IPCS INCHEM Home


    INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMME ON CHEMICAL SAFETY








    ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CRITERIA 175





    ANTICOAGULANT RODENTICIDES












    This report contains the collective views of an international group of
    experts and does not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated
    policy of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International
    Labour Organisation, or the World Health Organization.

    First draft prepared by Dr M. Tasheva, National Centre of Hygiene,
    Medical Ecology and Nutrition, Sofia, Bulgaria

    Published under the joint sponsorship of the United Nations
    Environment Programme, the International Labour Organisation, and the
    World Health Organization

    World Health Organization
    Geneva, 1995

         The International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) is a joint
    venture of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International
    Labour Organisation, and the World Health Organization. The main
    objective of the IPCS is to carry out and disseminate evaluations of
    the effects of chemicals on human health and the quality of the
    environment. Supporting activities include the development of
    epidemiological, experimental laboratory, and risk-assessment methods
    that could produce internationally comparable results, and the
    development of manpower in the field of toxicology. Other activities
    carried out by the IPCS include the development of know-how for coping
    with chemical accidents, coordination of laboratory testing and
    epidemiological studies, and promotion of research on the mechanisms
    of the biological action of chemicals.

    WHO Library Cataloguing in Publication Data

    Anticoagulant rodenticides.

    (Environmental health criteria ; 175)

    1.Rodenticides  2.Anticoagulants
    3.Occupational exposure  I.Series

    ISBN 92 4 157175 1                 (NLM Classification: WA 240)
    ISSN 0250-863X

         The World Health Organization welcomes requests for permission to
    reproduce or translate its publications, in part or in full.
    Applications and enquiries should be addressed to the Office of
    Publications, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, which
    will be glad to provide the latest information on any changes made to
    the text, plans for new editions, and reprints and translations
    already available.

    (c) World Health Organization 1995

         Publications of the World Health Organization enjoy copyright
    protection in accordance with the provisions of Protocol 2 of the
    Universal Copyright Convention. All rights reserved. The designations
    employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do
    not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the
    Secretariat of the World Health Organization concerning the legal
    status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities,
    or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The
    mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers' products
    does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World
    Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that
    are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of
    proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters.

    CONTENTS

    ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CRITERIA FOR ANTICOAGULANT RODENTICIDES

    Preamble

    Introduction

    1. SUMMARY

         1.1. General
         1.2. Properties and analytical methods
         1.3. Sources of human and environmental exposure
         1.4. Environmental distribution, levels and exposures
         1.5. Mode of action and metabolism
         1.6. Effects on mammals and in vitro test systems
         1.7. Effects on humans
         1.8. Effects on other organisms in the laboratory and field
         1.9. Evaluation and conclusion

    2. IDENTITY, PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES, ANALYTICAL METHODS

         2.1. Identity
         2.2. Physical and chemical properties
         2.3. Analytical methods

    3. SOURCES OF HUMAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE

         3.1. Natural occurrence
         3.2. Anthropogenic sources

    4. ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPORT, DISTRIBUTION AND TRANSFORMATION

         4.1. Transport and distribution between media
               4.1.1. Air, water and soil
               4.1.2. Vegetation and wildlife
         4.2. Transformation
               4.2.1. Biodegradation
               4.2.2. Abiotic degradation
                       4.2.2.1   Photolysis
                       4.2.2.2   Hydrolysis

    5. ENVIRONMENTAL LEVELS AND HUMAN EXPOSURE

         5.1. Environmental levels
         5.2. General population exposure
         5.3. Occupational exposure

    6. MODE OF ACTION AND METABOLISM

         6.1. Vitamin K and its antagonists
         6.2. Metabolism
               6.2.1. Absorption, distribution and elimination
               6.2.2. Metabolic transformation
               6.2.3. Retention and turnover

    7. EFFECTS ON LABORATORY MAMMALS AND IN VITRO TEST SYSTEMS

         7.1. Acute effects
               7.1.1. Rodent species
               7.1.2. Non-target species
         7.2. Short-term exposure
               7.2.1. Rodent species
               7.2.2. Non-target species
         7.3. Long-term exposure
         7.4. Skin and eye irritation; sensitization
         7.5. Reproductive toxicity and teratogenicity
         7.6. Mutagenicity
         7.7. Factors modifying toxicity
         7.8. Adverse effects in domestic and farm animals
               7.8.1. Domestic animals
                       7.8.1.1   Poisoning incidents
                       7.8.1.2   Diagnosis and treatment of poisoning
               7.8.2. Farm animals

    8. EFFECTS ON HUMANS

         8.1. General population exposure
               8.1.1. Acute poisoning
               8.1.2. Poisoning incidents
               8.1.3. Controlled human studies
         8.2. Monitoring of biological effects
               8.2.1. Effects of short- and long-term exposure
               8.2.2. Epidemiological studies
         8.3. Developmental effects
         8.4. Other adverse effects
         8.5. Methods for assessing absorption and effects of
               anticoagulant rodenticides
         8.6. Treatment of anticoagulant rodenticide poisoning
               8.6.1. Minimizing the absorption
               8.6.2. Specific pharmacological treatment
                       8.6.2.1   Vitamin K1 (phytomenadione)
                       8.6.2.2   Blood components
                       8.6.2.3   Phenobarbital
               8.6.3. Response to therapy

    9. EFFECTS ON OTHER ORGANISMS IN THE LABORATORY AND FIELD

         9.1. Laboratory experiments
               9.1.1. Microorganisms
               9.1.2. Aquatic organisms
               9.1.3. Terrestrial organisms
                       9.1.3.1   Acute toxicity
                       9.1.3.2   Primary toxicity
                       9.1.3.3   Secondary toxicity
         9.2. Field observations
               9.2.1. Primary poisonings
               9.2.2. Secondary poisonings

    10. EVALUATION OF HUMAN HEALTH RISKS AND EFFECTS ON THE
         ENVIRONMENT

         10.1. Evaluation of human health risks
         10.2. Evaluation of effects on the environment

    11. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN HEALTH
         AND THE ENVIRONMENT

         11.1. Conclusions
         11.2. Recommendations for protection of human health and the
               environment

    12. FURTHER RESEARCH

    13. PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS BY INTERNATIONAL BODIES

    REFERENCES

    RESUME

    RESUMEN
    

    NOTE TO READERS OF THE CRITERIA MONOGRAPHS

       Every effort has been made to present information in the criteria
    monographs as accurately as possible without unduly delaying their
    publication.  In the interest of all users of the Environmental Health
    Criteria monographs, readers are requested to communicate any errors
    that may have occurred to the Director of the International Programme
    on Chemical Safety, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, in
    order that they may be included in corrigenda.



                                    *     *     *



       A detailed data profile and a legal file can be obtained from the
    International Register of Potentially Toxic Chemicals, Case postale
    356, 1219 Châtelaine, Geneva, Switzerland (Telephone No. 9799111).



                                    *     *     *



       This publication was made possible by grant number 5 U01 ES02617-15
    from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National
    Institutes of Health, USA, and by financial support from the European
    Commission.

    Environmental Health Criteria

    PREAMBLE

    Objectives

         In 1973 the WHO Environmental Health Criteria Programme was
    initiated with the following objectives:

    (i)     to assess information on the relationship between exposure to
            environmental pollutants and human health, and to provide
            guidelines for setting exposure limits;

    (ii)    to identify new or potential pollutants;

    (iii)   to identify gaps in knowledge concerning the health effects of
            pollutants;

    (iv)    to promote the harmonization of toxicological and
            epidemiological methods in order to have internationally
            comparable results.

         The first Environmental Health Criteria (EHC) monograph, on
    mercury, was published in 1976 and since that time an everincreasing
    number of assessments of chemicals and of physical effects have been
    produced.  In addition, many EHC monographs have been devoted to
    evaluating toxicological methodology, e.g., for genetic, neurotoxic,
    teratogenic and nephrotoxic effects.  Other publications have been
    concerned with epidemiological guidelines, evaluation of short-term
    tests for carcinogens, biomarkers, effects on the elderly and so
    forth.

         Since its inauguration the EHC Programme has widened its scope,
    and the importance of environmental effects, in addition to health
    effects, has been increasingly emphasized in the total evaluation of
    chemicals.

         The original impetus for the Programme came from World Health
    Assembly resolutions and the recommendations of the 1972 UN Conference
    on the Human Environment.  Subsequently the work became an integral
    part of the International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS), a
    cooperative programme of UNEP, ILO and WHO.  In this manner, with the
    strong support of the new partners, the importance of occupational
    health and environmental effects was fully recognized. The EHC
    monographs have become widely established, used and recognized
    throughout the world.

         The recommendations of the 1992 UN Conference on Environment and
    Development and the subsequent establishment of the Intergovernmental
    Forum on Chemical Safety with the priorities for action in the six
    programme areas of Chapter 19, Agenda 21, all lend further weight to
    the need for EHC assessments of the risks of chemicals.

    Scope

         The criteria monographs are intended to provide critical reviews
    on the effect on human health and the environment of chemicals and of
    combinations of chemicals and physical and biological agents.  As
    such, they include and review studies that are of direct relevance for
    the evaluation.  However, they do not describe every study carried
    out.  Worldwide data are used and are quoted from original studies,
    not from abstracts or reviews.  Both published and unpublished reports
    are considered and it is incumbent on the authors to assess all the
    articles cited in the references.  Preference is always given to
    published data.  Unpublished data are only used when relevant
    published data are absent or when they are pivotal to the risk
    assessment.  A detailed policy statement is available that describes
    the procedures used for unpublished proprietary data so that this
    information can be used in the evaluation without compromising its
    confidential nature (WHO (1990) Revised Guidelines for the Preparation
    of Environmental Health Criteria Monographs. PCS/90.69, Geneva, World
    Health Organization).

         In the evaluation of human health risks, sound human data,
    whenever available, are preferred to animal data.  Animal and
     in vitro studies provide support and are used mainly to supply
    evidence missing from human studies.  It is mandatory that research on
    human subjects is conducted in full accord with ethical principles,
    including the provisions of the Helsinki Declaration.

         The EHC monographs are intended to assist national and
    international authorities in making risk assessments and subsequent
    risk management decisions.  They represent a thorough evaluation of
    risks and are not, in any sense, recommendations for regulation or
    standard setting.  These latter are the exclusive purview of national
    and regional governments.

    Content

         The layout of EHC monographs for chemicals is outlined below.

    *    Summary - a review of the salient facts and the risk evaluation
         of the chemical
    *    Identity - physical and chemical properties, analytical methods
    *    Sources of exposure
    *    Environmental transport, distribution and transformation

    *    Environmental levels and human exposure
    *    Kinetics and metabolism in laboratory animals and humans
    *    Effects on laboratory mammals and  in vitro test systems
    *    Effects on humans
    *    Effects on other organisms in the laboratory and field
    *    Evaluation of human health risks and effects on the environment
    *    Conclusions and recommendations for protection of human health
         and the environment
    *    Further research
    *    Previous evaluations by international bodies, e.g., IARC, JECFA,
         JMPR

    Selection of chemicals

         Since the inception of the EHC Programme, the IPCS has organized
    meetings of scientists to establish lists of priority chemicals for
    subsequent evaluation.  Such meetings have been held in: Ispra, Italy,
    1980; Oxford, United Kingdom, 1984; Berlin, Germany, 1987; and North
    Carolina, USA, 1995. The selection of chemicals has been based on the
    following criteria: the existence of scientific evidence that the
    substance presents a hazard to human health and/or the environment;
    the possible use, persistence, accumulation or degradation of the
    substance shows that there may be significant human or environmental
    exposure; the size and nature of populations at risk (both human and
    other species) and risks for environment; international concern, i.e.
    the substance is of major interest to several countries; adequate data
    on the hazards are available.

