth, and survival. Exper-
imental  evidence  suggests  that even  small increases in
ambient  UV-B exposure could result in significant ecosys-
tem changes.

1.7.  Effects on experimental animals and  in vitro systems

    The  acute inhalation toxicity  of chlorofluorocarbons
has been extensively studied. The chlorofluorocarbons con-
sidered in this monograph show low acute  inhalation  tox-
icity.  The symptomatology of acute  intoxication involves
CNS  effects, secondary effects on the cardiovascular sys-
tem, and irritation of the respiratory tract.  The limited
information  available  on  the  acute  oral  toxicity  of
chlorofluorocarbons  indicates low toxicity.  When applied
dermally  in  high  doses, CFC-112,  CFC-112a, and CFC-113
cause  various degrees of irritation but no other signifi-
cant effects.

    Short-term  inhalation studies have been  reported for
CFC-11,  CFC-12,  CFC-112, CFC-113,  CFC-114, and CFC-115.
The  results showed low toxicity, and the effects observed
were related mainly to the CNS, respiratory tract, and the
liver. Oral toxicity studies have confirmed the  low  tox-
icity.

    In  a long-term inhalation study, rats were exposed to
CFC-113 at 0.2, 1, or 2% (15.3, 76.6, or  183 g/m3)    6 h
per day, 5 days/week for up to 2 years. No histopathologi-
cal  effects or changes in clinical laboratory values were
observed.  The only finding considered by the  authors  to
be treatment-related was a reduction in body  weight  gain
in the groups exposed to the two highest doses.

    The  available  information  indicates that  the fully
halogenated  chlorofluorocarbons  evaluated in  this mono-
graph have little or no mutagenic or  carcinogenic  poten-
tial.  Negative results have been obtained in vitro  using
bacteria  and  mammalian  cells with  or without metabolic
activation and in the dominant lethal test.

    Long-term  carcinogenicity studies (by oral  and inha-
lation  routes) with CFC-11  and CFC-12 in  rats and  mice
showed  negative results.  Although a tumorogenic response
in the nasal cavity was observed in rats  upon  inhalation
of  CFC-113, this response was  considered equivocal.  The
tumours  were of various  morphologies and the  incidences
were not dose-related.

    Of  the  eight  chlorofluorocarbons reviewed  in  this
document,   developmental   toxicity  studies   have  been
reported  in the available scientific  literature for CFC-
11,  CFC-12, and CFC-113.  No  evidence of embryotoxicity,
fetotoxicity,  or  teratogenicity has  been documented for
any of these three chlorofluorocarbons.

1.8.  Effects on humans

    Controlled  studies  of  volunteers using  CFC-11  and
CFC-12 revealed  no observable effects on  clinical haema-
tology and chemistry, EEG, or neurological parameters.

    At   high   concentrations,  subjects   experienced  a
tingling sensation, humming in the ears, and apprehension.
EEG changes were noted as well as slurred speech  and  de-
creased performance in psychological tests. An exposure to
an  11%a (545 g/m3)    concentration of CFC-12  for 11 min
caused a significant degree of cardiac arrythmia, followed
by a decrease in consciousness with amnesia after 10 min.
    Following  exposure to CFC-12 at a concentration of 1%
(50 g/m3)   for 150 min, a 7% decrease in psychomotor test
scores  was noted, but  no effects were  observed at  0.1%
(5 g/m3).

    In a study in which 10 subjects were exposed  to  CFC-
11,  CFC-12, CFC-114, two  mixtures of CFC-11  and CFC-12,
and  a mixture of  CFC-12 and CFC-114  (breathing  concen-
trations between 16 and 150 g/m3)   for 15, 45, or 60 sec-
onds,  significant  acute  reduction of  ventilatory  lung
capacity (FEF50, FEF25) was reported in each case, as well
as bradycardia and increased variability in heart rate and
atrioventricular block.

    Psychomotor performance was evaluated using CFC-113 at
concentrations  of  0.15%  (12 g/m3),    0.25%    (19 g/m3),
0.35% (27 g/m3),   or 0.45% (35 g/m3)   for 165 min. There
was no effect at the lowest concentration, but  there  was
difficulty  in mental concentration  and some decrease  in
test scores beginning at 0.35% (27 g/m3).


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
a   Throughout this monograph, percentages of chlorofluorocarbons
    in air are expressed as the volume of chlorofluorocarbon divided 
    by the volume of air. 

    Limited studies indicate that individuals with a prior
history  of skin reaction  to deodorant sprays  containing
CFC-11  or CFC-12 may  become sensitized to  dermal appli-
cations  of  certain  chlorofluorocarbons.   The  tracheal
mucociliary  function in five non-smokers was not impaired
by exposure to CFC-11.

    Two  studies suggest that normal occupational exposure
to  CFC-113 does  not pose  a serious  health hazard.   No
adverse effects occurred at occupational levels as high as
0.47%  (36.7 g/m3),    with  an  average  level  of  0.07%
(5.4 g/m3).

    Although  chlorofluorocarbons have been used  for over
50 years,  only one cohort study  (539 exposed workers) is
available.  No increase in  total deaths or  tumour deaths
was observed.

    Significant  acute  reduction in  the ventilatory lung
capacity of hairdressers using chlorofluorocarbon-contain-
ing  hairsprays was observed in several studies.  Cases of
neurological  effects attributed to  occupational exposure
to  chlorofluorocarbons have been  reported.  One case  of
neuropathy  in a laundry  worker, exposed to  tetrachloro-
ethene  and to undetermined levels of CFC-113 for 6 years,
has been described.

    Non-occupational  exposure  and accidental  or abusive
inhalation of aerosols have also been documented, the main
symptoms  being  CNS  depression and  cardiovascular reac-
tions.  Cardiac arrythmia, possibly aggravated by elevated
levels  of  catecholamines due  to  stress or  by moderate
hypercapnia,  is suggested as  the cause of  these adverse
responses, which may lead to death.

    Increased UV-B radiation is expected to lead  to  pre-
dominantly  adverse effects on human health, but the state
of  knowledge varies greatly  from one effect  to another.
It  is  virtually undisputed  that  the incidence  of non-
melanoma skin cancers will increase.  Projections based on
recent  data indicate that  the incidence of  non-melanoma
skin cancers will increase by 3% for every 1% depletion of
ozone. On this basis, an ozone depletion by 5% would lead,
after  several  decades,  to about  240 000 additional new
cases of non-melanoma skin cancer per year, worldwide.

    UV-B radiation appears also to play a role in the for-
mation of the more dangerous cutaneous melanomas. However,
there  is  insufficient  knowledge to  determine  accurate
dose-response relationships.

    The immune system is influenced by UV-B  radiation  in
various  ways. Although the knowledge  available is insuf-
ficient to predict the consequences of ozone depletion for

human  health, increased incidence of some infectious dis-
eases might be one of the consequences.

    The most important effect for the human eye  would  be
an  increase in the  incidence of cataracts,  a  permanent
clouding  of the  eye lens  which leads,  even at  current
levels of UV-B radiation, to impaired vision and blindness
in many people.

    Increased UV-B radiation would be expected to increase
photochemical  smog, and this would  aggravate the related
health problems in urban and industrialized areas.

1.9.  Evaluation of human health risks

    The most important direct effects on humans  from  ex-
posure  to chlorofluorocarbons are caused by the excessive
concentrations resulting from industrial accidents or poor
occupational  practices and from  misuse or abuse  of  the
chemicals  when used as  solvents or as  propellant gases.
Release of chlorofluorocarbons into the global environment
during use, disposal of wastes, transport, and storage are
an increasing concern because of the potential impact such
uncontrolled  releases may have  on the future  health  of
mankind,  mainly  through  the depletion  of stratospheric
ozone.

2.  IDENTITY, PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES, ANALYTICAL METHODS

2.1.  Identity

    The  chlorofluorocarbons  (CFCs)  considered  in  this
monograph  are compounds derived  by the complete  substi-
tution  of the hydrogen atoms  in methane and ethane  with
both fluorine and chlorine atoms. Chlorofluorocarbons con-
taining hydrogen (designated HCFC) will be reviewed  in  a
subsequent report. The chemical formulae, relative molecu-
lar  masses, common names, common synonyms, and CAS Regis-
try  numbers of some  of the chlorofluorocarbons  reviewed
(CFCs  11, 12, 13, 112,  112a, 113, 113a, 114,  114a, 115)
are given in Table 1.

    Chlorofluorocarbons  are marketed under many different
trade  names,  e.g.,  Algcon, Algofrene,  Arcton, Eskimon,
Flugene, Forane, Freon, Frigen, Genetron, Isceon, Osotron,
Khladon. The individual chemical substances are character-
ized by code numbers, as defined in DIN 89 62,  which  are
very widely adopted and uniformly used.

2.1.1.  Technical product

    Commercial  chlorofluorocarbons rank among the highest
purity  organic chemicals sold  in the USA  (Bower, 1973),
the  purity of commercial  CFC-11 and CFC-12  commonly ex-
ceeding 99.9% (Hamilton, 1962). The predominant isomers of
the ethane series (CFC-113, CFC-114) are the more symmetri-
cal  ones  (CCl2F.CClF2  and CClF2.CC1F2). CFC-113 usually
contains  no more  than a  few tenths  of 1%  of  CFC-113a
(CCl3.CF3),      while  CFC-114  usually contains  no more
than  7-10%  CCl2F.CF3.  Levels  of other impurities in the
four  major CFCs (CFC-11,  CFC-12, CFC-113, CFC-114)  are:
moisture,  10 ppm; residue, a  few ppm; acids,  much  less
than  1 ppm;  and non-condensibles  (i.e., air components)
100-200 ppm  in the liquid  phase or 0.5-1.0%  in the  gas
phase (Hamilton, 1962).

    The  commercial chlorofluorocarbons may also be formu-
lated  with  chemicals other  than  CFCs, such  as actone,
ethanol, isopropanol, and methylene chloride. In addition,
nitromethane  or other stabilizers are  sometimes added to
alcohol-based aerosols (0.3% by weight) (Du Pont, 1980a).