         If an EHC monograph is proposed for a chemical not on the
    priority list, the IPCS Secretariat consults with the Cooperating
    Organizations and all the Participating Institutions before embarking
    on the preparation of the monograph.

    Procedures

         The order of procedures that result in the publication of an EHC
    monograph is shown in the flow chart.  A designated staff member of
    IPCS, responsible for the scientific quality of the document, serves
    as Responsible Officer (RO).  The IPCS Editor is responsible for
    layout and language.  The first draft, prepared by consultants or,
    more usually, staff from an IPCS Participating Institution, is based
    initially on data provided from the International Register of
    Potentially Toxic Chemicals, and reference data bases such as Medline
    and Toxline.

         The draft document, when received by the RO, may require an
    initial review by a small panel of experts to determine its scientific
    quality and objectivity.  Once the RO finds the document acceptable as
    a first draft, it is distributed, in its unedited form, to well over
    150 EHC contact points throughout the world who are asked to comment
    on its completeness and accuracy and, where necessary, provide
    additional material.  The contact points, usually designated by
    governments, may be Participating Institutions, IPCS Focal Points, or
    individual scientists known for their particular expertise.  Generally
    some four months are allowed before the comments are considered by the
    RO and author(s).  A second draft incorporating comments received and
    approved by the Director, IPCS, is then distributed to Task Group
    members, who carry out the peer review, at least six weeks before
    their meeting.

         The Task Group members serve as individual scientists, not as
    representatives of any organization, government or industry.  Their
    function is to evaluate the accuracy, significance and relevance of
    the information in the document and to assess the health and
    environmental risks from exposure to the chemical.  A summary and
    recommendations for further research and improved safety aspects are
    also required.  The composition of the Task Group is dictated by the
    range of expertise required for the subject of the meeting and by the
    need for a balanced geographical distribution.

         The three cooperating organizations of the IPCS recognize the
    important role played by nongovernmental organizations.
    Representatives from relevant national and international associations
    may be invited to join the Task Group as observers.  While observers
    may provide a valuable contribution to the process, they can only
    speak at the invitation of the Chairperson.

    Observers do not participate in the final evaluation of the chemical;
    this is the sole responsibility of the Task Group members.  When the
    Task Group considers it to be appropriate, it may meet in camera.

         All individuals who as authors, consultants or advisers
    participate in the preparation of the EHC monograph must, in addition
    to serving in their personal capacity as scientists, inform the RO if
    at any time a conflict of interest, whether actual or potential, could
    be perceived in their work.  They are required to sign a conflict of
    interest statement. Such a procedure ensures the transparency and
    probity of the process.

    FIGURE 1

         When the Task Group has completed its review and the RO is
    satisfied as to the scientific correctness and completeness of the
    document, it then goes for language editing, reference checking, and
    preparation of camera-ready copy.  After approval by the Director,
    IPCS, the monograph is submitted to the WHO Office of Publications for
    printing.  At this time a copy of the final draft is sent to the
    Chairperson and Rapporteur of the Task Group to check for any errors.

         It is accepted that the following criteria should initiate the
    updating of an EHC monograph: new data are available that would
    substantially change the evaluation; there is public concern for
    health or environmental effects of the agent because of greater
    exposure; an appreciable time period has elapsed since the last
    evaluation.

         All Participating Institutions are informed, through the EHC
    progress report, of the authors and institutions proposed for the
    drafting of the documents.  A comprehensive file of all comments
    received on drafts of each EHC monograph is maintained and is
    available on request.  The Chairpersons of Task Groups are briefed
    before each meeting on their role and responsibility in ensuring that
    these rules are followed.

    WHO TASK GROUP ON ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CRITERIA FOR ANTICOAGULANT
    RODENTICIDES

     Members

    Dr N. Gratz, Commugny, Switzerland

    Mr P. Howe, Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Huntingdon,
       Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom

    Dr W. Jacobs, Office of Pesticide Programs, US Environmental   
       Protection Agency, Washington, USA

    Mrs M. Palmborg, Swedish Poison Information Centre, Stockholm, Sweden

    Dr A.F. Pelfrène, Technology Sciences Group (TSG) International Inc.,
       Brussels, Belgium  (Chairman)

    Mr D. Renshaw, Health Aspects of Environment and Food (Medical),
       Department of Health, London, United Kingdom

    Dr M. Tasheva, National Centre of Hygiene, Medical Ecology and
       Nutrition, Sofia, Bulgaria  (Rapporteur)

    Dr C. Vermeer, University of Limburg, Maastricht, Netherlands

     Observers

    Dr A. Buckle, ZENECA Public Health, Haslemere, Surrey, United Kingdom
        (Representative of GIFAP)

    Dr Y. Cohet, Lipha SA, Lyon, France  (Representative of GIFAP)

     Secretariat

    Dr R. Plestina, International Programme on Chemical Safety, World
       Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland  (Secretary)

    ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CRITERIA FOR ANTICOAGULANT RODENTICIDES

         A WHO Task Group on Environmental Health Criteria for
    Anticoagulant Rodenticides met in Geneva from 14 to 18 November 1994.
    Dr R. Plestina, IPCS, welcomed the participants on behalf of
    Dr M. Mercier, Director of the IPCS, and the three IPCS cooperating
    organizations (UNEP/ILO/WHO).

       The first draft was prepared by Dr M. Tasheva of the National
    Centre of Hygiene, Medical Ecology and Nutrition, Sofia, Bulgaria. 
    The second draft was prepared by Dr R. Plestina, incorporating
    comments received following the circulation of the first draft to the
    IPCS contact points for Environmental Health Criteria monographs.  The
    Task Group reviewed and revised the draft document and made an
    evaluation of risks for human health and the environment from exposure
    to anticoagulant rodenticides.  Dr R. Plestina and Dr P.G. Jenkins,
    both members of the IPCS Central Unit, were responsible for the
    overall scientific content and technical editing, respectively.

       The efforts of all who helped in the preparation and finalization
    of the monograph are gratefully acknowledged.

    ABBREVIATIONS

    AAPCC    American Association of Poison Control Centers
    DT50     degradation time for 50% of a compound
    EC50     median effect concentration
    FD       fluorescence detection
    GC       gas chromatography
    HPLC     high-performance liquid chromatography
    I50      concentration of an inhibitor causing 50% inhibition of an
             enzyme under given conditions
    IUPAC    International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry Kal
             adsorption coefficient
    LD50     median lethal dose
    MS       mass spectrometry
    MTD      maximum tolerated dose
    NOAEL    no-observed-adverse-effect level
    NOEL     no-observed-effect level
    PT       prothrombin time
    PTT      partial thromboplastin time
    WISN     warfarin-induced skin necrosis

    INTRODUCTION

         The anticoagulants included in this review are those that are
    used as rodenticides.  The development of coumarin anticoagulants
    occurred during the Second World War and they were introduced as
    effective antithrombotic agents for treatment of thromboembolic
    disease in humans.  Warfarin has been used both as a drug and a
    rodenticide, and has been extensively evaluated.  Several
    hydroxycoumarin and indandione derivatives have been synthesized and
    introduced as effective rodenticides.  They act by interfering with
    the blood coagulation mechanism.

         The appearance of rat strains resistant to warfarin and some
    other anticoagulants has stimulated the development of more potent,
    second-generation anticoagulants, some of which are also "single dose"
    anticoagulants or "superwarfarins".

         Many anticoagulant rodenticides are known, but it is not the aim
    of this monograph to include all available information on each
    compound.  The purpose is to describe the general characteristics of
    anticoagulants, using suitable illustrations to indicate their impact
    on humans and the environment.

         A distinction needs to be made between the characteristics of the
    technical compounds and those of their formulated products concerning
    the risks that their use poses to human health and the environment.

    1.  SUMMARY

    1.1  General

         The anticoagulants described in this monograph are those used
    mainly in agriculture and urban rodent control.  Warfarin, the first
    widely used anticoagulant rodenticide, was introduced as an effective
    agent for treatment of thromboembolic disease in humans.

         Based on their chemical structure, anticoagulant rodenticides may
    be grouped into two categories, hydroxycoumarins and indandiones,
    although their mechanisms of action are similar.

    1.2  Properties and analytical methods

         Anticoagulant rodenticides come in a solid crystalline or powder
    form, and are slightly soluble in water.  Most of them are stable
    under normal storage conditions.

         Most of the procedures for the determination of anticoagulant
    rodenticides are based on high-performance liquid chromatography.

    1.3  Sources of human and environmental exposure

         First-generation hydroxycoumarins were introduced as rodenticides
    in the late 1940s.  The appearance of resistance to warfarin and other
    first-generation anticoagulants led to the development of more potent,
    second-generation anticoagulants.  The concentrations of active
    ingredients in baits vary according to the efficacy of the
    rodenticides.

    1.4  Environmental distribution, levels and exposures

         Anticoagulant rodenticides are used mainly as bait formulations. 
    Since their volatility is low, concentrations in the air will be
    negligible.  As they are only slightly soluble in water, their use is
    unlikely to be a source of water contamination.

         Since anticoagulant rodenticides are not intended for direct
    application to growing crops, no residues in plant foodstuffs are
    expected.

         Non-target vertebrates are exposed to rodenticides primarily
    through consumption of bait and secondarily from consumption of
    poisoned rodents.  Small pellets and whole grain baits are highly
    attractive to birds.

         Warfarin is used as a therapeutic agent for thromboembolic
    disease.

         There is a potential for occupational exposure to anticoagulant
    rodenticides during manufacture, formulation and bait application, but
    data on the levels of exposure are not available.

    1.5  Mode of action and metabolism

         Anticoagulant rodenticides are vitamin K antagonists.  The main
    site of their action is the liver, where several of the blood
    coagulation precursors undergo vitamin-K-dependent posttranslation
    processing before they are converted into the respective procoagulant
    zymogens.  The point of action appears to be the inhibition of K1
    epoxide reductase.

         Anticoagulant rodenticides are easily absorbed from the
    gastrointestinal tract, and may also be absorbed through the skin and
    respiratory system.  After oral administration, the major route of
    elimination in various species is through the faeces.

         The metabolic degradation of warfarin and indandiones in rats
    mainly involves hydroxylation.  However, the second-generation
    anticoagulants are mainly eliminated as unchanged compounds.  The low
    urinary excretion precludes isolation of metabolites from the urine.

         The liver is the main organ for accumulation and storage of
    rodenticide anticoagulants.  Accumulation also occurs in the fat.

    1.6  Effects on mammals and in vitro test systems

         Signs of poisoning in rats and mice are those associated with
    increased bleeding tendency.

         There is wide variation in the LD50 of anticoagulant
    rodenticides, toxicity being greatest by the oral route.  Dermal and
    inhalation toxicities of anticoagulants are also high.

         Some anticoagulants show a similar range of acute toxicity for
    non-target mammals as for target rodents, but toxicity spectra for
    anticoagulants may vary between species.

         Following repeated oral administration in rats, the main effects
    seen are those associated with the anticoagulant action.

         There are few data available on repeated exposure of non-rodent
    species.

         One study on warfarin in rats has indicated developmental
    effects.  Otherwise, there is no convincing evidence that
    anticoagulants are teratogenic in experimental animals.

         There is no evidence to suggest that any anticoagulant
    rodenticides are mutagenic, but there are insufficient data available
    on individual compounds to demonstrate an absence of mutagenicity. 
    Strain, sex and diet are important factors modifying the toxicity of
    anticoagulants in rodents.

         Poisoning incidents in domestic animals after consumption of
    anticoagulant baits have been reported.  Fatalities and severe
    clinical syndromes are generally due to the second-generation
    anticoagulants.  The major difference between warfarin and the other
    anticoagulants (both indandiones and second-generation
    hydroxycoumarins) is that they have a longer retention time in the
    body and consequently a more prolonged effect than warfarin. 
    Therefore in cases of poisoning, antidote treatment with vitamin K1
    needs to be continued for a longer period.

    1.7  Effects on humans

         Many poisoning incidents (both intentional and unintentional)
    have been reported.  A few cases of intoxications from occupational
    exposure to anticoagulants have also occurred. Symptoms of acute
    intoxication by anticoagulant rodenticides range from increased
    bleeding tendency in minor or moderate poisoning to massive
    haemorrhage in more severe cases.  The signs of poisoning develop with
    a delay of one to several days after absorption.

         Warfarin is associated in humans with the induction of
    developmental malformations when taken as a therapeutic agent during
    pregnancy.  No cases of developmental defects following the use of
    anticoagulants as rodenticides have been reported.

         The plasma prothrombin concentration is one guide to the severity
    of intoxication.  This is a more sensitive indication than overall
    tests such as prothrombin time.  In repeated occupational exposure,
    direct measurement of either trace amounts of circulating
    descarboxyprothrombin or circulating vitamin K 2,3-epoxide may provide
    a more sensitive assessment.

         Treatment of anticoagulant poisoning is graded according to the
    severity of intoxication.  Specific pharmacological treatment consists
    of parenteral administration of vitamin K1 with, in serious cases,
    co-administration of blood components.  Measurement of prothrombin
    time helps to determine the effectiveness and required duration of
    treatment.

    1.8  Effects on other organisms in the laboratory and field

         The possible effects of anticoagulant rodenticides on non-target
    organisms can be considered to fall into two categories: primary
    (direct poisoning through consumption of bait) and secondary (through
    consumption of poisoned rodents).

         In the form of the technical product, anticoagulants are highly
    toxic to fish.  As bait formulations they are unlikely to present any
    hazard because of their low water solubility.  For this reason, they
    will not be available to fish unless misused.

         Bird species vary in their susceptibility to anticoagulant
    rodenticides.  It is difficult to assess the risks to birds resulting
    from direct consumption because most published studies consist of
    toxicity trials in laboratory conditions.  The attractiveness of whole
    grain bait to small birds increases the risk in field conditions.

         Secondary toxicity laboratory studies with wildlife have shown
    that captive predators can be intoxicated by no-choice feeding with
    anticoagulant-poisoned or -dosed prey.  Some deaths of predators in
    the field have been reported.

    1.9  Evaluation and conclusion

         Anticoagulant rodenticides disrupt the normal blood-clotting
    mechanisms, resulting in increased bleeding tendency and,
    eventually, profuse haemorrhage.

         Unintentional exposure of the general population to anticoagulant
    rodenticides is unlikely.

         Occupational contact is a potential source of significant
    exposure.  It may occur during manufacture and formulation as well as
    during bait preparation and application.

         Anticoagulant rodenticide compounds are readily absorbed from the
    gastrointestinal tract, and through the skin and respiratory system. 
    The liver is the major organ for accumulation and storage.  The plasma
    prothrombin concentration is a suitable guide to the severity of acute
    intoxication and to the effectiveness and required duration of the
    therapy.

         The specific antidote is vitamin K1.

         The major difference between first- and second-generation
    anticoagulant rodenticides is that the latter have longer body
    retention and therefore tend to lead to a longer period of bleeding.

         Most anticoagulants are stable under conditions of normal use. 
    Their low water solubility and low concentration in baits make them
    unlikely to be a source of water contamination.  They also appear to
    bind quickly to soil particles, with very slow desorption and no
    leaching properties.

         Non-target organisms are potentially at risk from direct
    consumption of baits (primary hazard) and from eating poisoned rodents
    (secondary hazard).

    2.  IDENTITY, PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES, ANALYTICAL METHODS

    2.1  Identity

         Based on their chemical structure, anticoagulant rodenticides may
    be grouped into two categories:

    *    hydroxycoumarins:

    FIGURE 2

    *    indandiones:

    FIGURE 3

         The common and chemical names of the rodenticides are given in
    Table 1.  Trade names, chemical structures, RTECS and CAS numbers,
    molecular formulae and relative molecular masses are listed in
    Table 2.

    2.2  Physical and chemical properties

         Anticoagulant rodenticides are solids (crystalline or powders),
    slightly soluble in water (Table 3) and readily soluble in acetone. 
    Most of them are stable under normal storage conditions.


        Table 1.  Identity of anticoagulant rodenticides
                                                                                                                                                

    Common name                         CAS name                                                                IUPAC name
                                                                                                                                                

    First generation hydroxycoumarins

    Coumachlor       3-[1-(4-chlorophenyl)-3 oxobutyl]-4-hydroxy-                   3-[1-(4-chlorophenyl)-3-oxobutyl]-4-hydroxycoumarin
                     2H-1-benzopyran-2-one

    Coumafuryl       3-[1-(2-furanyl)-3 oxobutyl]-4-hydroxy-                        3-[1-(2-furyl)-3-oxobutyl]-4-hydroxycoumarin
                     2H-1-benzopyran-2-one

    Coumatetralyl    4-hydroxy-3-(1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-1-naphthalenyl)-               4-hydroxy-3-(1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-1-naphthyl) coumarin
                     2H-1-benzopyran-2-one

    Warfarin         4-hydroxy-3-(3-oxo-1-phenylbutyl-2H-1-benzopyran-2-one         (RS)4-hydroxy-3-(3-oxo-1-phenylbutyl) coumarin

    Second generation hydroxycoumarins

    Brodifacoum      3-[3-(4'-bromo-[1,1'-biphenyl]-4-yl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-       3-[3-(4'-bromobiphenyl-4-yl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-
                     1-naphthalenyl]-4-hydroxy-2H-1-benzopyran-2-one                1-naphthyl]-4-hydroxycoumarin

    Bromadiolone     3-[3-(4'-bromo-[1,1'-biphenyl]-4-yl)-3-hydroxy-1-              3-[3-(4'-bromobiphenyl-4-yl)-3-hydroxy-1-phenylpropyl]-
                     phenylpropyl]-4-hydroxy-2H-1-benzopyran-2-one                  4-hydroxycoumarin

    Difenacoum       3-[3-(1,1'-biphenyl)-4-yl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-1-                3-(3-biphenyl-4-yl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-1-naphthyl)-
                     naphthalenyl]-4-hydroxy-2H-1-benzopyran-2-one                  4-hydroxycoumarin

    Difethialone     3-[3-(4-bromo-[1,1'-biphenyl]-4-yl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-        3-[1RS,3RS;1RS,3SR)-3-(4'-bromobiphenyl-4-yl)-1,2,3,4-
                     1-naphthalenyl]-4-hydroxy-2H-1-benzothiopyran-2-one            tetrahydro-1-naphthyl]-4-hydroxy-1-benzothi-in-2-one

    Flocoumafen      4-hydroxy-3-[1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-3-[4-[-(trifluoromethyl)       4-hydroxy-3-[1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-3-[4-
                     phenyl]methoxy]phenyl-1-naphthalenyl]-2H-1-benzopyran-2-one    (4-trifluoromethylbenzyloxy)phenyl]-1-naphthyl] coumarin
                                                                                                                                                

    Table 1 (contd).
                                                                                                                                                

    Common name                         CAS name                                                                IUPAC name
                                                                                                                                                

    Indandione derivatives

    Chlorophacinone  2-[(4-chlorophenyl)phenylacetyl]-1H-indene-1,3 (2H)-dione      2-[2-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-phenylacetyl]indan-1,3-dione

    Diphacinone      2-(diphenylacetyl)-1H-indene-1,3 (2H)-dione                    2-(diphenylacetyl)indan-1,3-dione

    Pindone          2-(2,2-dimethyl-1-oxopropyl)-1H-indene-1,3 (2H)-dione          2-pivaloylindan-1,3-dione

    Valone           2-(3-methyl-1-oxopropyl)-1H-indene-1,3 (2H)-dione              2-isovaleryl-1,3-indandione
                                                                                                                                                

    Table 2.  Names, structures and identification details
                                                                                                                                                

    Common name         Trade/other              Chemical structure     RTECS          CAS             Molecular        Relative molecular
                        names                                           number         number          formula          mass
                                                                                                                                                

    Brodifacoum         Finale                                          GN4934750      56073-10-0      C31H23BrO3       523.4
                        Folgorat
                        Havoc
                        Klerat
                        Matikus
                        Mouser
                        Ratak +
                        Rodend
                        Talon
                        Volak
                        Volid

                                                 FIGURE 4
                                                                                                                                                

    Table 2 (cont'd)
                                                                                                                                                

    Common name         Trade/other              Chemical structure     RTECS          CAS             Molecular        Relative molecular
                        names                                           number         number          formula          mass
                                                                                                                                                

    Bromadiolone        Apobas, Bromard,                                GN4934700      28772-56-7      C30H23BrO4       527.4
                        Bromorat, Bromatrol,
                        Contrac, Deadline,
                        Hurex, Lanirat,
                        Maki, Morfaron,
                        Musal, Ramortal,
                        Ratimon, Rodine-c,
                        Slaymor, Super-caid,
                        Topidon

                                                 FIGURE 5
                                                                                                                                                

    Table 2 (cont'd)
                                                                                                                                                

    Common name         Trade/other              Chemical structure     RTECS          CAS             Molecular        Relative molecular
                        names                                           number         number          formula          mass
                                                                                                                                                

    Chlorophacinone     Caid                                            NK5335000      3691-35-8       C23H15ClO3       374.8
                        Delta
                        Drat
                        Lepit
                        Liphadione
                        Microzul
                        Muriol
                        Patrol
                        Quick
                        Raviac
                        Redentin OC
                        Rozol
                        Saviac

                                                 FIGURE 6
                                                                                                                                                

    Table 2 (cont'd)
                                                                                                                                                

    Common name         Trade/other              Chemical structure     RTECS          CAS             Molecular        Relative molecular
                        names                                           number         number          formula          mass
                                                                                                                                                

    Coumachlor          Ratilan                                         GN4830000      81-82-3         C19H15ClO4       342.8
                        Tomorin
                        (Discontinued by
                        Ciba-Geigy in 1984)

                                                 FIGURE 7
                                                                                                                                                

    Table 2 (cont'd)
                                                                                                                                                

    Common name         Trade/other              Chemical structure     RTECS          CAS             Molecular        Relative molecular
                        names                                           number         number          formula          mass
                                                                                                                                                

    Coumafuryl          Fumarin                                         GN4850000      117-52-2        C17H14O5         298.3
                        (Discontinued by
                        Rhône-Poulenc)
                        Fumasol
                        Kill-ko rat
                        Krumkil
                        Kumatox
                        Lurat
                        Mouse blues
                        Ratafin
                        Rat-a-way

                                                 FIGURE 8
                                                                                                                                                

    Table 2 (cont'd)
                                                                                                                                                

    Common name         Trade/other              Chemical structure     RTECS          CAS             Molecular        Relative molecular
                        names                                           number         number          formula          mass
                                                                                                                                                

    Coumatetralyl       Racumin                                         GN7630000      5836-29-3       C19H16O3         292.4
                        Raukumin 57
                        Rodentin

                                                 FIGURE 9
                                                                                                                                                

    Table 2 (cont'd)
                                                                                                                                                

    Common name         Trade/other              Chemical structure     RTECS          CAS             Molecular        Relative molecular
                        names                                           number         number          formula          mass
                                                                                                                                                

    Difenacoum          Compo                                           GN4934500      56073-07-5      C31H24O3         444.5
                        Diphenacoum
                        Matrak
                        Neosorexa
                        Rastop
                        Ratak
                        Ratrick
                        Silo

                                                 FIGURE 10
                                                                                                                                                

    Table 2 (cont'd)
                                                                                                                                                

    Common name         Trade/other              Chemical structure     RTECS          CAS             Molecular        Relative molecular
                        names                                           number         number          formula          mass
                                                                                                                                                