Table 1.  Identity and physical and chemical properties of commercially
significant fully halogenated chlorofluorocarbonsa
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chemical formula      CCl3F           CCl2F2         CClF3           CC12F.CCl2F      CCl3.CClF2

Relative molecular    137.37          120.92         104.46          203.82           203.82
mass
                                                                                  
Common name           trichloro-      dichlorodio-   chlorotri-      1,2-difluoro-    1,1-difluoro-
                      fluoro-         fluormethane   fluoromethane   1,1,2,2-tetra-   1,2,2,2-    
                      methane                                        chloroethane     tetrachloro-
                                                                                      ethane

CAS registry number   75-69-4         75-71-8        75-72-9         76-12-0          76-11-9

Common synonyms       CFC-11, F-11,   CFC-12, F-12,  CFC-13, F-13    CFC-112, F-112   CFC-112a, 
and trade names       Freon 11,       Freon 12,                                       F-112a
                      Frigen 11,      Arcton, Frigen 12,           
                      Arcton 9        Genetron 12,
                                      Halon, Osotron 2

Physical state        liquid at       gas            gas             solid            solid
                      temperatures            
                      < 23.7 °C 

Colour                colourless      colourless     colourless      white

Odour                 faint ethereal  nearly         ethereal        slightly
                                      odourless                      camphor-like
Melting point (°C)    -111            -158           -181            26               40.6

Boiling point (°C)    23.82           -29.79         -81.4           92.8             91.5

Flashpointb           NF              NF             NF              NF               NF

Density of saturated  5.86            6.33           7.01            7.02
vapour at boiling     
point (g/litre)

Solubility in water   0.11            0.028          0.009           0.012
(25 °C) (wt %)                                                       (saturation pressure)

Conversion factor     5.71            5.03           4.34            8.47             8.47
(ppm(v/v)-> mg/m3) 
(20 °C)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table 1 (contd.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Chemical formula      CCl2F.CClF2     CCl3.CF3       CClF2.CClF2     CCl2F.CF3        CClF2.CF3

Relative molecular    187.38          187.38         170.92          170.92           154.47
mass

Common name           1,1,2-tri-      1,1,1-tri-     1,2-dichloro-   1,1-dichloro-    1-chloro-1,1,
                      chloro-1,2,2-   chloro-2,2,2-  1,1,2,2-tetra-  1,2,2,2-tetra-   2,2,2-penta-
                      trifluoro-      trifluoro-     fluoroethane    fluoroethane     fluoroethane
                      ethane          ethane

CAS registry number   76-13-1         354-58-5       76-14-2         374-07-2         76-15-3

Common synonyms       CFC-113, F-113  CFC-113a       CFC-114,        CFC-114a,        CFC-115, F-115
and trade names       Freon 113                      F-114           F-114a           Freon 115

Physical state        liquid          liquid         gas             gas              gas

Colour                colourless                     colourless                       colourless

Odour                 nearly                         nearly          
                      odourless                      odourless

Melting point (°C)    -35             14.2           -94             -94              -106

Boiling point (°C)    47.57           45.8           3.77            3.6              -39.1

Flashpointb           NF              NF             NF              NF               NF

Density of saturated  7.38                           7.83                             8.37
vapour at boiling 
point (g/litre)

Solubility in water   0.011                          0.009                            0.006
(25 °C) (wt %)

Conversion factor     7.79            7.79           7.11            7.11             6.42
(ppm(v/v) -> mg/m3) 
(20 °C)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
a  From: Du Pont (1980b); Smart (1980); Hawley (1981); and Windholz (1983).
b  NF: non-flammable.
2.2.  Physical and chemical properties

    Chlorofluorocarbons  are usually characterized by high
vapour  pressure (low boiling  point) and density  and low
viscosity,  surface  tension, refractive  index, and solu-
bility  in water. The common physical and chemical proper-
ties  of the commercially  significant chlorofluorocarbons
are given in Table 1.

    The  degree  of fluorine  substitution greatly affects
the  physical  properties of  chlorofluorocarbons. In gen-
eral, as the number of fluorine atoms  replacing  chlorine
increases,  the  vapour  pressure also  increases, but the
boiling  point, density, and solubility in water decrease.
For  example,  in  the chlorofluoroethane  series,  vapour
pressure increases with fluorination in the sequence:

    CFC-112 < CFC-113 < CFC-114 < CFC-115 < CFC-116

    The  solvent  power of  the chlorofluorocarbons ranges
from poor for the highly fluorinated compounds  to  fairly
good  for the less fluorinated compounds (Du Pont, 1980b).
Being  typical non-polar liquids,  they exhibit low  water
solubility.

    Apart  from their use  as chemical intermediates,  the
chlorofluorocarbons   reviewed   find  applications   that
reflect  their  chemical  stability rather  than  chemical
reactivity.   This chemical stability  is a result  of the
strength of the C-F bond (Bower, 1973).

    Although  quite inert, chlorofluorocarbons  do exhibit
some   chemical  reactivity  in  some  applications.   For
example,  although they exhibit  a low rate  of hydrolysis
compared  with  other  halogenated compounds,  the rate of
hydrolysis  is greatly affected by  temperature, pressure,
the  presence of metals,  and the pH  of the solution  (Du
Pont,  1980a,b).  Thus CFC-11 is considered unsuitable for
water-based  products  packaged in  metal containers since
some  metals may catalyse  the hydrolysis of  CFC-11  with
liberation  of  acid.   Sanders (1960)  has demonstrated a
free-radical   reaction   between   CFC-11  and   alcohols
resulting  in dichloromonofluoromethane and  small amounts
of  tetrachlorodifluoroethane.  The reaction  is inhibited
by  high concentrations of  oxygen and, therefore,  it  is
unlikely  that it  will occur  in nature.   In some  cases
dechlorination  by zinc (also by  magnesium and aluminium)
can occur in the presence of polar solvents:

               Zn
  FCl2C-CClF2  ->  FClC=CF2  +  ZnCl2
             Alcohol

    Chlorofluorocarbons  are highly resistant to attack by
conventional  oxidizing  agents  at  temperatures  <200 °C
(Downing,  1966; Bower, 1973).  In general, they exhibit a

high  degree  of  thermal stability,  but  when  pyrolysis
occurs  in the presence  of humidity the  products usually
include  hydrofluoric  and  hydrochloric acid  and, in the
presence of either water or oxygen, phosgene.

    The  photolysis of chlorofluorocarbons is discussed in
section 4.2.3.

    The  carbon-fluorine bonds in  chlorofluorocarbon com-
pounds  are  extremely  resistant to  almost  all chemical
reagents.   Reduction with hydrogen  does not occur  until
temperatures are >830 °C, and often the C-C bond  is  also
cleaved.  Strong reducing agents such as lithium aluminium
hydride  will not reduce the C-F bond. However, chloroflu-
orocarbons  react violently with alkali and alkaline earth
metals,  such  as  sodium, potassium,  and  barium (Bower,
1973).

2.3.  Conversion factors

    Conversion  factors  for  the chlorofluorocarbons  re-
viewed in this monograph are given in Table 1.

2.4.  Analytical methods

    Several  analytical  procedures used  for the determi-
nation  of chlorofluorocarbons are summarized  in Table 2.
Methods used include spectrophotometry, gas chromatography
with  several  quantification  procedures, and  mass spec-
trometry.   However,  the  majority  of  methods  use  gas
chromatography with various detection techniques.  Methods
for  sample  collection  have been  developed  to  achieve
greater selectivity and sensitivity.


Table 2.  Analytical methods for the determination of chlorofluorocarbons
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sample     Samping method/clean-up        Analytical method               Detection   Reference
type                                                                      limit 
                                                                          v/v
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Air                                       modified inlet with silicon     100 ppb     Collins &             
                                          rubber membrane;                            Utley (1972)
                                          mass spectrometry

Air                                       gas chromatography - electron   50-100 ppb  Collins et 
                                          capture detection                           al. (1965)

Air                                       gas chromatography - electron   5-10 ppt    Lovelock et 
                                          capture detection                           al. (1973);
                                                                                      Su & Goldberg 
                                                                                      (1973); Hester 
                                                                                      et al. (1974)

Air        sorption on cold (< -50 °C)   gas chromatography - electron   1 ppt       Paryjczak et 
           activated carbon               capture detection                           al. (1985)          

Air        sorption on cold (< -50 °C)   gas chromatography - electron   1 ppt       Reineke & 
           Tenax-TA+ activated carbon     capture detection                           Baechmann (1985)

Air        cryogenic trapping in porous   gas chromatography - electron   1 ppt       Rudolph & Jebsen 
           glass beads                    capture detection                           (1983)          

Air        sorption on cold (liquid       gas chromatography - electron   1 ppt       Singh et al. 
           N2) SE-30/glass wool           capture detection                           (1983)

Air        sorption on cold (-40 °C)      gas chromatography - electron   1 ppt       Makide et al. 
           OV-101                         capture detection                           (1980)
                                                                          
Air        sorption on cold (< -50 °C)   gas chromatography -            2.6 ppt     Crescentini 
           activated carbon               high-resolution                             et al. (1983)
                                          mass spectrometry                                  

Table 2.  (contd.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sample     Samping method/clean-up        Analytical method               Detection   Reference
type                                                                      limit 
                                                                          v/v
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Air                                       absorption spectrometry using               Zasavitskii 
                                          diode laser                                 et al. (1984)

Air        sorption on Tenax GC/          capillary column gas                        Hanai et al. 
           activated carbon               chromatography - electron                   (1984)
                                          capture detection                               

Air                                       spectrophotometry of pyridine   7 ppm       Tyras (1981)
(occupational)                            complex

Sea water  dynamic purge and trap         gas chromatography - electron   0.003 ng/   Bullister & 
                                          capture detection               litre       Weiss (1983)

Blood      head space                     gas chromatography - electron   0.01-0.01   Ramsey & 
                                          capture detection               ng/litre    Flanagan 
                                                                                      (1982)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3.  SOURCES OF HUMAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE

3.1.  Natural occurrence

    The  chlorofluorocarbons  discussed in  this monograph
are not known to occur in nature.

3.2.  Man-made sources

    Almost  all  chlorofluorocarbons produced,  except for
those  used  as  chemical  intermediates,  are  eventually
released into the environment, whether during manufacture,
handling,  use,  or  disposal.  The  significance  of  the
release  mechanisms  discussed  below should  be evaluated
with this in mind.

3.2.1.  Production levels

    The  estimated world production of the three important
potentially  ozone-depleting  chlorofluorocarbons (CFC-11,
CFC-12, and CFC-113) in 1985 was approximately one million
tonnes, about 30% being in the USA (SRI,  1986).   Table 3
indicates  some of the major world producers in 1985 (CMA,
1986; CMR, 1986; Rand, 1986; SRI, 1986).