    Difethialone        Baraki                                          DM0013800      104653-34-1     C31H23BrO2S      539.5
                        Frap
                        Quell

                                                 FIGURE 11
                                                                                                                                                

    Table 2 (cont'd)
                                                                                                                                                

    Common name         Trade/other              Chemical structure     RTECS          CAS             Molecular        Relative molecular
                        names                                           number         number          formula          mass
                                                                                                                                                

    Diphacinone         Diphacine                                       NK5600000      82-66-6         C23H16O3         340.4
                        Gold Crest
                        Kill-ko rat killer
                        Pid
                        Promar
                        Ramik
                        Ratindan 1

                                                 FIGURE 12
                                                                                                                                                

    Table 2 (cont'd)
                                                                                                                                                

    Common name         Trade/other              Chemical structure     RTECS          CAS             Molecular        Relative molecular
                        names                                           number         number          formula          mass
                                                                                                                                                

    Flocoumafen         Stratagem                                       DJ3100300      90035-08-8      C33H25F3O4       542.6
                        Storm

                                                 FIGURE 13
                                                                                                                                                

    Table 2 (cont'd)
                                                                                                                                                

    Common name         Trade/other              Chemical structure     RTECS          CAS             Molecular        Relative molecular
                        names                                           number         number          formula          mass
                                                                                                                                                

    Pindone             Pivaldione                                      NK6300000      83-26-1         C14H14O3         230.3
                        Pival
                        Pivalyn
                        Tri-ban

                                                 FIGURE 14
                                                                                                                                                

    Table 2 (cont'd)
                                                                                                                                                

    Common name         Trade/other              Chemical structure     RTECS          CAS             Molecular        Relative molecular
                        names                                           number         number          formula          mass
                                                                                                                                                

    Valone              Motomco trading                                 NK5775000      83-28-3         C14H14O3         230.3
                        powder

                                                 FIGURE 15
                                                                                                                                                

    Table 2 (cont'd)
                                                                                                                                                

    Common name         Trade/other              Chemical structure     RTECS          CAS             Molecular        Relative molecular
                        names                                           number         number          formula          mass
                                                                                                                                                

    Warfarin            Arthrombine-K                                   GN4550000      81-81-2         C19H16O4         308.4
                        Dethmore
                        Panwarfin
                        Warfarat
                        Warfarin +
                        Warficide
                        Zoocoumarin

                                                 FIGURE 16
                                                                                                                                                

    Table 3.  Water solubility and vapour pressure of various anticoagulant rodenticides
                                                                                                                                                

    Rodenticide                                         Solubility                                      Vapour pressure
                                                                                                                                  
                       in water (mg/litre)          at temperature (°C)    at pH               mPa              at temperature (°C)
                                                                                                                                                

    Brodifacoum           < 10                             20               7                 < 0.13                  25
    Bromadiolone          19                               20                                 0.002                   20
    Chlorophacinone       100                              20                                 negligible              20
    Coumachlor            0.5                              20               4.5               < 10                    20
    Coumatetralyl         4                                20               4.2               8.5 × 10-6              20
                          20                               20               5
                          425                              20               7
    Difenacoum            < 10                             20               7                 0.16                    45
    Difethialone          0.39                             25                                 0.074                   25
    Diphacinone           0.3                                                                 13.7 × 10-6             25
    Flocoumafen           1.1                              22                                 0.133 × 10-6            25
    Pindone               18                               25                                 very low                25
    Warfarin              practically insoluble
                                                                                                                                                
    

    2.3  Analytical methods

         Most of the procedures for the determination of anticoagulant
    rodenticides are based on high-performance liquid chromatography
    (Hunter, 1983; Hoogenboom & Rammell, 1983; Murphy et al., 1989;
    O'Bryan & Constable, 1991; Chalermchaikit et al., 1993; Kelly et al.,
    1993).

         Warfarin is an acid which, in its hydrogenated form, is
    practically insoluble in distilled water.  At neutral or higher pH,
    however, it is ionized and as such it readily dissolves in water.  In
    addition, compounds contaminating the water (such as proteins or
    detergents) may substantially increase the solubility of warfarin.

         Hunter (1983) developed a multi-residue method for the
    determination of warfarin, coumatetralyl, bromadiolone, difenacoum and
    brodifacoum in animal tissues by high-performance liquid
    chromatography with fluorescence detection.  A chloroformacetone (1:1)
    mixture was significantly better than chloroform for the extraction of
    residues of these rodenticides from liver tissues.  Detection limits
    in animal tissues of 2 µg/kg for coumatetralyl, difenacoum and
    brodifacoum, 10 µg/kg for bromadiolone, and 20 µg/kg for warfarin
    could be routinely achieved.

         Felice et al. (1991) developed a reversed-phase liquid
    chromatographic method with fluorescence detection for multicomponent
    determination of the above-mentioned five rodenticides in blood serum
    with detection limits of 10 to 20 ng/ml.  Acetonitrile was used for
    the extraction.

         Braselton et al. (1992) developed a special method for confirming
    the presence of indandione rodenticides (diphacinone and
    chlorophacinone) in intoxicated domestic animals by using mass
    spectrometry/mass spectrometry with collision-activated dissociation. 
    More details of analytical methods for individual rodenticides are
    given in Table 4.


        Table 4.  Methods for the determination of anticoagulant rodenticides
                                                                                                                                                

    Sample type          Extraction                     Analytical   Limit of            Rodenticide                       Reference
                                                        method       detection
                                                                                                                                                

    Animal tissues    Chloroform-acetone (1:1)          HPLC/FD      2 µg/kg        coumatetralyl, difenacoum,         Hunter (1983)
    brodifacoum
                                                                     10 µg/kg       bromadiolone                       Hunter (1983)
                                                                     20 µg/kg       warfarin                           Hunter (1983)

    Animal tissues    Chloroform-acetone (1:1)          HPLC/FDa     10 µg/kg       warfarin                           Hunter (1985)
                                                                     2 µg/kg        other rodenticides                 Hunter (1985)

    Serum             Acetonitrile and diethyl ether    HPLC         10 µg/litre    brodifacoum, coumatetralyl,        Felice et al. (1991)
                                                                                    difenacoum
                                                                     20 µg/litre    bromadiolone, warfarin             Felice et al. (1981)

    Serum             Acetonitrile and diethyl ether    HPLC         1 µg/litre     brodifacoum                        Felice & Murphy (1989)

    Serum             twice with diethyl ether and      HPLC/FD      3 µg/litre     brodifacoum                        Murphy et al. (1989)
                      twice with acetonitrile-ether
                      (1:1)
                                                                                                                                                

    Table 4 (contd).
                                                                                                                                                

    Sample type          Extraction                     Analytical   Limit of            Rodenticide                       Reference
                                                        method       detection
                                                                                                                                                

    Plasma            Acetonitrile-ethyl ether (9:1)    HPLC/FD      2 µg/litre     brodifacoum; no interference       O'Bryan & Constable
                                                                                    with bromadiolone,                 (1991)
    Liver tissue                                                     5 µg/kg        coumarin, difenacoum,
                                                                                    diphacinone, warfarin
                                                                                    and vitamin K1

    Liver tissue      Chloroform and acetone            GC/MS        60 µg/kg       protocol did not differentiate     Ray et al. (1989)
                                                                                    between brodifacoum and
                                                                                    bromadiolone
                                                                                                                                                

    a   Post-column pH-switching fluorescence detection
    

    3.  SOURCES OF HUMAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE

    3.1  Natural occurrence

         Anticoagulant rodenticides do not occur naturally in the
    environment, although some plants do contain coumarinic derivatives. 
    Huebner & Link (1941), Overman et al. (1944) and Alstad et al. (1985)
    described the anticoagulant properties of dicumarol found in spoiled
    sweet clover and in connection with haemorrhagic disease in cattle.

    3.2  Anthropogenic sources

         Anticoagulant rodenticides are used worldwide, but figures for
    the total world production are not available.

         First-generation hydroxycoumarins were introduced as rodenticides
    in the late 1940s.  The appearance of resistance to warfarin and other
    early anticoagulant rodenticides stimulated the development of
    second-generation anticoagulants.  About 95% of all commensal rodent
    control in the USA is carried out with anticoagulants (Marsh, 1985a). 
    More than 50% of rodenticides used by professional pest controllers in
    the USA contain brodifacoum (Dubock, 1986).

         Depending on the toxicity of the rodenticide, the concentration
    of the active ingredient varies from 0.005 to 0.05% for indandiones
    and second-generation hydroxycoumarins and from 0.025 to 0.05% for
    first-generation anticoagulants.

         Anticoagulant rodenticides are available in a variety of
    different formulations, including paraffin wax blocks, whole grain
    baits, pelleted baits and tracking powder (FAO, 1979).  Baits are the
    most widely used formulations for rodent control.

         Some manufacturers have added bittering agents, such as Bitrex
    (denatonium benzoate), to anticoagulant baits.  According to Kaukeinen
    & Buckle (1992), adult humans found wax-block and pelleted placebo
    baits containing denatonium benzoate (10 mg/kg) to be unpalatable. 
    However, the concentration of Bitrex cannot be increased to levels
    that would make baits unpalatable to target rodents, and there is no
    evidence that concentrations of Bitrex that target rodents readily
    accept will deter bait-eating by non-target animals or by children
    under 14 months of age.

    4.  ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPORT, DISTRIBUTION AND TRANSFORMATION

    4.1  Transport and distribution between media

    4.1.1  Air, water and soil

         Since anticoagulant rodenticides are generally used as bait
    formulations and have low volatility, increased levels in the air are
    unlikely.  As mentioned in section 2.2, most anticoagulants are
    slightly soluble in water and therefore their use is unlikely to be a
    source of water pollution.

         Newby & White (1978) studied the adsorption and desorption of
    14C-brodifacoum in soil under laboratory conditions. Adsorption
    coefficients (kd) for course sand (pH 6.6), sandy clay loam (pH 7.1)
    and calcareous sandy loam (pH 7.6) were 625, 1320 and 1180,
    respectively, indicating strong adsorption to soil particles. 
    Adsorption equilibria were established fairly rapidly with the large
    water:soil ratios used and despite very low brodifacoum water
    solubility.  Desorption was reported to be very slow and much less
    than that required for a reversible interaction.

         Lewis (1992b) applied 14C-difenacoum at 0.2 mg/kg (dry weight)
    to a sandy soil with low humous content.  After 142 days of incubation
    (the approximate half-life of difenacoum in this soil type), two soil
    samples were transferred to the top of soil columns.  The columns were
    eluted with deionized water at a rate and amount equivalent to
    approximately 200 mm of rain falling onto the soil surface area
    (91.6 cm2) for 50 h.  The percentages of applied radioactivity
    present in the leachates were 0.41 and 0.47%, representing only a very
    small amount of leaching under these test conditions.

         The leaching characteristics of aged soil residues of 14C-
    brodifacoum in four soil types were investigated.  14C-
    Brodifacoum was applied to soil at a nominal application rate of
    0.4 mg/kg and incubated under aerobic conditions for 30 days.  Samples
    were taken and transferred to soil columns.  After leaching, most of
    the radioactivity applied to the soil was recovered in the top segment
    of each column.  No detectable levels of 14C residues were found in
    the leachates.  The results indicated that 14C-brodifacoum was
    effectively immobile in all the soils tested (Jackson & Hall, 1992).

         A study was carried out with 14C-bromadiolone in four types of
    soil.  With a soil rich in clay and organic compounds, bromadiolone
    stayed in the superficial layer and scarcely moved.  However, in soil
    poor in clay and organic compounds, 67% of the added bromadiolone was
    eluted (Spare et al., 1980).

    4.1.2  Vegetation and wildlife

         Since anticoagulant rodenticides are not intended for direct
    application to growing crops, no residues in plant food stuffs are
    expected.  Unlike conventional crop protection products, which must be
    applied over relatively large crop areas, rodenticides are applied to
    discrete sites in the form of low concentration baits.  Even if the
    bait is spilled, it will not be taken up by plants.

         Small pellets and whole grain baits are highly attractive to
    birds and other non-target vertebrates.  The formulation in wax blocks
    consequently decreases the risk of primary poisoning of non-target
    species.

         Rodenticides may present a risk not only of primary poisoning
    (from direct consumption of the bait) but also of secondary poisoning
    (from consumption of poisoned rodents), in spite of the fact that many
    of the target rodents die below ground in their burrows (Gorenzel et
    al., 1982).  Commensal and wild rodents poisoned by anticoagulants may
    lead to the death of cats, pigs, foxes and birds of prey.  The risk of
    secondary poisoning depends mainly on the extent to which predators
    feed on the target animals (Dubock, 1986).

    4.2  Transformation

    4.2.1  Biodegradation

         Coveney & Forbes (1987) studied the degradation of flocoumafen in
    rat carcasses, rat faeces, loose grain and wax block baits placed on
    small soil plots.  Overall losses of flocoumafen ranged from 85% to
    95% over the 12-month study.  The majority of the rodenticide present
    in samples collected after 4 months was found in the upper 15 cm of
    the soil.  Only very small quantities were found in the lower soil
    layers.

         The degradation of 14C-difenacoum was studied in two standard
    soils under controlled conditions for a period of 108 days.
    Degradation time (DT50) values for the two soils were 146 and 439
    days, indicating that difenacoum is a relatively long-lived compound
    in soils (Lewis, 1992a).

         Hall & Priestley (1992) monitored the metabolism of 14C-
    brodifacoum in soil under aerobic conditions after applying it
    at a nominal rate of 0.4 mg/kg and incubating for up to 52 weeks.  A
    mean total of 35.8% of the applied radioactivity was recovered as
    14CO2 within the test period.  14C-Brodifacoum was the major
    radiolabelled component in the soil extracts throughout the 52 weeks. 
    Under the conditions of the study the half-life of brodifacoum was
    calculated to be 157 days.

         A study was carried out with 14C-bromadiolone in four types of
    soil.  The rodenticide was degraded significantly with half-lives
    ranging from 1.8 to 7.4 days (Wölkl & Galicia, 1992).

    4.2.2  Abiotic degradation

    4.2.2.1  Photolysis

         A photolysis study was carried out with 14C-bromadiolone
    (1 mg/litre) in a solution at pH 7.3 (Spare, 1982).  The rodenticide
    was very quickly degraded by exposure to artificial sunlight with a
    half-life of 2.1 h.

         The photolytic stability of 14C-difenacoum was investigated in
    sterile buffered aqueous solutions of pH 5, 7 and 9 over a 24-h
    irradiation period.  The photolytic half-lives for total difenacoum
    were calculated to be 3.26, 8.05 and 7.32 h at pH 5, 7 and 9,
    respectively (Hall et al., 1992).

    4.2.2.2  Hydrolysis

         Lewis (1992c) studied the stability of 14C-difenacoum in
    sterile buffered aqueous solutions of pH 5, 7 and 9.  No hydrolysis
    was observed at pH 5, at pH 7 there was very slow hydrolysis
    (half-life estimated to be 847-1332 days), and at pH 9 the half-life
    was estimated to be 77-85 days.

         Jackson et al. (1991) studied the hydrolytic stability of
    14C-brodifacoum (0.04 mg/kg) in sterile buffered aqueous solutions
    at pH 5, 7 and 9 over a 30-day period.  The hydrolytic half-life of
    brodifacoum at pH 7 and 9 was found to be much greater than 30 days,
    but precise calculation was not possible because the degradation seen
    after one day did not continue.

         Spare (1992) demonstrated that 14C-bromadiolone was slowly
    hydrolysed in pH 5 buffer, with an estimated half-life of 392 days. 
    No degradation was observed at pH 7 and 9.

         In the absence of a co-solvent, bromadiolone has a half-life of
    67 days at pH 7 and 20°C (Morin, 1988).  Degradation is more
    significant in the presence of H3O+ ions, in saline water and at
    increased temperatures.

    5.  ENVIRONMENTAL LEVELS AND HUMAN EXPOSURE

    5.1  Environmental levels

         There is no information available on concentrations of
    anticoagulant rodenticides in air, water and soil.

         Since anticoagulant rodenticides are not intended for direct
    application to growing crops, no residues in plants are expected.

         Residues of difenacoum and brodifacoum were detected in the
    bodies of 15 out of a total of 145 dead barn owls  (Tylo alba) received
    from various parts of the United Kingdom during the period 1983-1989. 
    Levels of difenacoum were in the range of 0.005-0.106 mg/kg body
    weight, whilst levels of brodifacoum were in the range
    0.019-0.515 mg/kg body weight (Newton et al., 1990).

         Merson & Byers (1984) analysed eastern screech owl  (Otus asio)
    pellets following the application of 0.001% brodifacoum to an orchard
    for rodent control.  The brodifacoum residues in pellet samples ranged
    from 0.06 to 0.09 mg/kg, indicating some exposure of the birds. 
    Hegdal & Colvin (1988) analysed screech owl tissues up to 52 days
    after application of brodifacoum in an orchard.  Brodifacoum was
    detected in livers (detection limit = 0.3 mg/kg) from 9 out of 16
    birds, the concentrations ranging from 0.3 to 0.8 mg/kg.  No
    detectable residues were found in the remainder of the carcasses
    (detection limit = 0.1 mg/kg).

         Hegdal & Blaskiewicz (1984) sampled six barn owls of different
    ages in the vicinity of farm buildings treated with brodifacoum. 
    Analysis of carcasses revealed only one with trace (< 0.05 mg/kg)
    levels of brodifacoum; the other carcasses did not contain detectable
    concentrations.

         Brodifacoum residues in the liver, muscle and fatty tissue of
    rabbits poisoned during field trials with bait containing 0.005%
    active ingredient were 4.4, 0.26 and 0.86 mg/kg, respectively.  During
    the same field trials, brodifacoum residues in seven poisoned birds of
    various species ranged from 0.12 to 8.1 mg/kg in the liver, < 0.05 to
    0.14 mg/kg in muscle and < 0.05 to 0.25 mg/kg in fatty tissue (Rammel
    et al., 1984).

    5.2  General population exposure

         As mentioned in the previous section, residues are unlikely to be
    found in plant foods.  The use of dry baits to protect grain stores
    can result in contamination of the stored food.  Although on average
    the concentration of residues would be expected to be low, occasional
    areas of high concentration can occur.

         With respect to residues in animals used for human food (pigs,
    sheep and birds), there are no residue data concerning animals that
    have survived anticoagulant poisoning.  It should be emphasized,
    however, that in some countries rodents are used as food.

         Warfarin is widely used as a therapeutic agent.

    5.3  Occupational exposure

         Exposure may occur during manufacture, formulation and bait
    application.  The available information is discussed in section 8.2.

    6.  MODE OF ACTION AND METABOLISM

    6.1  Vitamin K and its antagonists

         Vitamin K is a collective name for a number of related compounds,
    which all may function as co-enzymes for the enzyme gamma-glutamate
    carboxylase.  They all contain the functional naphthoquinone ring
    structure, but differ in their aliphatic side chains.  Vitamin K1
    (phytomenadione) contains a side chain composed of four isoprenoid
    residues, one of which is unsaturated.  The vitamin K2 compounds
    (menaquinones) have side chains which vary from 1 to 13 isoprenoid
    residues, all of which are unsaturated.  They are generally referred
    to as MK-n, where n is the number of isoprenoid residues.  Vitamin
    K3 (menadione) has no side chain, but upon ingestion it is converted
    into MK-4 by a liver enzyme.  The two products commercially available
    for human use are K1 and MK-4. Both are equally active, but for some
    reason K1 is almost exclusively used in Europe and North America,
    whereas MK-4 (also known as menatetrenone) is used in Asia, notably
    Japan.  K3 is not used any more for humans because of its adverse
    side effect, haemolysis, but is frequently added to animal food.

         Both 4-hydroxycoumarin derivatives and indandiones (also known as
    oral anticoagulants) are antagonists of vitamin K.  Their use as
    rodenticides is based on the inhibition of the vitamin K-dependent
    step in the synthesis of a number of blood coagulation factors.  The
    vitamin K-dependent proteins involved in the coagulation cascade
    (Fig. 1) are the procoagulant factors II (prothrombin), VII
    (proconvertin), IX (Christmas factor) and X (Stuart-Prower factor),
    and the coagulation-inhibiting proteins C and S.  All these proteins
    are synthesized in the liver.  Before they are released into the
    circulation the various precursor proteins undergo substantial
    (intracellular) post-translational modification.  Vitamin K functions
    as a co-enzyme in one of these modifications, namely the carboxylation
    at well-defined positions of 10-12 glutamate residues into
    gamma-carboxyglutamate (Gla). The presence of these Gla residues is
    essential for the procoagulant activity of the various coagulations
    factors. Vitamin K hydroquinone (KH2) is the active co-enzyme, and its
    oxidation to vitamin K 2,3-epoxide (KO) provides the energy required
    for the carboxylation reaction.  The epoxide is than recycled in two
    reduction steps mediated by the enzyme KO reductase (Fig. 2).  The
    latter enzyme is the target enzyme for coumarin anticoagulants.  Their
    blocking of the KO reductase leads to a rapid exhaustion of the supply
    of KH2, and thus to an effective prevention of the formation of Gla
    residues.  This leads to an accumulation of non-carboxylated
    coagulation factor precursors in the liver.  In some cases these
    precursors are processed further without being carboxylated, and
    (depending on the species) may appear in the circulation.  At that

    stage the under-carboxylated proteins are designated as descarboxy
    coagulation factors (Stenflo et al., 1974; Nelsestuen et al., 1974). 
    Normal coagulation factors circulate in the form of zymogens, which
    can only participate in the coagulation cascade after being activated
    by limited proteolytic degradation (see Fig. 1).  Descarboxy
    coagulation factors have no procoagulant activity (i.e. they cannot be
    activated) and neither they can be converted into the active zymogens
    by vitamin K action. Whereas in anticoagulated humans high levels of
    circulating descarboxy coagulation factors are detectable, these
    levels are negligible in warfarin-treated rats and mice.  Reviews by
    Vermeer (1990) and Furie & Furie (1990) give further details.

         Leck & Park (1981) compared the effects of warfarin and
    brodifacoum on vitamin K metabolism and blood-clotting factor activity
    in warfarin-susceptible and warfarin-resistant rats.  In
    warfarin-susceptible rats both brodifacoum and warfarin induced a
    significant increase in the circulating KO (measured as the KO/K ratio
    using 3H-vitamin K1), indicating that KO reductase is the target
    enzyme for both drugs.  However, whereas warfarin (1 mg/kg) only
    inhibited the KO reductase in the susceptible strain, brodifacoum
    (1 mg/kg) produced the same decrease of plasma prothrombin
    concentration in both warfarin-susceptible and warfarin-resistant
    animals.

         The KO/K ratio in warfarin-resistant rats is five times higher
    than in warfarin-susceptible animals.  This is explained by the fact
    that the hepatic KO reductase in the resistant animals has not only a
    reduced affinity for warfarin, but also for KO.  Hence the vitamin K
    requirement of warfarin-resistant animals is 5-10 times higher than
    that of warfarin-susceptible ones.  Second-generation anticoagulants,
    if given in doses which cause anticoagulation, further increase the
    KO/K ratio (Leck & Park, 1981).