    The  reported total demand for all chlorofluorocarbons
in the USA in 1985 was 458 000 tonnes (CMR, 1986),  a  26%
increase  from the demand figure in 1980 (CMR, 1981). Pro-
duction figures for CFC-11, CFC-12, and CFC-113 in the USA
for  1974-1985 are given in Table 4.  In 1984, these three
CFCs  accounted for 83%  of the total  chlorofluorocarbons
produced  in the USA  (US ITC, 1985).   Based on the  1980
demand  and the strong  market position in  several appli-
cations,  CMR (1986) projected that the demand for chloro-
fluorocarbons in the USA would grow to  458 000 tonnes  in
1985 and reach 590 000 tonnes by 1990, a  positive  growth
in this 5-year period of 5% per year.  However,  this  was
before  the  Montreal  Protocol was  signed  in  September
1987.a     The demand for CFC-11, which is used mainly for

------------------------------------------------------------
a The Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the 
  Ozone Layer, signed by 24 countries in September 1987,  
  requires a 20% reduction in use and production of the  
  chlorofluorocarbons 11, 12, 113, 114, and 115 from 1 
  July 1993 and a further 30% reduction from 1 July 1998. 
  It stipulates a number of stepwise importation bans 
  binding on signatories in order to achieve these 
  reductions (United Nations Environment Programme.  
  Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone 
  Layer, Final Act, Montreal, 1987). 

foam blowing, was largely anticipated to follow the expan-
sion pattern of the construction industry. Demand for flu-
oropolymers  made from CFC-113  (as well as  from HCFCs 22
and  142b) is expected to  grow at a rate  of 10% or  more
because  of  electrical and  electronic applications.  The
demand for CFC-113 is also expected to grow because of its
use as a solvent in the semi-conductor industry and  as  a
replacement  for  chlorinated  solvents  under  regulatory
pressure  (CMR,  1986). Between  1964  and 1974,  the pro-
duction  of CFC-11 and  CFC-12 increased at  8 and 9%  per
year  respectively.   At  that time,  the  hypothesis that
certain  chlorofluorocarbons that accumulate in  the upper
atmosphere  could deplete the  earth's ozone layer  had  a
major impact on the fluorochemical industry (Smart, 1980).

The  US EPA (1978) ruled  that most aerosol products  con-
taining CFC-11 and CFC-12 propellants could not  be  manu-
factured  in the USA after 15 December, 1978. As a result,
the  production of CFC-11 and CFC-12 fell sharply, stabil-
izing  in 1980.  However, with the entry into force of the
Montreal  Protocol,  which progressively  limited the pro-
duction  of CFCs-11, 12, 113, 114, and 115, the release of
all of these chlorofluorocarbons should decline.


    
Table 3.  Some of the major world producers of chlorofluorocarbons 
in 1985a,b
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Country       Company name
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Argentina     Ducilo S.A. (subsidiary of Du Pont de Nemours and Co.)

Australia     Pacific Chemical Industries Pty. Ltd. (subsidiary of 
              Atochem S.A.); Australian Fluorine Chemical Pty. Ltd. 

Brazil        Du Pont do Brasil S.A. (subsidiary of Du Pont de Nemours 
              and Co.); Hoechst do Brasil Quimica e Farmacêutica S.A. 
              (subsidiary of Hoechst A.G.) 

Canada        Allied Canada, Inc. (subsidiary of Allied Corp.); Du Pont 
              Canada Inc. 

France        Atochem S.A.

Germany,      Hoechst AG (Frigen); Kali-Chemie AG (Kaltron)
Federal    
Republic of

Greece        Société des Industries Chimiques du Nord de la Grèce, S.A. 

India         Navin Fluorine Industries

Italy         Montefluos S.p.A. (Algofren)

Japan         Asahi Glass Co., Ltd. (Asahiflon); Daikin Kogyo Co., Ltd. 
              (Daiflon); Du Pont Mitsui Fluorochemical Co., Ltd. (Flon) 
              Showa Denko, K.K. 

Mexico        Quimoleasicos, S.A. (subsidiary of Allied Corp.); 
              Halocarburos S.A. (subsidiary of E.I. Du Pont de Nemours 
              and Co., Inc.) 

Netherlands   Akzochemic B.V.; Du Pont de Nemours (Nederland) B.V. 
              (subsidiary of E.I. Du Pont de Nemours and Co., Inc) 

Spain         Ugimica S.A. (subsidiary of Atochem, S.A.); Hoechst 
              Iberica (subsidiary of Hoechst AG); Kali-Chemie S.A. 
              (subsidiary to Kali-Chemie AG) 

United        Imperial Chemical Industries PLC (Arcton); I.S.C. 
Kingdom       Chemicals Ltd. (Isecon)

USA           Allied Corp.; E.I. Du Pont de Nemours and Co. Inc.; Essex 
              Chemical Corp.; Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corp.; 
              Pennwalt Corp. 

Venezuela     Produren (subsidiary to Atochem, S.A.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
a  From: CMA (1986); CMR (1986); and SRI (1986).
b  Trade names are given in parentheses, where available.
    From: Noble (1972) and Smart (1980).


    
Table 4.  Production of the major chlorofluorocarbons 
in the USA in thousands of tonnesa
----------------------------------------
Year    CFC-11    CFC-12     CFC-113b
----------------------------------------
1985    73.9b,c   127.9b,c   73.2c
1984    83.9      152.7      65.9d
1982    63.6      117.0      NA
1980    71.7      133.8      NA
1979    75.8      133.3      NA
1978    87.9      148.4      NA
1977    96.4      162.5      >23.1
1976    116.2     178.3      NA
1975    122.3     178.3      NA
1974    154.6     221.1      29.0
----------------------------------------
a   From: US ITC (1975-85), unless otherwise specified.
b   From: Smart (1980), US EPA (1980), and Rand (1986).
c   It is assumed that consumption was the same as 
    production volume.
d   Estimated value from the 1985 production data and 
    the assumption that the 1984 production volume was 
    10% lower (CMR, 1986).
NA  = Not available.

3.2.2.  Manufacturing processes

    The  traditional  method  for manufacturing  the fully
halogenated chlorofluorocarbons is the catalytic displace-
ment of chlorine from chlorocarbons with fluorine by reac-
tion  with  anhydrous  hydrogen fluoride  (Hamilton, 1962;
Smart,  1980).  Carbon tetrachloride, and hexachloroethane
(or  tetrachloroethylene plus chlorine) are  commonly used
starting  materials  for 1- and  2-carbon chlorofluorocar-
bons.  Carbon tetrachloride is normally used for producing
CFC-11,  CFC-12, and CFC-113.   The reaction can  occur in
either liquid or vapour phases. The processes use antimony
pentafluoride  or an equivalent catalyst,  in contact with
which the chlorocarbon and hydrogen fluoride react. Excess
hydrogen fluoride may then be recovered and the chloroflu-
orocarbon stream is neutralised to remove traces  of  acid
and  dried.  The chlorofluorocarbons are then separated in
a fractionating column and sent to storage. An alternative
process for the production of the methane-based chloroflu-
orocarbons  uses  the direct  reaction  of methane  with a
mixture  of chlorine and hydrogen  fluoride (Noble, 1972).
Other commercially important chlorine-fluorine-substituted
hydrocarbons   are   manufactured  by   similar  processes
(Lowenheim & Moran, 1975).

    The  production  processes  described above  give very
high yields.  Losses of chlorofluorocarbons are limited to
small  mechanical leakage, small amounts  leaving with the
by-product  hydrogen chloride, and  miscellaneous venting.
The  total  material loss  is estimated to  be 1% at  most

(McCarthy,  1973) for the production  operations excluding
transport  and storage.  Fuller  et al. (1976)  assumed  a
total  production loss of  1.5% for the  commercially pro-
duced chlorofluorocarbons.

3.2.3.  Loss during disposal of wastes

    The  release of chlorofluorocarbons into  the environ-
ment  during their disposal arises  mainly from pre-fabri-
cated   refrigeration   and  air-conditioning   equipment.
Environmental   contamination  due  to  chlorofluorocarbon
disposal results principally from the following:

*   Unreclaimed  refrigerants  in  the cooling  systems of
    scrapped  pre-fabricated-type  refrigeration and  air-
    conditioning  units.  Disposal of these old appliances
    is usually to scrap yards or waste dumps.  Efforts are
    made  in  some countries  to remove chlorofluorocarbon
    refrigerants before discarding equipment.

*   Discarding  of vessels containing unused chlorofluoro-
    carbons.

*   Time-release   of  trapped  blowing  agents  in  rigid
    urethane  products. This is a minor source of environ-
    mental  contamination  compared with  that of scrapped
    refrigerants.

    Waste  disposal  streams resulting  from manufacturing
operations  are very minor contamination  sources compared
with scrapped refrigerants.

    Because  of the high vapour  pressure of chlorofluoro-
carbons  at ambient temperature, all releases pass eventu-
ally  into the atmosphere except  in cases where the  com-
pounds have been chemically altered.

3.2.4.  Release from transport, storage, and accidents

3.2.4.1  Transport and storage

    The  principal factor required  for the transport  and
storage  of  the  major  chlorofluorocarbons  is  adequate
design to meet the elevated pressures.  The  products  are
shipped in a wide variety of pressure  containers  ranging
from 23-litre drums to 91-m3 tank cars.

    The  containers are fitted with safety valves, rupture
discs,  and  fusible  plugs  according  to  US  Interstate
Commerce  Commission  (ICC) specifications;  also included
are requirements for labelling and leak pressure testing.

    Loss  of product during transport and storage is rela-
tively minor because of the completely closed system used.
Losses are further controlled by monitoring discrepancies,

if  any,  between  product  billings  and  receipts.    In
addition, the high cost of the products provides an incen-
tive to control losses.  The total industry-wide  loss  in
transport  and storage is <1%  of the total quantity  pro-
duced.

3.2.4.2  Accidents

    Data  concerning  accidental  release are  not readily
available.  However,  it  is probable  that quantities re-
leased by accident are negligible compared with quantities
released by use and disposal.

3.3.  Use patterns

3.3.1.  Major uses

    Chlorofluorocarbons are commercially important because
of their unique physical and chemical properties and rela-
tively  low physiological activity.  They  are mainly used
as  refrigerants,  solvents,  blowing agents,  sterilants,
aerosol  propellants,  and as  intermediates for plastics.
Table 5  lists the estimated use patterns of chlorofluoro-
carbons  in the USA  for the years  1975, 1978, 1981,  and
1985.   The aerosol propellant market, which consumed half
of  the  total  chlorofluorocarbon production  in 1975, is
currently  a  minor  application because  of  governmental
restrictions.

    Estimated use patterns of CFC-11 and CFC-12 in the USA
and  worldwide (excluding eastern European  countries) are
given  in Tables 6 and  7, respectively (Rand,  1986). The
"unallocated"  amounts represent the  difference between
the amount of estimated use and the total production data.
According to Rand (1986), part of the unallocated use con-
sists  of  unreported  food refrigeration  use  and losses
during storage, packaging, and transport.

    In  countries that signed  the Montreal Protocol,  the
use of these chlorofluorocarbons will decline.