         The much stronger potency of difenacoum and brodifacoum, as
    vitamin K-antagonists, was reported by Park & Leck (1982), who
    concluded that in the case of poisoning with these second-generation
    anticoagulants it will be necessary to give repeated and frequent
    doses of vitamin K to maintain clotting factor synthesis.  The potency
    of second-generation anticoagulants can be partly explained by their
    highly lipophilic nature, which enables them to bind strongly to
    membranes.  Their target enzyme KO reductase is an integral membrane
    protein with, in addition, a highly lipophilic nature.  It is to be
    expected that the dissociation of enzyme/inhibitor complexes will be
    extremely slow.  Moreover, their effectiveness in warfarin-resistant
    rats demonstrates that the mutation leading to warfarin resistance
    does not significantly affect their interaction with the KO reductase.

    FIGURE 17

    FIGURE 18

         Vermeer & Soute (1992) compared the inhibition of each of the
    three enzymes from the vitamin K cycle by four anticoagulants
    (warfarin, flocoumafen, difenacoum and brodifacoum).  The studies were
    performed using  in vitro enzyme systems prepared from rat, cow and
    human liver.  It was shown that in all three species the inhibitor
    concentration required for 50% inhibition (I50) was comparable for
    the KO reductase and K reductase activity, but that the I50 for
    gamma-glutamylcarboxylase was 2-3 orders of magnitude higher. It was
    concluded that for all four anticoagulants the reductions of KO and K
    are the target reactions for inhibition.  Moreover, it was found that
    there is no species specificity of the inhibitors, which means that
    they are equally active in cell-free systems derived from rat, cow and
    human liver.  Any species-dependent differences which might be found
     in vivo will presumably be brought about by a different
    pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic behaviour in these species.

    6.2  Metabolism

    6.2.1  Absorption, distribution and elimination

         Anticoagulant rodenticides are easily absorbed through the
    gastrointestinal tract, skin and respiratory system.

         After a single oral dose of 14C-flocoumafen (0.14 mg/kg body
    weight) to rats, the absorption into blood was rapid, reaching maximum
    concentrations (0.03-0.05 µg/ml) in plasma within 4 h (Huckle et al.,
    1989).

         The major route of elimination in rats and sheep after oral
    administration of anticoagulants is through the faeces.  The
    intestinal levels of brodifacoum in rats began increasing 24 to 72 h
    after an oral dose of 0.2 mg/kg body weight (Bachmann & Sullivan,
    1983).  Faecal elimination of radiolabelled flocoumafen following an
    oral dose of 0.14 mg/kg body weight accounted for 23-26% of the dose
    over the 7-day period; approximately half of this was recovered within
    the first 24 h.  Less than 0.5% of the dose appeared in the urine
    within 7 days (Huckle et al., 1989).

         After single oral administration of brodifacoum (0.2 and 2 mg/kg
    body weight) to sheep, about 20% and 30%, respectively, was excreted
    in the faeces within 8 days (Laas et al., 1985).

         A larger proportion of a percutaneous dose of 14C-flocoumafen
    (0.17 mg/kg body weight) dissolved in acetone was found in the urine
    of rats (10%) than in the case of an equivalent oral dose (less than
    0.5%) over a 7-day period.  Faecal elimination accounted for 31% of
    the percutaneous dose (Huckle & Warburton, 1986b).

         After oral 14C-flocoumafen doses of 0.02 mg/kg body weight or
    0.1 mg/kg body weight were given to rats, once weekly for up to 14
    weeks, approximately one-third of each weekly low dose was eliminated
    through the faeces within 3 days, mostly within the first 24 h.  At
    the higher dose the elimination ranged from 18% after the first dose
    to 59% after the tenth dose (Huckle et al., 1988).

         Following repeated oral administration of 14C-flocoumafen to
    rats at 0.02 mg/kg body weight per week for 14 weeks or 0.1 mg/kg body
    weight per week for 10 weeks, appreciable accumulation was seen in the
    liver.  At both dose levels tissue concentrations were highest in the
    liver, followed by the kidney > skin > muscle > fat > blood.  The
    hepatic residue in the low-dose group ranged from 0.1 mg/kg tissue
    after one week to 2.1 mg/kg by week 14 (Huckle & Warburton, 1986a).

         Brodifacoum could not be detected in the omental fat of sheep 8
    days after the oral administration of 0.2 and 2 mg/kg body weight
    (Laas et al., 1985).

    6.2.2  Metabolic transformation

         Warfarin is readily hydroxylated  in vitro and  in vivo by rat
    liver microsomal enzymes to form 6-, 8- and, especially
    7-hydroxy-warfarin (Ullrich & Staundinger, 1968; Ikeda et al.,
    1986a,b).  These inactive metabolites are to some extent conjugated
    with glucuronic acid, undergo enterohepatic recirculation, and are
    excreted in the urine and faeces (Ellenhorn & Barceloux, 1988).

         The metabolic pattern of indandiones in rats also mainly involves
    hydroxylation (Yu et al., 1982).

         The second-generation anticoagulants have mainly been found as
    unchanged compounds (Bachmann & Sullivan, 1983; Huckle et al., 1988). 
    The low urinary elimination following oral dosing has precluded
    accurate isolation of metabolites in urine (Warburton & Hutson, 1985;
    Waburton & Huckle, 1986; Huckle & Warburton, 1986a).

         Following administration of flocoumafen, liver residues in rats
    consisted mainly of unchanged flocoumafen, although in a repeat dose
    study a polar metabolite was detected.  Eight urinary metabolites were
    detected after percutaneous exposure to 14C-flocoumafen (Huckle &
    Warburton, 1986b).

         Studies in male Japanese quail have shown more rapid metabolism
    and elimination than in the rat following an oral dose of
    14C-flocoumafen.  Up to 12 radioactive components were detected in
    the excreta (Huckle & Warburton, 1986c).

         Bromadiolone, brodifacoum and coumatetralyl were also found in
    rats as unchanged parent compounds, whereas in the case of difenacoum
    metabolites predominated (Parmar et al., 1987).  The metabolism and
    elimination of the difenacoum trans isomer was more rapid than for the
    cis isomer (Bratt, 1987).

         The suggestion that the anticoagulant effect in rats is mediated
    by the unchanged compound itself rather than by its metabolites has
    been confirmed by the effects of phenobarbital and SKF525A
    pretreatments on the general pattern of responses to warfarin and
    brodifacoum (Bachmann & Sullivan, 1983).

    6.2.3  Retention and turnover

         Metabolic studies of anticoagulant rodenticides show that the
    liver is the main organ of accumulation and storage. Liver
    concentrations of brodifacoum after a single oral dose of 0.2 mg/kg
    body weight to rats remained high and relatively constant for 96 h,
    with a maximum of 5.0 mg/kg after 50 h (Bachmann & Sullivan, 1983).

         A high degree of body retention was found 7 days after a single
    oral dose of 0.14 mg/kg body weight 14C-flocoumafen (74-76% of the
    administered dose); approximately half the dose was found in the liver
    (Huckle et al., 1989).

         Brodifacoum was detected in the liver of sheep 128 days after
    oral administration (0.2 and 2 mg/kg body weight) in concentrations of
    0.64 and 1.07 mg/kg dry weight (equivalent to 0.22 and 0.36 mg/kg wet
    weight), respectively.  The peak levels occurred at 2 days in the
    high-dose group and at 8 days in the low-dose group, being 6.50 and
    1.87 mg/kg dry weight (2.21 and 0.64 mg/kg wet weight), respectively
    (Laas et al., 1985).  Woody et al. (1992) observed an elimination
    half-life for brodifacoum in serum of 6 ± 4 days in four dogs.

         The largest proportion of a percutaneous flocoumafen dose of
    0.17 mg/kg body weight was located in the liver (25% of the dose at a
    concentration of 0.8 mg/kg), although this was 10 times lower than
    that following an oral dose (Huckle & Warburton, 1986b).

         Parmar et al. (1987) found that elimination of radiolabelled
    brodifacoum, bromadiolone and difenacoum from the liver was biphasic,
    consisting of an rapid initial phase lasting from days 2 to 8 after
    dosing and a slower terminal phase when the elimination half-lives
    were 130, 170 and 120 days, respectively.  Elimination of
    coumatetralyl was more rapid, with a half-life of 55 days.

         Similar results for difenacoum were found by Bratt (1987).  After
    a single oral 14C-difenacoum dose of 1.2 mg/kg body weight, the
    highest concentration of radioactivity (41.5% of the dose) was found
    in the rat liver 24 h after dosing.  The elimination from the liver
    was biphasic.  The half-life of elimination of the radioactivity
    during the first rapid phase was three days, and for the slower phase
    was 118 days.  A similar biphasic elimination was also apparent in the
    kidney.  In the pancreas the concentration declined more slowly than
    in any of the other tissues (182 days).  The parent compound was the
    major component in the liver 24 h after dosing (42%).

         Unchanged flocoumafen comprised the major proportion of the
    hepatic radioactivity in rats and was eliminated with a half-life of
    220 days (Huckle et al., 1989).  Veenstra et al. (1991) found
    retention of about 8% of an administered flocoumafen dose of 0.4 mg/kg
    in the liver of beagle dogs 43 weeks after dosing.

         Despite the more rapid metabolism of flocoumafen in Japanese
    quail, a proportion of the administered dose is retained in the liver,
    with an elimination half-life of 115 days after oral dosing (Huckle &
    Warburton, 1986c).

         Six Hereford heifers weighing approximately 230 kg each were
    dosed with diphacinone (1 mg/kg body weight) by injecting it into the
    rumen.  The highest residue level of parent compound found in the
    liver was 0.15 mg/kg at days 30 and 90 after treatment.  No detectable
    levels (> 0.01 mg/kg) could be found in any of the other tissues
    analysed (kidney, plasma, brain, heart, muscle and fat).  The residues
    in the liver were almost constant from 30 to 90 days post-treatment
    (Bullard et al., 1976).

         The plasma half-life of brodifacoum determined in three patients
    with severe bleeding disorders was found to be approximately 16 to 36
    days (Weitzel et al., 1990).

         The half-life for disappearance from the plasma of human
    volunteers given a single oral or intravenous warfarin dose of
    1.5 mg/kg body weight varied from 15 to 58 h, with a mean of 42 h
    (O'Reilly et al., 1963).

    7.  EFFECTS ON LABORATORY MAMMALS AND IN VITRO TEST SYSTEMS

    7.1  Acute effects

    7.1.1  Rodent species

         Wide variations exist in the literature for LD50 values of
    anticoagulant rodenticides.  A particular reason for these variables
    is the use of single or repeated (5-day) doses.  LD50 values also
    vary according to the animal strain and sex, but both have not always
    been indicated in reported data (Ashton et al., 1987)
    (Tables 5 and 6).

    Table 5.  Acute oral LD50 values for various rodenticides in albino
              Norway rats
                                                                        

    Rodenticide            LD50 (mg/kg)          Reference
                                                                        

    Brodifacoum                0.26         Redfern et al. (1976)
    Bromadiolone               1.125        Grand (1976)
    Chlorophacinone           20.5          Thomson (1988)
    Coumachlor               900.0          Thomson (1988)
    Coumafuril                 0.4          Wiswesser (1976)
    Coumatetralyl             16.5          Thomson (1988)
    Difenacoum                 1.8          Bull (1976)
    Difethialone               0.56         Lechevin & Grand (1987)
    Diphacinone                3.0          Thomson (1988)
    Flocoumafen                0.46         Sharples (1983a)
    Pindone                   50.0          Tomlin (1994)
    Warfarin                  58.0          Thomson (1988)
                                                                        

         Reported oral LD50 values for warfarin in rats vary by a
    considerable magnitude.  Values of 11 mg/kg body weight (Lund, 1982),
    58 mg/kg body weight (Thomson, 1988) and 58 mg/kg body weight and
    323 mg/kg body weight for female and male, respectively (Hagan &
    Radomski, 1953), have been reported.

         The second-generation anticoagulants are more toxic than the
    first-generation ones in the sense that a single feeding may be
    lethal.  Apparent discrepancies between the single oral LD50 values
    for Norway rats, as shown in Table 5, and the multiple dose oral
    LD50 values, shown in Table 6, can be explained by the cumulative
    effects resulting from multiple dose (5 day) administration (Table 6)
    and characteristics of this family of compounds.


        Table 6.  Five-day oral LD50 (mg/kg body weight per day) of various anticoagulants
              for the Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus)a
                                                                                                                                                

    Anticoagulant     Strainb             Male                     Female             Both sexes              Number of
                                                                                                              animalsc
                                                                                                                                                

    Pindone             SD            1.21 (0.70-2.11)        1.60 (0.83-3.08)      1.34 (0.87-2.06)             40
                        wild          7.60 (2.61-22.2)        25.60 (5.34-123)      12.80 (1.73-84.8)            40

    Warfarin            SD            0.29 (0.14-0.57)        0.38 (0.22-0.66)      0.33 (0.22-0.50)             40
                        wild          0.39 (0.16-0.91)        0.60 (0.23-1.09)      0.44 (0.25-0.76)             40

    Diphacinone         SD            0.19 (0.11-0.33)        0.23 (0.12-0.43)      0.21 (0.14-0.31)             40
                        wild          0.39 (0.15-0.84)        0.60 (0.22-0.57)      0.44 (0.23-0.54)             40

    Chlorophacinone     SD            0.18 (0.18-0.18)        0.20 (0.15-0.27)      0.19 (0.16-0.22)             40
                        wild          0.13 (0.10-0.19)        0.23 (0.14-0.36)      0.16 (0.12-0.22)             40

    Bromadiolone        SD            0.13 (0.10-0.19)        0.10 (0.08-0.13)      0.12 (0.10-0.15)             40
                        wild          0.06 (0.03-0.12)        0.09 (0.09-0.09)      0.07 (0.05-0.10)             16
                                                                                                                                                

    a   Modified from: Ashton et al. (1987); figures in parentheses represent 95% confidence limits
    b   SD = Sprague-Dawley
    c   50% males and 50% females in all tests
    

         Reported oral LD50 values for mice show similar variations,
    from less than 1 mg/kg body weight for second-generation rodenticides
    to 374 mg/kg body weight for warfarin (Hagan & Radomski, 1953; Redfern
    et al., 1976; Bull, 1976; Sharples, 1983a).

         Signs of anticoagulant poisoning in rats and mice include
    lethargy, hunched posture and vein clearing in the ears. Blood around
    the eyes, mouth and anus, indicating internal haemorrhaging, appears
    prior to death (Sharples, 1984).

         The percutaneous toxicity of anticoagulants to rats varied for
    different compounds from an LD50 of 0.54 mg/kg body weight for
    flocoumafen (master mix in corn oil) to > 50 mg/kg body weight for
    brodifacoum and difenacoum (Price, 1985b; Tomlin, 1994).  The signs of
    intoxication were identical to those observed after an oral dose.

         Second-generation anticoagulants appeared to be highly toxic by
    inhalation.  An acute inhalation study in Wistar rats exposed (nose
    only) for 4 h was conducted using the 0.5% manufacturing master mix
    specifically prepared to give a mass median aerodynamic diameter of
    less than 5 µm.  The acute LC50 values were between 0.16 and
    1.4 mg/litre.  Signs of intoxication, characteristic of an
    anticoagulant action, were observed within 3 days after exposure with
    deaths occurring between 4 and 9 days (Blair, 1984).

    7.1.2  Non-target species

         The acute toxicity of various anticoagulant rodenticides to
    non-target mammalian species is presented in Table 7.

         From the data presented it appears that some anticoagulants show
    a similar range of acute toxicity for both non-target mammals and
    target rodents.

    7.2  Short-term exposure

    7.2.1  Rodent species

         In a study by Hadler (1974), groups of Wistar rats (male and
    female) were given brodifacoum by gavage (0.01, 0.02, 0.05, 0.1 and
    0.2 mg/kg body weight) for 5 consecutive days.  All rats receiving the
    two lowest doses survived the 21-day experimental period, but all rats
    given the two highest doses died within 11 days of cessation of
    dosing.  No abnormalities were detected in surviving animals
    sacrificed at the end of the observation period.  In animals which
    died during the study, only massive internal haemorrhages, mainly in
    the peritoneum, were observed.  The no-observed-effect level of
    brodifacoum for Wistar rats was 0.02 mg/kg body weight per day.


        Table 7.  Acute oral toxicity (LD50, mg/kg) of various anticoagulant rodenticides for non-target mammalian speciesa
                                                                                                                                                

    Rodenticide       Guinea-pig   Rabbit       Dog            Cat               Sheep       Pig                     References
                                                                                                                                                

    Brodifacoum       2.78 (F)     0.29 (M)     0.25-1 (F)     approx. 25 (F)    > 25 (M)    0.5-2                Hadler (1975a,b); Parkinson
                                                3.56                             11-33                            (1975, 1976); Godfrey (1984);
                                                                                                                  Godfrey et al. (1985)

    Bromadiolone      2.8          1.0          10 (F) MTD     > 25 MTD                      3                    Grand (1976)

    Chlorophacinone                50                                                                             Pelfrène (1991)

    Difenacoum        50 (F)       2 (M)        approx. 50     100               100         80-100               Bull (1976); Tomlin (1994)

    Diphacinone                    35           3-7.5          14.7                          150                  Kosmin & Barlow (1976)

    Difethialone                   0.75         5 MTD          > 16 MTD                      2-3                  Lechevin & Grand (1987)

    Flocoumafen       > 10 (M)     0.7 (M/F)    0.075-0.25     > 10 (M/F)        > 5         approx. 60 (M,F)     Sharples (1983b); Price (1985a);
                                                (M/F)                                                             Chesterman et al. (1984);
                                                                                                                  Roberts et al. (1985a, 1986)

    Warfarin                       800          20-50          6-40                          1-5                  Anonymous (1976)
                                                                                                                                                

    a   F = female; M = male; MTD = maximum tolerated dose
    

         Wistar rats (male and female) were continuously given a diet
    containing brodifacoum at 0.1 mg/kg body weight, with no choice of
    other feed, for 12 weeks.  Prothrombin time was increased and
    mortality occurred in 9 out of 20 males and 5 out of 20 females. 
    Macroscopic examination of the major organs of surviving rats revealed
    no abnormalities other than those expected of anticoagulant action
    (Hadler, 1976).

         Feeding Fisher-344 rats with diets containing flocoumafen at
    concentrations of 0.2 or 0.4 mg/kg feed for 5 days produced no
    toxicologically significant effects during the 15-day observation
    period (Price, 1985c).

         In a 28-day feeding study in rats, fed on a diet containing 0,
    0.01, 0.05, 0.1 or 0.2 mg-flocoumafen/kg, there were no overt signs of
    toxicity.  Highest-dose females showed a slight but significant
    increase in mean prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial
    thromboplastin time (PTT), and a slight decrease in mean plasma total
    protein.  No toxicological or pathological changes were observed in
    rats fed diets containing 0.01 or 0.05 mg/kg of diet (Price, 1985d).

         No effect on prothrombin time was observed in a 12-week study
    with Wistar rats administered oral flocoumafen doses (by gavage) of
    0.0125, 0.0625 and 0.125 mg/kg body weight once a week (Forsey, 1985).

         Groups of six male and six female Sprague-Dawley rats were fed
    diphacinone in their diets at concentrations of 0 (control), 0.0313,
    0.0625, 0.125, 0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg diet (equivalent to 0, 1.7, 3.3,
    6.4, 13 and 27 µg/kg body weight per day) for 90 days (Elias & Johns,
    1981).  Additional satellite groups of one rat of each sex and each
    dose group were killed for gross pathological examination at 30 and
    60 days.  Mortality was unaffected by the treatment.  In the survivors
    of the main groups and satellite groups, there were no gross
    pathological changes, but in the two males that died prematurely (in
    the 0.0625 and 0.25 mg/kg groups) there was subdural haemorrhage.
    Prothrombin time was unaffected by treatment.  Routine haematological
    and clinical chemistry tests were performed on only two rats of each
    sex from each group, and no effects were observed apart from a reduced
    blood fibrinogen concentration in both sexes at the highest dose
    level.

         As no clear NOAEL was indicated by the results of the 90-day
    study, a 21-day study was performed using two rats of each sex at
    diphacinone levels of 0 (control), 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 mg/kg
    diet.  All the rats in the 2 and 4 mg/kg groups died within the first
    14 days, but all others survived until the end of the study.  The mean

    dosages received by the survivors were equivalent to 0, 9, 17, 34 and
    67 µg/kg body weight per day.  At 21 days, there was no effect on
    prothrombin time.  Gross necropsy revealed haemorrhage in the thymus
    of one rat in the 0.5 mg/kg group, but no effects were seen in any
    other survivors.  All the animals in the 2 and 4 mg/kg groups had
    massive and extensive internal haemorrhage (Elias & Johns, 1981).

    7.2.2  Non-target species

         There are few data available on the repeated exposure of
    non-rodent species to anticoagulant rodenticides.

         Death followed five daily warfarin doses of 3 mg/kg body weight
    in cats and 1 mg/kg body weight in pigs (Tomlin, 1994).  The route of
    administration was not specified.

         The dermal administration of warfarin (188 mg/kg per day) to
    female baboons caused profuse bleeding in 5 days followed by death
    (Dreyfus et al., 1983).

         When it became known that vitamin K was not an antagonist for
    warfarin action in bone, it became possible to study the long-term
    effects of this anticoagulant in bones without the risk of inducing
    haemorrhages and bleeding. By feeding lambs with high doses of
    warfarin (up to 150 mg/kg body weight per day) under the protection of
    4 mg/kg body weight per day of vitamin K, Pastoureau et al. (1993)
    showed that within 3 months the lambs had developed a marked
    osteopenia that resulted from a decrease in resorption and a much more
    pronounced decrease in bone formation. As a result the bone density in
    the warfarin-treated animals was substantially lower than that in
    control animals. This is in agreement with earlier studies in rats
    (Price et al., 1982) where it was found that, under the protection of
    vitamin K, warfarin induced excessive mineralization and growth plate
    closure, due to which bone growth came to a halt.

         The maximum tolerated 5-day oral dose of bromadiolone was
    considered to be 25 mg in pigs (Large White strain) weighing 25 kg.
    After 45 oral daily doses of 0.5 mg no change in the prothrombin time
    was observed (Grand, 1976).

         Woody et al. (1992) studied the effect of a cumulative dose of
    1.1 mg brodifacoum/kg body weight administered orally to dogs over a
    3-day period.  Signs of coagulopathic effects appeared within 24 h
    (greater PT and PTT) and increased over a 10-day period.  Treatment
    with Vitamin K1 at 10 days post-exposure reduced the effects.

         Six horses were treated by gavage with brodifacoum containing
    bait at a dosage of 0.125 mg/kg body weight (Boermans et al., 1991). 
    Four of the horses became anorexic and depressed, one requiring K1
    therapy.  Peak plasma concentration occurred 2-3 h after
    administration.  Pharmacokinetic evaluation indicated that brodifacoum
    has a plasma half-life of 1.22 days.  An increase in clotting time was
    observed as early as 24 h after dosing, returning to the pre-treatment
    level by day 12.

         Male pigs (five per group) were fed difenacoum in the diet for 14
    days at dose levels of 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg diet.  With
    the exception of the lowest-dose group, all groups showed a marked
    increase of prothrombin time values.  Extensive subcutaneous, inter-
    and intra-muscular haemorrhage and oedema was observed in animals
    dosed at levels of 0.5 mg/kg or more (Ross et al., 1979).

    7.3  Long-term exposure

         No data on long-term exposure are available.