3.3.2.  Release from use: controlled or uncontrolled

    The release of CFC-11 and CFC-12 during use has caused the  greatest  
concern  environmentally because  of  their impact  on  ozone-depletion.   
During the  mid-1970s, when aerosol  propellant  use was  the major 
chlorofluorocarbon application,  aerosols accounted for 75%  of the 
immediate release  of  CFC-11  and CFC-12,  while  refrigerants  and 
blowing  agents  accounted  for 14%  and 12%, respectively (Smart,  
1980).   Table 8  shows the  estimated release of these  two 
chlorofluorocarbons in 1965,  1970, 1975, 1980, and  1985.  CMA (1986) 
estimated that the total cumulative worldwide   (with   the  exception   
of  eastern  European countries)  release of CFC-11  and CFC-12 as  a 
result  of their  use since 1931  amounted to 13.6 million  tonnes in 
1985. 

Table 5.  Estimated use patterns of chlorofluorocarbons 
in the USAa  (% total production)
-----------------------------------------------------
Application                   1975  1978  1981  1985
-----------------------------------------------------
Aerosol propellants           50    24    <1    2
Refrigerants                  28    39    46    39
Foam blowing agents            b     12    20    17
Solvents                      5     11    16    14
Plastics and resins           10     b     7     14
Sterilant gas                  b      b     2     2
Food freezant                  b      b     1     1
Miscellaneous and export      7     14    7     11
-----------------------------------------------------
a   From: CMR (1975, 1978, 1981, 1986).
 b   Included in miscellaneous category.

Table 6.  Estimated use patterns of CFC-11 in the USA and worldwidea
(excluding eastern European countries)
-------------------------------------------------------
Use                         USA                World
-------------------------------------------------------
Blowing agent               71%                 58%
Refrigeration                6%                  3%
Aerosol                      5%                 31%
Miscellaneous               18%                  8%
-------------------------------------------------------
a   From: Rand (1986).

Table 7.  Estimated use patterns of CFC-12 in the USA 
and worldwidea (excluding eastern European countries)
---------------------------------------------
Use                         USA    World
---------------------------------------------
Blowing agent               11%    12%
Mobile air-conditioning     37%    20%
Retail food refrigeration   4%     3%
Chillers                    1%     1%
Home refrigerators          2%     3%
Aerosol                     4%     32%
Miscellaneous               10%    7%
Unallocated                 31%    22%
---------------------------------------------
a   From: Rand (1986).


Table 8.  Worldwide production and release of CFC-11 and CFC-12 during use 
(thousands of tonnes)a
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                               Release from:
                    -------------------------------------------------------
Year   Production   Refrigeration   Refrigeration   Blowing agent  Other     Total
                    (hermetically-  (non-hermetic)  (closed-cell   sources   release
                    sealed)                         foam only)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1965   312.9        0.8             44.9            5.7            232.1     283.5
                                                                             
1970   559.2        1.2             68.5            16.3           420.7     506.7

1975   695.1        1.8             103.8           35.4           574.0     715.0

1980   639.8        2.6             156.1           65.0           359.7     583.4

1985   703.1        3.9             188.2           99.4           357.8     649.3
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
a   From: CMA (1986).
4.  ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPORT, DISTRIBUTION, AND TRANSFORMATION

4.1.  Transport between media

    Because  of the high vapour  pressure of chlorofluoro-
carbons, the major transport medium is the atmosphere. For
example,  Lovelock (1972) found that CFC-11 concentrations
in  rural  southern England  and  Ireland could  be partly
attributed to sources on the continent of Europe.

    CFC-11 and CFC-12 introduced into aquatic systems will
most  likely volatilize to  the atmosphere.  Once  in  the
troposphere, they will eventually diffuse into the strato-
sphere  or be carried back  to the earth through  precipi-
tation (Callahan et al., 1979).

    Data pertaining to the adsorption of CFC-11 and CFC-12
onto  soils  and  sediments are  inconclusive (Callahan et
al.,  1979).   However, the  octanol/water partition coef-
ficients  of  CFC-11  (log P = 2.53) and  CFC-12  (log P =
2.16)  (Hansch et al., 1975) indicate that adsorption onto
organic particulates may be possible. In cases of signifi-
cant sorption to soils, the volatilization of  these  com-
pounds will be slower than in aquatic systems, though vol-
atilization  may still be the major transport process from
soils.

4.2.  Environmental transformation and degradation processes

4.2.1.  Oxidation

    No  information is available concerning  the oxidation
of CFC-11 or CFC-12 in the aquatic environment under ambi-
ent conditions. These two chlorofluorocarbons are known to
be  relatively stable with  respect to attack  by hydroxyl
radicals present in the troposphere (Lillian et al., 1975;
US EPA, 1975; Cox et al., 1976; Hanst, 1978).

4.2.2.  Hydrolysis

    As  a group, chlorofluorocarbons exhibit a low rate of
hydrolysis  compared with other halogenated compounds, and
the rates of hydrolysis are greatly affected  by  tempera-
ture,  pressure, and the  presence of catalytic  materials
such  as metals.  Should hydrolysis of CFC-12 and possibly
other  chlorofluorocarbons  occur,  it would  proceed at a
negligible  rate compared with the  rate of volatilization
and subsequent photodissociation.

4.2.3.  Photolysis

4.2.3.1  Photochemistry

    Atmospheric  ozone prevents virtually all  sunlight of
wavelengths  less  than  290 nm from  reaching the earth's

surface.   Since the wavelength  of sunlight at  altitudes
below  50 km is greater  than 280 nm, which  is above  the
wavelength absorbed by chlorofluorocarbons (Doucet et al.,
1973,  1974), there is no mechanism for direct photoalter-
ation of these chemicals in the lower atmosphere.

4.2.3.2  Environmental transformation

    CFC-11 and CFC-12 do not photodissociate in the tropo-
sphere,  since they do not absorb radiation at wavelengths
greater than 200 nm (Hanst, 1978). They eventually diffuse
into  the stratosphere (NRC, 1976; Hanst, 1978) where they
are  broken  down  by higher  energy,  shorter  wavelength
ultraviolet  radiation  (Jayanty  et al.,  1975; Rebbert &
Ausloos,  1975;  US  EPA,  1975;  Hanst,  1978;  Isaksen &
Stordal, 1981).

    The photodissociation of CFC-11 and CFC-12 each result
in the release of two chlorine atoms, since less energy is
required  to  cleave  the  C-Cl  bond  than  the  C-F bond
(Rebbert  & Ausloos, 1975).   According to Jayanty  et al.
(1975),  the photolysis of CFC-11 in the presence of  O2 at
213.9 nm and 25 °C leads to the production of  CFClO  and,
potentially,  chlorine  molecules (Cl2),    while the pho-
tolysis of CFC-12 under the same conditions leads  to  the
production  of CF2O   and Cl2.    Chlorine atoms, released
by  reactions such as these, are catalysts in the destruc-
tion  of  the stratospheric  ozone  layer (US  EPA,  1975;
Hanst, 1978; Ember, 1986; Zurer, 1988).

    Isaksen   &  Stordal  (1981)  rationalized  the  ozone
depletion  by way of  a cycle involving  the  intermediate
formation of chlorine oxide (ClO).  The net  reaction  for
each turn of the cycle is as follows:

         Cl + O3     ->   ClO + O2
        ClO + O      ->    Cl + O2
    ---------------------------------
    Net   O + O3     ->     2O2

Other  sequences involving ultraviolet radiation  and rad-
ical species have also been proposed (Ember, 1986).

4.2.4.  Biodegradation

    No  information on the biodegradability of the commer-
cial  chlorofluorocarbons  is  available (Su  &  Goldberg,
1976; Callahan et al., 1979).

4.3.  Interaction with other physical, chemical, or biological factors 

    As indicated above, the commercial chlorofluorocarbons
are  relatively persistent in  the environment because  of
their  chemical stability, although  their degree of  per-
sistence  has  not  been determined  with  accuracy.   The

current  best estimates for the average residence times in
the  atmosphere are 65, 110,  400, 90, 180, and  380 years
for  CFC-11,  CFC-12,  CFC-13, CFC-113,  CFC-114, and CFC-
115, respectively (NASA, 1986).

    Assuming  a troposphere-to-stratosphere turnover  time
(the time taken for 63% of troposphere air to diffuse into
the  stratosphere) of 30 years, tropospheric life-times of
65  and 110 years, respectively, would result in about 86%
of  tropospheric CFC-11 and CFC-12 eventually reaching the
stratosphere.  The effect of the transport of  CFC-11  and
CFC-12  from troposphere to stratosphere has been reviewed
by  NASA (1986).  The addition of CFC-11 and CFC-12 to the
atmosphere affects the climate in two ways. Firstly, these
compounds  have strong absorption bands in the atmospheric
"window"  region, that is from 7-13 µm.  Therefore, both
CFC-11  and CFC-12 will  induce a "greenhouse"   warming
effect by direct absorption of terrestrial radiation.  The
second effect is due to the depletion of the stratospheric
ozone layer. Mathematical modelling has shown that chloro-
fluorocarbons will reduce the ozone column.  For instance,
it  has been calculated  that a chlorofluorocarbon  growth
rate  of 3% per year  would lead to a  10% ozone depletion
within  70 years (NASA, 1986).  Changes of that magnitude,
or  even  smaller  ones, could  have  important biological
consequences (sections 6 and 9.4). Additions of chloroflu-
orocarbons  to the atmosphere are also predicted to modify
the vertical distribution within the ozone column.   As  a
result of the unique regional meteorology and the presence
of   chlorine  radicals  in  the  Antarctic  stratosphere,
stratospheric   ozone  reductions  of  30-50%   have  been
recently observed there during the austral spring.

    The  reduction of stratospheric ozone affects the sur-
face in two ways:

*   directly  by increasing the penetration of ultraviolet
    B radiation (290-320 nm);

*   indirectly by enhancing the global warming effects and
    altering climatic conditions.

4.4.  Bioconcentration and bioaccumulation

    Dickson  & Riley (1976) have found CFC-11 at levels of
0.6-28 µg/kg  (dry weight basis) in various organs of fish
and  molluscs.  These levels, however,  do not necessarily
indicate a potential for bioaccumulation.

    Neely  et al. (1974) suggested that bioaccumulation is
directly  related  to  the octanol/water  partition  coef-
ficient (P) of the compound. The experimentally determined
log octanol/water partition coefficients (log P) of CFC-11
and  CFC-12 (see section 4.1.1)  indicate that the  bioac-
cumulation potential in organisms is low.

5.  ENVIRONMENTAL LEVELS AND HUMAN EXPOSURE

5.1.  Environmental levels

5.1.1.  Air

    Singh  et  al.  (1979) collected in  situ air  samples
aboard  a US Coast  Guard vessel that  sailed the  Pacific
Ocean from Oakland, California, USA (37 °N) to Wellington,
New Zealand (42 °S). Tyson et al. (1978) made measurements
at  latitudes from 74 °N to  62 °S as part of  a 1976 NASA
Latitude  Survey  Mission  between Alaska,  USA,  and  New
Zealand.   The results of their  monitoring are summarized
in Table 9.
Table 9.  Global distribution of chlorofluorocarbons in the troposphere (ng/m3)a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Northern hemisphere           Southern hemisphere     

Chloro-        Mean          Standard        Mean          Standard     Reference
fluorocarbon                 deviation                     deviation
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CFC-11         747.5 (113)   75.3 (13.4)     668.8 (119)   65.8 (11.7)  Singh et al. (1979)
               741.8 (132)   50.6 (9)        696.9 (124)   33.7 (6)     Tyson et al. (1978)

CFC-12         1138.5 (230)  126.2 (25.5)    1039.5 (210)  124.2 (25.1) Singh et al. (1979)
               1079.1 (218)  54.4 (11)       821.7 (166)   39.6 (8)     Tyson et al. (1978)

CFC-113        145.9 (19)    26.8 (3.5)      138.1 (18)    23.8 (3.1)   Singh et al. (1979)

CFC-114        83.9 (12)     13.3 (1.9)      69.9 (10)     9.1 (1.3)    Singh et al. (1979)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
a  Figures in brackets are in parts per trillion (by volume).

    The  increased use of chlorofluorocarbons  on a world-
wide  basis has  resulted in  an increase  in  the  global
levels of these compounds. The two most  abundant  chloro-
fluorocarbons  in  the  atmosphere are  CFC-11  and CFC-12
(Guicherit & Schulting, 1985).  The annual growth rates in
the 1980s appear to be slower than the growth rates in the
1970s  (Rasmussen et al.,  1981). The annual  rate of  in-
crease in CFC-11 global levels during the period 1975-1980
was  8-12% (Rasmussen et al.,  1981; Fraser et al.,  1983;
Singh  et al., 1983), whereas it was 6-7% during 1980-1981
(Brice  et al., 1982; Cunnold et al., 1983b; Prinn et al.,
1983;  Rasmussen & Khalil, 1986).  Similarly, although the
average  annual growth rate  for global levels  of  CFC-12
during 1975-1980 was 8-9% (Rasmussen et al.,  1981;  Singh
et  al., 1983), it  was only 6%  in 1980 (Cunnold  et al.,
1983b; Prinn et al., 1983; Rasmussen & Khalil, 1986). Both
CFC-11 and CFC-12 showed an accumulative increase of about
60%  during  the  decade 1975-1985  (Rasmussen  &  Khalil,
1986).

    Data  on the atmospheric concentrations of chlorofluo-
rocarbons  are shown in Table 10.   Measurements of atmos-
pheric chlorofluorocarbon concentrations up to an altitude
of  6 km  did  not reveal  any  significant  concentration
changes  with  increasing  altitude (Rasmussen  &  Khalil,
1982, 1983, 1986; Robinson et al., 1983).  Hunter-Smith et
al.  (1983), Rasmussen & Khalil  (1983), and Singh et  al.
(1983)  studied the latitudinal variation in chlorofluoro-
carbon  concentrations  between the  northern and southern
hemisphere and reported inter-hemispheric contrasts (ratio
of  concentration  between  northern  and  southern  hemi-
spheres)  of  1.08  for  CFC-11,  1.07-1.08  for   CFC-12,
1.10-1.25  for  CFC-113,  and 1.08  for CFC-114.  Table 10
reveals that the concentrations of chlorofluorocarbons are
higher in urban areas than in remote areas, this being the
result of local emission sources. The urban concentrations
of chlorofluorocarbons (CFC-11 and CFC-12) in the People's
Republic  of China, with the exception of Beijing, are the
same as background levels in the USA. This is probably due
to  the less  extensive use  of these  compounds in  urban
areas in China (Rasmussen et al., 1982).

    Median  concentrations of the most abundant compounds,
CFC-11  and  CFC-12,  in several  urban/suburban areas and
rural/remote  areas in the  USA are reported  in  Table 10
(Brodzinsky  & Singh, 1982).  These measurements were made
from 1972 to 1980, the median year being 1975. Median con-
centration  values of 1090 and 3420 ng/m3 for  CFC-11, and
1630  and  5700 ng/m3 for   CFC-12,  in  rural/remote  and
urban/suburban  areas,  respectively,  were projected  for
1985,  assuming that the  average annual growth  rate  for
both compounds would be 5% (NASA, 1986).  Assuming that an
individual  inhales  20 m3 air/day,  the  total inhalation
exposure  (CFC-11 plus  CFC-12) in  1985 would  be  54  or
182 µg/day  in rural/remote or urban/suburban areas of the
USA, respectively.  Using the 1985 data from Ragged Point,
Barbados, as a basis, the inhalation for  combined  CFC-11
and CFC-12 in rural/remote areas in late 1985  would  have
been 66 µg/day.
Table 10.  Some worldwide measurements of the atmospheric
concentrations of chlorofluorocarbons
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        Concentration of                            
Location                 Year      chlorofluorocarbons (ng/m3)    Reference
                                CFC-11  CFC-12  CFC-113  CFC-114
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Barbados 

 Ragged Point            1980   NR      1499    NR       NR       Cunnold et al. (1983b)

                         1985   1313    2012    NR       NR       NASA (1986)

 Samoa (American) 

 Point Matatula          1980   NR      1433    NR       NR       Cunnold et al. (1983b)

Table 10. (contd.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        Concentration of                            
Location                 Year      chlorofluorocarbons (ng/m3)    Reference
                                CFC-11  CFC-12  CFC-113  CFC-114
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 United Kingdom 

 Harwell                 1980   1342    NR      NR       NR       Brice et al. (1982)

 Adrigole, Ireland       1980   NR      1564    NR       NR       Cunnold et al. (1983b)

 USA 

 Phoenix, Arizona        1979   1423    NR      1192     NR       Singh et al. (1981)

 Los Angeles,            1979   2700    NR      2376     NR       Singh et al.  (1981)
 California

 Oakland, California     1979   1365    NR      381      NR       Singh et al. (1981)

 USA rural/remote        1973-  685     1911    241      64       Brodzinsky & Singh (1982)
 (median concentration)  1980

 USA urban/suburban      1972-  1199    3521    1324     199      Brodzinsky & Singh (1982)
 (median concentration)  1980

 Pacific Northwest       1980   1073    1620    132      NR       Rasmussen et al. (1981)

Northern hemisphere      1978   919     1378    101      NR       Rasmussen & Khalil (1982)

Northern hemisphere      1978   1062    1534    179      100      Singh et al. (1983)

Southern hemisphere      1978   845     1283    93       NR       Rasmussen & Khalil (1982)

Southern hemisphere      1978   982     1418    164      92       Singh et al. (1983)

Arctic                   1982   1174    1780    175      NR       Rasmussen & Khalil (1983)

Arctic haze              1979   1097    1633    NR       NR       Khalil & Rasmussen (1983)

South Pole               1980   948     1428    86       NR       Rasmussen et al. (1981)

Over Atlantic Ocean      1981   1056    NR      NR       NR       Brice et al. (1982)

Global average           1980   959     NR      NR       NR       Fraser et al. (1983)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NR = not reported.
5.1.2.  Water

    Singh et al. (1979) measured CFC-11 and CFC-12 concen-
trations  in  1977 at  various  locations in  the  Pacific
Ocean.   The average surface  concentration of CFC-11  was
0.13 (± 0.006) ng/litre,  while  the CFC-12  concentration

was 0.28 (± 0.15) ng/litre.  The average concentrations at
a  depth of 300 m were  0.06 and 0.21 ng/litre for  CFC-11
and CFC-12, respectively. The concentrations of CFC-11 and
CFC-12 at various locations in the eastern  Pacific  Ocean
(surface  waters)  during  1979-1981 were  0.22  and  0.25
ng/litre  (Singh et al.,  1983), in Greenland  Sea surface
water  in 1982 were  0.61 and 0.21 ng/litre  (Bullister  &
Weiss,   1983),  and  in  Japanese   coastal  waters  were
0.20-0.54  and 0.19-0.33 ng/litre, respectively (Tomita et
al., 1983).

    Samples of water from Lake Ontario analysed  for  vol-
atile  halocarbon  contaminants  contained  mean   concen-
trations  for CFC-11 and  CFC-12 of 249  and 572 ng/litre,
respectively  (Kaiser et al., 1983).   An alluvial aquifer
in  Southington, Connecticut, USA, adjacent  to a solvent-
recovery  operation  was  analysed in  1980  for  volatile
organic  compounds, but CFC-12 was not detected (detection
limit not specified) in water obtained from various depths
(Hall, 1984). CFC-11 and CFC-12 have been detected in sur-
face snow and rainwater in Alaska (Su &  Goldberg,  1976).
The detection of chlorofluorocarbons in drinking-water has
not been reported.

5.1.3.  Food and other edible products

    With the exception of a few scattered reports (section
4.4), chlorofluorocarbons have not been measured in food.

5.2.  Occupational exposure

    Information  on occupational exposure is summarized in
section 9.2.

6.  ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE DEPLETION

6.1.  Introduction

    Speculation  on the possibility of stratospheric ozone
reduction first appeared in the early 1970's  and  focused
on the consequences of large quantities of nitrogen oxides
being  injected  into  the upper  atmosphere by supersonic
aircraft flying at high altitudes. Other sources of nitro-
gen  oxides originating from the earth's surface were also
considered.   These concerns gradually diminished, because
the  quantities of nitrogen  oxides likely to  be involved
were insufficient to cause a serious threat to  the  ozone
layer.   However,  concern  over halogen  pollution of the
upper  atmosphere  arose  during  the  mid-1970s  (section
4.2.3).   The halogens of immediate  concern were chlorine
and bromine. The main source for chlorine is chlorofluoro-
carbons, which are released worldwide from such sources as
aerosol  spray cans, certain plastic foams, refrigerators,
and refrigerative air conditioners.

    Many gases emitted as a result of industrial and agri-
cultural  activities can accumulate in  the Earth's atmos-
phere and ultimately contribute to alterations in the ver-
tical  distribution  and  concentrations of  stratospheric
ozone. Among the most important are those trace gases that
have  long residence times in the atmosphere.  This allows
accumulation  in  the  troposphere and  a  gradual  upward
migration  of the gases  into the stratosphere  where they
contribute to depletion of stratospheric ozone. The atmos-
pheric  and  chemical  processes  involved  are  extremely
complex (US EPA, 1987a). Trace gases of particular concern
include  certain  long-lived chlorofluorocarbons,  such as
CFC-11,  CFC-12,  and  CFC-113 (for  atmospheric residence
times see section 4.3). Since the transport of these gases
to the stratosphere is slow, their residence  times  there
are long, and the removal processes are slow,  any  effect
on stratospheric ozone already seen is probably the result
of  anthropogenic emissions of these gases several decades
ago.   Those gases already in the atmosphere will continue
to  exert stratospheric ozone depletion  effects well into
the next century.

    The  atmospheric  models  that  predict  future  ozone
depletion  are in a continual process of refinement.  Over
the years, predicted decreases in stratospheric ozone have
ranged from 4 to 18%, based on the  stratospheric  concen-
trations of chlorine expected from the 1974 levels of CFC-
11 and CFC-12 emissions.  However, it has  gradually  been
realized  that other gases will influence column ozone and
that  the size and  direction of the  predicted change  in
total ozone during the next century depend  critically  on
the  assumption of the multiple trace-gas scenarios.  Many
of  the  modelling  scenarios tended  to assume relatively
uniform  rates of ozone layer reduction widely distributed

above  all regions of the  Earth.  However, areas of  dis-
tinctly  greater  depletion (ranging  from  15 to  40%  in
recent  years) have been  identified over the  South Polar
region  during September to  November of each  year.   The
evidence  suggests  a  likely gradual  expansion  of  this
"Antarctic  Ozone Hole" ultimately to  extend beyond the
South  Polar region, possibly  coming to reach  over  more
heavily  populated areas of the Southern Hemisphere. Simi-
larly, it is considered likely that an  analogous,  though
less  intense, zone of  upper level ozone  reduction  will
occur  over the North Polar  region and expand over  popu-
lated areas of the Northern Hemisphere.

    Although  ozone constitutes a very small proportion of
the stratosphere, it plays a major role in protecting life
on this planet.  The result of changes in the  density  of
the  total ozone column could, therefore, be far-reaching.
The  natural distribution of  ozone in the  Earth's atmos-
phere, concentrated most heavily in a diffuse layer in the
stratosphere,  is  crucial  in helping  to  protect  human
beings,  other biological systems, and  man-made materials
from  the harmful effects  of certain wavelengths  of sun-
light.   Stratospheric ozone exerts its beneficial effects
by  absorbing ultraviolet radiation in  the 200- to 320-nm
range,  allowing  only  reduced amounts  of UV-B radiation
(280- to  320-nm  waveband)  to penetrate  to  the Earth's
surface. In addition, the vertical distribution of strato-
spheric  ozone and  relative dryness  of the  air  in  the
stratosphere help to maintain the radiative balance of the
Earth.   Depletion of the  stratospheric ozone layer  can,
therefore,  be  expected to  lead  to damaging  effects on
human health and the environment (i) directly by increased
penetration of UV-B radiation to the Earth's  surface  and
(ii)  indirectly through the  influence of changes  in the
vertical  distribution  of  stratospheric ozone  and water
vapour  that  contribute  to global  warming  effects  and
altered climatic conditions.  The possibility of increased
exposure to solar UV-B radiation is a particular cause for
concern  because of its  effect on humans,  other animals,
plants,  certain manufactured materials, and photochemical
smog  production.  Most of the known biological effects of
UV-B  radiation  are  damaging.  Detailed  discussions  of
evolving  concern about stratospheric ozone  depletion and
assessment  of the scientific base underlying such concern
can  be found in several recent national and international
expert  work  group reports  or  symposia (e.g.,  US  EPA,
1987a; Schneider et al., 1989; WMO/Canada DOE, 1989).  The
following  sections summarize key points from such sources
and  discuss  their  implications for  the  development of
effective  international efforts to cope  with ozone layer
depletion.

6.2.  Terrestrial plants

    Increased  UV-B irradiation of the Earth's surface due
to ozone layer depletion can be expected to have  a  nega-
tive  impact on both terrestrial and aquatic biota. In as-
sessing the impact of increased exposure to UV-B radiation
for  crops and terrestrial  ecosystems, it must  be recog-
nized that existing knowledge is in many  ways  deficient.
The effects of enhanced levels of UV-B radiation have been
studied  in only a few representative species from some of
the major terrestrial ecosystems.  Most knowledge has been
derived  from studies that focused upon agricultural crops
and were conducted at mid-latitudes. Despite uncertainties
resulting  from the complexities of field experiments, the
available  data suggest that crop yields are vulnerable to
increased  levels of solar UV-B radiation.  Unlike drought
or  other geographically isolated  stresses, stratospheric
ozone  depletion  would affect  all  areas of  the  world,
including  ecosystems whose UV-B sensitivity  has not been
investigated.

    Out  of more than  200 species and cultivars  screened
for UV tolerance, about two-thirds have been found  to  be
sensitive. Most tests were done in controlled environments
with  UV radiation from artificial sources.  The UV sensi-
tivity  was usually exaggerated  when compared to  results
obtained by exposure to solar radiation in the field.  The
most  sensitive plant groups include crops related to peas
and  beans, melons, mustard,  and cabbage, but  there  are
large differences in sensitivity between the various crops
studied in the field (US EPA, 1987b). In general, UV radi-
ation causes reduced leaf and stem growth, lower total dry
weight,  and  lower  photosynthetic activity  in sensitive
cultivars  (Tevini & Iwanzik,  1986).  These results  were
corroborated in an experiment simulating a 25% enhancement
of   solar  UV-B  radiation   (equivalent  to  12%   ozone
reduction), where UV-B exposure was controlled by an arti-
ficial ozone filter at a high altitude and at  a  southern
latitude  (Tevini  et al.,  1986).   Members of  the grass
family  were generally less  sensitive (with some  notable
exceptions),  possibly due to protective abilities such as
photorepair  or production of screening pigments (Beggs et
al., 1986).

    The  large variation in sensitivity  that exists among
cultivars  within  each  crop species  suggests  that some
degree  of UV tolerance  must be present  in the  existing
gene  pool. The genetic basis for differences in UV-B sen-
sitivity  is not fully understood. However, it is possible
that selective crop breeding might help mitigate  some  of
the potentially deleterious effects (Teramura, 1983).

    In  addition  to other  factors,  the quality  of crop
yield  may be reduced  by increased levels  of UV-B  radi-
ation.  Changes in crop quality have not been specifically

examined  in many studies,  but reduced quality  has  been
noted  in certain cultivars of tomato, potato, sugar beet,
and  soybean.   The protein  and  oil content  of specific
cultivars  of soybean seeds were reduced by up to 10% when
plants were exposed to UV levels equivalent to a 25% ozone
depletion (US EPA, 1987b).

    Increased  levels  of  UV-B radiation  may also affect
forest  productivity.  Only limited data  are available on
coniferous  species, but in studies by Sullivan & Teramura
(1988)  about one-half of  the species of  seedlings  were
adversely  affected by UV-B  radiation.  In loblolly  pine
seedlings, growth and photosynthesis were reduced in field
studies  simulating  a  40% ozone  reduction  (Teramura  &
Sullivan,  1988).  However, extrapolation from the results
of  seedling studies to  forested ecosystems is  not poss-
ible,  nor is interpolation  of predicted results  at  ex-
posure levels simulating a lower level of ozone reduction.

    The  existing  data  also suggest  that increased UV-B
radiation  will modify the  distribution and abundance  of
plants,  and potentially change  ecosystem structure as  a
result of an alteration of the competitive balance between
different  species. Even small changes in competitive bal-
ance  over a period of time can result in large changes in
community  structure  and  composition (Gold  &  Caldwell,
1983).   The  shift in  competitive  balance may  occur in
response  to subtle changes in plant growth, without large
changes  in  fundamental  physiological processes  such as
photosynthesis  (Beyschlag et al., 1988).   The alteration
of the competitive balance of species is a dynamic process
affected  by  the  competing species  and  their immediate
environment.   Unfortunately, neither a quantitative nor a
qualitative  prediction of how  these ecosystems might  be
altered  can  be  determined from  the  current  knowledge
base.

6.3.  Aquatic organisms

    Various  experiments have demonstrated that UV-B radi-
ation causes damage to fish larvae and  juveniles,  shrimp
larvae, crab larvae, copepods, and plants essential to the
marine food web.  These damaging effects include decreased
fecundity,  growth, survival, and other  reduced functions
in  these organisms (Worrest,  1982; US EPA,  1987c). Evi-
dence   indicates  that  ambient  solar   UV-B  radiation,
although not nearly as important as light, temperature, or
nutrient  levels, is currently an  important limiting eco-
logical  factor,  and that  even  small increases  in UV-B
exposure  could  result  in significant  ecosystem changes
(Damkaer, 1982).

    Effects  induced  by  solar UV-B  radiation  have been
measured to a depth of more than 20 metres in clear waters
and  more  than  five metres  in  less  clear water.   The

euphotic  zone (i.e. water depth with levels of light suf-
ficient  for  positive  net photosynthesis)  is frequently
taken as the water column that reaches down to  the  depth
at which photosynthetically active radiation is reduced by
99%.   In  marine  ecosystems, UV-B  radiation  penetrates
approximately  the upper 10%  of the marine  euphotic zone
before  it is reduced  by 99% of  its surface  irradiance.
Penetration of UV-B radiation into natural waters is a key
variable in assessing the potential impact of  this  radi-
ation on any aquatic ecosystem (US EPA, 1987c).

    In marine plant communities a change in species compo-
sition rather than a decrease in net production  would  be
the  probable result of increased  UV-B exposure (Worrest,
1983).  A change in community composition at the  base  of
food webs may produce instabilities within ecosystems that
could  affect  higher  trophic levels  (Kelly, 1986).  The
generation time of marine phytoplankton is in the range of
hours to days, whereas the potential increase  in  ambient
levels of solar UV-B irradiance will occur  over  decades.
The  question remains as to  whether the gene pool  within
species  is  capable  of adapting  during  this relatively
gradual  (relative to the  generation time of  the  target
organisms) change in exposure to UV-B radiation.  There is
evidence that a decrease in column ozone  abundance  could
diminish the near-surface season of invertebrate zooplank-
ton  populations.  For some zooplankton, the time spent at
or  near the surface  is critical for  food gathering  and
breeding.  Whether these populations  could endure a  sig-
nificant  shortening  of  the surface  season  is  unknown
(Damkaer et al., 1980).

    The  direct effect of  UV-B radiation on  edible  fish
larvae   closely  parallels  the  effect  on  invertebrate
zooplankton.   More  information  is required  on seasonal
abundances and vertical distributions of fish larvae, ver-
tical  mixing,  and  penetration of  UV-B  radiation  into
appropriate  water columns before  effects of exposure  to
solar  UV-B radiation can  be predicted.  However,  in one
study involving anchovy larvae, it was calculated  that  a
20% increase in UV-B radiation (which would accompany a 9%
depletion of total column ozone) would result in the death
of  about 8% of  the annual larval  population (Hunter  et
al., 1982).  This one study was performed in  the  labora-
tory,  and even the  control animals had  significant mor-
tality  at the end of the normal larval period. This high-
lights  the need for  caution when trying  to  extrapolate
conclusions  to natural conditions when  those conclusions
are based on results from laboratory studies.

    In  many countries marine species supply more than 50%
of the dietary protein, and in developing  countries  this
percentage is often higher.  Research is needed to improve
our  understanding  of  how stratospheric  ozone depletion

could influence the world food supply.  However, effective
steps  to  minimize  stratospheric zone  depletion  cannot
await the outcome of such research.

6.4.  Research needs

    Future  work  concerning  UV-B effects  on terrestrial
ecosystems  must  proceed  on a  broad front.  Sensitivity
screenings   and  dose-response  studies  must  expand  to
include  representative species from a wider range of eco-
system  types and a wider range of plant types within eco-
systems  of particular interest. Knowledge of species sen-
sitivities  and their geographic  ranges can then  be com-
bined  with information on current and projected levels of
UV-B in order to identify areas of greatest  concern.   An
understanding  of how sensitivity  to UV-B is  affected by
other  environmental  factors  will aid  in  this process.
Additional  work  at the  biochemical  level is  needed to
clarify  interactions of UV-B  radiation and plant  metab-
olism as well as the nature of effects of  UV-B  radiation
on pests and pathogens.

    Ultimately, the information gathered in field and lab-
oratory  studies must be put into the context of ecosystem
properties,   including  primary  productivity,   nutrient
cycling,  resistance to disturbance,  and the capacity  to
recover  from disturbance.  Efforts are  clearly needed to
integrate what is known about the influences  of  elevated
UV-B irradiance on plants with what is known  about  plant
stress  associated with other human-induced changes in the
environment.

    In  order to quantify the effects on marine systems of
UV-B radiation on an ocean-wide basis, there is a need for
additional  data on the penetration of UV-B radiation as a
function of water mass, concentration of particulates, and
presence  of plankton.  These  data must be  combined with
accurate  measurements of total  incident radiation, as  a
function  of angle  of incidence  and time,  to arrive  at
reliable estimates of both total UV-B radiation  dose  and
dose rate.

    There  is a clear  need to measure  fish-larval sensi-
tivity to UV-B radiation for many resource species, refine
the  links between exposure  of primary producers  to UV-B
radiation  and effects on fish, assess the impact of food-
web  changes on fish  yield, and delineate  the mitigating
mechanisms available to the organism.

    Studies on changes in population size and diversity as
a  result of stress would provide insights for predictions
of  the effects of  UV-B increases in  a given  ecological
niche (Worrest et al., 1978, 1981a,b; Worrest, 1983). Data
describing  changes  resulting from  environmental stress,
such as contamination from toxic substances or temperature

change, could be combined with data on the  efficiency  of
energy conversion between trophic levels, upon which a re-
source species relies, to estimate the potential reduction
in fish catch.  To narrow the reliability limits  of  such
predictions,  field investigations into the  resiliency of
affected populations are required.

    There  is a paucity  of information on  the impact  of
UV-B radiation on marine resource species. The  fact  that
dose-response  sensitivity  data  exist  for  only  a  few
species greatly impedes our ability to extrapolate  to  an
overall assessment of the risk to marine fisheries.  It is
important  to  be  able to  translate  known intracellular
cause-and-effect  relationships of UV damage to effects on
simple   or  single-celled  organisms  and  to  population
effects.

    Knowledge  of  adaptive  or protective  mechanisms  by
which  marine organisms minimize the  effects of increased
UV-B radiation in the ocean's surface layers  is  lacking.
No  avoidance mechanisms specific  to UV-B radiation  have
been  described  for marine  organisms, although avoidance
mechanisms to visible light may lessen the impact  of  the
concurrent  UV radiation. While pigmentation occurs exten-
sively  in marine organisms, the  degree to which it  con-
tributes to UV-B protection is unknown.

    The  time scale of  adaptation or repair,  compared to
the  time scale of increased UV-B radiation, is an import-
ant  factor.  Are genetic mechanisms sufficient to obviate
the  negative impacts?  Do they  affect competitor species
over similar time scales?  What organisms are pre-disposed
to  environmental (i.e. non-genetic) protective behaviour?
These questions must be addressed as part of the framework
of risk assessment.

7.  KINETICS AND METABOLISM

7.1.  Absorption

    Chlorofluorocarbon  propellants and solvents  may pre-
sent a hazard for human beings by  inhalation,  ingestion,
and  dermal absorption.  However, because  of the physical
properties  and uses of these compounds, inhalation is the
most  common route of  entry, and exhalation  is the  most
significant route of elimination.

    Information  concerning  chlorofluorocarbon absorption
has been obtained in two types of studies:

*   chlorofluorocarbon retention in the lungs;
*   chlorofluorocarbon blood levels after inhalation.

    The  relative amounts of CFC-11,  CFC-12, CFC-113, and
CFC-114  absorbed by human  beings have been  measured  in
breath-holding   studies (Paulet & Chevrier,  1969; Morgan
et  al.,  1972).   Retention was  measured using radioiso-
topically  marked  chlorofluorocarbons by  subtracting the
radioactivity  exhaled  30 min  after inhalation  from the
amount  of radioactivity inhaled with a single breath.  In
terms  of  absorption  the following  order  was obtained:
CFC-11 ~ CFC-113 > CFC-114 ~ CFC-12,     with  retentions
of 23%, 19.8%, 12.2%, and 10.3%, respectively.  Shargel  &
Koss  (1972) exposed dogs  to an equal  weight mixture  of
CFC-11, CFC-12, CFC-113, and CFC-114, and obtained similar
results.

    In  other studies, human volunteers (Aviado & Micozzi,
1981)  and dogs (Azar et al., 1973) were exposed to CFC-11
at  a  concentration  of 5710 mg/m3 (1000 ppm)   and for a
period of 8 h or 10 min, respectively. The blood levels in
the  human volunteers were  4.69 µg/ml   and in  the  dogs
6.5-10 µg/ml.  According to a mathematical model developed
for  the description of  the pharmacokinetics, 77%  of the
dose applied was absorbed.

    Azar  et al. (1973) determined  the corresponding data
for  CFC-12 in  beagle dogs.   After an  exposure to  5030
mg/m3   (1000 ppm) for a period of 10 min, 1.1 µg/ml   was
found  in the arterial blood and 0.4 µg/ml   in the venous
system.  At higher concentrations, the arterial and venous
concentrations  were similar.  Trochimowicz et  al. (1974)
found,  under  similar  conditions (1000 ppm,  1 min inha-
lation period), that the blood level in dogs  for  CFC-113
was 2.7 µg/ml  (arterial) and 1.9 µg/ml  (venous), and for
CFC-114 0.4 µg/ml and 0.2 µg/ml, respectively.

    In  a study by Angerer et al. (1985), three volunteers
were  exposed to a CFC-11 concentration of  3750 mg/m3 (657
ppm).  The average value of pulmonary retention was 18.9%.
CFC-11 levels in alveolar air and blood  were    3066 mg/m3
(537 ppm) and 2.8 µg/ml, respectively.

    Further  absorption  and elimination  data from CFC-11
and  CFC-12 atomizer administrations indicated that, while
CFC-11  is  more  readily absorbed  by  mammals (including
humans) than CFC-12, the degree of preferential absorption
may  vary among individuals (Dollery et al., 1970; Allen &
Hanburys Ltd, 1971; Paterson et al., 1971; Shargel & Koss,
1972).   Similar  information on  the different absorption
rates  has been obtained from other studies. Chlorofluoro-
carbons  were administered to dogs for 5 min at fixed con-
centrations  between 0.3 and 10 vol % in the inspired air.
The  blood  concentrations  determined up  to 60 min after
exposure  indicated that CFC-11  is more readily  absorbed
than CFC-12 or CFC-114 (Clark & Tinston, 1972a).

    The  results of Adir et al. (1975) and Brugnone et al.
(1984) provide additional evidence that CFC-11 is absorbed
to  a greater extent than CFC-12 in dogs and rabbits.  The
absorption  data correlate well  with the liquid/gas  par-
tition  coefficients for these  compounds in whole  blood,
serum, and olive oil shown in Table 11.

    CFC-12  was absorbed 4 times more readily than CFC-114
in a study by Rauws et al. (1973) in which rats  were  ex-
posed  to a mixture of CFC-11, CFC-12, and CFC-114 (weight
ratio  of 1:2:1).   A similar  pattern was  also  seen  in
monkeys  by Taylor et al.  (1971).  In each instance,  the
ratio  of CFC-12 to CFC-114  in arterial blood was  higher
than the ratio of exposure concentrations, indicating that
CFC-12 was slightly more readily absorbed than CFC-114.

    The  available data on chlorofluorocarbon uptake indi-
cate  that chlorofluorocarbons can be  absorbed across the
alveolar  membrane, gastro-intestinal tract, the skin, and
internal  organs.  Following inhalation, they are absorbed
rapidly by the blood.  Blood-tissue absorption is probably
the  rate-limiting  step.   After an  initial, rapid blood
level  stabilization,  chlorofluorocarbons  are still  ab-
sorbed by body tissues and continue to enter the body.

Table 11.  Partition coefficients of various chlorofluorocarbons
---------------------------------------------------------
Compound  Whole blooda  Whole bloodb  Serumc   Olive 
          (rat)         (human)       (human)  oilc
---------------------------------------------------------
CFC-11    1.4           0.87           0.9     27
CFC-12    0.2           0.15           0.2     3
CFC-113                                0.8     32
CFC-114                 0.15           0.2     5
---------------------------------------------------------
a   From: Allen & Hanburys, Ltd (1971).
b   From: Chiou & Niazi (1973).
c   From: Morgan et al. (1972).

7.2.  Distribution

    Allen  & Hanburys, Ltd. (1971) found in mice that both
CFC-11  and CFC-12 are taken up by heart, fat, and adrenal
tissue after 5-min inhalation exposures. CFC-11 is concen-
trated  from  the  blood to  the  greatest  extent in  the
adrenals  followed by the fat, then the heart.  A similar,
though  less pronounced, pattern is evident for CFC-12 but
CFC-11 is absorbed and concentrated in all of  these  tis-
sues to a much greater extent than CFC-12. Paulet  et  al.
(1975) noted that both CFC-11 and CFC-12  are  distributed
to  the  cerebrospinal  fluid  of  dogs  after  inhalation
exposure.

    Following   inhalation  exposures  lasting  7-14 days,
Carter  (1970) noted distribution patterns  for CFC-113 in
rats  that were qualitatively  similar to those  noted for
CFC-11 and CFC-12 by Allen & Hanburys, Ltd.  (1971).   The
major  difference from the  CFC-11 and CFC-12  results was
that almost all of the CFC-113 concentration  occurred  in
the fat, while adrenal levels were relatively low and even
decreased  as exposure continued (it  should be emphasized
that  the exposures  to CFC-11  and CFC-12  were for  only
5 min).  The other organ  levels did not  change  signifi-
cantly  from a 7-day to  a 14-day exposure, which  is con-
sistent  with  the  idea  that  such  concentrations  will
stabilize as equilibria between ambient air concentration,
blood level, and tissue levels are reached.  In  rats  and
guinea-pigs,  shortly  after  exposure to  CFC-113, Furuya
(1979)   noted   the  following   tissue  distribution  in
decreasing  order: fat, brain, liver, kidney, heart, lung,
muscle, and blood.

    In  summary, chlorofluorocarbons are  rapidly absorbed
after inhalation and are distributed by blood into practi-
cally  all  tissues.   Relatively high  concentrations are
found in fat, but also in organs with good blood supply.

7.3.  Metabolic transformation

    Of the nine chlorofluorocarbons reviewed in this docu-
ment,  some data regarding metabolism exists only for CFC-
11, CFC-12, CFC-112a, and CFC-113a.

    Cox  et  al. (1972a)  found  no evidence  of reductive
dehalogenation  of CFC-11 in microsomal  preparations from
rats,  chickens, or other species.  However, the reductive
dechlorination  in  vitro of CFC-11 to HCFC-21 by rat liver
microsomes  was reported by  Wolf et al.  (1978).  In vitro
metabolism   studies suggested that CFC-112a  and CFC-113a
can  be metabolized by  reductive dechlorination and  that
the  reaction is catalyzed  by cytochrome P-450  from  rat
liver  microsomes.   However,  no  metabolites  of  either
compound  were  identified  (Salmon et  al.,  1981,  1985;
Nastainczyk et al., 1982a,b).

    Published studies on  in vivo  metabolism exist only for
CFC-11  and CFC-12.  Eddy  & Griffith (1971)  administered
14C-labelled    CFC-12  to  rats  by  the  oral  route and
reported  a small amount of  metabolism.  About 2% of  the
total dose was exhaled as 14CO2 and   0.5% was excreted in
urine.   CFC-12  and/or  its metabolites  were  no  longer
detectable in the body 30 h after administration.

    Blake  & Mergner (1974)  exposed beagle dogs  for 6-20
min to CFC-11 (5710 to 28 550 mg/m3;   1000  to  5000 ppm,
v/v) or CFC-12 (40 240 to 60 380 mg/m3;   8000  to  12 000
ppm,  v/v) containing up to  180 µCi  of  14C-chlorofluoro-
carbon.  Virtually all the administered chlorofluorocarbon
was recovered in exhaled air within one hour  with  either
material. Only traces of radioactivity were found in urine
or  exhaled  CO2    and may  have  represented unavoidable
radiolabelled  impurities  rather  than metabolites.   The
authors  concluded that less than  1% of either CFC-11  or
CFC-12  is  metabolized  after inhalation.   The preceding
results  were essentially confirmed in human volunteers by
the  same  authors  (Mergner et  al., 1975). Radiolabelled
CFC-11 (571 mg/m3;   100 ppm) and CFC-12 (503 mg/m3;   100
ppm) were given by inhalation to one male and  one  female
volunteer for 7-17 min.  As was the case in  dogs,  little
or  no biotransformation of either  chlorofluorocarbon was
observed.   Total metabolites were equal to, or less than,
0.2% of the administered dose.

    The results of the preceding studies suggest that CFC-
11 and CFC-12 are metabolized to a very small  extent,  if
at all, in mammals following brief inhalation exposures.

7.4.  Elimination and excretion in expired air, faeces, and urine

    Regardless  of the route of entry, chlorofluorocarbons
appear  to  be  eliminated almost  exclusively through the
repiratory  tract.  Little, if any,  chlorofluorocarbon or
metabolite  has  ever been  reported  in urine  or  faeces
(Matsumoto et al., 1963; Blake & Mergner, 1974; Mergner et
al., 1975).

7.5.  Retention and turnover

    When exposure is terminated, the more readily absorbed
compounds are retained longer. The retention of chloroflu-
orocarbons  after inhalation follows the same order as the
amount absorbed during exposure:

         CFC-11 ~ CFC-113 > CFC-114 ~ CFC-12

    In  human  studies  designed  to  mimic  exposures  to
chlorofluorocarbons  from  atomizers,  the  initial  blood
half-lives  for CFC-11 were in  the range of 6 seconds  to
1 min (Paterson et al., 1971).

    In  one study, volunteers  exposed to CFC-11  at  3751
mg/m3 (657 ppm)  for 150-210 min showed half-lives for the
initial and second phases of elimination from venous blood
of  11 min and 1 h,  respectively (Angerer et  al., 1985).
Half-lives  for the initial  and second phases  of  CFC-11
elimination in alveolar air were 7 min and 1.8 h, respect-
ively (Angerer et al., 1985).  Average pulmonary retention
at  an apparent  steady state  after 1 h  of exposure  was
18.2%.   Similarly,  the data  of  Brugnone et  al. (1984)
indicate a pulmonary retention of 19% for CFC-11  and  18%
for CFC-12 in workers during occupational exposure.

    Studies in which dogs were administered CFC-11 or CFC-
12  by intravenous infusion indicated that the elimination
of  CFC-11  and CFC-12  from  venous blood  was  triphasic
(Niazi  & Chiou, 1975,  1977).  A 3-compartment  model was
proposed  with  initial, intermediate,  and terminal half-
lives  of 3.2, 16, and  93 min for CFC-11 and  1.47, 7.95,
and  58.50 min for CFC-12.  Adir et al. (1975) also fitted
their  venous  blood  elimination data  to a 3-compartment
model.  Estimates of half-lives for the terminal phases of
CFC-11 elimination were 6.30 and 24.75 min for  two  human
volunteers  and 13.86-21 min (mean, 18.34)  for four dogs.
For the terminal phases of CFC-12 elimination,  the  half-
lives were 9.63 min for one human volunteer and 8.45-11.35
min (mean, 9.90) for three dogs.

    In  dogs exposed to  CFC-11 by atomizers,  the initial
and  terminal half-lives in venous  blood were at 0.6  and
4.03 min, respectively (McClure, 1972). The terminal half-
life of 80 min in dogs after exposures to  ambient  CFC-11
concentrations  of 2, 5, and  7.5% (Amin et al.,  1979) is
close to the terminal half-lives reported by Niazi & Chiou
(1975).

    Reinhardt  et al. (1971a) conducted  retention studies
on  CFC-113 in human  volunteers over occupationally  rel-
evant  periods.  They measured the chlorofluorocarbon con-
centration  in the expired  air of volunteers  exposed  to
3835 mg/m3   (0.05%) or 7670 mg/m3   (0.1%) for 3 h in the
morning and 3 h in the afternoon.  Although there  was  no
indication  of chlorofluorocarbon accumulation, detectable
levels  were  retained overnight  in  four cases  at  3835
mg/m3    and in 14 cases at 7670 mg/m3.   In one instance,
there was a detectable level on a Monday morning following
a  final exposure to  7670 mg/m3   (0.1%) on  the previous
Friday.

7.6.  Reaction with body components

    Lessard  & Paulet (1985) concluded that simple dissol-
ution of CFC-12 in the lipid layer of biological membranes
with  ensuing  alteration  of membrane  configuration  may
account for its anaesthetic effect and some of its cardiac

effects.   Young & Parker (1972),  however, suggested that
CFC-12  is bound to the hydrophilic areas of various phos-
pholipids and that potassium chloride may stop adrenaline-
induced  arrhythmia in hearts sensitized by CFC-12 by dis-
placing the CFC-12 molecule held by the phospholipid.

    CFC-11 has been shown to bind  in vitro to liver micro-
somal protein and lipid (Uehleke et al., 1977; Cox et al.,
1972a,b)  and to cytochrome  P-450 (Cox et  al.,  1972a,b;
Wolf  et al., 1977, 1978). Vainio et al., (1980) also dem-
onstrated binding of CFC-113 to cytochrome P-450.  In view
of  the very low  liver toxicity potential  of CFC-11  and
CFC-113,  the  toxicological  significance  of  the  P-450
binding is unknown.

8.  EFFECTS ON EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS AND  IN VITRO TEST SYSTEMS

8.1.  Single exposures

8.1.1.  Acute inhalation toxicity

    A  number of chlorofluoromethanes and chlorofluoroeth-
anes  have been tested  for acute inhalation  toxicity  in
laboratory animals.  Because most of the information is of
limited  importance for a quantitative risk assessment, it
will not be discussed in detail.  The data  are  presented
in Table 12.

    Of  the fully halogenated chlorofluoromethanes, CFC-12
and  CFC-13 show extremely low  acute inhalation toxicity.
CFC-11  also  has  low acute  inhalation  toxicity, lethal
concentrations   being  in  the  range   of    571-1427 g/m3
(100 000-250 000 ppm).

    Within  the chlorofluoroethanes, CFC-114 and  115 seem
to be of an extremely low acute toxicity, followed by CFC-
113 and CFC-112.

    The symptomatology of acute intoxication is character-
ized  by  central  nervous system  effects  and  secondary
effects on the cardiovascular and respiratory systems.

8.1.2.  Acute oral toxicity

    Very little information is available on the acute oral
toxicity  of chlorofluorocarbons.  The lethality  data for
some chlorofluorocarbons are summarized in Table 13.  With
the exception of a slight increase in liver weight follow-
ing exposure to CFC-112 and CFC-112a at  25 000 mg/kg,  no
gross  or histological abnormalities were noted by Clayton
(1966).

8.2.  Short-term exposures

    In this monograph, short-term exposures are defined as
those  involving repeated daily exposure up to 90 days and
long-term studies as those longer than 90 days (see 8.4).


Table 12.  Acute inhalation toxicity of fully halogenated chlorofluorocarbons
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compound    Conc.a   Conc.b     Exposure  Effects observed    Reference
and                             period
species                         (min)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 CFC-11

Guinea-pig  22-25    125-143    120       tremor, dyspnoea    Nuckolls (1933)
            45-51    257-291    120       tremor, incipient
                                          narcosis
            100      571        50        deep narcosis       Scholz (1961)
            250      1427       30        death (LC50)        Caujolle (1964)
                                                              Paulet (1969)

Mouse       10       57         1440      no clinical signs   Quevauviller et al. (1963)
            100      571        30        de