         Studies with second-generation anticoagulants are difficult to
    carry out for more than a few weeks due to the rapid acute effects,
    and NOEL values for second-generation rodenticides and longer exposure
    periods have not been established.  In any chronic study approaching
    two years in length, the dose level would have to be less than the
    analytical limit of detection.

    7.4  Skin and eye irritation; sensitization

         Brodifacoum is a slight skin irritant and a mild eye irritant in
    the rabbit (Hadler, 1975c).  No skin or eye irritation was observed in
    New Zealand white rabbits treated with flocoumafen (Forsey, 1983a,b). 
    Neither of these rodenticides was a skin sensitizer when tested in the
    guinea-pig maximization test (Parkinson, 1979; Price, 1986).

    7.5  Reproductive toxicity and teratogenicity

         Brodifacoum was given by oral gavage to female rats at daily dose
    levels of 0.001, 0.01 or 0.02 mg/kg body weight during days 6-15 of
    pregnancy.  There was no evidence of adverse effects on the fetus at
    termination.  Higher daily doses (above 0.05 mg/kg) caused an
    anticoagulant effect in the dams which resulted in a high incidence of
    abortion (Hodge et al., 1980a).

         Pregnant female rabbits were given oral gavage doses of 0.001,
    0.002 or 0.005 mg brodifacoum/kg body weight per day from days 6-18 of
    pregnancy.  A the highest dose level a high proportion of maternal
    deaths occurred as a result of haemorrhage.  Although the survivors
    showed signs of haemorrhage, there were no effects on the developing
    fetus.  No effects were observed at either of the other dose levels
    used (Hodge et al., 1980b,c).

         Bromadiolone was given orally to four groups of 25 female rats
    from day 6 to 15 of pregnancy at doses of 0, 17.5, 35 and 70 µg/kg
    body weight per day.  Maternal toxicity occurred at the higher dose
    levels.  There was no evidence of embryotoxicity or teratogenic
    effects at any dose level (Monnot et al., 1981).  A similar absence of
    effects was reported in a study on rabbits treated orally with daily
    doses of either 2, 4 or 8 µg/kg body weight per day on days 6-18 of
    pregnancy, although there was maternal toxicity at the highest dose
    level (Virat, 1981).

         Groups of 18 pregnant F-344 rats were given daily oral doses of
    0, 0.01 or 0.04 mg flocoumafen/kg body weight from day 8 to 17 of
    gestation.  Eight animals in the 0.04 mg/kg body weight group either
    died or were killed with signs of anticoagulant poisoning.

         In contrast, Mirkova & Antov (1983) found warfarin to be
    embryotoxic and teratogenic to Wistar rats when administered by gavage
    in single doses or repeatedly throughout the periods of
    pre-implantation (1-7 days of gestation) and organogenesis (8-16
    days), and also throughout the whole gestation (1-21 days) at a wide
    range of dose levels (0.04-8 mg/kg body weight).  At these dose levels
    and treatment regimens, warfarin induced substantially increased rates
    of embryolethality, subcutaneous and internal haemorrhage and gross
    structural malformations (pes varus, internal hydrocephalus and
    anomalies of skeletal ossification).

    7.6  Mutagenicity

         Various  in vitro and  in vivo studies have been undertaken to
    assess the genotoxic potential of brodifacoum. No mutagenic activity
    was detected in the Salmonella reverse mutation assay in any of the
    five tester strains employed (TA98, TA100., TA1535, TA1537 and TA1538)
    either in the presence or absence of Arochlor 1254-induced rat liver
    S9 fraction at brodifacoum concentrations ranging from 1.6 to
    5000 µg/plate (Callander, 1984).  Brodifacoum showed no activity in a
    forward mutation assay using L5178 mouse lymphoma cells, either with
    or without metabolic activation, at concentrations of 47.5, 63.3 and
    84.4 mg/litre (Cross & Clay, 1984).

         Brodifacoum caused no significant chromosomal aberrations in
    cultured human lymphocytes (concentrations 1, 10, 100 and
    1000 mg/litre), either with or without metabolic activation, and did
    not induce unscheduled DNA synthesis in cultured HeLa cells at the
    same range of concentrations (Mellano, 1984a,b).  Difenacoum did not
    induce unscheduled DNA synthesis in rat hepatocytes  in vivo at
    either dose level or time-point (Kennelly, 1990).

         An  in vivo micronucleus test, in which mice were given single
    brodifacoum intraperitoneal doses of 0.187 or 0.30 mg/kg body weight,
    showed no induction of micronuclei in bone marrow polychromatic
    erythrocytes (Sheldon et al., 1984).

         Bromadiolone was tested in the Salmonella reverse mutation assay
    at concentrations ranging from 10 to 3330 µg per plate on strains
    TA1535, TA1537 and TA1538.  No evidence of mutagenic effect was found
    either with or without Aroclor metabolic activation (Lawlor, 1992).

         Bromadiolone did not induce forward mutations in Chinese hamster
    ovary cells either with or without metabolic activation
    (Cifone, 1993).

         In a mouse micronucleus test at four dose levels from 50 to
    400 mg/kg, bromadiolone did not induce micronuclei in bone marrow
    polychromatic erythrocytes (Murli, 1993).

         Flocoumafen did not induce reverse gene mutation in  Salmonella
     typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, TA1538 nor in
     Escherichia coli WP2uvrA pkm 101 either with or without metabolic
    activation.  Flocoumafen was tested at concentrations ranging from 31
    to 2000 µg/plate, beyond which precipitation from suspension occurred
    (Brooks et al., 1984).

         Flocoumafen did not increase the frequency of mutation to
    6-thioguanine resistance in Chinese hamster V79 cells either in the
    presence or absence of an Arochlor-induced rat liver S9 fraction. 
    Doses ranging from 5 to 150 mg/litre were used, beyond which
    cytotoxicity occurred (Clare & Wiggins, 1986).

         Flocoumafen did not induce  in vitro cell transformation in
    C3H1OT´ mouse fibroblasts, either in the presence or absence of a rat
    S9 metabolizing system, at concentrations ranging from 12.5 to
    100 µg/litre (Meyer & Wiggins, 1986).

         Flocoumafen did not induce mitotic gene conversion in liquid
    suspension cultures of  Saccharomyces cerevisiae JD1, either in the
    presence or absence of a rat liver S9 fraction, at concentrations
    ranging from 0.01 to 2 g/litre (Brooks et al., 1984).

         When incubated at concentrations ranging from 5 to 25 mg/litre
    for 24 h in monolayer cultures of rat liver RL4 cells, flocoumafen did
    not induce  in vitro chromosomal damage (Brooks et al., 1984).

         Oral administration of flocoumafen to rats at doses of 0.25 mg/kg
    or 1000 mg/kg body weight (a dose 4000 times the acute oral LD50 for
    rats) did not produce chromosomal damage (Allen et al., 1986).

         The cytogenic effect of chlorophacinone was investigated  in vivo
    in metaphase bone marrow cells taken at 48 and 96 h after oral dosing
    of male CFLP mice with 20 mg/kg body weight.  No induction of
    chromosomal aberrations was observed (Nehéz et al., 1985).

         In the same study, chlorophacinone was investigated in
    spermatocytes taken from male CFLP mice at 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks after a
    single oral dose of 20 mg/kg body weight.  The spermatocytes were
    analysed in the diakinesis phase of meiosis.  There was no increased
    incidence of chromosomal aberrations (Nehéz et al., 1985).

         Rabbits were treated orally with 20 mg chlorophacinone/kg body
    weight and chromosomal analysis was performed in bone marrow and
    spermatocytes taken at 48 h post-dosing.  No increase in the incidence
    of chromosomal aberrations was seen (Selypes et al., 1984).

    7.7  Factors modifying toxicity

         Phenobarbital pretreatment of rats followed by a single
    administration of brodifacoum or warfarin decreased the anticoagulant
    effects of both compounds, more markedly in the case of warfarin
    (Bachmann & Sullivan, 1983).

         The non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs ibuprofen and
    phenylbutazone potentiated the anticoagulant effects of brodifacoum
    and bromadiolone in rats (Sridhara & Krishnamurthy, 1992).

         Strain and sex are important factors modifying the toxicity of
    anticoagulants in rodents (see Table 5, section 7.1.1).  Winn et al.
    (1987) observed greater sensitivity of male rats and mice to
    difenacoum, compared with female rats and mice.  The possible
    explanation of different responses to difenacoum was the greater
    turnover of plasma proteins in male rats or the marked
    inter-individual variation of vitamin K1 level in male rat liver.

         Large amounts (relative to farm animals' dietary requirements) of
    vitamin K3 (menadione and its salts) are sometimes added to animal
    feedstuffs.  This gives rodent pests ready access to a substance which
    acts as an antidote to anticoagulant rodenticides, and thus can reduce
    the efficacy of these rodenticides.

         Differences in metabolism to inhibitors of vitamin K synthesis
    among strains of mice and rats has been attributed to a number of
    different factors (Misenheimer et al., 1994).  Among these are: 1)
    reduced sensitivity of vitamin K epoxide hydrolase to inhibition; 2)
    greater reversibility of inhibition of epoxide hydrolase; and 3)
    faster clearance of the rodenticide.  The mechanism of resistance
    differs between strains.

         A single flocoumafen dose of 0.5 mg/kg body weight resulted in
    clear signs of anticoagulation in five out of eight beagle dogs
    (Veenstra et al., 1991).  Administration of a second dose 5 weeks
    later resulted in clinical evidence of anticoagulation in two out of
    the three remaining dogs.  Vitamin K treatment (2 to 5 mg/kg
    subcutaneously) reversed the effects in all cases.

    7.8  Adverse effects in domestic and farm animals

    7.8.1  Domestic animals

    7.8.1.1  Poisoning incidents

         The main cause for accidental poisoning of domestic animals is
    direct consumption of anticoagulant baits.  Secondary poisoning
    through the consumption of rats and mice killed with anticoagulants
    may occur in dogs and cats in urban situations, but is more likely in
    farm situations (Marsh, 1985b).  The majority of fatalities and severe
    clinical syndromes are connected with the second-generation
    anticoagulants (Dodds & Frantz, 1984). Du Vall et al. (1989) studied
    10 cases of second-generation anticoagulant rodenticide poisoning in
    dogs and cats.  The presence of anticoagulants (brodifacoum,
    bromadiolone or diphacinone) in serum or liver was confirmed by HPLC
    or GC/MS.  Several other cases of brodifacoum poisonings in dogs have
    been reported and some of them were fatal (Mc Sporran & Phillips,
    1983; Stowe et al., 1983; Dodds & Frantz, 1984).

         Until 1983, only first-generation anticoagulants were available
    in New Zealand and, between 1977 and 1983, warfarin, coumatetralyl and
    diphacinone were involved in 45 reported incidents of accidental
    poisoning of domestic and farm animals.  Brodifacoum and flocoumafen
    were introduced after 1983.  From 1983 to 1994, 40 cases of poisoning
    of domestic and farm animals resulted from the use of
    second-generation compounds and 17 cases were due to the ingestion of
    first-generation anticoagulants (Hoogenbroom, 1994).

         Schulman et al. (1986) reported five cases of coagulopathy in
    dogs caused by consumption of diphacinone-containing baits.  Lethargy
    and respiratory distress, associated with pulmonary interstitial
    haemorrhage and pleural and/or pericardial effusion, were the most
    consistent signs.  The prothrombin time and the activated partial
    thromboplastin time were moderately to markedly prolonged.

    7.8.1.2  Diagnosis and treatment of poisoning

         The major difference between warfarin and the other anticoagulant
    rodenticides is that the latter have longer body retention and a
    tendency to induce bleeding for a longer period of time.  It is
    therefore necessary to continue the treatment for weeks rather than
    days.

         Signs of poisoning occur after a latent period of 12 h to several
    days and may include: