Glyphosate (EHC 159, 1994)

INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMME ON CHEMICAL SAFETY

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CRITERIA 159

GLYPHOSATE

This report contains the collective views of an international group of
experts and does not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated
policy of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International
Labour Organisation, or the World Health Organization.

First draft prepared by Dr H. Mensink and
Dr. P. Janssen, National Institute of Public
Health and Environmental Hygiene,
Bilthoven, The Netherlands

Published under the joint sponsorship of
the United Nations Environment Programme,
the International Labour Organisation,
and the World Health Organization

World Health Orgnization
Geneva, 1994

The International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) is a
joint venture of the United Nations Environment Programme, the
International Labour Organisation, and the World Health
Organization. The main objective of the IPCS is to carry out and
disseminate evaluations of the effects of chemicals on human health
and the quality of the environment. Supporting activities include
the development of epidemiological, experimental laboratory, and
risk-assessment methods that could produce internationally
comparable results, and the development of manpower in the field of
toxicology. Other activities carried out by the IPCS include the
development of know-how for coping with chemical accidents,
coordination of laboratory testing and epidemiological studies, and
promotion of research on the mechanisms of the biological action of
chemicals.

WHO Library Cataloguing in Publication Data

Glyphosate.

(Environmental health criteria ; 159)

1.Glycine - analogs and derivatives 2.Herbicides
3.Environmental exposure I.Series

ISBN 92 4 157159 4 (NLM Classification: WA 240)
ISSN 0250-863X

The World Health Organization welcomes requests for permission
to reproduce or translate its publications, in part or in full.
Applications and enquiries should be addressed to the Office of
Publications, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, which
will be glad to provide the latest information on any changes made
to the text, plans for new editions, and reprints and translations
already available.

^(c) World Health Organization 1994

Publications of the World Health Organization enjoy copyright
protection in accordance with the provisions of Protocol 2 of the
Universal Copyright Convention. All rights reserved.

The designations employed and the presentation of the material
in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion
whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the World Health
Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory,
city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation
of its frontiers or boundaries.

The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers'
products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the
World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar
nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the
names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital
letters.

CONTENTS

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CRITERIA FOR GLYPHOSATE

1. SUMMARY

1.1. Identity, physical and chemical properties,
and analytical methods
1.2. Sources of human and environmental exposure
1.3. Environmental transport, distribution and
transformation
1.4. Environmental levels and human exposure
1.5. Kinetics and metabolism in laboratory animals
and humans
1.6. Effects on laboratory mammals, and in vitro
test systems
1.7. Effects on humans
1.8. Effects on other organisms in the laboratory
and field

2. IDENTITY, PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES, AND ANALYTICAL
METHODS

2.1. Identity
2.2. Physical and chemical properties
2.3. Formulations
2.4. Conversion factors
2.5. Analytical methods
2.5.1. Sample handling and preparation
2.5.2. Analytical methods

3. SOURCES OF HUMAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE

3.1. Anthropogenic sources
3.1.1. Production levels and processes
3.1.2. Uses
3.1.3. Drinking-water

4. ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPORT, DISTRIBUTION AND TRANSFORMATION

4.1. Transport and distribution between media
4.1.1. Water
4.1.2. Soil sorption
4.1.3. Mobility in soils
4.1.4. Dissipation from the soil in the field
4.1.5. Uptake and dissipation from plants
4.1.6. Ingestion by animals
4.2. Abiotic degradation
4.2.1. Hydrolytic cleavage
4.2.2. Photodegradation

4.3. Biodegradation
4.4. Bioaccumulation
4.5. Waste disposal

5. ENVIRONMENTAL LEVELS AND HUMAN EXPOSURE

5.1. Environmental levels
5.2. General population exposure
5.3. Occupational exposure during manufacture,
formulation, or use

6. KINETICS AND METABOLISM IN LABORATORY ANIMALS AND HUMANS

6.1. Absorption
6.2. Distribution
6.3. Metabolic transformation
6.4. Elimination and excretion
6.5. Retention and turnover

7. EFFECTS ON LABORATORY ANIMALS AND IN VITRO TEST SYSTEMS

7.1. Single exposure
7.2. Short-term exposure
7.2.1. Oral studies
7.2.2. Dermal studies
7.2.3. Inhalational studies
7.3. Long-term toxicity and carcinogenicity
7.4. Skin and eye irritation; sensitization
7.5. Reproductive toxicity, embryotoxicity and
teratogenicity
7.5.1. Teratogenicity studies
7.5.2. Reproduction studies
7.6. Mutagenicity and related end-points

8. EFFECTS ON HUMANS

8.1. Cases of intentional and accidental exposure
8.2. Occupational exposure
8.3. Subpopulations at special risk

9. EFFECTS ON OTHER ORGANISMS IN THE LABORATORY AND FIELD

9.1. Laboratory experiments
9.1.1. Microorganisms
9.1.1.1 Water
9.1.1.2 Soil
9.1.2. Aquatic organisms
9.1.2.1 Plants
9.1.2.2 Invertebrates
9.1.2.3 Vertebrates

9.1.3. Terrestrial organisms
9.1.3.1 Plants
9.1.3.2 Invertebrates
9.1.3.3 Vertebrates
9.2. Field observations
9.2.1. Microorganisms
9.2.1.1 Water
9.2.1.2 Soil
9.2.2. Aquatic organisms
9.2.2.1 Plants
9.2.2.2 Invertebrates
9.2.2.3 Vertebrates
9.2.3. Terrestrial organisms
9.2.3.1 Plants
9.2.3.2 Invertebrates
9.2.3.3 Vertebrates

10. EVALUATION OF HUMAN HEALTH HAZARDS AND EFFECTS ON THE
ENVIRONMENT

10.1. Human health hazards
10.2. Evaluation of effects on the environment
10.2.1. Exposure levels and toxic effects
10.2.2. Hazard evaluation for aquatic organisms
10.2.3. Hazard evaluation for terrestrial organisms

11. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PROTECTION OF HUMAN HEALTH

12. FURTHER RESEARCH

REFERENCES

RESUME

RESUMEN

WHO TASK GROUP ON ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CRITERIA FOR GLYPHOSATE

Members

Dr S. Dobson, Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Monks Wood
Experimental Station, Huntingdon, United Kingdom
(Chairman)

Dr A.H. El-Sebae, College of Agriculture, Alexandria University,
El Shatby, Alexandria, Egypt

Dr P. Janssen, National Institute of Public Health and
Environmental Hygiene, Bilthoven, The Netherlands

Dr H. Mensink, National Institute of Public Health and
Environmental Hygiene, Bilthoven, The Netherlands

Dr M.S. Morrow, Health Effects Division, Office of Pesticide
Programs, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC,
USA

Professor R. Nilsson, Department of Scientific Documentation and
Research, National Chemicals Inspectorate, Solna, Sweden^a

Dr R. Ye, National Environmental Protection Agency, Beijing,
People's Republic of China

Observers

Dr C. Hastings, Agricultural Group, Monsanto, Missouri, St.
Louis, USA

Secretariat

Dr M. Gilbert, International Programme on Chemical Safety, World
Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland (Secretary)

___________

^a Invited but unable to attend.

NOTE TO READERS OF THE CRITERIA MONOGRAPHS

Every effort has been made to present information in the
criteria monographs as accurately as possible without unduly
delaying their publication. In the interest of all users of the
Environmental Health Criteria monographs, readers are kindly
requested to communicate any errors that may have occurred to the
Director of the International Programme on Chemical Safety, World
Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, in order that they may be
included in corrigenda.

* * *

A detailed data profile and a legal file can be obtained from
the International Register of Potentially Toxic Chemicals, Case
postale 356, 1219 Châtelaine, Geneva, Switzerland (Telephone No.
9799111).

* * *

This publication was made possible by grant number 5 U01
ES02617-14 from the National Institute of Environmental Health
Sciences, National Institutes of Health, USA.

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CRITERIA FOR GLYPHOSATE

A Task Group on Environmental Health Criteria for Glyphosate
met at the Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Monks Wood, United
Kingdom, from 23 to 27 August 1993. Dr S. Dobson welcomed the
participants on behalf of the host institution, and Dr M. Gilbert
opened the Meeting on behalf of the three cooperating organizations
of the IPCS (UNEP/ILO/WHO). The Task Group reviewed and revised the
draft monograph and made an evaluation of the risks for human health
and the environment from exposure to glyphosate.

The first draft of this monograph was prepared by Dr H. Mensink
and Dr P. Janssen, National Institute of Public Health and
Environmental Hygiene, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

Dr M. Gilbert was responsible for the overall scientific
content of the monograph and for the organization of the meeting,
and Dr P.G. Jenkins, IPCS, for the technical editing of the
monograph.

The efforts of all who helped in the preparation and
finalization of the monograph are gratefully acknowledged.

ABBREVIATIONS

a.i. active ingredient

ALAT alanine aminotransferase

AMPA aminomethylphosphonic acid

AP alkaline phosphatase

CHO Chinese hamster ovary

CNS central nervous system

HPLC high-performance liquid chromatography

i.p. intraperitoneal

IPA isopropylamine

MATC maximum acceptable toxicant concentration

NOAEL no-observed-adverse-effect level

NOEC no-observed-effect concentration

1. SUMMARY

1.1 Identity, physical and chemical properties, and analytical
methods

Glyphosate is a weak organic acid consisting of a glycine and a
phosphonomethyl moiety. The empirical formula is C₃H₈NO₅P.
Glyphosate is usually formulated as a salt of the deprotonated acid
of glyphosate and a cation, e.g., isopropylamine or
trimethylsulfonium. The purity of technical grade glyphosate is
generally above 90%. Technical grade glyphosate is an odourless
white crystalline powder with a specific gravity of 1.704, a very
low vapour pressure, and a high solubility in water. The
octanol-water partition coefficient (log K_ow) is -2.8. Glyphosate
is amphoteric and may exist as different ionic species, dependent on
the actual pH.

Determination of glyphosate is in general laborious, complex,
and costly. Derivatization with fluorogenic substances is the most
common method and may be applied pre- or post-column. Determination
is usually carried out with high performance liquid chromatography
or gas liquid chromatography. Limits of determination for glyphosate
in water, plants, soil and human urine, are 0.02-3.2 µg/litre,
0.01-0.3 mg/kg, 0.05-1 mg/kg and 0.1 mg/litre, respectively.

1.2 Sources of human and environmental exposure

Glyphosate is a post-emergent, systemic and non-selective
herbicide that is used in both agricultural and non-agricultural
areas all over the world. Glyphosate is applied to many crops and in
various commercial formulations. The major formulation is Roundup in
which glyphosate is formulated as the isopropylamine salt.
Recommended application rates do not exceed 5.8 kg a.i./ha and are
dependent on the type of use. Environmental exposure may occur
because of deposition due to drift and accidental releases.

1.3 Environmental transport, distribution and transformation

The most important processes of dissipation that may be
involved after application of glyphosate are complexation in water
with ions, e.g., Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺, sorption to sediment, suspended
particles in water, and soil, photodegradation in water, uptake by
plants, and biodegradation.

Glyphosate dissipates from the water with DT₅₀ values
(dissipation) ranging from a few days to more than 91 days. Sediment
or suspended particles are shown to be the major sink.

The adsorption coefficients (K_s/l) of glyphosate in
laboratory experiments vary between 8 and 377 dm³/kg for various
soils and clay minerals. No data on the sorption of
aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA), the major metabolite, under
laboratory conditions are available.

R_f values of glyphosate do not exceed 0.2 in soil thin-layer
chromatography experiments. Between less than 0.1% and 11% of the
applied activity is recovered in the eluate of soil columns under
leaching conditions simulating an extremely high rainfall. From
field experiments it appears that AMPA is not likely to leach.

Glyphosate dissipates in field experiments from the soil with
DT₅₀ values between 3 and 174 days, mainly depending on edaphic
and climatic conditions. Up to 1.8% of the applied dose dissipated
from the soil due to run-off in some field experiments.

Under laboratory conditions, up to 45% of the applied activity
may be absorbed by treated leaves, and this is followed by a
substantial translocation.

Hydrolysis of glyphosate in sterile buffers is very slow with
DT₅₀ values >> 35 days. Photodegradation in water under natural
conditions occurs with DT₅₀ values < 28 days. No substantial
photodegradation in soil was recorded in a study lasting 31 days.

The time needed for 50% biodegradation of glyphosate in the
whole system of a test with water and sediment is > 14 days under
aerobic conditions and 14-22 days under anaerobic conditions in the
laboratory. The time needed for 50% biodegradation of glyphosate in
the soil is 2-3 days under aerobic conditions.

The major metabolite in soil and water is AMPA. Maximum amounts
of AMPA in soils are approximately 20% of the applied activity under
aerobic conditions and 0.5% under anaerobic conditions. Maximum
amounts of AMPA in sediments are 25% under both aerobic and
anaerobic conditions.

Bioconcentration factors are low in laboratory tests with
invertebrates and fish. Bluegill sunfish in a flow-through test
showed a depuration half-life of 35 days, after being exposed for 35
days. AMPA is recovered in bluegill sunfish up to 21 days after
continuous exposure to glyphosate. Glyphosate has not been detected
in fish living in directly sprayed water in field experiments. In
one experiment, AMPA was detectable in carp up to 90 days after
application. No biomagnification of glyphosate in litter by
herbivorous and omnivorous small mammals in a forest brush ecosystem
was indicated in a field experiment. Concentrations of up to 5 mg
a.i./kg were measured in deermice immediately after spraying in this
experiment.

A range of bacterial strains can degrade glyphosate. Bacteria
capable of using the compound as sole phosphorus, sole carbon or
sole nitrogen source have been identified. Growth is slow compared
to growth on inorganic sources of P, C and N. There is evidence from
the field that bacterial populations adapted to metabolise
glyphosate. The presence of inorganic phosphate inhibits degradation
of glyphosate with some, but not all, bacteria. Biodegradation of
glyphosate may involve co-metabolism with other energy sources.

1.4 Environmental levels and human exposure

Data on the occurrence of glyphosate in environmental biota and
abiota as part of regular monitoring programmes are very scarce.
Data from field experiments in which common agricultural practice is
simulated are used to indicate maximum environmental concentrations:
< 1-1700 µg/litre surface water, 0.07-40 mg/kg dry weight soil,
< 0.05-19 mg/kg dry weight sediment, 261-1300 mg/kg foliage, 5 mg/kg
the viscera of deermice, 1.6-19 mg/kg wild berries, and 45 mg/kg
lichens. The corresponding maximum concentrations of AMPA are:
< 1-35 µg/litre (surface water), 0.1-9 mg/kg dry weight (soil),
< 0.05-1.8 mg/kg dry weight (sediment), 1.7-< 9 mg/kg (foliage),
0.02-0.1 mg/kg (wild berries), and 2.1 mg/kg (lichens). The
above-mentioned concentrations of glyphosate are generally found
immediately after application. The concentration in lichens was
found 270 days after application.

Measurements of daily human intake of glyphosate via food and
drinking-water (total diet studies) are not available. The few data
on occupational exposure indicate that exposure levels for workers
applying glyphosate as the herbicide formulation Roundup are low.

1.5 Kinetics and metabolism in laboratory animals and humans

Technical glyphosate is only partially absorbed from the
gastrointestinal tract. In studies with ¹⁴C-labelled glyphosate,
absorption percentages of 30-36% were found in several species.
Dermal absorption is low. From the herbicide formulation Roundup,
< 5.5% of the glyphosate present is absorbed through the skin
(contact time about 24 h). In body tissues, the highest
concentrations, approximately 1% of the oral dose, are found in
bone. Following a single oral dose, 62-69% is eliminated in the
faeces without absorption. Of the absorbed glyphosate, 14-29% is
excreted in urine and 0.2% or less in expired air. Biliary excretion
following intravenous application was only 5-8%. In lactating goats,
excretion in milk was shown to occur to a minor extent only
(concentration < 0.1 mg/kg whole milk at a dose level of
120 mg/kg diet). Biotransformation of glyphosate occurs to a very
low degree only. The only metabolite, AMPA, accounts for 0.3% of the
dose or less; the rest is unchanged glyphosate. Whole body clearance
(99% of an oral dose) occurs in approximately 168 h.

1.6 Effects on laboratory mammals, and in vitro test systems

In experimental animals, technical glyphosate has very low
acute toxicity by the oral and dermal administration routes; it is
markedly more toxic by the intraperitoneal route than by other
routes. Short-term feeding studies have been conducted in several
species, but few effects were seen in most of these tests. In one
13-week study in mice with technical glyphosate, increased weights
of several organs and growth retardation were observed at
50 000 mg/kg diet. In a 13-week study in rats no effect occurred
(technical glyphosate dose levels up to 20 000 mg/kg diet). In
another 13-week study, lesions of the salivary glands were found in
rats and mice. In mice, the NOAEL was 3125 mg/kg diet; in rats, it
was < 3125 mg/kg diet. These findings were not present in any other
short-term or long-term studies conducted in different strains and
species. The salivary lesions suggest that glyphosate may be acting
as a weak adrenergic agonist.

Long-term toxicity was studied in mice and rats. Few effects
were observed and, in almost all cases, at relatively high dose
levels only. In mice, technical glyphosate produced growth
retardation, hepatocyte hypertrophy or necrosis and urinary bladder
epithelial hyperplasia at 30 000 mg/kg. In rats, the same test
compound produced decreased growth, increased liver weights,
degenerative lens changes and gastric inflammation at 20 000 mg/kg
diet.

The available studies do not indicate that technical glyphosate
is mutagenic, carcinogenic or teratogenic. Two multigeneration
studies were carried out in rats. The main effects of technical
glyphosate were decreased body weights of parent animals and pups
and decreased litter size at 30 000 mg/kg diet. In one reproduction
study, an increase in the incidence of unilateral renal tubular
dilation in F_3b male pups at 30 mg/kg body weight was reported.
The absence of a renal effect in pups at a higher dose level in the
other reproduction study indicates that the reproducibility of this
lesion is uncertain.

1.7 Effects on humans

The available controlled studies are limited to three
irritation/sensitization studies in human volunteers, the results of
which indicated no effect. Several cases of (mostly intentional)
intoxications with technical glyphosate herbicide formulation
Roundup have been reported. In a study on health effects in workers
applying Roundup herbicide formulation, no adverse effects were
found. Available data on occupational exposure for workers applying
Roundup indicate exposure levels far below the NOAELs from the
relevant animal experiments.

1.8 Effects on other organisms in the laboratory and field

Technical grade glyphosate is moderately to slightly toxic to
aquatic microorganisms, with EC₅₀ (3-4 days) values of
1.2-7.8 mg/litre, and 7-day NOEC values of 0.3-34 mg/litre.
Formulations of glyphosate are slightly to highly toxic to aquatic
microorganisms with 3-day EC₅₀ values of 1.0 to > 55 mg product
per litre. Cyanophyta (blue-green algae) are more sensitive to
Roundup than true algae. Physiological processes that are affected
include the greening process, respiration, photosynthesis, and the
synthesis of aromatic amino acids.

Mycelial growth of ectomycorrhizal fungi in pure cultures is
inhibited at concentrations of > 29 µg Roundup/litre. Sensitive
genera are Cenococcum, Hebeloma and Laccaria.

Glyphosate is slightly toxic to aquatic macrophytes with a
14-day NOEC value of 9 mg/litre, when dissolved in water. Roundup is
also slightly toxic with 14-day NOEC values of 2.4-56 mg
Roundup/litre, when dissolved in water. No data on acute toxicity
are available. Phytotoxicity is much higher when sprayed deposits
are not washed off.

Technical grade glyphosate is slightly to very slightly toxic
to aquatic invertebrates with 2- to 4-day LC₅₀ or EC₅₀ values of
> 55 mg/litre, and a 21-day NOEC value of 100 mg/litre.
Formulations of glyphosate are moderately to very slightly toxic to
aquatic invertebrates with 2-day EC₅₀ values of 5.3-5600 mg
product/litre and 21-day MATC values of 1.4-4.9 mg product per
litre. The higher toxicity of Roundup is mainly due to the presence
of surfactants.

Technical grade glyphosate is moderately to very slightly toxic
to fish, with 4-day LC₅₀ values of 10 to > 1000 mg/litre, a
21-day NOEC value of 52 mg/litre, and an MATC value of >
26 mg/litre. Formulations of glyphosate are also moderately to very
slightly toxic to fish with 4-day LC₅₀ values of 2.4 to > 1000 mg
product per litre, and 21-day NOEC values of 0.8-2.4 mg
product/litre. The most sensitive species is the carp, when exposed
to the formulation Sting. No treatment-related effects of Roundup on
fish have been found under field conditions, with the exception of
stress immediately after application of a recommended rate and
avoidance of concentrations of > 40 mg Roundup/litre.

Nodulation of sub-clover inoculated with Rhizobium is inhibited
in a dose-related way in soil-free systems with nutrient solutions
at concentrations of > 2 mg a.i./litre. Seed germination of
various forest species is not affected by glyphosate at the
recommended application rates. The root length of red pine seedlings
is decreased under laboratory conditions in a dose-related way at
application rates of > 0.54 kg a.i./ha. This decrease was not
confirmed in a comparable field experiment.

Technical grade glyphosate and Roundup are slightly toxic to
bees when applied either orally or topically. The 2-day LD₅₀
values are > 100 µg (a.i. or product) per bee. The oral 2-day
LD₅₀ of Sting to bees is > 100 µg/bee. Roundup and Roundup D-pak
are slightly toxic to earthworms with 14-day NOEC values of 500 and
158 mg product per kg dry weight, respectively. No adverse effects
of Roundup were found on the fecundity and fertility of green
lacewings, and there were no effects of Sting on the food uptake and
mortality of the beetle Poecilus.

Technical grade glyphosate is slightly toxic to birds, with an
LD₅₀ of >3851 mg/kg body weight, an 8-day LC₅₀ of >4640 mg/kg
feed, and 112- to 119-day NOEC values of > 1000 mg/kg feed.
Roundup and an unknown formulation are also slightly toxic to birds,
with an LD₅₀ of > 2686 mg product/kg body weight and an 8-day
LC₅₀ of > 5620 mg product/kg feed. Generally no treatment-related
effects of technical grade glyphosate or Roundup on mammals are
found under laboratory conditions, except at very high application
rates. Treatment-related effects on birds and mammals under field
conditions appear to be primarily due to habitat changes after
treatment with Roundup.

2. IDENTITY, PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES, AND ANALYTICAL
METHODS

2.1 Identity

Glyphosate is the primary name of a weak organic acid that
consists of a glycine moiety and a phosphonomethyl moiety. The
chemical name is N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine according to IUPAC
nomenclature. The CAS name is glycine, N-(phosphonomethyl)-, and
its CAS registry number is 1071-83-6. The empirical formula is
C₃H₈NO₅P, and the structural formula is as follows:

The relative molecular mass of glyphosate is 169.07. Technical
grade glyphosate has a purity of > 80%, but the purity generally
exceeds 90%. Glyphosate usually is formulated as a salt of the
deprotonated acid of glyphosate and a cation, e.g., isopropylamine.
The CAS registry number of the salt of glyphosate and
isopropyl-amine is 38641-94-0.

Surfactants and inerts may be added to formulations of
glyphosate. The type of surfactant and its concentration may differ
per formulation. A common surfactant in the major formulation
Roundup is polyoxyethylene amine. Other known surfactants are ortho
X-77 (Mitchell et al., 1987), LI-700, R-11 and Widespread (Monsanto,
1990a). Other additives in formulations may be sulfuric and
phosphoric acids.

2.2 Physical and chemical properties

The physical and chemical properties of glyphosate are
tabulated in Table 1. Glyphosate is an amphoteric compound of which
the ionic species and their pKa values are presented in Fig. 1. Due
to its high polarity glyphosate is practically insoluble in, for
instance, ethanol, acetone and benzene.

Table 1. Physical and chemical properties of glyphosate^a

Remarks

Physical state crystalline powder

Colour white

Odour none

Melting point^b 184.5 °C decomposition at 187 °C

Boiling point n.a.

Specific gravity (density)^c 1.704 20 °C

Vapour pressured < 1 x 10-5 Pa 25 °C

Solubility in water^b,e 10 100 mg/litre 20 °C

Henry's law constant < 7 x 10-11

Octanol-water partition
coefficient (log K_ow)^d -2.8

Surface tension^d 0.072 N/m 0.5% (w/v) at approx. 25 °C

pKa values^d,f < 2, 2.6, 5.6, 10.6 Sprankle et al. (1975)

Molar absorptivity^c 0.086 litre/mol per cm at 295 nm

Flammability^d not flammable

Explosiveness^d not explosive

pH^d 2.5 1% solution

^a data provided by Monsanto Ltd
^b purity 96%
^c purity 100%
^d purity not reported
^e pure glyphosate had been reported to have a water solubility of
11 600 mg/litre at 25 °C
^f free acid
n.a. = not applicable

2.3 Formulations

Glyphosate can be applied in various formulations. A synopsis
of these formulations, their concentrations of active ingredient,
and the countries in which the use is permitted is presented in
Table 2. This synopsis is not complete. Formulations may contain
specific surfactants. The major formulation of glyphosate is Roundup
containing 480 g/litre of the isopropylamine salt, which is
equivalent to 360 g/litre of the free acid. Some other Roundup
formulations that are characterized by other a.i. concentrations or
other surfactants have been developed for specific applications.
Other formulations that have been developed for special equipment
are Roundup Ultrabax for CDA equipment, Glyphosate Nomix for Nomix
equipment, and EZ-JECT for tree injections. In Canada, Roundup was
re-labelled as Vision in 1987 for use in forestry.

Table 2. Composition of various commercial formulations with glyphosate^a

Name Synonyms Concentration Country
a.i. (%)

Roundup Spasor, 48.0 (w/v); Most countries

Sting Vision, 41.0 (w/w)^b

Swing, 21.7 (w/w) Belgium, Cameroon, France,
Arcade, Holland, Kenya, Malawi,
Tomahawk Portugal, South Africa,
United Kingdom

Armada Frontier 16.6 (w/w) Belgium, Cameroon, Ivory
Coast, Gabon, Greece, Zaire
Dardo Ricochet^g, 12.2 (w/w) Cameroon, Egypt, France,
Rival, Greece, Israel, Italy,
Ultrasonic Portugal, Spain, United
Kingdom

Squadron 20.2 (w/w) Argentina, Australia, Columbia
Stirrup Nomix, Expedite 18.3 (w/w) France, United Kingdom
Wallop 20.8 (w/w) Malaysia
Deploy Dry^c 94.0 (w/w) USA
Quotamaker^d 75.0 (w/w) USA
Landmaster II^e 13.3 (w/w) USA
Landmaster BW,
Campaign^f 12.9 (w/w) USA
Roundup D-Pak 62.0 (w/w) USA
Rodeo 53.8 (w/w) USA
Ranger 28.6 (w/w) USA
Roundup Lawn and
Garden Conc. 18.0 (w/w) USA
Roundup-Ready-
To-Use 0.96 (w/w) USA
Fusta 22.5 (w/w) Spain

Table 2 (continued)
^a all formulations produced by Monsanto Ltd; data provided by Monsanto Ltd
^b based on the isopropylamine salt; equivalent to 36.0% (w/v) and 30.5% (w/w)
of the free acid
^c dry formulation of the monoammonium salt
^d dry formulation of the sodium sesqui salt
^e also contains 11.1% 2,4-D (isopropylamine salt)
^f also contains 20.6% 2,4-D (isopropylamine salt)
^g also contains simazine

Formulations may contain other active ingredients, e.g.,
simazine in Ricochet, 2,4-D in Landmaster, and MCPA in Fusta.

2.4 Conversion factors

1 ppm = 6.91 mg/m³ at 25 °C and 101.3 kPa

1 mg/m³ = 0.145 ppm

2.5 Analytical methods

2.5.1 Sample handling and preparation

The first preparative step before detection and measurement of
glyphosate is generally extraction. As both glyphosate and its main
metabolite aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA, see Fig. 2) show high
polarity, and are therefore highly water soluble, they are difficult
to extract with organic solvents. However, various methods have been
developed. Some recently developed extraction methods for different
media are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3. Sampling, preparation, and analysis of glyphosate

Medium Sampling Preparations Derivatization Analytical Limit of Recovery Reference
volume or reagent method determination^a
weight

Air n.r. collected onto an trifluoroacetic GC-MS and approx. 0.3 94% Jauhiainen
absorption liquid; anhydride and GC-EC µg/m³ et al. (1991)
evaporation to trifluoroethanol
dryness

Cyano-bacteria 100 ml dry, resuspend in PITC HPLC with a n.r.^b 78% Powell et al.
methanol/sodium - radically (1990)
acetate/ column compressed
triethylamine

Plants 5 g extraction with trifluoroacetic GC-NPD 0.03 mg/kg 72-92% Konar & Roy,
water/chloroform; anhydride and (1990)
preconcentration trifluoroethanol
and clean-up on
cation-exchange
resin

Plants 25-50 g extraction with TLC with 0.01 mg/kg n.r. Bunyathyan &
water/chloroform; ninhydrin Gevorgyan
preconcentration detection (1984)
and clean-up on
anion-exchange
and cation-exchange
resin; evaporation
to dryness

Table 3. cont'd (2)

Medium Sampling Preparations Derivatization Analytical Limit of Recovery Reference
volume or reagent method determination^a
weight

Water 250 ml extraction with o-phthalaldehyde LC 3.2 µg/litre 89% Wigfield &
dichloromethane; Lanouette
adsorption on (1990)
anion-exchange
resin

Water 25 ml extraction with FMOCCl HPLC and TLC 0.02 µg/litre 80% Gauch et al.
dichloromethane/ (1989)
2-propanol;
acidification
with H₂SO₄;
evaporation
to dryness

Water 1-1.5 litre no extraction; TLC with - 0.05 mg/litre n.r. Bunyathyan &
preconcentration ninhydrin Gevorgyan
and clean-up detectionc (1984)
with anion-exchange
and cation-exchange
resin

Soil 5 g extraction with trifluoroacetic GC-NPD 0.05 mg/kg 75% Roy & Konar
deionized water/ anhydride/ (1989)
H₃PO₄; addition trifluoroethanol
of Darco
charcoal

Table 3. cont'd (3)

Medium Sampling Preparations Derivatization Analytical Limit of Recovery Reference
volume or reagent method determination^a
weight

Soil 2 g (sandy extraction with FMOCCl HPLC 1 mg/kg 80-119% Miles & Moye,
soil); 25 g KH₂PO₄ (sandy soil), (1988b)
(clayish KOH (clayish soil);
soil) no clean-up

Soil, 5 g (soil); extraction with NH₄OH; ninhydrin LC 0.05-0.1 73-79% Thompson
sediment, 20 g (sed); adsorption on mg/kg (soil); (soil) et al. (1989)
foliage 5 g (fol) anion-exchange resin; 0.1 mg/kg 65-84%
further clean-up with (sed); 0.3 (sed)
Dowex cation-exchange mg/kg (fol)^d 81-84%
resin (fol)

Urine and 5-6 g extraction with H₂O HPLC (ion n.r. 81-99% Monsanto
faeces of (only faeces); protein pair, strong (1988a)
the rat precipitation and anion and
lyophilization cation-exchange),
(only urine); LSC, ¹H NMR, ³¹P
clean-up with C₁₈ NMR, GC/MS
column

Urine n.r. adsorption on trifluoroacetic GC-MS and 0.1 mg/litre n.r. Jauhiainen
(human anion-exchange resin anhydride/ GC-EC et al. (1991)
male) (SAX); elution of the trifluoroethanol
resin with HCl;
evaporation to
dryness

Table 3. cont'd (4)

Medium Sampling Preparations Derivatization Analytical Limit of Recovery Reference
volume or reagent method determination^a
weight

Serum 0.5 ml extraction with p-toluene HPLC with UV n.r.^e n.r Tomita et
(human) trichloroacetic sulfonyl chloride detection al. (1991)
acid; adsorption
on anion-exchange
resin; elution
with HCl; evaporation
to dryness

^a In no study with a non-liquid medium was it reported whether the limit of determination was based on dry or fresh weight,
except in the study of Thompson et al. (1989).
^b The order of magnitude was reported to be picomol.
^c The use of TLC with ninhydrin, copper nitrate and rhodamine B detection is reported for glyphosate in distilled water in
Ragab (1978).
^d The limits of determination in soil, sediment, and foliage are expressed per kg dry weight.
^e Only the limit of detection was reported: 0.3 mg/litre (approximately 75% recovery).

PITC = phenylisothiocyanate; FMOCCl = 9-fluorenyl-methyl chloroformate; GC =gas chromatography;
(HP)LC = (high-performance) liquid chromatography; TLC = thin layer chromatography; MS = mass spectroscopy;
EC = electron capture detector; NPD = nitrogen-phosphorus detector; n.r. = not reported;
LSC = liquid scintillation counting; NMR = nuclear magnetic resonance; sed = sediment; fol = foliage

The second preparative step is the clean-up, which may include
extraction, preconcentration by evaporation, ion-exchange
chromatography or gel chromatography. Clean-up procedures may
involve different combinations of chromatographic techniques. In a
validation study in which plant tissues and water were analysed, a
Chelex column was combined with anion-exchange clean-up (Cowell
et al., 1986). No chromatography was included in the clean-up
procedures for analysing glyphosate and AMPA in natural waters
(Miles et al., 1986). In this procedure samples were successively
filtrated, supplied with phosphate buffer, concentrated by
evaporation, and filtrated, prior to derivatization.
Samples with urine and faeces of the rat were subjected to clean-up
with a C₁₈ column (Monsanto, 1988a). Prior to this extraction,
proteins were precipitated and the samples were lyophilized; samples
of faeces were, however, only extracted with water.

The third preparative step is derivatization. Derivatization
with a fluorogenic reagent is common. Burns (1983), however,
developed a preparation technique without derivatization.
Derivatization prior to detection and measurement with HPLC can be
pre-column (Miles et al., 1986; Lundgren, 1986; Miles & Moye,
1988a) or post-column (Moye et al., 1983; Tuinstra & Kienhuis,
1987). 9-Fluorenylmethyl chloroformate, phenylisothiocyanate and
1-fluoro-2,4-dinitrobenzene may be used as pre-column reagents,
whereas ortho-phthalaldehyde-mercaptoethanol and ninhydrin may be
used as post-column fluorogenic reagents. With post-column
techniques, derivatives can be formed on-line, but it requires more
equipment and experience. On the other hand, pre-column techniques
are often more rapid and require less equipment and experience. In
general the facilities required for derivatization with fluorogenic
substances are very specific, and therefore not available in many
laboratories (Konar & Roy, 1990). These authors proposed
derivatization with a mixture of trifluoroacetic anhydride and
trifluoroethanol prior to analysis with gas chromatography as a
simpler, less laborious and more economical method. This proposal
referred to the determination of glyphosate and AMPA in plant
tissues. This and other recently developed techniques of clean-up
and derivatization are summarized in Table 2. These techniques are
intended to simplify and improve preparative techniques, which in
general used to be complex and costly (Marcotte et al., 1977;
Guinivan et al., 1982; Roseboom & Berkhoff, 1982; Moye et al.,
1983; Moye & Deyrup, 1984; Deyrup et al., 1985; Miles et al.,
1986; Lundgren, 1986; Miles & Moye, 1988b).

Sample preparation and derivatization, as developed by Powell
et al. (1990) for cyanobacteria without deproteinization (see
Table 3), should also be usable for plant and animal tissue. In this
case, a simple maceration step prior to ethanol extraction should be
included. Bunyathyan & Gevorgyan (1984) developed preparative
techniques for different media prior to analysis with TLC. Only

their procedures for plants and water are summarized in Table 3. The
preparative technique for soil samples was comparable with that of
Thompson et al. (1989), although samples of 25-50 g were required.
Bunyathyan & Gevorgyan (1984) also developed a method for preparing
20-litre air samples prior to TLC. They extracted the residues
collected on a filter with water before clean-up on a
cation-exchange resin.

2.5.2 Analytical methods

Various analytical methods for the determination of glyphosate
have been described, including thin-layer chromatography (Young
et al., 1977; Ragab, 1978; Bunyathyan & Gevorgyan, 1984),
colorimetry (Glass, 1981), differential pulse polarography (Friestad
& Bronstad, 1985), gas chromatography (Guinivan et al., 1982; Moye
& Deyrup, 1984; Deyrup et al., 1985), high-performance liquid
chromatography (Miles & Moye, 1988a; Powell et al., 1990), and
³¹P NMR (Dickson et al., 1988). Some of these techniques, their
analytical recoveries and limits of determination are listed in
Table 3. The corresponding determination limits for AMPA, i.e.
analysed with the same techniques, are listed in Table 4. Recoveries
in the different media appear to be higher for glyphosate than for
AMPA. This is probably due to optimization of the systems for
glyphosate, as was done by Thompson et al.(1989).

Table 4. Limits of determination of AMPA

Medium Limit of Recovery Reference
determination

Plants 0.01 mg/kg 61-73% Konar & Roy (1990)

Water 1.2 µg/litre 86% Wigfield & Lanouette (1990)

Soil 0.01 mg/kg 66% Roy & Konar (1989)

Soil 0.03-0.05 mg/kg 58-68% Thompson et al. (1989)

Sediment 0.03 mg/kg 54-67% Thompson et al. (1989)

Foliage 0.008 mg/kg 55-70% Thompson et al. (1989)

Urine (human) 0.05 mg/litre n.r. Jauhiainen et al. (1991)

Serum (human) n.r.^a n.r. Tomita et al. (1991)

^a n.r. = not reported; only the limit of detection was reported: 0.2 mg/litre
(approximately 88% recovery)

TLC techniques are generally based on silica gel or cellulose
plates; cellulose plates give a better separation (Dubelman, 1988).
Ninhydrin and phosphate sensitive reagents may be used for
detection, although interference from co-extractives may occur.
According to Dubelman (1988), fluorogenic reagents may be preferable
in case of interference.

Fluorogenic derivatives can be determined in HPLC analysis with
fluorescence detectors (Wigfield & Lanouette, 1990) and also with a
spectrophotometer (Powell et al., 1990). In a GC analysis a
nitrogen-phosphorus, electron capture or a flame photometric
detector can be used.

3. SOURCES OF HUMAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE

3.1 Anthropogenic sources

3.1.1 Production levels and processes

No data on the world production of glyphosate and its
formulations are available. In addition, no data on losses to the
environment during normal production and formulation or accidental
losses have been reported.

The first phase of the production of glyphosate consists of
refluxing a mixture of glycine (50 parts), chloromethylphosphonic
acid (92 parts), an aqueous solution with 50% sodium hydroxide (150
parts), and water (100 parts) in a suitable reaction vessel. Another
50 parts of an aqueous solution with 50% sodium hydroxide are added
to maintain the pH between 10 and 12, whereafter the reaction
mixture is refluxed for another 20 h. The mixture is then cooled to
room temperature and filtered. After adding 160 parts of
concentrated hydrochloric acid, this mixture is again filtered.
Glyphosate will slowly precipitate in the filtrate (IRPTC, 1991).

3.1.2 Uses

Glyphosate is a post-emergent, systemic and non-selective
herbicide intended for use against deep-rooted perennial species,
and also biennial and annual broad-leaved, grass and sedge species
(WSSA, 1983; Monsanto, personal communication to the IPCS, 1991).
Glyphosate is used in both agriculture and forestry. Fields of
agricultural use include grassland renovation, horticulture,
fructiculture, arable cultivation, and rice cultivation. Use in
forestry includes the killing of fast growing competitors in conifer
plantations or conservation areas, and the treatment of tree stumps.
Glyphosate may also be used for weed killing in non-agricultural
areas such as water systems, including irrigation and temporarily
drained waters, parks, road verges and gardens.

The uses of glyphosate indicate that it can be applied in
various crops for specific purposes. The major formulation Roundup
may, for instance, be used in pre-plant treatments for seed bed
preparations, and also against bracken infestations in forestry,
against couchgrass (Elytrigia repens) infestations on pastures, in
direct treatments between rows of crops, or by direct wiping of the
leaves of the weed, assuming the weeds are taller than the existing
crop.

Glyphosate is used worldwide. In 1987, 35 160 ha of the area in
British Columbia where vegetation management activities took place
had been treated with Roundup. This was 94% of the total area where
there were such activities (Ackurst, 1989).

The application rates of glyphosate are dependent on the
formulation and type of use. In the Netherlands, recommended rates
for the application of Roundup are 0.3-2.9 kg a.i./ha. In Canada the
recommended application rates of Roundup are 1.1-1.7 kg a.i./ha for
annual weeds and 1.2-5.8 kg a.i./ha for perennial weeds. The
recommended application rates for Vision in Canadian forestry are
1.1-2.1 kg a.i./ha (Task Force on Water Quality Guidelines, 1991).
Glyphosate is generally applied as a 0.5-5% solution in water by
spraying, and as a 10-50% solution in water by wiping with, for
instance, a rope-wick (Monsanto, personal communication to the IPCS,
1991).

The timing of application is dependent on the use. Application
in late summer or autumn is recommended for use in forestry in
Canada (Hildebrand et al., 1982). Application in agriculture may
be pre- or post-harvest. In the Netherlands, for instance,
glyphosate may be applied to cereals, potatoes and asparagus
immediately (up to 7 days) before harvest, but only when the
ripening is complete. Treatment of immature crops would result in
higher residue levels, early crop desiccation and reduced yields.

Glyphosate may be applied in different ways. For large-scale
treatments aerial application can be appropriate, small-scale
treatments can be done with spraying equipment on the back or behind
vehicles, or by wiping equipment.

Aerial applications will lead to losses due to wind-drift.
Exposure of flora and fauna due to off-target deposits may take
place. These downwind deposits depend on the meteorological
conditions, the plant canopy structure and the application method,
including the release height (Payne et al., 1989; Feng et al.,
1990; Payne, 1992; Payne & Thompson, 1992). The non-volatile
tank-mix fraction and the speed of the aircraft may influence the
drop-size spectrum, and it can be expected that dispersal systems
causing relatively small droplets and having a relatively low
non-volatile fraction will cause the highest off-target deposits.
Payne (1992) assumed that the large differences in deposits in two
comparable experiments were due more to different aircraft airspeeds
than to different wind speeds. In these experiments the maximum
deposits at a downwind distance of 50 m were 19 and 3 mg a.i./m²
at aircraft airspeeds of 45 and 11-20 m/second, respectively. The
application rate in both experiments was 2.1 kg a.i./ha. In other
experiments with the same application rate, Payne & Thompson (1992)
found that the meteorological conditions had a considerable impact
on the off-target deposition up to 400 m downwind when spraying at
different wind speeds (2.2-5.7 m/second) and turbulences. The
deposits at a downwind distance of 400 m varied between 0.001 and
0.06 mg a.i./m², whereas they varied between 0.6 and 4 mg
a.i./m² at a downwind distance of 50 m. Remarkably, the deposition
was highest with an intermediate wind speed and intensity of

turbulence. Payne et al.(1989) investigated the deposits for
aerial applications of Roundup with different dispersal systems.
When 2.1 kg a.i./ha was applied with a helicopter in a single
crosswind swath over 100 ha, up to 13.4 mg a.i./m² was deposited
on a downwind distance of 50 m. This maximum deposition was caused
by a D8-46 hydraulic nozzle, whereas the highest depositions with a
Thru Valve Boom and a Microfoil Boom were 2 and 0.4 mg a.i./m²,
respectively. These depositions were also found at a downwind
distance of 50 m. At the time of application the windspeed 13 m
above ground level was 0.4-0.5 m/second. Riley et al.(1991)
modelled spray deposition of glyphosate using results from
helicopter applications under semi-operational conditions. The study
was designed to test the appropriateness of a New Brunswick "buffer
zone" of 65 m to minimize the effects of spray drift. At a distance
of 65 m, it was estimated that between 3.7% and 5.6% of the nominal
spray rate was deposited.

3.1.3 Drinking-water

Appraisal

The low mobility of glyphosate in soil would indicate a
minimal potential for the contamination of drinking-water from
groundwater aquifers. The only possible source of drinking-water
contamination is, therefore, surface waters. There have been no
reported incidences of drinking-water contamination with
glyphosate.

Conventional plants for processing of drinking-water would not
remove glyphosate, but this could be achieved by coprecipitation
after adding iron salts (AMA van der Linden, personal communication
to the IPCS, 1991). Ozone, increasingly used as an alternative to
chlorine in drinking-water treatment, does effectively remove
glyphosate through the hydroxyl radical (HO^. ) chain processes that
occur in most ozonated waters (Yao & Haag, 1991; Haag & Yao, 1992).

4. ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPORT, DISTRIBUTION AND TRANSFORMATION

4.1 Transport and distribution between media

Appraisal

Following application, glyphosate selectively partitions to
particulate matter suspended in surface water or to the soil
substrate. This partitioning is usually rapid and occurred within 14
days in reported studies. The mechanism of sorption to soil is only
partially understood. Glyphosate can adsorb to soils through
phosphate binding sites. Competition with inorganic phosphate has
been demonstrated in the laboratory but not measured in the field.
Specific ions (Fe²⁺, Fe³⁺ and Al³⁺ ) complex glyphosate; metal
complexes with humic acids in soil may be a main binding mechanism
for glyphosate in soil. There is little reported information on
desorption from soil; the data available suggest "strong" binding.
This is supported by mobility studies which show little leaching of
glyphosate below the upper few centimetres of the soil profile. The
major metabolite, AMPA, is also retained in the upper soil layers.

There is very little information on the bioavailability of
sediment-bound glyphosate to either aquatic or terrestrial
organisms. Bioaccumulation and ecotoxicity studies have not,
generally, been performed with added sediment.

Applied glyphosate can be translocated in plants. Glyphosate
in plant foliage or leaf litter does not seem to represent a source
of contamination of aquatic systems. Animals can ingest the
herbicide residues in or on plants.

Dissipation of glyphosate from soil has been widely studied
with very variable results (DT₅₀ between 3 and 174 days).
Biodegradation appears to be the major source of dissipation.

Run-off was minimal in experimental studies, but field results
suggest that aquatic systems may be receiving glyphosate bound to
soil particles following rainfall.

In this chapter the terms biodegradation and dissipation are
used to distinguish between the decrease of the concentration in,
for instance, the soil that is due to microbes transforming the
molecule to a smaller size (biodegradation) and the decrease of the
concentration that might be due to microbial activity but also to
other processes, e.g., sorption, leaching and run-off (dissipation).

4.1.1 Water

Glyphosate dissipates from the water with 50% dissipation times
ranging from a few days to 2 weeks (Newton et al., 1984; Monsanto
1990a; see also Table 5). These DT₅₀ values were deduced from both
laboratory and field experiments in which sediment or suspended
particles were shown to be the major sink.

In water with a near-neutral pH, the formation of an insoluble
complex of Ca²⁺ with glyphosate was demonstrated in a laboratory
experiment (Subramaniam & Hoggard, 1988). It was confirmed with
X-ray powder diffraction and infrared spectra that this complex was
not an ionic salt. At a near-neutral pH, the dianionic species of
glyphosate is dominant. Insoluble complexes have also been found
with Mg²⁺, Fe³⁺ and Cu²⁺.

In a field experiment in a temperate coastal rainforest in
British Columbia, Canada, the highest concentration of glyphosate in
water was 162 µg/litre (Feng et al., 1990). This maximum was found
in a directly sprayed tributary 2 h after an aerial application of
Roundup at a rate of 2 kg a.i./ha. Concentrations in oversprayed
tributaries without a high cover of overhanging riparian vegetation
increased after the first rainfall. In oversprayed tributaries with
a high cover of riparian vegetation almost no residues were found.
Within 96 h after application the residues in all waters had
declined below detection limits, indicating rapid dissipation. After
rainstorms, peak concentrations of glyphosate were found in the
sediments and on suspended particles of the oversprayed tributaries,
with maximum concentrations of 7 mg a.i./kg dry weight and 0.06 µg
a.i./litre unfiltered water, respectively. The amounts in the
sediments of these waters were variable but declined over time. As
0.1-2 mg residue/kg dry weight sediment was found between 196 and
364 days after application, the residues appear to be persistent in
sediments of oversprayed waters. Feng et al.(1990) concluded,
therefore, that after rainstorms sediments appear to be the major
sink.

In another field experiment in the same forest ecosystem,
glyphosate dissipated rapidly from a small perennial, very slow
flowing stream, in a site of 8 ha aerially sprayed with Roundup at a
rate of 3.3 kg a.i./ha (Newton et al., 1984). In water, 50% of the
initial concentration had dissipated in 2 days. In sediment, maximum
concentrations of approximately 0.6 mg a.i./kg were found 14 days
after application. These were reduced to approximately 0.3 mg
a.i./kg in 28 days, and to < 0.2 mg a.i./kg in 55 days after
application. A comparable rapid dissipation from the water column
was found for small forest ponds in a boreal forest in Manitoba,
Canada, after applying Roundup at a rate of 0.9 kg a.i./ha
(Goldsborough & Beck, 1989). The highest concentration in filtered
water was 141 µg a.i./litre, within 6 h after application. The main

mechanism of dissipation was probably sorption to the sediment. This
was confirmed by additional experiments with polyethylene basins
filled with unfiltered water and sediment that were placed in the
spray zone. Without sediment, only a very small amount of the dose
actually applied had dissipated after 30 days, whereas with sediment
the initial concentrations in the water had decreased by 50%,
approximately 6 days after application.

Comparable dissipation patterns were found in a field
experiment (Monsanto, 1990a) in which Accord (30.5% a.i. w/w) was
applied at a rate of 4.2 kg Accord/ha on three forestry sites with
non-flowing pond water and flowing water. Concentrations of up to
1700 µg/litre filtered water were found in the pond water
immediately after spraying. The initial concentrations in both pond
and flowing water were reduced by 50% within 7 days. Concomitantly
initial AMPA concentrations (maximally 35 µg/litre) were reduced by
50% within the same period. In flowing water the dissipation of both
glyphosate and AMPA was even more rapid. Concentrations of
glyphosate increased up to 19 mg/kg dry weight in the sediment of
one pond 28 days after application. Concentrations of up to 1 mg/kg
of both compounds were measured in the sediments of non-flowing
ponds up to 400 days after application.

In field experiments in turbid Australian irrigation water,
glyphosate adsorbed to suspended particles at different rates,
apparently mainly depending on the application rate (Bowmer et al.,
1986). At an initial concentration of 5 mg a.i./litre, 10-16% of the
load adsorbed to suspended matter, whereas at an initial
concentration of 0.05 mg a.i./litre, 53-71% adsorbed. In more saline
water the degree of sorption was less, probably due to rapid
flocculation. Maximum adsorbed amounts were approximately 7000 mg
a.i./kg in less saline supply water, and approximately 2500 mg
a.i./kg in more saline drainage water. When a supply channel was
emptied before spraying with 3.6 kg a.i./ha for control of aquatic
weeds, and filled again with water 4 days after the treatment, the
amount in the unfiltered water used for irrigation was 7% of the
applied dose.

4.1.2 Soil sorption

Glyphosate is readily bound to many soils and clay minerals
(Sprankle et al., 1975; Hance, 1976; Glass, 1987; Miles & Moye,
1988b). In laboratory experiments in which glyphosate was added to
aqueous soil suspensions, the adsorption coefficient K_s/l was
18-377 dm³/kg in nine soils ranging from sandy loam to peat
(Hance, 1976), and 33-76 dm³/kg in three soils ranging from sandy
loam to clay loam (Glass, 1987). These K_s/l values indicate strong
sorption. In both experiments the sorption could be described by the
Freundlich equation. Glass (1987) found K_s/l values for the clay
minerals montmorillonite, illite and kaolinite of 138, 115 and 8
dm³/kg, respectively.

Table 5. Biodegradationa of technical grade glyphosate in water and sediments in the laboratory

Water type Sediment Test Sediment Organic Temperature pH of Experimental Parameter Time Reference
type type (%) matter in (°C) water time (days)
sediment (days)
(%)

Pond water silty A 17 0.9 23-25 5.9-7.0 30 DT₅₀ 14^b PTRL East
clay Inc. (1990a)
loam

Pond water silty An 16 0.9 20-27 5.7-6.5 365 DT₅₀ 14^c,e PTRL East
clay Inc. (1990b)
loam

Surface waterd n.r. A 9 n.r. 30 8.2-8.6 14 DT50 < 14 Monsanto
(1972a)

Lake water sandy An 33 1.4 30 6.6 42 DT50 22^e Monsanto
clay (1978a)
loam

^a Biodegradation in the whole system
^b The biodegradation stopped after approximately 15 days
^c The biodegradation stopped after approximately 150 days
^d Three rivers and one lake in the USA
^e Approximate value derived from data of the author(s)
A = aerobic; An = anaerobic; n.r. = not reported.

The mechanism of sorption of glyphosate to soil is only
partially understood. Several factors may be involved. The
phosphonic moiety adsorbs weakly to unoccupied phosphate binding
sites and can be displaced by phosphate (Hance, 1976). In laboratory
experiments with nine soils the author showed that sorption was
positively correlated with the unoccupied phosphate sorption
capacity, and not correlated with the total phosphate sorption
capacity, organic matter, clay, iron or aluminium content. No data
are available that confirm competition of glyphosate and phosphate
under field conditions, e.g., after application of artificial
fertiliser. Miles & Moye (1988b) suggested that the main mechanism
was probably by H-bonding and ion-exchange, as the degree of
sorption in their experiments was not correlated with cation
exchange capacity (CEC) values or surface areas. Contrary to the
results of Miles & Moye (1988b) and of Hance (1976), sorption
appeared to be correlated with CEC values and clay content in a
sorption study with clay loam, silt loam and sandy loam (Glass,
1987).

The binding is also influenced by the presence of specific
cations. Hensley et al.(1978) demonstrated that Fe²⁺, Fe³⁺
and Al³⁺ inactivated glyphosate much more than Ca²⁺, K⁺ and
Na⁺. This was confirmed by Glass (1987) and Sprankle et al.
(1975). Glass (1987) suggested that glyphosate was complexed by
cations, released from cation-saturated clays via a cation-exchange
with solution protons.

According to Heinonen-Tanski (1989), most of the soil-bound
residues of glyphosate were recovered in the fulvic acid fraction
(21-33%). Sorption of glyphosate to fulvic acids was also reported
by Madhun et al.(1986), who added ¹⁴C-glyphosate to an aqueous
soil extract (ASE) of peat. In this study sorption was mainly on ASE
fractions with a relative molecular mass ¾ 1000. Piccolo et al.
(1992) studied the interaction of glyphosate with a pure iron-humic
acid complex. Maximum adsorption values indicated that adsorption to
the complex occurred to as great an extent as to whole soils. This
suggested that humic acid complexes with polyvalent cations might
represent a main binding substrate for glyphosate in soils. There
was no desorption of bound residues of glyphosate following shaking
with 0.01 mol CaCl₂/litre solution for 48 h, the maximum shaking
time for the adsorption studies.

Desorption of glyphosate with ionized water from
montmorillonite and illite needed three days before reaching an
equilibrium in a study of Miles & Moye (1988b).

It can be concluded that sorption of glyphosate can be expected
in the presence of available phosphate binding sites, the presence
of iron and aluminium (oxides or hydroxides), and appropriate
combinations of clay and organic matter.

4.1.3 Mobility in soils

In view of its K_s/l, glyphosate can be expected to be
immobile or slightly mobile in many soils. This was confirmed by
several experiments, both in the laboratory and in the field. In
thin-layer chromatography studies with sandy loam, clay loam and
sandy clay loam, the Rf values of ¹⁴C-glyphosate were 0.14-0.20
(Sprankle et al., 1975). In comparable studies with silt loam,
silty clay loam, and sandy loam Rf values were < 0.2 (Monsanto,
1972c). In a leaching study with columns of 30 cm and a high water
flux of 51 cm over less than 2 days, < 0.1-6.6% of the applied
activity was leached (Monsanto, 1978b). This experiment was
performed with eight soils, ranging from sandy loam (organic matter
content 0.7%) to volcanic ash (organic matter content 9.5%). More
than 90% of the applied activity was recovered in the upper 0-14 cm
layer.

Only one leaching study under laboratory conditions with
respect to the mobility of AMPA has been reported. In this
experiment with 30-day-old residues, < 0.1-1.6% of the applied
activity was leached over 45 days (Monsanto, 1978b). The columns
were 30 cm and the water flux over 45 days was low (17 cm). The
amount of AMPA that was recovered after 45 days in the upper 0-2 cm
layer was low (0.5-12% of the applied activity), due to a high rate
of mineralisation.

4.1.4 Dissipation from the soil in the field

Many field experiments on the dissipation of glyphosate from
the soil have been performed. Some relevant studies are summarized
in Table 6. They indicate DT₅₀ values based on dissipation that
range from 3 to 174 days depending on edaphic and climatic
conditions. In a forest brush ecosystem in Oregon, USA, the DT₅₀
value in loam was 29 days with and 40 days without litter (Newton
et al., 1984). In field experiments in Sweden, Roundup was sprayed
over reforestated sites (Torstensson et al., 1989). In the soils
of these sites the DT₅₀ values were < 50 days, apparently
depending on the soil respiration rate. The dissipation consisted of
a fast first, and a much slower second phase, especially in sites in
northern Sweden, which was possibly due to a longer frost period. In
these sites 1-2% of the actually applied dose was recovered 1080
days after application. A comparable dissipation pattern was found
in a field experiment on Finnish agricultural soils (Heinonen-Tanski
et al., 1985). In this experiment 25% of the concentration in a
sandy loam 2 days after the treatment was recovered one year after
application. The application rate was 1.4 kg a.i./ha.

A study in a temperate coastal rain forest in British Columbia,
Canada, showed that, 360 days after application, 6-18% of the
initial levels was recovered (Feng et al., 1990). In this
experiment Roundup was applied at a rate of 2 kg a.i./ha. The soils

were alluvial sandy loam or sandy clay loam with highly organic
surface horizons. Some of these soils were well drained, others were
seasonally flooded. At each sampling time more than 90% of the
recovered residues was in the upper 0-15 cm layer. Under all
conditions the amount of glyphosate declined over time, whereas
there was a transient increase of AMPA.

In other field experiments on boreal forest soils, comparable
dissipation patterns were found. Stark (1983) reported DT₉₀ values
of 30-720 days, and Roy et al.(1989b) found a DT₅₀ value of
approximately 20 days on a sandy soil planted with jackpines (Pinus
banksiana). In the field experiments of Roy et al.(1989b),
glyphosate was detectable up to 335 days after application; almost
all residues in the sandy soil were recovered in the organic top
layer. In field experiments of Monsanto (1990a) in three forest
locations in the USA, the concentration course of glyphosate
appeared to be rather irregular, especially during the first four
months. However, 50% of the initial concentrations in the soil had
mostly dissipated within 120 days. One clear exception was a site in
Corvallis in which glyphosate increased up to 0.15 mg/kg dry weight,
180 days after application. On the same site AMPA increased up to
0.32 mg/kg, 346 days after application. The application rate in
these experiments was 4.2 kg Accord/ha.

On a clay soil of a clear-cut boreal forest area, Roy et al.
(1989b) found no dissipation of glyphosate due to run-off on a 8°
slope. In a field experiment on agricultural soils without
conventional tillage, the dissipation of glyphosate due to run-off
on 6-16° slopes was < 1% of the applied dose when 1.1-3.4 kg
a.i./ha was applied (Edwards et al., 1980). However, when 9.0 kg
a.i./ha was applied, 1.8% of the applied dose dissipated due to
run-off, mainly because of a rainstorm shortly after application.

4.1.5 Uptake and dissipation from plants

Uptake of ¹⁴C-glyphosate by leaves of trembling aspen
seedlings (Populus tremuloides) was initially rapid, after which
it slowed down (Sundaram, 1990). The seedlings were exposed to
Roundup that was dripped with a micro-applicator on some central
leaves. The application rate was 0.35 kg a.i./ha leaf surface area.
Most activity was washable from the leaves (61-77%), and 22-28% was
recovered in the treated leaves within 48 h. As only 1-10% was
recovered in the other parts of the seedlings, this indicated a
rather low translocation after absorption. A rapid uptake of
¹⁴C-glyphosate within a few hours was indicated for sugar beets
(Beta vulgaris), when applied to a mature leaf (Gougler & Geiger,
1981). ¹⁴C-glyphosate probably entered the phloem in a
non-facilitated way. The subsequent transport through the phloem

Table 6. Biodegradation and dissipation of glyphosate in soils

Soil type Compound Test Moisture Temperature pH Organic Experimental DT₅₀ Reference
type content (°C) matter duration (days)
(%) (%) (days)

Biodegradation

Sandy loam Tgg L,A 14-16 25 7.3 2.8 360 2^b PTRL East Inc. (1991)
Silt loam Tgg L,A 12-14 25 7.5 1.0 360 2^b PTRL East Inc. (1991)

Dissipation

Sandy loam Tgg G 11 32 5.7 1.0 112 130^b Monsanto (1972b); Rueppel
et al. (1977)
Silt loam Tgg G 11 32 6.5 1.0 112 3^b Monsanto (1972b); Rueppel
et al. (1977)
Silty clay loam Tgg G 11 32 7.0 6.0 112 25-27^b Monsanto (1972b); Rueppel
et al. (1977)
Sand Ru F n.r. n.r. 3.5-3.7 40 762 approx Roy et al. (1989b)
(humoferric 20^a
podsol)
Sandy loam, Ru F n.r. n.r. 4.2-4.9 15-31 360 45-60^b Feng & Thompson (1990)
sandy clay loam
Loam Ru F n.r. n.r. 4.0-4.7 3.8-5.2 55 29-40^b Newton et al. (1984)
Loamy sand Ru F n.r. n.r. n.r. 0.8 370 3-4^b Monsanto (1983a)
Sandy clay loam Ru F n.r. n.r. n.r. 7.0 370 122-174^b Monsanto (1983a)

^a Based on data of the author(s) ^b Data reported by the author(s)
L = laboratory study; F = field study; G = greenhouse study; A = aerobic; An = anaerobic;
Tgg = technical grade glyphosate; Ru = Roundup; n.r. = not reported

appeared to be according to an "intermediate permeability
mechanism". When exposed for a longer time, plants may show
substantial translocation of absorbed ¹⁴C-glyphosate, as was shown
for potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) by Smid & Hiller (1981). In the
treated leaves of the potatoes 45% of the absorbed activity was
recovered, whereas the rest was mainly translocated to the apical
meristem and the roots. Up to 5% was recovered in the mother tuber.
The degree of translocation was age-dependent, as older plants
showed less translocation than younger plants.

The uptake of glyphosate by red raspberries (Rubus strigosus)
was 9% of the amount that was deposited on the leaves after spraying
Roundup at a rate of 2 kg a.i./ha (Roy et al., 1989a). In the same
field experiment the uptake was 14% by wild blueberries (Vaccinium
myrilloides). Most glyphosate was recovered in the washings, which
was also found under laboratory conditions. The initial absorbed
amounts were 0.92-2.0 mg a.i./kg dry weight. The absorbed and
washable amounts together were reduced by 50% within 13 days in the
raspberries and within 20 days in the blueberries. AMPA was
detectable up to 33 days after application. Metabolism occurred to
only a minor extent as AMPA concentrations were less than 1.5% of
the concurrent concentrations of glyphosate (similar results were
reported by FAO/WHO, 1986b). In a field experiment by Feng &
Thompson (1990) in a temperate coastal rainforest in British
Columbia, Canada, the main target species for treatment with Roundup
were red alder (Alnus rubra) and salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis).
Immediately after spraying, the concentrations in leaf tissue were
up to 448 mg a.i./kg dry weight. Glyphosate dissipated rapidly from
the leaf litter with a DT₅₀ value of 8-9 days. The leaf litter
included leaves directly exposed on the trees and existing leaf
litter from natural defoliation before treatment with Roundup. The
authors assumed that leaf litter of these major brush species is an
insignificant source of glyphosate input into streams or onto forest
floor, because of the fast dissipation. A rapid dissipation of
glyphosate from fresh foliage was also found in a field study
(Monsanto, 1990a) in which initial concentrations of up to 1300 mg
a.i./kg and 2.6 mg AMPA/kg decreased rapidly. A transient
accumulation of glyphosate and AMPA was found in the leaf litter on
some sites, but these amounts were reduced by approximately 90%
within 100 days.

Glyphosate dissipated completely from wild berries (Vaccinium
vitis-idaea, Vaccinium myrtilus) within one year in a field
experiment in Finland in which Roundup was applied at a rate of
0.25-2.2 kg a.i./ha with a knapsack sprayer (Siltanen et al.,
1981). Contrary to this dissipation pattern was that of glyphosate
in reindeer lichens (Cladonia rangiferina) that were sampled in
the same experimental plots. Around 270 days after application,
dose-related concentrations of glyphosate and AMPA were recovered in

lichens with maxima of 45 and 2.1 mg/kg for glyphosate and AMPA,
respectively. Approximately 390 days after application of 0.8 kg
a.i./ha, 6.4 and 0.3 mg/kg of glyphosate and AMPA were still
detectable.

4.1.6 Ingestion by animals

As the concentration in the foliage may increase up to high
amounts immediately after application, this implies the possibility
of entry into the food chain through ingestion by herbivorous or
omnivorous animals. This was confirmed by Sullivan & Sullivan (1979)
who investigated the effects of glyphosate on the feed preference
and daily chow consumption of black-tailed deer (Odocoileus
hemionus columbianus). These herbivores did not avoid eating
browse of alder (Alnus rubra) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa) that
was treated with glyphosate at a rate of 2.2 kg/ha. Sometimes the
treated alder browse was even preferred. Reindeer may be exposed to
glyphosate, since reindeer lichens, which are an important food
source, can take up a substantial amount of glyphosate (see above).

4.2 Abiotic degradation

Appraisal

Hydrolysis of glyphosate is very slow. Photodegradation in the
field may occur.

4.2.1 Hydrolytic cleavage

Hydrolysis of glyphosate in sterile buffers is very slow. After
32 days < 6.3% of the applied activity was recovered as AMPA,
after applying ¹⁴C-glyphosate at rates of 25 and 250 mg/litre to
aqueous buffer solutions of pH 3, 6 and 9 (Monsanto, 1978b). These
tests were performed at both 5 and 35 °C.

4.2.2 Photodegradation

Photochemical degradation in water may occur under both
laboratory and field conditions, mainly depending on the type of
light source. In sterile aqueous buffers of pH 5, 7, and 9, less
than 1% of the applied dose was degraded (photodecomposition of
¹⁴C-phosphonomethyl-labelled glyphosate) during 29-31 days, when
exposed to sunlight (PTRL Inc., 1990).

Lund-Hoie & Friestad (1986) exposed Roundup to several light
sources under different conditions. When exposed to UV light (lambda
= 254 nm) under laboratory conditions, concentrations of 1 and
2000 mg a.i./litre in deionized water showed DT50 values of 4 and 14
days, respectively. When exposed to sunlight under field conditions
1 mg a.i./litre in polluted water without sediment showed a much

slower decomposition (DT50 > 63 days), possibly due to pollution
preventing adequate UV penetration in the water. Polluted water with
sediments showed a rapid dissipation from water, probably due to
adsorption onto the sediments. In another field experiment 2 and
100 mg a.i./litre in deionized or polluted water without sediment
showed DT₅₀ values of < 28 days, when exposed to sunlight. At
the low concentration the dissipation in polluted water was more
rapid than in deionized water. In the dark no dissipation occurred.

In laboratory experiments 1 mg/litre of glyphosate in
sterilized natural and deionized water showed DT50 values of 4 to >
14 days when exposed to artificial light (350-450 nm) in
photoreactors without sediment (Monsanto, 1978a). In these
experiments Ca2+ acted as a photosensitizing agent.

Photodegradation by sunlight of glyphosate applied to a soil
appeared to be an insignificant route of dissipation (PTRL Inc.,
1989). In this study, ¹⁴C-glyphosate mixed with unlabelled
glyphosate was exposed for 31 days to natural sunlight, after
application to a sandy loam at a rate of 4.5 kg a.i./ha.
Extrapolated DT₅₀ values that were based on first-order kinetics
were 90 days in the sunlight and 96 days in the dark, indicating no
substantial degradation due to photolysis. The temperature of the
soil surface was 22-23 °C. Under unnatural light conditions
glyphosate appeared not to be photodegraded substantially (Monsanto,
1972c; Rueppel et al., 1977; Monsanto, 1978a).

4.3 Biodegradation

Appraisal

Selected studies of the biodegradation of glyphosate have been
considered; selection was on the basis of test conditions and modern
methodologies. There is considerable variation in rate of breakdown
in water, aquatic sediment and soil. Degradation occurs more rapidly
in aerobic than anaerobic conditions. Half-times for biodegradation
in the three media under laboratory conditions range between a few
days and approximately 20 days. No data on biodegradation under
anaerobic conditions are available.

The main route of biodegradation of glyphosate appears to be
by splitting the C-N bond to produce AMPA. However, a second route
with splitting of the C-P bond can also occur.

the field that bacterial populations adapt to the metabolism of
glyphosate. Presence of inorganic phosphate inhibits degradation of
glyphosate with some, but not all, bacteria. Biodegradation of
glyphosate may involve co-metabolism.

The most relevant laboratory experiments in which the
biodegradation in systems with water and sediment have been studied
are summarized in Table 5. These studies indicate that the rate of
biodegradation may vary substantially, depending on experimental
conditions, e.g., the availability of oxygen, temperature and type
of sediment. The time needed for 50% biodegradation of glyphosate in
the whole system of a test with water and sediment is < 14 days
under aerobic and 14-22 days under anaerobic conditions in the
laboratory.

In the experiments of PTRL East Inc. (1990a,b), less then 10%
of the applied activity was recovered in the pond water over a
period of 30 days under aerobic condition and 365 days under
anaerobic conditions. During all experiments more than 50% of the
applied activity was recovered in the sediment.

In experiments with water and their associated sediments the
amount of a.i. declines over time with a generally transient
increase of ¹⁴C-AMPA, an increase of ¹⁴CO₂, and an increase of
sediment-bound residues. An exception to this pattern of
biodegradation can be observed in some aerobic and anaerobic
experiments that were performed with pond water and a silty clay
loam sediment (PTRL East Inc, 1990a,b). In this water/sediment
system the biodegradation stopped after approximately 15 days under
aerobic conditions and after approximately 150 days under anaerobic
conditions. The glyphosate residues (a.i. plus AMPA) at both time
points remained approximately 40% of the applied dose, which
indicated substantial persistence in spite of the rapid initial
degradation.

AMPA is the main metabolite of glyphosate found in both the
water column and the sediment. Maximum amounts of AMPA under both
aerobic and anaerobic conditions in the sediment were 25% of the
applied activity (PTRL East Inc., 1990a,b). These maxima were found
at 7-20 days after application. In the same experiments maximum
amounts of sediment-bound residue were 9% of the applied activity
under aerobic conditions and 4% under anaerobic conditions. These
maxima were found at the end of the experiments. The amounts of
evolved ¹⁴CO₂ in these studies gradually increased in most cases
up to 24 and 35% of the applied activity after 30 days (aerobic),
and 365 days (anaerobic), respectively. This indicates substantial
differences in the mineralization rate. These differences are partly
due to the availability of oxygen, since under anaerobic conditions
the mineralization rate was slower than under aerobic conditions.

This was also found by Monsanto (1972a, 1978a). In the aerobic
experiments of Monsanto (1972a), four sediments that differed by up
to two orders of magnitude in the total number of micro-organisms
did not show substantial differences in mineralization rate.

Biodegradation studies with glyphosate in the soil under
conditions where unequivocal interpretation is justified are scarce.
Table 6 summarizes some relevant studies, indicating that the
biodegradation rate may differ substantially, depending on the
experimental conditions. The laboratory and greenhouse experiments
in Table 6 were performed with moisture contents (> 75% of the
field capacity) that were adequate for optimal biodegradation.

In most laboratory experiments the biodegradation rate of
glyphosate in soils appears to be rapid (see Table 6). Mostly
biodegradation can be described with linear first-order kinetics.

Sometimes a non-linear first-order model taking into account
spatial variability better describes the results observed (PTRL East
Inc., 1991):

C = C₀ (1 + ßt)-^alpha

C in this equation is the concentration in the soil at time t,
C₀ the initial concentration, and alpha and ß are rate constants
reflecting spatial variability.

The main metabolite under aerobic conditions of glyphosate in
soil is AMPA. In aerobic laboratory experiments the maximum amounts
in sandy loam and silt loam were 27 and 29%, respectively, of the
applied activity. These maxima were reached 14 days after
application (PTRL East Inc., 1991). From the data of PTRL East Inc.
(1991), DT₅₀ values for AMPA of approximately 50 days in sandy and
silty loam can be derived. That AMPA is more persistent than
glyphosate was also shown in a laboratory experiment with sandy loam
(Monsanto, 1972b). The amounts of AMPA after 111 days were 10-17% of
the applied activity. In this study, the temperature (32 °C) was
higher than in the other studies discussed above.

Some minor unidentified metabolites were quantified in an
aerobic laboratory experiment lasting 364 days with sandy loam and
silt loam (PTRL East Inc., 1991). Two unknown metabolites did not
exceed 3.5% of the applied activity, whereas some other unknown
metabolites did not exceed 1.5% each. Rueppel et al.(1977)
quantified some minor metabolites that did not exceed 1% of the
applied activity. These metabolites were
N-methylamino-methylphosphonic acid, glycine,
N,N-dimethylaminomethylphos-phonic acid, hydroxymethylphosphonic
acid, and two unknown metabolites.

In aerobic laboratory experiments, the amounts of soil-bound
residues immediately after application were 9-35% of the applied
dose, after which they showed an irregular time-course during these
experiments of approximately 112 days (Monsanto, 1972b). In general,
the initial amounts were also the maximum amounts. In other
laboratory experiments however, maximum amounts of soil-bound
residues appeared to be reached after 14 days, whereafter they
remained more or less constant or even decreased (PTRL East Inc.,
1991). These maximum amounts were 7-9% of the applied activity, and
were probably lower compared with other studies due to better
extraction procedures.

Mineralization in the soil occurs under both aerobic and
anaerobic conditions in the laboratory, although the rates may
differ greatly, apparently mainly depending on the soil respiration
rate and the temperature. When ¹⁴C-phosphonomethyl-labelled
glyphosate was applied to sandy loam and silt loam, 70-78% ¹⁴CO₂
evolved during an aerobic laboratory experiment of 360 days (PTRL
East Inc., 1991). In this study the application rate was 4 mg
a.i./kg dry weight. In an aerobic laboratory study with 15 Swedish
forest soils, DT₅₀ values based on ¹⁴CO₂ evolution varied
between 6 and 200 days. Mineralization was highly correlated with
the soil respiration rate, but not with pH or organic matter content
(Torstensson & Stark, 1981). This was confirmed by Torstensson &
Stenström (1986) and Heinonen-Tanski (1989). Torstensson & Stenström
(1986) reported that glyphosate was co-metabolized. In this case,
co-metabolizing microorganisms are not supplied with energy by
biodegrading glyphosate.

Establishing the correlation between soil respiration and
mineralization requires both a standardized measurement of the
respiration rate and an accurate measurement of the actual dose that
reaches the soil (Torstensson & Stenström, 1986). In a laboratory
experiment simulating temperatures under arctic conditions in forest
soils, 51-71% of the applied activity was recovered as ¹⁴CO₂ 217
days after application of ¹⁴C-glyphosate. In this study the
mineralization rate was reduced 10-15 times during a temperature
decrease of 10 °C over the first part of the study. The rate
increased only 3.7-4 times with a temperature increase of 10 °C
during the second part (Heinonen-Tanski, 1989).

Glyphosate in the soil appears to be degradable by
micro-organisms in two ways (Jacob et al., 1988), as shown in
Fig. 3. One route is via the formation of AMPA and a C₂ fragment
which might be glyoxylate. This scheme for degradation was proposed
by many researchers (Monsanto, 1972b; PTRL East Inc., 1991). In this
route the splitting of the C-N bond is the first step. There is,
however, another route of biodegradation via sarcosine
(N-methyl-glycine) and orthophosphate, after which sarcosine is

degraded to glycine and a one-carbon unit that eventually might form
CO₂ via formaldehyde (Kishore & Jacob, 1987; Jacob et al., 1988).
In this route the splitting of the C-P bond is the first step. In
experiments with ¹⁴C-glyphosate, isolated cultures of Pseudomonas
sp. strain LBr were able to degrade glyphosate according to both
routes (Jacob et al., 1988). Approximately 5% of the applied
¹⁴C-glyphosate was not degraded via AMPA, but via sarcosine.

The growth rate of bacteria isolated from a sandy loam garden
soil that was sprayed with Tumbleweed (a garden product) was less
inhibited by technical grade glyphosate than the growth rate of
bacteria from an unsprayed control (Quin et al., 1988). This
indicated adaptation of the bacterial populations of the sprayed
site. As addition of aromatic amino acids prevented growth
inhibition in the population of the unsprayed site to a greater
extent than in the population of the sprayed site, different
mechanisms of biochemical interference were indicated. The
composition of the bacterial population on the unsprayed site was
also different from the sprayed one. Pseudomonas sp. and
lactose-fermenting bacteria could be identified in an inoculum from
the sprayed soil able to use glyphosate as a sole source of
phosphorus (Quinn et al., 1988). A different regulatory mechanism
for biodegradation in unsprayed and sprayed sites was assumed: in
the latter the aromatic amino acid pathway might be regulated by
direct control of 3-deoxy-D-arabino-heptulosonate-7-phosphate (DAHP)
by the end-products, whereas in the unsprayed site DAHP synthase
might be indirectly regulated by prephenate. Also in other
experiments bacteria were shown to use glyphosate as a sole P source
(Kishore & Jacob, 1987; Pipke & Amrhein, 1988; Weidhase et al.,
1990), thereby primarily degrading glyphosate to orthophosphate and
sarcosine, by splitting the C-P bond. In the study of Weidhase et
al. (1990), 18.2% of the applied activity was recovered as sarcosine
8 h after application of ¹⁴C-1-methyl-labelled glyphosate to a
pure culture of Pseudomonas sp. GS. This biodegradation route of
glyphosate via sarcosine was also demonstrated by Kishore & Jacob
(1987). In their experiments with glyphosate as sole P source for
Pseudomonas sp. PG2982, one hour after application of
¹⁴C-labelled glyphosate, glycine, phosphate, and a one-carbon
unit, possibly formaldehyde, were identified as metabolites. After
one hour, the ¹⁴CO₂ evolution when the phosphonomethyl moiety
was labelled was substantially higher, as compared with the 1- or
2-glycine-labelled moieties. The authors suggested that the
so-called phosphate-starvation-inducible proteins, as identified by
others, might be responsible for cleaving the C-P bond. In an
experiment with pure cultures of a mutant of Arthrobacter sp.
GLP-1 able to use glyphosate as a sole P source, 90% of the applied
activity was released as orthophosphate at 240 h after application
of ¹⁴C-1-methyl-labelled glyphosate (Pipke & Amrhein, 1988).
Orthophosphate inhibited further biodegradation of glyphosate.
Flavobacterium sp. was found by Balthazor & Hallas (1986) to be

able to degrade glyphosate in spite of the presence of
orthophosphate. Liu et al. (1991) showed that 12 strains of bacteria
from the family Rhizobiaceae could degrade glyphosate present in the
medium as the sole phosphorus source; although growth of the
bacteria was slower than with inorganic phosphate. Sarcosine was the
intermediate breakdown product, indicating initial cleavage of the
C-P bond, in Rhizobium meliloti, the strain used for detailed
metabolic studies.

Carlisle & Trevors (1986a) deduced from their experiments that
nitrate-reducing bacteria are involved in metabolizing glyphosate.
Involvement of nitrifying bacteria in the biodegradation of
glyphosate was also demonstrated by Murthy et al. (1989), when they
investigated the treatment of waste water from a Roundup formulating
factory.

Pseudomonas sp. may use glyphosate as a sole P or C source,
as demonstrated by Weidhase et al. (1990). Only slight growth of the
wild-type strain of the bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens was
observed with glyphosate as sole carbon or nitrogen source. The
herbicide was metabolized to aminomethylphosphonate (Zboinska
et al., 1992). Murthy et al. (1989) isolated a denitrifying
bacterial species that was also able to use glyphosate as a C
source. This species was isolated from activated sludge in a
waste-water treatment plant. A mutant of Arthrobacter sp. strain
GLP-1 was able to utilize glyphosate as a sole N source, whereas
this was not possible for the normal strain (Pipke & Amrhrein,
1988), probably due to the uptake of inorganic P released during
biodegradation.

As the Biological Oxygen Demand and the Chemical Oxygen Demand
of glyphosate are < 2 mg/g and 0.53 g/g, respectively, glyphosate
cannot be considered as readily biodegradable (LISEC, 1990a,b). In
suitable systems, however, glyphosate is biodegradable, as shown by
Murthy et al. (1989), who investigated the biodegradation of
glyphosate in waste-water treatment plants under different
conditions in sequencing batch reactors on a laboratory scale. These
reactors were fed with waste water from a Roundup manufacturing
facility. Glyphosate was degraded completely within one cycle of
24 h, independent of whether there was an initial aerated or anoxic
phase of 4 h. However, more glyphosate could be processed with an
anoxic initial phase, probably due to better conditions for
denitrification. Not only denitrifiers but also ammonifiers and
nitrifiers appeared to be involved in the biodegradation of
glyphosate. Only at the very high concentration of approximately
5000 mg a.i./litre was biodegradation repressed by non-glyphosate
COD and inhibited by excess ammonia production.

Pseudomonas sp. strain LBr, Flavobacterium sp. and a
denitrifying bacterial species were isolated from activated sludge
as species with the ability to use glyphosate as a P source
(Balthazor & Hallas, 1986; Jacob et al., 1988; Murthy et al., 1989).
The denitrifier was also able to use glyphosate as a sole C source.
Flavobacterium sp. degraded glyphosate to AMPA in both the
presence and absence of PO₄^3- (Balthazor & Hallas, 1986). In
this experiment the further degradation of AMPA appeared to be
hampered in the presence of PO₄^3-.

Pseudomonas sp. strain LBr was capable of completely
eliminating amounts of glyphosate up to 3212 mg/litre from a growth
medium (Jacob et al., 1988).

Continuous exposure of an activated sludge treatment system in
a pilot plant increased the ability of the sludge to metabolize
glyphosate to AMPA (Hallas et al., 1992). In this trial an influent
concentration of 50 mg a.i./litre was reduced to less than 5 mg
a.i./litre under continuous-flow conditions with an average
residence time of 10 min. The sludge was inoculated with immobilized
bacteria capable of degrading glyphosate. The effectiveness of the
treatment was dependent on the presence of a nitrogen source and a
non-glyphosate carbon source, and required a pH range of 6.0 to 8.0.

No data are available on the amounts of glyphosate that can be
eliminated in conventional waste-water treatment plants under
practical conditions. In waste water from glyphosate-producing
plants, 28-45% is reported to be eliminated through biological
treatment (Task Force on Water Quality Guidelines, 1991).

No data are available on the biodegradability of the
surfactants in formulations. It is, however, probable that
polyoxyethylene amine is biodegraded fairly rapidly in view of the
biodegradability of structurally related compounds (Swisher, 1987).

4.4 Bioaccumulation

Appraisal

Glyphosate is not expected to bioaccumulate in view of its
high water solubility and its ionic character. This was confirmed by
several laboratory experiments with fish, crustaceans and molluscs
and by field experiments.

In a static test, channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) were
exposed to 0.94-0.99 mg ¹⁴C-labelled a.i./litre (actual
concentrations) for 10 days (ABC Inc, 1981d; Monsanto, 1981a). Of
the absorbed amount, 76% was recovered in the viscera. More than 90%
of the extractable residues in the viscera and the fillet was
identified as glyphosate, whereas less than 2% was identified as
AMPA. After 10 days of depuration 80% of the absorbed activity was
eliminated. For exposed channel catfish the calculated
bioconcentration factor based on the activity absorbed by the whole
fish was 0.27. For depurated channel catfish the calculated
bioconcentration factor was 0.052.

The marsh clam (Rangia cuneata) and crayfish (Procambarus
simulans) were exposed in static tests lasting 28 days to
synthetic uncontaminated sea water and a sandy loam sediment that
was incorporated with 3 mg ¹⁴C-labelled a.i./kg (ABC Inc.,
1982d,e). These experiments were set up to assess the degree of
bioconcentration of glyphosate when used in flooded rice levees and
tidal water. The calculated bioconcentration factor for the edible

parts of the clam increased during exposure up to 4.8, whereas for
the whole crayfish it increased up to 12. The highest concentrations
in the edible parts of the clam and the whole crayfish were 0.3 mg
¹⁴C-labelled residues/kg for both. After 28 days of depuration 48%
of the accumulated residues were eliminated from the edible parts of
the clam. The concentration in these parts was then 0.16 mg
¹⁴C-residues/kg. The crayfish finally had eliminated 91% after 14
days of depuration. The concentration in the whole crayfish was then
0.02 mg ¹⁴C-residues/kg. It must be stated that this test refers
to the accumulation of ¹⁴C and not glyphosate.

In a static test without sediment, in which rainbow trout
(Salmo gairdnerii) were exposed to 2 mg a.i./litre (nominal
concentration) for 12 h, the fillets of the fish contained 80 µg
a.i./kg (in the original article the erroneous figure of 80 mg/kg
was reported), and the eggs 60 µg a.i./kg (Folmar et al., 1979).
This indicates a bioconcentration factor of 0.04 for the edible
parts. Roundup was applied in this test.

In a flow-through test in which bluegill sunfish (Lepomis
macrochirus) were exposed to 11-13 mg ¹⁴C-labelled a.i./litre
(actual concentrations) for 35 days, calculated daily
bioconcentration factors based on the whole fish increased from <
0.1, 0.2 days after the start of the test, to 0.4-0.5 at the end
(ABC Inc., 1989f). Maximum concentrations in the whole fish, viscera
and fillet were 13, 7.6 and 4.8 mg ¹⁴C-residues/kg, respectively.
The time required to reach 90% of the steady state and the uptake
rate constant were calculated to be 120 days and 0.02 mg/kg fish x
(mg/litre water)-1 x day-1, respectively. During 21 days of
depuration, the half-life of depuration was calculated to be 35. A
slow decrease in tissue concentration during depuration was
indicated. After the period of depuration 2.2 mg ¹⁴C-residues/kg
whole fish was still present. In an additional study to characterize
the ¹⁴C-residues, 95-97% of the residues in the water was
glyphosate, whereas in the whole fish and tissues 28-91% of the
recovered activity was glyphosate (ABC Inc., 1989g). In a whole fish
sample 21 days after starting the test, 49% of the recovered
activity was found to be AMPA. By treating homogenates with
proteinase K it was indicated that a substantial amount of the
absorbed residues was tightly associated with, or incorporated into,
protein.

In a field experiment in a forest ecosystem in Oregon, USA,
neither glyphosate nor AMPA were recovered in salmon fingerlings
(Oncorhynchus kisutch) after aerial application of Roundup at a
rate of 3.3 kg a.i./ha (Newton et al., 1984). The fingerlings were
released at the downstream edge of the sprayed site and analysed up
to 55 days after treatment. Glyphosate was not recovered in carp
(Cyprinus carpio) in a field experiment in which ponds were
sprayed with Roundup at rates of 1.3-1.4 kg a.i./ha (Monsanto,
1980). In this experiment of approximately 90 days, AMPA was not

recovered until 30 days after application. It then increased up to
0.21 mg/kg whole fish, remained constant for another 30 days, and
then decreased to around the limit of determination (0.1 mg/kg) at
the end of the experiment.

In a forest ecosystem in Oregon, USA, Roundup was aerially
applied at a rate of 3.3 kg a.i./ha (Newton et al., 1984).
Concentrations in mammals were of the same order of magnitude as the
concentrations in litter and ground cover. The concentrations of
glyphosate in the viscera of herbivorous small mammals decreased
more slowly than in omnivorous and carnivorous small mammals, which
was probably due to a higher ingestion of contaminated litter. The
highest concentration was found in the viscera of omnivorous
deermice (Peromysces maniculatus) immediately after spraying: 5 mg
a.i./kg. Only small traces of AMPA were found in mammalian viscera.

4.5 Waste disposal

Small amounts of glyphosate can be disposed of by mixing with
alkali and soil prior to burial in a pit or trench, whereas large
amounts should be incinerated in units equipped with effluent gas
scrubbing (IRPTC, 1991).

5. ENVIRONMENTAL LEVELS AND HUMAN EXPOSURE

Appraisal

The low toxicity, low volatility and low body absorption of
glyphosate makes its application by backpack sprayer safe under
field condition provided that the worker wears full protective
clothing.

5.1 Environmental levels

A synopsis of concentrations of glyphosate is tabulated in
Table 7. Measurements as part of regular monitoring programmes are
very scarce; measurements in field experiments with recommended
application rates simulating common agricultural practice are
therefore included in Table 7. Only maximum amounts are tabulated as
indicative values, since the rate at which they dissipate is not
included here (see sections 4.1 and 4.3). Data on the occurrence of
glyphosate and AMPA in sewage sludge are not available.

In biota the highest concentrations of glyphosate and AMPA were
found in fresh foliage and reindeer lichen (Cladonia rangiferina).
In abiota the highest concentrations of both compounds were found in
the soil (see Table 7). The occurrence of glyphosate in the
groundwater of Texas, USA, was reported by Hallberg (1989), but the
measured concentration and the year of measurement were not
specified.

Use of glyphosate as a herbicide may result in the presence of
residues in crops and animal tissues destined for human consumption.
Application as a herbicide may also be responsible for the presence
of glyphosate in drinking-water. Direct measurements of glyphosate
in foodstuffs (as part of food surveillance), drinking-water or
total diets have not been carried out. The only information
available comes from controlled residue studies. With technical
glyphosate formulated as the isopropylamine salt in aqueous
solution, numerous residue studies have been carried out in
vegetables, grasses, oil seeds, mammalian products, poultry products
and primary feed commodities. The results are summarized in the
various reports of the FAO/WHO Joint Meeting on Pesticide Residues
(FAO/WHO, 1986a, 1987, 1988). For detailed information on these
studies the reader is referred to these reports. The appraisals made
by the JMPR included the following more general statements.
Pre-harvest (5-14 days) application of glyphosate (isopropylamine
salt) in the cultivation of cereals results in significant residues
in the grain and plant materials. Studies are available to show the
fate of glyphosate in milling, baking and brewing. Residue levels in
white flour were approximately 10-20% of the levels in wheat, while
the bran residue levels were 2 to 4 times as high as those in the
wheat. Glyphosate residues were not lost during baking, but residue
levels decreased when bread was made from flour because of dilution.

Glyphosate residue levels in malt and beer derived from
field-treated barley were, respectively, about 25% and 4% of the
original level in the barley. Some glyphosate is lost during
washing, but most of the decrease can be attributed to dilution. The
levels in groats (processed oats) were about 50% of the levels in
the pre-harvest-treated oats. In all these cases, AMPA contributed
only a small proportion (average < 2.5%) of the total residues
(FAO/WHO, 1986a, 1987).

When administered to animals glyphosate is rapidly excreted
without degradation. Residues in cattle, pig and poultry meat, eggs
and milk were negligible after the animals were fed with a diet
containing 100 mg/kg glyphosate and aminoglyphosate acid. The
highest residues were in pig liver and kidney (up to 0.16 and
0.91 mg/kg, respectively) and cattle kidney (up to 1.4 mg/kg).
Residues in animal feeds arising from pre-harvest glyphosate
applications to cereals will result in only low residues in meat,
milk and eggs (FAO/WHO, 1986a).

On the basis of these residue studies the JMPR has estimated
the maximum residue levels that are likely to occur when glyphosate
(as isopropylamine salt) is used in practice, and recommended these
levels as Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs). These MRLs are presented in
FAO/WHO (1986a, 1987, 1988).

5.2 General population exposure

Apart from the controlled residue studies mentioned above, no
data are available.

Table 7. Maximum concentrations of glyphosate in environmental air, water, soil, sediment and biota

Sample Compound Location Year^a Concentration Reference

Netherlands

Surface water glyphosate Drentsche Aa 1988-1989 0.5-1 µg/litre^b (Soppe, personal
Surface water AMPA Drentsche Aa 1988-1989 6 µg/litre^b communication to the IPCS, 1991)

Finland

Loam soil (agric.) glyphosate Kettula 1978 17 mg/kg d.w. Müller et al. (1981)
Loam soil (agric.) AMPA Kettula 1978 3.2 mg/kg d.w. Müller et al. (1981)
Silt soil (agric.) glyphosate Kettula 1978 3.8 mg/kg d.w. Müller et al. (1981)
Silt soil (agric.) AMPA Kettula 1978 0.4 mg/kg d.w. Müller et al. (1981)
Wild berries glyphosate Laukaa, Konnevesi 1977 1.6-2.1 mg/kg^c Siltanen et al. (1981)
Wild berries AMPA Laukaa, Konnevesi 1977 0.02-0.07 mg/kg^c Siltanen et al. (1981)
Reindeer lichen glyphosate Laukaa, Konnevesi 1976 45 mg/kg^c Siltanen et al. (1981)
Reindeer lichen AMPA Laukaa, Konnevesi 1976 2.1 mg/kg^c Siltanen et al. (1981)

Canada

Wild berries glyphosate Harker, Lamplugh 1985 8-19 mg/kg f.w. Roy et al. (1989a)
Wild berries AMPA Harker, Lamplugh 1985 0.06-0.1 mg/kg f.w. Roy et al. (1989a)
Surface water^d glyphosate Carnation Creek 1984 162 µg/litre Feng et al. (1990)
Surface water^e glyphosate Carnation Creek 1984 < 1 µg/litre Feng et al. (1990)
Surface water^d AMPA Carnation Creek 1984 approx 3 µg/litre Feng et al. (1990)
Pond water glyphosate Manitoba 1986 141 µg/litre Goldsborough & Beck (1989)
Pond water AMPA Manitoba 1986 2.2 µg/litre Goldsborough & Beck (1989)
Sedimentd glyphosate Carnation Creek 1984 6.8 mg/kg d.w. Feng et al. (1990)
Suspended sediment glyphosate Carnation Creek 1984 0.06 µg/litre Feng et al. (1990)
Soil glyphosate Carnation Creek 1984 40 mg/kg d.w. Feng & Thompson (1990)
Soil AMPA Carnation Creek 1984 9 mg/kg d.w. Feng & Thompson (1990)

Table 7. (cont'd)

Sample Compound Location Year^a Concentration Reference

Canada (cont'd)

Foliage (fresh) glyphosate Carnation Creek 1984 261-448 mg/kg d.w. Feng & Thompson (1990)
Foliage (fresh) AMPA Carnation Creek 1984 < 9 mg/kg d.w. Feng & Thompson (1990)
Topcrown foliage glyphosate Oregon Coast Range 1978 489 mg/kg^c Newton et al. (1984)
Topcrown foliage AMPA Oregon Coast Range 1978 2.1 mg/kg^c Newton et al. (1984)
Deermice (viscera) glyphosate Oregon Coast Range 1978 5.1 mg/kg^c Newton et al. (1984)

USA

Pond water glyphosate Chassell, Corvallis, 1987 90-1700 µg/litre Monsanto (1990a)
Cuthbert
Pond water AMPA Chassell, Corvallis, 1987 2-35 µg/litre Monsanto (1990a)
Cuthbert
Stream water glyphosate Chassell, Corvallis, 1987 35-1237 µg/litre Monsanto (1990a)
Cuthbert
Stream water AMPA Chassell, Corvallis, 1987 < 1.0-10 µg/litre Monsanto (1990a)
Cuthbert
Pond sediment glyphosate Chassell, Corvallis, 1987 0.26-19 mg/kg d.w. Monsanto (1990a)
Cuthbert
Pond sediment AMPA Chassell, Corvallis, 1987 0.13-1.8 mg/kg d.w. Monsanto (1990a)
Cuthbert
Stream sediment glyphosate Chassell, Corvallis, 1987 0.11-0.69 mg/kg d.w. Monsanto (1990a)
Cuthbert
Stream sediment AMPA Chassell, Corvallis, 1987 < 0.05-0.38 mg/kg d.w. Monsanto (1990a)
Cuthbert
Soil (no litter on it) glyphosate Chassell, Corvallis, 1987 0.15-4.7 mg/kg d.w. Monsanto (1990a)
Cuthbert

Table 7. (cont'd)

Sample Compound Location Yeara Concentration Reference

USA (cont'd)

Soil (no litter on it) AMPA Chassell, Corvallis, 1987 0.18-0.51 mg/kg d.w. Monsanto (1990a)
Cuthbert
Soil (litter on it) glyphosate Chassell, Corvallis, 1987 0.07-1.4 mg/kg d.w. Monsanto (1990a)
Cuthbert
Soil (litter on it) AMPA Chassell, Corvallis, 1987 0.14-0.68 mg/kg d.w. Monsanto (1990a)
Cuthbert
Foliage (fresh) glyphosate Chassell, Corvallis, 1987 650-1300 mg/kgb Monsanto (1990a)
Cuthbert
Foliage (fresh) AMPA Chassell, Corvallis, 1987 1.7-2.6 mg/kgb Monsanto (1990a)
Cuthbert

^a Sampling invariably took place during the autumn period.
^b Analytical procedure was unvalidated; the water was sampled at an inlet point of
a drinking-water processing facility
^c It was not reported whether values were based on dry or fresh weight
^d Water unbuffered by vegetation
^e Water buffered by vegetation

5.3 Occupational exposure during manufacture, formulation or use

In the study of Monsanto (1977), worker exposure to Roundup was
measured during herbicide mixing and application operations and upon
re-entry of treated fields. The formulation was applied on separate
plots using three application devices, i.e. a broadcast boom
sprayer, a handgun broadcast sprayer and a backpack/hand-gun
sprayer. Exposure time during mixing was < 5 min; during
application this was about 45 to 60 min. Inhalational exposure
during mixing and spraying was determined using a sampling device
placed close to the applicator's face; the total air volume sampled
was 15-20 times the daily ventilation volume. Dermal exposure during
mixing and spraying was monitored by determination of deposition on
gauze pads placed outside or inside the operator's clothing on
different parts of the body. Operator exposure (inhalation and skin,
determination method as above) upon re-entry was determined at 1, 3
and 7 days after application. In one treated plot, this was done by
having operators walk through the plot for 28 to 44 min; in two
other plots a dummy sampling device was used to determine exposure
upon re-entry. Using the measured glyphosate residues total worker
exposure was estimated. The results are presented in Table 8.

Table 8. Applicator/worker exposure to glyphosate^a

Operation Average dermal Average inhalation Total exposure
exposure exposure (µg/h)
(µg/h) (µg/h)^b

Tank filling 805.1 17.9 823.0

Boom spraying 271.4 0.19 271.59

Handgun spraying 7957.0 2.47 7959.47

Backpack spraying 3619.0 0.92 3619.92

Field re-entry:

1 day after treatment 2046.6 4.58 2051.18

3 days after treatment 2919.7 0.12 2919.82

7 days after treatment 15.9 0.12 16.02

^a From: Monsanto (1977)
^b Calculation based on an estimated breathing rate of 1.8 m³/h

Monsanto (1990) conducted another collaborative study at three
sites maintained by the USDA Forestry Service near Clayton, Georgia;
the Savanah River Plant, South Carolina; and Edgefield, South
Carolina. Glyphosate was being used to control vegetative growth
around pine seedlings planted in clear-cut forest areas. The workers
were biologically monitored by analysis of collected composite urine
specimens. Additionally, dermal/clothing deposition and simulated
inhalation exposure were monitored by passive dosimetry with cotton
cloth patches, hand rinses and air filters. At the three sites,
exposure of workers to glyphosate using backpack sprayers while
performing their duties under normal use conditions was monitored.
The analytical results indicated that the majority of urine
composite samples had unmeasurable residues of glyphosate.
Deposition on air filters, patches and hands from measurement of
washes, however, indicated a small amount of body exposure. It was
concluded that penetration of clothing did not exceed 3.84% and thus
clothing produced 96.2% protection. Body burden, as shown in urine
samples, was extremely low and in most cases below the detection
limit.

A new Monsanto study was conducted for the assessment of worker
exposure to glyphosate during mist blower application of Roundup
herbicide. Exposure was determined by a passive dosimetry technique
while workers sprayed weeds around palm trees in a plantation in
Malaysia. The workers were fitted with gauze patches at different
locations on their clothing. Air sampling was performed in the
breathing zone and the workers hands were washed at the end of the
day. The passive dosimetry body dose estimates were calculated for a
fully clothed worker with a long-sleeved shirt, long pants and
rubber boots. The hand exposure would account for bare hands during
the loading and spraying operations. Passive dosimetry estimates for
the four replicates, corrected for clothing and dermal penetration,
transport/storage/analytical recovery and normalized for body weight
and amount of chemical handled, averaged 1.88 µg/kg body weight per
kg a.i. This is little higher than the passive dosimetry estimates
of forestry workers who applied Roundup with knapsack sprayers,
which was 1.75 µg/kg body weight per kg a.i. Thus, it can be
concluded that workers applying Roundup herbicide with mist blowers,
experience some dermal exposure. In addition, inhalation exposure to
glyphosate may be higher during mist blower application. However,
Roundup demonstrated essentially no volatility. The only possible
route would be via air-borne particles. The actual amount of
glyphosate absorbed through inhalation would be much lower than the
estimated values because the measurement includes particles too
large to be inhaled (Monsanto, 1991).

Jauhiainen et al. (1991) examined the exposure of workers to
glyphosate during silvicultural clearing with brush saws equipped
with herbicide sprayers. Measurements of air concentrations during
spraying and urinary glyphosate levels both during and following
spraying were carried out. Most of the air samples had glyphosate
concentrations below 1.25 µg/m³; the highest value observed was
15.7 µg/m³. All urine samples taken had glyphosate concentrations
below the limit of detection of 0.1 mg/litre (Jauhiainen et al.,
1991).

Lavy et al. (1992) used two methods to monitor glyphosate
exposure of workers planting conifer seedlings. Firstly, they
estimated dermal exposure based on the rate of deposition on cotton
gauze patches, surface area exposed, and a dermal penetration rate
of 1.8%. This yielded dose estimates in the range of 0-875 or
0-1.7 µg/kg body weight per h. Secondly, they attempted to measure
urinary concentration levels but found no samples above the
detection limit of 0.01 mg/litre. Based on the negative results with
the urine samples, the authors concluded that the estimates based on
patch deposition overestimated exposure by at least a factor of 11
for the most highly exposed workers (Lavy et al., 1992).

It should be noted that a dermal penetration rate of 1.8% was
used in this calculation. In view of the discussion of the dermal
penetration studies (section 6.1), a value of 5.5% is to be
preferred. However, since the estimate based on 1.8% is already an
overestimation of exposure, it is not considered necessary to adjust
the estimate of Lavy et al. (1992) to 5.5%. In their final data
assessment, the authors estimated exposure from the biological
monitoring using postulated data, i.e. assuming a concentration in
urine of half the lower limit of method validation. This yielded
mean exposure values of 0.039 to 0.080 µg/kg body weight per h (Lavy
et al., 1992).

6. KINETICS AND METABOLISM IN LABORATORY
ANIMALS AND HUMANS

Appraisal

Absorption from the gastrointestinal tract after oral intake
is limited to 30-36% of the dose or less in various species, i.e.
rats, rabbits, laying hens and lactating goats. Percutaneous
absorption in Rhesus monkeys amounts to 5.5% only, and glyphosate is
very poorly absorbed through excised human abdominal skin.

Radiolabelled glyphosate distributes widely in the body, but
is primarily found in the bones where approximately 1% can be
detected after oral administration.

Glyphosate is essentially not metabolized. This validates
kinetic studies performed with radiolabelled compound.

After absorption, excretion of glyphosate occurs mainly in the
urine. Biliary excretion is limited and elimination through exhaled
air is very low. Total body clearance is 99% after 168 h.

6.1 Absorption

The absorption percentage in rats was reported to be 30-36%
after single oral dosage at 10 and 1000 mg/kg body weight;
calculations were based on excretion percentages in urine and
faeces, and on the fact that biliary elimination is probably a minor
route (Monsanto, 1988b; Brewster et al., 1991). From a similar study
carried out in 1973, total absorption percentages of approximately
20% (male rats) and 45% (female rats) can be derived (Monsanto,
1973a). Comparable results were obtained in a recent single dose
(5.6 or 56 mg/kg body weight) disposition study in F344/N rats (NTP,
1992), which indicated that 30% of the dose was absorbed.

In a 14-day oral study in rats with application of
¹⁴C-glyphosate via the diet (dose levels 1, 10 and 100 mg/kg
feed), the observed total excretion in urine was < 10% and in
faeces approximately 80-90%. Given the minor importance of the
biliary elimination route, these data indicate absorption levels of
about 15% or less (Monsanto, 1973c). The results of oral studies
with ¹⁴C-glyphosate in rabbits (Monsanto, 1973d), laying hens
(Hazleton Lab. Inc., 1988a) and lactating goats (Hazleton Lab. Inc.,
1988b) indicate gastrointestinal absorption percentages of
approximately 30% or less.

Percutaneous absorption has been studied in Rhesus monkeys and
in human tissue in vitro. After a single application of
¹⁴C-glyphosate (isoproylamine salt) as the undiluted Roundup
formulation to the shaven intact abdominal skin (contact time 24 h)
of Rhesus monkeys, absorption amounted to only 1.8% of the dose. In
this study, however, only 16% of the dose could be accounted for at
the end of the study (Maibach, 1983). This low recovery strongly
reduces the value of the study result (possibly skin absorption is
seriously underestimated in this study). From an identical study
with diluted Roundup formulation (1:29 with water), conducted by
Wester et al. (1991), also in Rhesus monkeys (contact time 12 h),
total absorption percentages of 3.7% (at low dose) or 5.5% (high
dose) can be derived. Using both undiluted and diluted Roundup
formulation, Wester et al. (1991) observed that percutaneous
absorption of ¹⁴C-glyphosate through human skin in vitro into
human plasma as receptor fluid was < 2% (contact-time up to
16 h). In another in vitro study with human skin, absorption of
¹⁴C-glyphosate from three undiluted formulations (i.e. MON 0139,
Roundup and Roundup spray mix) was studied (contact time 24 h); very
low absorption percentages of 0.028 to 0.152% were found (Franz,
1983). With regard to these in vitro results it should be pointed
out that this technique has not yet been fully validated and
therefore direct extrapolation to in vivo human skin absorption
should be undertaken cautiously.

The absorption after inhalational intake has not been
determined.

6.2 Distribution

Concentrations of ¹⁴C label in tissues were determined on day
7 after administration of a single oral dose (10 or 1000 mg/kg body
weight) of ¹⁴C-glyphosate to rats (Monsanto, 1988b). Although only
a small proportion was absorbed, the isotope was widely distributed
throughout the body, but was primarily found in bone. The principal
results are presented in Table 9.

In rats tissue concentrations of ¹⁴C label were determined on
several occasions throughout a treatment period of 14 days and a
post-dosing withdrawal period of 10 days (dietary administration of
¹⁴C-glyphosate at 1, 10 and 100 mg/kg diet). Maximum tissue levels
were reached after 10 days or less, with highest concentrations
(maximum 0.85 mg/kg at the 100 mg/kg dose level) in kidneys
(Monsanto, 1973c). It should be noted, however, that in this study
concentrations in bone or bone marrow were not measured. An increase
of ¹⁴C in excreta was observed during the withdrawal period after
an initial rapid decrease; this indicated mobilization from storage
in depot tissue (Monsanto, 1973c).

Table 9. Concentrations of ¹⁴C label (as mg glyphosate-equivalents/kg
fresh weight) in selected tissues of rats on day 7 after a single
oral dose (rounded values) (Monsanto, 1988b)

Dose: 10 mg/kg body weight Dose: 1000 mg/kg body weight

male female male female

Blood 0.0045 0.0027 0.33 0.17

Liver 0.030 0.014 1.9 1.3

Kidney 0.022 0.013 1.9 1.4

Spleen 0.012 0.0073 2.6 3.0

Lung 0.015 0.012 1.5 1.1

Thyroid 0.00080 0.00036 1.5 1.2

Nasal mucosa 0.0050 0.023 1.7 1.8

Stomach 0.0080 0.0037 2.4 2.4

Small intestines 0.022 0.018 1.9 1.6

Colon 0.034 0.016 11.0 9.2

Bone 0.55 0.31 30.6 19.7

Bone marrow 0.029 0.0064 4.1 12.5

In lactating goats concentrations of ¹⁴C label in milk were
measured after giving capsules containing a 9:1 mixture of
¹⁴C-glyphosate and ¹⁴C-aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) to a
dose level equivalent to 120 mg/kg diet (expressed as free acid) for
5 days. Concentrations in milk (as mg equivalents glyphosate/kg
whole milk) ranged from 0.019 to 0.086 mg/kg during the test period;
at day 5 after the last dose the concentration was 0.006 mg/kg
(Hazleton Lab. Inc., 1988b; Monsanto, 1988d).

In a study on laying hens, carried out using a 9:1 mixture of
¹⁴C-glyphosate and ¹⁴C-AMPA, concentrations of radiolabel were
measured in eggs collected during a 7-day period of dietary
administration at 120 or 400 mg/kg diet. At 400 mg/kg, residues in
egg white were 0.010-0.032 mg/kg (expressed as
glyphosate-equivalents) and in egg yolk 0.096-0.753 mg/kg; at
120 mg/kg the corresponding concentration ranges were 0.003-0.017
and 0.002-0.24 mg/kg, respectively. At 120 mg/kg diet, no ¹⁴C was
detectable in egg white after 10 withdrawal days; in yolk
0.019 mg/kg was present at that time (at 400 mg/kg no withdrawal
test was conducted) (Hazleton Lab. Inc., 1988a).

6.3 Metabolic transformation

Biotransformation of glyphosate occurs to a very low degree
only. In rats it was shown that all of the ¹⁴C in urine and
faeces, after a single oral application of ¹⁴C-glyphosate, was
present as unchanged parent compound (Monsanto, 1973b). Also in
rats, > 97% of the ¹⁴C in excreta, after a single oral dose,
was shown to be unchanged compound. AMPA was the only metabolite,
covering only 0.2-0.3% of the applied ¹⁴C (Monsanto, 1988a). In
laying hens also, AMPA was the only metabolite, accounting for only
a minor part of the applied amount (Monsanto, 1988c).

6.4 Elimination and excretion

In the period of 0-5 days after a single oral application of
¹⁴C-glyphosate (6.7 mg/kg body weight) to rats the total excretion
in urine was 15% (males) and 35-43% (females) of the administered
dose; total excretion in faeces was 85% (males) or 50-55% (females).
Less than 1% of the radiolabel was expired as ¹⁴CO₂ (Monsanto,
1973a). In a more recent study (Monsanto, 1988b), the very low level
of expiration as ¹⁴CO₂ was confirmed but no significant
inter-sex difference in the level of ¹⁴C in excreta was observed.
The result of the latter study was that at both oral dose levels (10
and 1000 mg/kg body weight) elimination in faeces was 62-70% and
excretion in urine was 14-18% (1000 mg/kg body weight) or 22-29%
(10 mg/kg body weight); less than 0.2% of the dose was expired as
¹⁴CO₂. After single intravenous application (dose 10 mg/kg body
weight) 75-79% appeared in urine and only 5-8% in faeces, a finding
that shows that biliary elimination occurs to a limited degree only
(Monsanto, 1988b).

Delayed excretion in rats during a 10-day post-dosing
withdrawal period was observed after daily oral administration via
the diet for 14 days (Monsanto, 1973c); this suggests that some
storage in tissue(s) occurs when uptake is prolonged. Tissue
equilibrium was attained by day 10 of the dosing period and
excretion equalled intake by day 6 of the dosing period.

In rabbits > 80% was eliminated in faeces (with additional
¹⁴C present in the gut) and 7-11% in urine within 5 days after
administration of a single oral dose (6.7 mg/kg body weight) of
¹⁴C-glyphosate. Less than 1% of the dose was expired as ¹⁴CO₂
(Monsanto, 1973d). In one oral study in lactating goats lasting 5
days, total excretion in urine varied from 20 to 24% and in faeces
from 60 to 66% (Hazleton Lab. Inc., 1988b).

6.5 Retention and turnover

Total body clearance in the study of Monsanto (1973a) was
94-98% (males) or 82-84% (females) over a 48-h period after giving a
single oral dose of ¹⁴C-glyphosate; at 120 h post-dosing this was
99% (both sexes). In Monsanto (1988b), the kinetics of whole body
elimination were estimated using the radioactivity (¹⁴C) measured
in urine and faeces after a single oral dose of ¹⁴C-glyphosate (10
or 1000 mg/kg body weight). Because of the lack of biotransformation
of glyphosate it is valid to base kinetics on total radioactivity.
The elimination appeared to be biphasic. The half-life of the alpha
elimination phase at 10 mg/kg body weight was 5.87 h (males) or
6.22 h (females); at 1000 mg/kg body weight this was 5.26 h (males)
or 6.44 h (females). The half-life of the beta phase at 10 mg/kg
body weight was 79 h (males) or 106 h (females); at 1000 mg/kg body
weight this was 181 h (males) or 337 h (females). Pretreatment with
unlabelled compound for 14 days (carried out at the low dose level)
did not have an effect on whole body elimination. Seven days after
dosing, < 0.05% of the dose was present in organs and < 0.5% in
the remaining carcass. Highest concentrations were present in bone.
It was estimated that 0.2-0.6% of the oral dose was associated with
this site; after intravenous dosing this was approximately 1%
(Monsanto, 1988b). Brewster et al. (1991) reported that in rats
nearly all of the absorbed material had been eliminated from the
body 168 h after oral administration of 10 mg/kg body weight;
approximately 1% of the dose was still associated with the bone.

In a recent study on the disposition of glyphosate in F-344/N
rats, 1% of a single oral dose (5.6 or 56 mg/kg) was found in the
tissues 72 h after dosing; 20-30% of the administered radioactivity
was eliminated via urine and 70-80% via the faeces (NTP, 1992).

7. EFFECTS ON LABORATORY ANIMALS AND IN VITRO TEST SYSTEMS

Appraisal

Glyphosate, administered by oral and dermal routes, has a very
low acute toxicity. Both glyphosate and its concentrated
formulations produce moderate to severe eye irritation, but only
slight dermal irritation. Neither glyphosate nor tested formulations
induce sensitization.

Short-term feeding studies have been conducted in several
species. In CD-1 mice, increased liver, brain, heart and kidney
weights, and growth retardation were reported at 50 000 mg/kg diet.
At 10 000 mg/kg diet, an increase in relative liver weight was
reported; however, there were no differences in absolute liver
weights when this group was compared to controls. The relative
increase represented only a 9% increase over the liver weight
reported for controls and was not considered toxicologically
significant. Additionally, there were no gross or histopathological
changes in the liver at doses of 10 000 mg/kg or more. The Task
Group considered the NOAEL to be 50 000 mg/kg diet.

In a 13-week study conducted in Charles River CD
(Sprague-Dawley) BR rats, no treatment-related effects were observed
at doses up to 20 000 mg/kg diet. The NOAEL was greater than the
highest dose tested.

Two additional 13-week studies (one in rats and the other in
mice) were conducted by NTP in which lesions of the salivary glands
were observed in both species. The NOAEL in the rat study was
< 3125 mg/kg diet and that in the mouse study was 3125 mg/kg diet.
Other short-term and long-term studies conducted in different
strains and species did not reveal similar lesions. The lesions
indicate that glyphosate may be acting as a weak adrenergic agonist.
The toxicological significance of the salivary gland lesions
observed in the NTP studies is unknown.

In a 52-week study conducted in beagles, no compound-related
effects were reported. The NOAEL was 500 mg/kg body weight per day.
In a 7-day study with the Roundup formulation in female cattle, a
NOAEL of 400 mg Roundup/kg body weight was reported. At higher dose
levels, decreased feed intake and diarrhoea occurred.

In long-term feeding studies in both rats and mice, few toxic
effects were observed. These effects were present at relatively high
dose levels only. In mice, technical glyphosate produced growth
retardation, hepatocyte hypertrophy or necrosis at 30 000 mg/kg diet
only. At 5000 and 30 000 mg/kg diet an increase in epithelial
hyperplasia of the urinary bladder was reported. The increased
incidence of this lesion did not follow a dose-related trend and in

the highest dose tested the incidence was actually lower than that
reported at the medium dose level, in spite of a 6-fold increase in
glyphosate. The observation at the medium dose (5000 mg/kg) is not
considered a compound-related effect and the NOAEL is, therefore,
considered to be 5000 mg/kg diet (814 mg/kg body weight).

Long-term feeding studies in rats resulted in decreased
growth, increased liver weight and degenerative liver changes at
20 000 mg/kg diet only. At 8000 and 20 000 mg/kg diet, there was an
apparent increase in the incidence of inflammation of the gastric
mucosa in both sexes. The only statistically significant increase
was observed in the medium-dose females (15%). This value was also
outside the historical control range of 0-13%. This finding was not
considered to be a treatment-related effect. There was no
dose-related trend across all groups of treated females and there
was no statistically significant difference in any treated male
groups. The NOAEL was therefore 8000 mg/kg diet (410 mg/kg body
weight).

Studies in rats and rabbits indicated that technical
glyphosate is not teratogenic. Two multigeneration studies were
conducted with technical glyphosate. In the first study, the only
effect noted was an increased incidence of unilateral renal tubular
dilation in F_3b male pups at 30 mg/kg body weight. In the second
study, decreased body weights were reported for parents and pups and
decreased litter size was associated with dose levels of
30 000 mg/kg diet. Decreased body weights reported for parents and
pups at 10 000 mg/kg diet were not toxicologically significant. In
parents, the decrease was only 2 to 4% below controls and for pups
the decrease was 5.6 to 6.6% lower than controls. The findings in
pups were also transient and did not occur consistently in all
litters. The NOAEL was 10 000 mg/kg diet. The absence of a renal
effect in pups at a higher dose level (1500 mg/kg body weight),
though not invalidating earlier findings of unilateral renal tubular
dilation in male F_3b pups, indicates that the reproducibility of
this lesion and its toxicological significance are uncertain. It
should be noted that in no other toxicological study was an effect
on kidneys found.

Bioassays in mice and rats did not indicate that technical
glyphosate was carcinogenic.

Glyphosate has been shown to have no genotoxic potential in a
range of in vitro and in vivo studies.

7.1 Single exposure

Numerous acute toxicity studies have been performed to
determine LD₅₀ values of glyphosate and of herbicide formulations
containing glyphosate as active ingredient. The results of these
studies are summarized in Tables 10 (results for glyphosate) and 11

(results for formulations). These data show that glyphosate and its
formulations have very low toxicity by the oral and dermal
administration routes. By the intraperitoneal route glyphosate is
markedly more toxic than by the other routes. General intoxication
symptoms include breathing difficulties, ataxia and convulsions.

The mechanism of the toxic action of glyphosate has been
studied in rats. Olorunsaga et al. (1979) observed dose-related
reduced respiratory control ratios and increased phosphatase
activity in mitochondria isolated from rat livers 5 h after single
intraperitoneal doses ranging from 15 to 120 mg/kg body weight. This
effect was also seen in rat liver mitochondria in vitro (Bababunmi
et al., 1979; Olorunsaga, 1982a,b). The authors suggest that acute
toxicity at lethal doses may occur as a result of the uncoupling of
oxidative phosphorylation.

The acute toxicity in rats of the surfactant
polyoxyethyleneamine, with which glyphosate is commonly formulated
in Roundup, was compared to that of glyphosate in a study by
Martinez et al. (1990). Both compounds exhibited pulmonary toxicity
following either oral or intratracheal administration. The toxicity
of the herbicide formulation was greater than can be accounted for
on the basis of the dose response data from either compound alone
(Martinez et al., 1990; Martinez & Brown, 1991).

A study was undertaken by Tai et al. (1990) to investigate the
effects of glyphosate, surfactant, and their combination in Roundup
on cardiovascular function in female beagles. They found that
glyphosate alone at plasma levels ranging from 923 to 3450 mg/litre,
which simulates the human ingestion situation, were shown to
increase the myocardial contractility. The surfactant alone
considerably reduced the cardiac output, the left ventricular stroke
work index and the mean arterial pressure. The joint effect of both
glyphosate and the surfactant in Roundup formulation resulted in
cardiac depression, which was mostly due to the surfactant since
glyphosate itself increased myocardial contractility. The authors
indicated that the probable cause of the observed increases in
pulmonary vascular resistance index and pulmonary artery pressure
was a direct vasoactive effect of glyphosate on the pulmonary
artery.

Table 10. Acute toxicity of glyphosate to experimental animals

Species (sex) Product tested LD₅₀/LC₅₀^a Reference

Oral studies

Rat (m,f) glyphosate techn, > 5000 mg/kg bw FDRL (1988d)
purity 97.8%
Rat (m,f) glyphosate techn, > 5000 mg/kg bw Inveresk Research Int.
purity 96-99% (1989a)
Rat (m,f) glyphosate techn, > 5000 mg/kg bw NOTOX (1988)
purity 96-99%
Rat (m,f) 85.5% techn. > 5000 mg/kg bw Bio/Dynamics Inc.
glyphosate in (1988c)
water
Rat (m,f) glyphosate, IPA salt, > 5000 mg/kg bw Monsanto (1981b)
65% in water
Rat (m.f) glyphosate, EO salt^b 2047 mg/kg bw Knapek et al. (1986)
Goat (f) glyphosate techn, 3500 mg/kg bw USDA (1987c)
purity 98.7%
Goat (f) glyphosate, IPA salt, 5700 mg/kg bw USDA (1987b)
65% in water

Dermal studies

Rat (m,f) glyphosate techn, > 2000 mg/kg bw Inveresk Research Int.
purity 96-99% (1989c)
Rabbit (m,f) glyphosate techn, > 5000 mg/kg bw FDRL (1988b)
purity 97.8%
Rabbit (m,f) 85.5% techn. > 5000 mg/kg bw Bio/Dynamics Inc.
glyphosate in water (1988a)
Rabbit (m,f) glyphosate, IPA salt, > 5000 mg/kg bw Monsanto (1981c)
65% in water

Intraperitoneal studies

Mouse (m) glyphosate (not 545 mg/kg bw
further specified)
Mouse (f) glyphosate (not 740 mg/kg bw FAO/WHO (1986b)
further specified)
Mouse (m,f) glyphosate (not 134 mg/kg bw FAO/WHO (1986b)
further specified)
Rat (m) glyphosate (not 281 mg/kg bw
further specified

Table 10. (cont'd)

Species (sex) Product tested LD₅₀/LC₅₀^a Reference

Rat (f) glyphosate (not 467 mg/kg bw FAO/WHO (1986b)
further specified)
Rat (m,f) glyphosate (not 238 mg/kg bw FAO/WHO (1986b)
further specified)

^a All values expressed as mg of product tested (as presented in "product tested"
column)

^b EO is an abbreviation of 5-ethoxy-oleinamine salt.

Table 11. Acute toxicity of glyphosate formulations to experimental animals

Species (sex) Product tested^a LD₅₀/LC₅₀^b Reference

Oral studies

Mouse (m,f) Roundup >5000 mg/kg bw Mitsukaido Labs (1986)
Rat (m,f) Roundup 5000 mg/kg bw Bio/Dynamics Inc.
(1988e)
Rat (m,f) "Compound No. 3607" >5000 mg/kg bw Inveresk Research Int.
(1988a)
Rat (m,f) Roundup TX >5000 mg/kg bw NOTOX (1987a,b)
Rat (m,f) Alphee >5000 mg/kg bw Bio/Dynamics Inc.
(1987a)
Rat (m,f) Sting TX >5000 mg/kg bw NOTOX (1987f,g)
Rat (m,f) Sting 2510 mg/kg bw Younger Labs Inc.
(1984)
Rat (m,f) Sting 1950 mg/kg bw Bio/Dynamics Inc.
(1984b)
Rat (m,f) MON 8780 >5000 mg/kg bw Bio/Dynamics Inc.
(1985a)
Rat (m,f) Agrichem Glyfosaat B >5000 mg/kg bw NOTOX (1990e)
Rat (m,f) "Glyfosaat 360 g/litre" >2000 mg/kg bw NOTOX (1989c)
Rat (m,f) Legend >2000 mg/kg bw CIT (1991a)
Goat (f) Roundup 4860 mg/kg bw USDA (1983)

Table 11. (cont'd)

Species (sex) Product tested^a LD₅₀/LC₅₀^b Reference

Dermal studies

Rat (m,f) "Compound No. 3607" >2000 mg/kg bw Inveresk Research Int.
(1988b)
Rat (m,f) Roundup TX >4000 mg/kg bw NOTOX (1987c)
Rat (m,f) Sting TX >4000 mg/kg bw NOTOX (1987h)
Rat (m,f) MON 8780 >5000 mg/kg bw Bio/Dynamics Inc.
(1985b)
Rat (m,f) Agrichem Glyfosaat >4000 mg/kg bw NOTOX (1990f)
B or 2
Rat (m,f) "Glyfosaat 360 g/litre" >2000 mg/kg bw NOTOX (1989b)
Rat (m,f) Legend >2000 mg/kg bw CIT (1991b)
Rabbit (m,f) Roundup >5000 mg/kg bw Bio/Dynamics Inc.
(1988f)
Rabbit (m,f) Alphee >5000 mg/kg bw Bio/Dynamics Inc.
(1987b)
Rabbit (m,f) Sting >5000 mg/kg bw Bio/Dynamics Inc.
(1984a)

Inhalation studies

Rat (m,f) Roundup (aerosol) 3180 mg/m³ Monsanto (1983d)
Rat (m,f) "Compound No. 3607" >4860 mg/m³ Inveresk Research Int.
(1989d)
Rat (m,f) Alphee >8900 mg/m³ Monsanto (1987b)

^a Composition of the formulations is given in Table 2, with the exceptions of
Agrichem Glyphosaat B (or 2), "Glyfosaat 360 g/litre" and "Compound No. 3607",
which all contain approximately 480 g/litre of the isopropylamine salt, and of MON
8780 (32.8% isopropylamine salt), and Legend (40% isopropylamine salt).

^b All values given as mg formulation.

7.2 Short-term exposure

7.2.1 Oral studies

In CD-1 mice, a 13-week feeding study was conducted with
technical glyphosate (purity 98.7%) using dose levels of 5000,
10 000 and 50 000 mg/kg diet (equal to 940, 1890 and 9710 mg/kg body
weight per day in males and 1530, 2730 and 14 860 mg/kg body weight
per day in females). No effect on appearance or survival was
observed. Growth retardation and increased weights of brain, heart

and kidneys were observed at 50 000 mg/kg. Liver weights were
increased at 50 000 and 10 000 mg/kg. Limited histopathology showed
no adverse effects. The authors of the study concluded that the
NOAEL was 10 000 mg/kg diet (1890 mg/kg body weight per day)
(Bio/Dynamics Inc., 1979).

In a 13-week feeding study with technical glyphosate,
Sprague-Dawley rats received 1000, 5000 or 20 000 mg/kg diet (equal
to 63, 317 and 1267 mg/kg body weight per day in males and 84, 404
and 1623 mg/kg body weight per day in females). No effect on
appearance, survival or growth occurred. Haematology, blood
biochemistry and urinalysis, carried out at test end only, were also
unaffected. Organ weights (determined for liver, kidneys and testes
only) were not affected. Limited histopathology showed no adverse
effect in any tissue. The NOAEL in this study was 20 000 mg/kg diet
(1267 mg/kg body weight per day) (Monsanto, 1987a). Absence of
toxicity was also found in another 13-week feeding study on rats
using technical glyphosate and dose levels of 200 to 12 500 mg/kg
diet (Tauchi, 1979 as cited by FAO/WHO, 1986b).

Two further 13-week studies in rodents were conducted on behalf
of the US National Toxicology Program (1992). Both rats (F-344/N)
and mice (B₆C₃F₁) were administered glyphosate (purity
approximately 99%) in feed at levels of 3125, 6250, 12 500, 25 000
and 50 000 mg/kg diet.

In rats, reduced weight gains were observed at 25 000 mg/kg
diet (males only) and at 50 000 mg/kg diet (males and females). No
changes in feed consumption were found. Minor increases in the
relative organ weight of liver, kidney and testes, and decreased
thymus weight were observed in males only at several dose levels;
these changes did not show a clear dose relation and therefore are
not considered to be compound-related effects. Small increases in
haematocrit and red cell blood counts were observed in male rats at
> 12 500 mg/kg diet. Clinical chemistry showed increased alkaline
phosphatase (AP) and alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) at >
6250 mg/kg diet in males and at > 12 500 mg/kg diet in females.
Bile acid levels in blood were increased at 25 000 mg/kg diet (males
only) and at 50 000 mg/kg diet (males and females). Decreases in
sperm count were observed in males at > 25 000 mg/kg diet. The
only histopathological lesions found were cytoplasmic alterations of
the parotid and submandibular salivary glands, consisting of
basophilic changes and hypertrophy of acinar cells. The parotid
gland was more severely affected. The magnitude of the effect was
dose-dependent, with focal lesions in less severe cases to diffuse
involvement at higher doses. Lesions of a similar nature and
magnitude were observed in both sexes. The sublingual gland was not

detectably altered. Effects on the salivary glands were observed
already at the lowest dose level tested of 3125 mg/kg diet (equal to
205 mg/kg body weight per day for males and 213 mg/kg body weight
per day for females). Thus, this study did not yield a NOAEL (NOAEL
< 3125 mg/kg diet) (NTP, 1992).

In mice, reduced weight gains were observed at 50 000 mg/kg
diet in both sexes. Increased organ weights were noted in heart,
kidney, liver, thymus, lung and testis; these changes did not show a
clear dose relation and therefore are not considered to be
compound-related effects. Feed consumption levels were not changed
significantly. Lesions in the parotid gland were observed, similar
to those observed in rats. The sublingual gland and the
submandibular salivary glands were not detectably altered. The
effects on the parotid gland were observed in mice at 6250 mg/kg
diet (equal to 1065 mg/kg body weight per day for males and
1411 mg/kg body weight per day for females), but were not seen at
the lowest dose level tested of 3125 mg/kg diet (equal to 507 mg/kg
body weight per day for males and 753 mg/kg body weight per day for
females). The NOAEL in this study was 3125 mg/kg diet (507 mg/kg
body weight per day) (NTP, 1992).

The salivary gland lesions could also be induced in rats by
14-day exposure at feed levels of 50 000 mg/kg diet. The salivary
glands lesions induced by glyphosate were similar to those which
could be induced by exposure to high subcutaneous doses of the
ß-adrenergic agonist isoproterenol and could be partially
ameliorated with the ß-adrenergic antagonist propanolol. This
indicates that glyphosate may induce the salivary gland lesions by
acting as a weak adrenergic agonist (NTP, 1992).

The short-term toxicity of technical glyphosate was also
studied in dogs. Beagle dogs received technical glyphosate in
gelatin capsules at dose levels of 0, 20, 100 or 500 mg/kg body
weight per day for 52 weeks. No effect occurred with respect to
clinical signs, body weight, feed consumption, ophthalmoscopy,
haematology, blood biochemistry, urinalysis, gross pathology and
histopathology. The only changes in treated groups relative to
controls were increased pituitary weights (absolute and relative) in
the medium- and high-dose males. Because there were no concomitant
histological changes present in pituitaries and given the absence of
an effect on this organ (and related organs) in all other studies,
the toxicological significance of the increased pituitary weights is
questionable. The NOAEL in this study was 500 mg/kg body weight per
day (Monsanto, 1985).

A 7-day oral study was carried out with Roundup in female
cattle weighing 160 to 272 kg. Brahman-cross heifers received 400,
500, 630 or 790 mg Roundup/kg body weight per day by nasogastric
tube. At 790 mg/kg, 1/3 animals died before test end, showing

laboured breathing and pneumonia caused by aspiration of rumen
contents. Decreased feed intake was seen at 630 and 790 mg/kg;
diarrhoea occurred at 500, 630 and 790 mg/kg body weight. Slight
increases in a number of blood parameters, occurring at 790 mg/kg
only, were probably due to extracellular fluid shifts and
haemoconcentration secondary to diarrhoea. The NOAEL in this study
was 400 mg Roundup/kg body weight per day (USDA, 1987a).

7.2.2 Dermal studies

Short-term dermal toxicity studies were carried out in rabbits
with technical glyphosate and the formulation Roundup.

Technical glyphosate, moistened with saline, was applied under
occlusion at dose levels of 100, 1000 and 5000 mg/kg body weight per
day to the shaven intact or abraded skin of rabbits for 6 h/day, 5
days/week for 3 weeks. No effect on survival and growth occurred.
Slight dermal irritation (barely perceptible erythema and oedema)
was observed at 5000 mg/kg body weight only. No evidence of systemic
toxicity was found (parameters: haematology and blood biochemistry
in five animals of each sex per group, organ weights, gross
pathology, limited histopathology) (IRDC, 1982). Absence of systemic
effects was also found in the somewhat more limited 21-day study in
rabbits (no haematology and blood biochemistry) with Roundup. Skin
effects were more severe in this study: at both dose levels (76 and
114 mg/kg body weight per day, undiluted formulation applied)
erythema and oedema were seen and, in addition, exudate and
fissuring occurred at the abraded skin sites. After a 4-week
recovery period the skin effects were no longer present
(Bio/Dynamics Inc., 1975).

7.2.3 Inhalational studies

A 4-week inhalation study was carried out on rats with a 1:3
dilution of Roundup formulation. Test concentrations of 50, 160 and
360 mg/m³ of the diluted formulation (equivalent to 17, 53 and
120 mg Roundup/m³) were administered as an aerosol spray for
6 h/day, 5 days/week. The mass median aerodynamic diameter of the
test material ranged from 1.8 to 2.7 µm with geometric standard
deviations between 1.7 and 2.0. An increased incidence of irritation
of the nasal turbinates (subacute inflammation), trachea
(mononuclear cell infiltration) and lungs (perivascular lymphoid
infiltrates/aggregates) was observed among the high-dose females
only. No signs of systemic toxicity were found (parameters:
survival, growth, limited haematology and blood biochemistry, organ
weights, limited histopathology) (Monsanto, 1983e).

7.3 Long-term toxicity and carcinogenicity

Only oral studies are available. Dietary studies using
technical glyphosate were performed in mice and rats.

In Charles River CD-1 mice technical glyphosate was fed in the
diet at concentrations of 0, 1000, 5000 or 30 000 mg/kg diet for 24
months (dose levels equal to 0, 157, 814 and 4841 mg/kg body weight
per day for males and 0, 190, 955 and 5874 mg/kg body weight per day
for females). No effect on survival or appearance was noted. Body
weights were decreased in the males of the high-dose group.
Haematology and organ weights showed no effects. Histopathology in
liver revealed an increased incidence of central lobular hepatocyte
hypertrophy among high-dose males (incidences: 9/49, 5/50, 3/50 and
17/50 in control, low-dose, medium-dose and high-dose males,
respectively) and an increased incidence of central lobular
hepatocyte necrosis also among high-dose males (incidences: 0/49,
2/50, 2/50 and 10/50). Increased incidences of epithelial
hyperplasia in the urinary bladder were present in the medium-dose
and high-dose males (incidences: 3/49, 3/50, 10/50 and 8/50). There
were no statistically significant increases in the frequency of
neoplastic lesions. The NOAEL in this study was 5000 mg/kg diet
(814 mg/kg body weight per day) (Bio/Dynamics Inc., 1983a).

Two chronic feeding studies on rats were conducted with
technical glyphosate, one in 1979-1981 and the other in 1988-1990.
The first study, carried out using Charles River CD (Sprague-Dawley)
BR rats, had dose levels of 0, 60, 200 and 600 mg technical
glyphosate/kg diet (equal to about 0, 3, 10 and 32 mg/kg body weight
per day, respectively). Survival, appearance, haematology, blood
biochemistry, urinalysis and organ weights were not changed. The
NOAEL was > 600 mg/kg diet (> 32 mg/kg body weight per day).
Slight growth retardation during part of the study was noted in the
high-dose males. The incidence of interstitial cell tumours in
testes showed a statistically significant increase (incidences:
0/50, 3/50, 1/50 and 6/50; historical control range: 3-7%)
(Bio/Dynamics Inc., 1981a). This finding, in itself constituting
some evidence for a carcinogenic effect in rats, should be judged in
the light of the absence of an effect at much higher dose levels in
the more recent 2-year study in rats (see below). This is also valid
for the slight growth retardation (i.e. no effect on growth at much
higher dose levels in the more recent study, see below). In the
recent 2-year study, rats (same strain) were fed 2000, 8000 or 20
000 mg technical glyphosate/kg diet (equal to about 100, 410 and
1060 mg/kg body weight per day) for 24 months. There was no effect
on survival or appearance. Growth was retarded in the high-dose
females. Haematology and blood biochemistry showed no effects. In
the high-dose males, the urine specific gravity (after 6 months
only) and urine pH were increased. A statistically significant
increased incidence of degenerative lens changes (basophilic
degeneration of the posterior subcapsular lens capsule or mature
cataracts) was found among the high-dose males (incidences 3/60,
4/60, 4/60 and 8/60 in the control, low-, medium- and high-dose
groups, respectively. However this finding was within the historical
control range of 0-33%. Liver weights were increased in the
high-dose males only. Histopathology showed an increased incidence

Table 12. Skin irritation tests on rabbits with glyphosate and its formulations

Product tested^a Contact time (h) Draize score^b Classification^c Reference

Glyposate

Glyphosate techn. 85% in water 4 0.8 slightly irritating Bio/Dynamics Inc. (1988b)
Glyphosate techn., moistened powder 4 0 not irritating FDRL (1988a)
Glyphosate techn., moistened powder 4 0 not irritating Inveresk Research Int. (1989e)
Glyphosate, IPA salt 65% in water 24 0.2 not irritating Monsanto (1981d)

Formulations

Roundup, undiluted 4 1.9 slightly irritating Bio/Dynamics Inc. (1988g)
"Compound No. 3607", undiluted 4 1.2 slightly irritating Inveresk Research Int. (1988c)
Roundup TX, undiluted 4 0.7 slightly irritating NOTOX (1987d)
Alphee, undiluted 4 1.0 slightly irritating Bio/Dynamics Inc. (1987c)
Sting, undiluted 4 1.3 slightly irritating Bio/Dynamics Inc. (1984c)
Sting TX, undiluted 4 3.6 moderately irritating NOTOX (1987i)
Roundup L&G, undiluted 4 1.0 slightly irritating Bio/Dynamics Inc. (1985c)
"Glyfosaat 360 g/litre, undiluted 4 0.3 not irritating NOTOX (1989d)
Agrichem Glyfosaat B, undiluted 4 1.7 slightly irritating NOTOX (1990d)
Agrichem Glyfosaat 2, undiluted 4 2.0 slightly irritating NOTOX (1990b)
Legend, undiluted 4 0.7 slightly irritating CIT (1991c)

^a For glyphosate content of the tested formulations, see footnote a in Table 11.
^b This score is the mean score per animal and was calculated using the data from
the original report. The standard Draize scoring system was used; in calculating
the mean response per animal, the maximum response observed for an animal was used.
^c The classification is based on the mean Draize score per animal. Specification:
score 0-0.5 not irritating; 0.6-2.0 slightly irritating; 2.1-5.0 moderately
irritating; 5.1-8.0 severely irritating.

Table 13. Results of eye irritation tests in rabbits for glyphosate and its formulations.

Product tested^a Irritation index^b Classification^c Reference

Glyphosate

Glyphosate techn. 85% in water, undiluted 45 strongly irritating Bio/Dynamics Inc. (1988d)
Glyphosate, IPA salt, 65% in water 0 not irritating Monsanto (1981e)
Glyphosate techn. (97.6%), undiluted 54 strongly irritating FDRL (1988c)
Glyphosate techn. (96-99%), undiluted 29 irritating Inveresk Research Int. (1989f)

Formulations

Roundup, undiluted 54 strongly irritating Bio/Dynamics Inc. (1990)
"Compound No. 3607", undiluted 13 irritating Inveresk Research Int. (1989g)
Roundup TX, undiluted 31 strongly irritating NOTOX (1987e)
Alphee, undiluted 6 slightly irritating Bio/Dynamics Inc. (1987d)
Sting, undiluted 104 extremely irritating Bio/Dynamics Inc. (1984d)
Sting TX, undiluted 19 irritating NOTOX (1987j)
Roundup L&G, undiluted 19 irritating Bio/Dynamics Inc. (1985d)
"Glyfosaat 360 g/litre", undiluted 33 strongly irritating NOTOX (1989a)
Agrichem Glyfosaat B, undiluted 58 strongly irritating NOTOX (1990c)
Agrichem Glyfosaat 2, undiluted 22 irritating NOTOX (1990a)
Legend, undiluted 21 irritating CIT (1991d)

Table 13 (continued)
^a For glyphosate content of the tested formulations, see footnote a in Table 11.

^b The irritation index represents a mean total score per animal for response in cornea, conjunctiva
and iris, using the standard Draize scoring system. The irritation index was calculated using the data
from the original report; in calculating the mean response per animal the maximum response observed
for an animal was used. The calculation procedure is as follows:

- score conjunctiva: A. chemosis: 0-4 Calculation partial
B. discharge: 0-3 index for conjunctiva:
C. erythema: 0-3 2 x (A + B + C) = 0-20
- score iris: 0-2 Calculation partial index for iris: 5 x (0-2) = 0-10
- score cornea: A. opacity: 0-4 Calculation partial index for cornea:
B. area: 0-4 5 x A x B = 0-80

The total irritation index is the sum of the partial indices (0-110).

^c The classification is based on the following scheme: index 0-5 not irritating; 5.1-12 slightly
irritating; 12.1-30 irritating; 30.1-60 strongly irritating; 60.1-80 severely irritating; 80.1-110
extremely irritating.

of inflammation of the gastric squamous mucosa in the medium- and
high-dose groups (incidences in males: 2/58, 3/58, 5/59 and 7/59;
females: 0/59, 3/60, 9/60, and 6/59; historical range: 0-13.3%). The
incidence of pancreatic islet cell adenomas was increased
(statistically significant) among low- and high-dose males
(incidences: 1/58, 8/57, 5/60 and 7/59; historical control range of
test laboratory 1.8-8.5%). The incidence in the control group was
below the historical control range; the trend test for the observed
increase was negative. No pancreatic carcinomas were found. The
NOAEL in this study was 8000 mg/kg diet (410 mg/kg body weight per
day) (Monsanto, 1990b).

Glyphosate has been tested in the US National Toxicology
Program; pre-chronic studies have been completed (NTP, 1992).

7.4 Skin and eye irritation; sensitization

Many studies have been carried out with rabbits to examine the
potential of glyphosate and its formulations to produce skin and eye
irritation. The results of these studies are briefly summarized in
Tables 12 (skin irritation) and 13 (eye irritation). Glyphosate and
its formulations produce only mild skin irritation after undiluted
single application. The result of the 21-day dermal study in rabbits
with the formulation Roundup (Bio/Dynamics Inc., 1975; see
subsection 7.2.2) shows that repeated application of undiluted
formulation to the skin does lead to irritation. The eye-irritating
potential is considerable for undiluted glyphosate and, with a few
exceptions, also for the formulations. Single application generally
produces moderate to severe reactions.

Sensitization studies have been carried out in guinea-pigs with
glyphosate and its formulations. The results of these tests are
summarized in Table 14. Neither glyphosate itself nor the tested
formulations induced sensitization in any experiment.

The results of two dermal irritation studies and one dermal
sensitization study performed with human volunteers exposed to
Roundup are presented in subsection 8.1.

Table 14. Results of sensitization tests in guinea-pigs for glyphosate and its
formulations

Product tested^a Method Result Reference

Glyphosate

Glyphosate Buehler negative Bio/Dynamics Inc.
(purity 99.7%) (1983c)

Glyphosate technical Magnusson & negative Safefarm Labs Inc.
Kligman^b (1991b)

Glyphosate techn. Magnusson & negative Inveresk Research
(96-99%) Kligman Int. (1989b)

Formulations

Roundup Buehler negative Bio/Dynamics Inc.
(1983b)

"Compound Magnusson & negative Inveresk Research
No. 3607" Kligman Int. (1988d)
Roundup L&G Buehler negative Bio/Dynamics Inc.
(1987e)
Legend Buehler negative Safefarm Labs Inc.
(1991a)
Sting Buehler negative Bio/Dynamics Inc.
(1986)

^a For glyphosate content of the tested formulations, see footnote a
in Table 11.
^b Method also called the maximization test.

7.5 Reproductive toxicity, embryotoxicity and teratogenicity

Technical glyphosate has been tested for teratogenicity in rats
and rabbits using the oral route. In addition, two oral
multi-generation reproduction studies in rats have been reported.

7.5.1 Teratogenicity studies

Glyphosate (technical) was given to pregnant Charles River COBS
CD rats by gavage at dose levels of 0, 300, 1000 and 3500 mg/kg body
weight per day on days 6-19 of gestation. At 3500 mg/kg the
following effects were observed: increased incidences of soft
stools, diarrhoea, breathing rattles, red nasal discharge and
reduced activity, increased mortality (6/25 dams dying before the
end of the treatment period), growth retardation, increased
incidence of early resorptions, decreases in total number of
implantations and the number of viable fetuses, increased number of
fetuses with reduced ossification of sternebrae. At the lower dose
levels these effects were absent. The NOAEL in this study was
1000 mg/kg body weight per day (IRDC, 1980b).

In Dutch belted rabbits technical glyphosate was tested at dose
levels of 0, 75, 175 and 350 mg/kg body weight per day
(administration by gavage) from days 6-27 of gestation. In dams the
incidences of diarrhoea and soft stools were increased in the
high-dose group and, to a slight degree, also in the medium-dose
group. The incidence of nasal discharge was increased in the
high-dose group only. In the medium- and high-dose groups 2 and 10
dams, respectively, died during the study from unknown causes. The
NOAEL in this study was 175 mg/kg body weight per day (IRDC, 1980c).

7.5.2 Reproduction studies

A three-generation feeding study in Charles River CD
(Sprague-Dawley) BR rats was conducted in 1980-1981 and a
two-generation study, using higher dose levels, was completed in
1990 with technical glyphosate. In the former study, dietary feeding
levels were continuously adjusted to achieve dose levels of 0, 3, 10
and 30 mg/kg body weight per day. The only effect noted was an
increased incidence of unilateral renal tubular dilation in the male
pups (randomly selected) of the F_3b mating of the high-dose group
(incidence 6/10 versus 0/10 in controls, not determined in
intermediate groups, earlier litters not examined). The NOAEL in
this study was < 30 mg/kg body weight (Bio/Dynamics Inc., 1981b).
The more recent two-generation study had dose levels of 0, 2000,
10 000 and 30 000 mg technical glyphosate/kg diet (equivalent to 0,
100, 500 and 1500 mg/kg body weight per day). In the high-dose
group, the following effects were observed: soft stools and
decreased body weights in parent animals, slightly decreased litter
size and decreased pup weights (the latter seen at day 14 or 21 of
lactation). The decreased body weights of parents and pups were seen
to a slight degree in the medium-dose group also. No histological
effect on kidneys was present in the F_2b male pups (15 and 23 pups
examined in control and high-dose groups, respectively; first
generation and F_2a pups not examined). The NOAEL in this study was
10 000 mg/kg diet (500 mg/kg body weight per day) (Monsanto, 1990c).

With regard to these reproduction studies using technical
glyphosate, it should be noted that in both studies the number of
pups submitted to histopathological examination was limited. These
limitations make evaluation of the renal effect in pups, seen (at
30 mg/kg body weight) in the study of Bio/Dynamics Inc. (1981b),
difficult.

7.6 Mutagenicity and related end-points

The results of several studies are summarized in Table 15. The
results show that glyphosate is not mutagenic.

Table 15. Results of mutagenicity studies with glyphosate and its salts.

Test system Test compound and Result^c Reference
concentrations

Ames test, Salmonella technical glyphosate - Monsanto
typhimurium TA98, TA100, (98.4%); 0.1-1000 (1978c)
TA1535 & TA1537, with and µg/plate
without metabolic activation

Ames test, S. typhimurium technical glyphosate - IET (1978)
TA98, TA100, TA1535 & (98.4%); 10-5000
TA1537, with and without µg/plate
activation

Rec assay, Bacillus subtilis, technical glyphosate - IET (1978)
strain H17 (rec⁺) & M45 (98.4%); 20-2000
(rec^-), without activation µg/disc

Reverse mutation assay in technical glyphosate - IET (1978)
Escherichia coli strain WP2hcr, (98.4%); 10-5000
with and without activation µg/plate

Forward mutation assay, technical glyphosate - Monsanto
CHO cells, in vitro (98.7%); 0-20 mg/ml (1983b)
(HGPRT-locus), with & (- activation) or
without activation 5-25 mg/ml (+ activation)

Table 15. (cont'd)

Test system Test compound and Result^c Reference
concentrations

Cytogenetic study technical glyphosate - Monsanto
(chromosome aberrations) (98.7%); 200-1000 mg/kg (1983f)
in rat bone marrow, body weight, i.p.^b;
in vivo sampling after 6, 12
and 24 h

Micronucleus test in glyphosate (not - Benova
erythrocytes of mice, specified); ´ LD₅₀, oral; et al.
in vivo sampling time not (1989)
specified

Dominant lethal test, mouse technical glyphosate - IRDC
in vivo (98.7%); 200-2000 mg/kg (1980a)
body weight, oral

Recessive sex-linked lethal glyphosate (not - Gopalan &
test, Drosophila melanogaster, specified); dose not Njagi
in vivo given (1981)

Unscheduled DNA repair assay technical glyphosate - Monsanto
rat hepatocytes, in vitro (98.7%); 0.0125-125 (1983c)
µg/ml

^a No higher concentrations tested because these would result in
osmolalities much higher than physiological levels; these high
osmolalities can produce non-specific chromosomal aberrations or
sister chromatid exchange.

^b In additional studies it was demonstrated that: (1) glyphosate
produced no effect on viability and mitotic index of bone marrow
cells of rats after i.p. doses of 200-1000 mg/kg body weight
(Monsanto, 1983g); and (2) after giving ¹⁴C-labelled glyphosate
i.p. significant concentrations of ¹⁴C reached the bone marrow
(peak levels reached after 0.5 h remaining virtually constant up to
10 h after dosing) (Monsanto, 1983h).

^c - = negative result

8. EFFECTS ON HUMANS

Appraisal

The formulation Roundup containing glyphosate is acutely toxic
to humans when ingested intentionally or accidentally.

No controlled studies have been conducted, and therefore the
human NOAEL level cannot not be derived.

No data are available to show the impact on workers exposed
during the manufacture or formulation of glyphosate. No
compound-related effects were observed in a test group of five
applicators prior to and after exposure for one week.

The reported higher susceptibility of individuals older than
40 years to ingested Roundup intoxication is important and requires
further investigation.

8.1 Cases of intentional and accidental exposure

Many cases of acute intoxication with herbicides containing
glyphosate and surfactant (Roundup) have been reported; most of
these were suicide attempts. Talbot et al. (1991) reviewed 93 cases
of exposure to Roundup (Chinese names: lan-da, hao-ni-chun,
nian-nian-chun) in Taiwan. The classification of the severity of
acute poisoning with Roundup as given by these authors is presented
in Table 16. Severe effects occurred only in the cases of
intentional ingestion (80 of the 93 reported). Accidental exposures
led to only mild effects. The typical symptoms were erosion of the
gastrointestinal tract (66% of the self-poisonings), seen as sore
throat, dysphagia and gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Other organs
were affected less often (nonspecific leucocytosis 65%, lungs 23%,
liver 19%, cardiovascular system 18%, kidney 14% and CNS 12%). Death
(in 7/80 cases) occurred within hours after ingestion. The amount of
undiluted Roundup ingested (rough estimates) in the lethal cases
varied from 85 to 200 ml (corresponding to roughly 30 to 70 g
glyphosate acid); but much larger amounts (500 ml Roundup,
corresponding to 180 g glyphosate acid) were reported to have been
ingested by some patients with mild to moderate symptoms. Overall,
moderate symptoms were associated with estimated intakes of 20 to
500 ml, mild symptoms with 5 to 150 ml, no symptoms with 5 to 50 ml.
The authors pointed out that the patient's estimates of the amount
ingested, and the conversion ratio used in their paper may be
inaccurate (Talbot et al., 1991). Other reviews of cases of
intoxication with Roundup have reported similar findings (Sawada &
Nagai, 1987; Tominack et al., 1991). The data of Tominack et al.
(1991) suggested that people over 40 years of age who ingest amounts
greater than 150 ml Roundup are at greatest risk of a fatal outcome.

These authors also pointed out that the surfactant contained in
Roundup may be responsible for the clinical syndrome (as suggested
by Sawada & Nagai, 1987), but that the available evidence on this
point is, as yet, inconclusive.

Table 16. Classification of severity of acute poisoning with Roundup^a

Classification Description

Asymptomatic no complaints and no abnormalities on physical or laboratory
examination.

Mild mainly gastrointestinal tract(GIT) symptoms (nausea, vomiting,
diarrhoea, abdominal pain, mouth and throat pain) that resolved
within 24 h. Vital signs were stable, and there was no renal,
pulmonary or cardiovascular involvement.

Moderate GIT symptoms lasting longer than 24 h, GIT haemorrhages, endoscopically
verified oesophagitis or gastritis, oral ulceration, hypotension
responsive to intravenous fluids, pulmonary dysfunction not
requiring intubation, acid-base disturbance, evidence of transient
hepatic or renal damage, or temporary oliguria.

Severe pulmonary dysfunction requiring intubation, renal failure requiring
dialysis, hypotension requiring treatment with pressor amines, cardiac
arrest, coma, repeated seizures, or death.

^a From: Talbot et al. (1991)

Further clinical experiences with patients exposed to Roundup
either accidentally or through deliberate ingestion have been
reported by Temple & Smith (1992). Symptoms resulting from dermal
exposure incidental to the use of the product included periorbital
oedema and chemosis of the eye, cardiovascular effects (tachycardia
and elevated blood pressure), swelling and paraesthesia at the site
of dermal contact and prolonged skin irritation. Deliberate
ingestion resulted in more severe effects, including lethality from
apparent respiratory and cardiac arrest (Temple & Smith, 1992).

Two dermal irritation studies were carried out with volunteers.
Application of 0.9 ml of a 9:1 dilution of Roundup formulation in
water to the intact skin of the upper arm for 24 h produced no skin
changes (Shelanski, 1973). Maibach (1986) tested undiluted Roundup
(application of 0.1 ml to intact and abraded skin sites on the back
for 24 h) and found erythema in only 1/24 subjects (23/24 no
reaction) for the intact skin sites; for the abraded skin sites 4/24
subjects showed an equivocal reaction and 10/24 showed erythema
(10/24 no reaction). The same author reported very briefly the
absence of effect in a photoirritation study in humans using
undiluted Roundup as test compound (application to abraded skin of
upper arm for 24 h with irradiation with UVA light for 45 min)
(Maibach, 1986).

A sensitization study was performed in 204 human volunteers
with undiluted Roundup according to a modified Draize method. The
summary report (no detailed report available) stated that there was
no effect in any subject (Maibach, 1986). The same author reported
absence of photosensitization by Roundup in volunteers.

8.2 Occupational exposure

The results of several studies focused primarily on the
determination of the extent of exposure to glyphosate when the
compound is used as herbicide are presented in section 5.3. The
study of Jauhainen et al. (1991) included health examinations of a
test group of five workers prior to and after an exposure period of
1 week. These examinations included haematology, clinical chemistry,
ECG, pulmonary function tests, an interview for a health
questionnaire and a general clinical examination (including
recording of blood pressure, pulse rate and pressure craft of
hands). A control group consisted of five workers. No
compound-related effects were observed (Jauhainen et al., 1991). The
other studies described in section 5.3 did not include a health
evaluation of workers.

8.3 Subpopulations at special risk

The only information available on this point is some suggestive
evidence referring to oral intoxications with Roundup; Tominack
et al. (1991) suggested that people older than 40 years are at
greater-than-normal risk after ingestion of Roundup.

9. EFFECTS ON OTHER ORGANISMS IN THE LABORATORY AND
FIELD

In this chapter, concentrations or doses of formulations with
glyphosate are always expressed as mg product per kg soil.
Therefore, these figures may have been recalculated from the
original data, in cases where the authors reported the data in, for
instance, mg a.i./litre instead of mg Roundup per litre. For
recalculation, the percentages of the active ingredient (free acid
or the salt), given in Table 2, were used.

9.1 Laboratory experiments

9.1.1 Microorganisms

9.1.1.1 Water

Appraisal

The prokaryotic cyanobacteria are generally more sensitive to
the effects of glyphosate than the eukaryotic true algae. Similar
enzyme systems are inhibited in microorganisms to those thought to
be responsible for the herbicidal properties of glyphosate in higher
plants. The single semi-field study suggests very variable results
but with no significant effect on populations or community
structure.

The acute and chronic toxicities of technical grade glyphosate
and its formulations to cyanobacteria, algae and diatoms are
summarized in Table 17. Technical grade glyphosate is slightly toxic
with 3- to 4-day EC₅₀ values of 1.2-7.8 mg/litre, and 7-day NOEC
values of 0.3-34 mg/litre. Formulations of glyphosate may be more
toxic (3-day EC₅₀ values of 1.0 to > 55 mg product/litre).

Toxicity to cyanobacteria and algae is dependent on the species
or strain tested. Wängberg & Blanck (1988) exposed 16 species in
pure cultures to Roundup for 14 days. The concentration at which
growth was inhibited completely was 16 mg Roundup/litre for the most
sensitive species (Raphidonema longiseta and Anabaena sp.) and
131 mg Roundup/litre for the least sensitive species (Selenastrum
capricornutum). The prokaryotic Cyanophyta were significantly more
affected by Roundup than the eukaryotic Chlorococcales.

In Pseudomonas chlororaphis Roundup severely inhibited
respiration at concentrations of > 2623 mg/litre, whereas in
Aeromonas hydrophila respiration was only slightly affected at
these concentrations (Chan & Leung, 1986). The bacteria were exposed
for 6 days.

Table 17. Aquatic microorganisms: acute and chronic toxicity of glyphosate and its formulations (EC₅₀, NOEC)

Organism A Test Compound Test pH Hardness Temperature Experimental Parameter^a Concentration Reference
type water (mg CaCO₃/ (°C) duration (mg/litre)
litre) (days)

Cyanobacteria

Anabaena A S Tgg a.m. 7.5 285 24 7 NOEC 9.7^b,c Malcolm
flos-aquae Pirnie
Inc.
(1987a)

Green algae

Selenastrum - S Tgg a.m. 7.0 n.r. 26 3.5-4 EC₅₀ 7.8^b,e Bozeman
capricornutum et al.
(1989)
S. capricornutum A S Tgg a.m. 7.5 285 24 7 NOEC 20^b,c Malcolm
Pirnie
Inc.
(1987d)
S. capricornutum - S St a.m. 7.7-9.0 26 23 3 EC₅₀ 1.0^b LISEC
(1989b)
S. capricornutum - S St a.m. 7.7-9.0 26 23 3 EC₅₀ 2.5^d LISEC
(1989b)
S. capricornutum - S St a.m. 7.7-9.0 26 23 3 NOEC 0.2^b LISEC
(1989b)
S. capricornutum - S Ru a.m. 7.7-10.0 26 24 3 EC₅₀ 2.1^b LISEC
1989a)
S. capricornutum - S Ru a.m. 7.7-10.0 26 24 3 EC50 8.0^d LISEC
(1989a)
S. capricornutum - S Ru a.m. 7.7-10.0 26 24 3 NOEC 0.7^b LISEC
(1989a)

Table 17 (contd).

Organism A Test Compound Test pH Hardness Temperature Experimental Parameter^a Concentration Reference
type water (mg CaCO₃/ (°C) duration (mg/litre)
litre) (days)

Chlorella - S Ru a.m. 7.5 n.r. 25 2.1-7 EC₅₀ > 55^b Hernando
pyrenoidosa et al.
(1989)

C. pyrenoidosa - S Ru a.m. 7.5 n.r. 25 2.1-7 NOEC < 55^b Hernando
et al.
(1989)

Diatoms

Skeletonema - S Tgg a.m.^h 8.2-8.5 n.r. 20 4 EC₅₀ 1.2^g E G &
costatum Bionomics
(1978a)
S. costatum - S Tgg a.m.^h 8.2-8.5 n.r. 20 4 EC₅₀ 1.3^b E G &
Bionomics
(1978a)
S. costatum - S Tgg a.m.^h 8.2-8.5 n.r. 20 4 NOEC < 0.6^f E G &
Bionomics
(1978a)
S. costatum A S Tgg a.m.^h 7.5 285 20 7 NOEC 0.3^b,c Malcolm
Pirnie
Inc.
(1987b)
Navicula A S Tgg a.m. 7.5 285 20 7 NOEC 34^b,c Malcolm
pelliculosa Pirnie
Inc.
(1987c)

Table 17 (continued)

^a concentration of a formulation is expressed as mg of the formulation per litre
^b based on biomass decrease
^c based on actual concentrations
^d based on inhibition of growth rate
^e NOEC value not reported
^f based on biomass and chlorophyll a decrease
^g based on chlorophyll a decrease
^h salinity was 30%
A = actual concentrations are measured; - = nominal concentrations; S = static system;
Tgg = technical grade glyphosate; Ru = Roundup;
St = Sting; a.m. = artificial medium; n.r. = not reported

Chan & Leung (1986) found that the activity of
5-enolpyruvyl-shikimic acid-3-phosphate synthase was inhibited
strongly in aquatic bacteria at the lowest tested concentration of
656 mg Roundup/litre. This enzyme takes part in the biosynthetic
sequence to phenylalanine, tryptophan, and tyrosine via the
conversion of shikimate to chorismate, and the conversion of
chorismate to anthralinate. In an in vitro experiment with
cell-free extracts of Aerobacter aerogenes, technical grade
glyphosate inhibited the conversion of shikimate to chorismate at
concentrations of > 0.2 mg a.i./litre (Amrhein et al., 1980).

In Chlorella pyrenoidosa Roundup affected the growth, the
greening process and the photosynthetic metabolism at the lowest
tested concentration of 55 mg/litre when exposed for 2.1 or 7 days
(Hernando et al., 1989). Synthesis of chlorophyll a and b and
carotenoids was then significantly inhibited. Roundup affected
synthesis of chlorophyll a to a greater extent than that of the
other pigments. In vivo and in vitro studies with isolated
chloroplasts showed inhibition of the photosystems PS I and PS II at
concentrations of > 55 mg Roundup/litre. Hernando et al. (1989)
suggested that glyphosate acted as an electron transport inhibitor
and that the stronger inhibition of PS II compared with PS I was due
to the surfactant polyoxyethyleneamine.

In periphytic algal communities that were collected in ponds of
boreal forests, Roundup decreased the carbon fixation rate by 50% at
concentrations of 243-479 mg/litre (Goldsborough & Brown, 1988). The
algae were exposed for 4 h. Austin et al. (1991) cultured periphyton
on glass plates suspended in artificial "stream-troughs" which were
supplied with flowing water pumped from natural streams in British
Columbia, Canada. The stream water was low in phosphorus and flowed
out of an oligotrophic lake. Glyphosate was added to give nominal
concentrations in the troughs of between 0.001 and 0.3 mg/litre. A
further series of treatments added nutrients to troughs. The
herbicide was not toxic to the periphyton. A transitory decrease in
growth was followed by a stimulation of biomass in the
glyphosate-treated troughs. Similar effects were seen with added
nutrient. The authors considered the effect to be the result of
algae using glyphosate as a phosphate source. Communities of
periphyton were similar in all treatments.

Various studies have indicated that glyphosate may affect
aromatic amino acid synthesis in microorganisms, in addition to the
greening process, respiration and photosynthesis (Amrhein et al.,
1980; Chan & Leung, 1986; Pipke & Amrhein, 1988).

9.1.1.2 Soil

Appraisal

Soil bacteria in culture have shown effects of glyphosate on
nitrogen fixation, denitrification and nitrification. However, field
studies after application of formulations have not shown significant
effects. Closely related species of bacteria have been shown to be
capable of degrading glyphosate (see chapter 4). The lack of
information on the bioavailability of glyphosate in soil makes it
difficult to relate the evaluation of effects in culture to the
actual exposure in the field.

Technical grade glyphosate inhibited the growth of bacteria
isolated from a sprayed garden soil of sandy loam to a lesser extent
than it did that of bacteria isolated from an unsprayed control
(Quinn et al., 1988). In a mineral salt medium the growth rate of
bacteria from the untreated site was reduced by 50% at 590 mg
a.i./litre at 50 h after application.

In various studies, glyphosate, applied at the recommended
rates, caused neither inhibition of processes that are part of the
nitrogen cycle nor inhibition of enzymes involved in microbial
activity.

Roundup did not affect dehydrogenase activity in sand and loamy
sand when applied at rates of 4.9 and 24 kg a.i./ha (NATEC, 1990).
In the same soils amended with lucerne (Medicago sativa), the same
application rates did not change significantly the amounts of
nitrate nitrogen, although in treated loamy sand there was a slight
increase. These experiments, with a duration of 28 days, indicated a
slight stimulation of nitrification in loamy sand. A stronger
stimulation of nitrification was found in silt loam, silty clay loam
and sandy loam up to 84 days after application of technical grade
glyphosate at rates of 5 and 25 mg a.i./kg (ABC Inc., 1978d). This
stimulation was not dose-related. In this experiment no
substance-related effects were found on nitrogen fixation and
nitrite formation.

Nitrogen fixation was not affected significantly at an
application rate of 13 mg a.i./kg dry weight whether the product
applied was technical grade glyphosate or Roundup, or whether
aerobic or anaerobic conditions were used (Carlisle & Trevors,
1986a). At concentrations > 127 mg a.i./kg dry weight, nitrogen
fixation was inhibited under anaerobic conditions, whereas this
could not be verified under aerobic conditions due to very low
acetylene reduction rates. In the same agricultural sandy loam,
denitrification under anaerobic conditions was stimulated at
concentrations of > 13 mg a.i./kg dry weight, whether technical

grade glyphosate or Roundup was applied. Denitrification was
stimulated more strongly, when, in addition to the test compound,
glucose was added. In the same soil, no substantial effects of
either test compound on nitrification were found at 77 mg a.i./kg
dry weight. Dose-related inhibition of nitrification was found at
concentrations > 230 mg a.i./kg dry weight for glyphosate and
Roundup with respect to nitrate and nitrite production,
respectively. For both substances the inhibition was transient in
these studies. The temperature used was not reported.

No substantial effects on nitrification or denitrification were
found in two agricultural soils from Southern Finland after
application of an unknown formulation at a rate of 2.6 kg a.i./ha
(Müller et al., 1981). A strong inhibition of nitrogenase activity
was possibly an indirect effect due to a changed C/N ratio after the
treatment. In this study lasting 28 days, pretreatment measurements
were used as a control.

Roundup did not inhibit nitrification in three agricultural
soils after treatment at a recommended application rate of 2.9 kg
a.i./ha in 25-day experiments (Stratton, 1990). In a sandy loam,
nitrification was stimulated after the application of 145 kg
a.i./ha, whereas nitrification rates were inhibited by 50% at rates
of 194-435 kg a.i./ha. Mineralization, expressed as the time-course
of mg N/g dry weight (N = ammonium or nitrate nitrogen), in two
agricultural sandy loam soils was stimulated significantly due to
the treatment with 100 mg a.i./kg dry weight during an experiment
lasting 70 days (Marsh et al., 1977).

Not only in agricultural soils but also in forest soils, the
effects of Roundup on the nitrogen cycle appear not to be
inhibitory. Preston & Trofymow (1989) found no significant effects
on nitrification or the immobilization of urea nitrogen in an
organic fir forest floor and its underlying mineral horizon due to
the application of 10 and 50 mg a.i./kg dry weight. This experiment
lasted for 40 days.

In two agricultural sandy loam soils exposed to 100 mg a.i./kg
dry weight for 210 days, transient slight effects on CO₂ evolution
were observed by Marsh et al. (1977). These effects were both
stimulatory (first 20 days) and inhibitory (until approximately 130
days) in both the soil from a permanent grassland and the soil from
an arable field, but especially in the latter. Carlisle & Trevors
(1986b) observed a dose-related increase in both O₂ consumption
and CO₂ production in an agricultural sandy loam soil during a
test of 10 days, with both technical grade glyphosate and Roundup.
In general the increases were significant at concentrations greater
than or equal to 127 mg a.i./kg. At the lowest dose (13 mg a.i./kg
soil) no effects were observed except a significant increase in

oxygen consumption due to Roundup. Oxygen consumption at doses
greater than or equal to 127 mg a.i./kg was more strongly stimulated
by Roundup than by technical grade glyphosate, possibly due to the
isopropylamine or surfactant. Preston & Trofymow (1989) found no
significant effect on CO₂ production in an organic fir forest
floor and its underlying mineral horizon after the application of 10
and 50 mg a.i./kg dry weight. This experiment lasted 40 days.

Aerobic H₂ oxidation in an agricultural sandy loam was
significantly inhibited by both technical grade glyphosate and
Roundup, but only at the highest dose of 635 mg a.i./kg dry weight
(Carlisle & Trevors, 1986b). Inhibition was stronger under anaerobic
conditions, and was found at concentrations of > 127 mg a.i./kg
dry weight to be significant and dose related. Anaerobic inhibition
might have been due to increased H₂ generation as a result of
stimulated fermentation.

No effects of glyphosate on the activities of 1,3-ß-glucanase
and urease in a silt loam were found after application of Roundup at
a rate of 12 mg a.i./kg dry weight (Lethbridge et al., 1981).
Preston & Trofymow (1989) found no significant effect on urea
hydrolysis in an organic fir forest floor and its underlying mineral
horizon amended with 200 mg urea nitrogen per kg dry weight, due to
treatment with Roundup at a rate of 50 mg a.i./kg dry weight.

The degradation of cellulose, starch, protein, or leaf litter
was not inhibited at concentrations of 5 and 25 mg a.i./kg soil in
three agricultural soils, with the exception of litter in silt loam
at the highest dose (ABC Inc., 1978e). In this experiment lasting 84
days, technical grade glyphosate was applied.

Bacterial growth of Rhizobium trifolii in sterile solutions
with Bergersen's broth was completely inhibited at solution
concentrations of 10 and 20 mg a.i./litre, applied as an unknown
formulation of glyphosate (Eberbach & Douglas, 1983). Only at 10 mg
a.i./litre did the bacterial growth recover within 4 days. At lower
concentrations no inhibition was found.

Mycelial growth of ectomycorrhizal fungi in pure cultures on
agar was inhibited by 50% or more at concentrations of > 1 mg
a.i./litre for Pisolithus tinctorius and of > 100 mg a.i./litre
for Cenococcum geophilum and Hebeloma longicaudum (Estok et al.,
1989). Ectomycorrhizal fungi commonly associated with pines (Pinus
sp) were significantly inhibited at concentrations of > 29 µg
Roundup/litre (Chakravarty & Chatarpaul, 1990a). The most sensitive
species were Cenococcum graniforme, Hebeloma crustuliniforme and
Laccaria laccata. Roundup increased the susceptibility of sandy
soil for Gaeumannomyces gramminis, a fungus causing "take-all
disease" in wheat crops (Mekwatanakarn & Sivasithamparam, 1987).

Application at a rate of 0.54 µg a.i./kg increased the survival and
pathogenicity of the fungus significantly after 140 days of
incubation at 25 °C. These authors concluded that Roundup affected
microbial antagonists of the fungus.

9.1.2 Aquatic organisms

9.1.2.1 Plants

Appraisal

There is conflicting information on the effects of sediment on
the phytotoxicity of glyphosate to aquatic plants; Lemna showed
reduced effects whilst Carthamus did not. Generally, glyphosate is
thought to be largely unavailable to plants when added to soil and
only effective as a herbicide when applied to foliage.

The chronic toxicity to aquatic macrophytes when exposed to
technical grade glyphosate or Roundup dissolved in water is
summarized in Tables 20 and 21. Glyphosate is slightly toxic with a
14-day NOEC value of 9 mg/litre. Roundup is also slightly toxic with
14-day NOEC values of 2.4-56 mg/litre. No data on acute toxicity for
plants were available.

When Roundup was sprayed at a rate of 0.8 kg a.i./ha, the
phytotoxicity to floating plants of the common duckweed (Lemna
minor) was dependent on the extent of washed-off deposit (Lockhart
et al., 1989). Phytotoxicity was highest when the sprayed deposits
were not washed off within 6 h after application. Suspensions of
50 mg/litre of inorganic bentonite clay reduced the phytotoxicity of
Roundup to common duckweed significantly (Hartman & Martin, 1984).
When exposed for 14 days, concentrations up to 24 mg Roundup/litre
had no effect on plant growth when sediment was added, whereas the
growth was reduced by 50% at 5 mg Roundup/litre when no sediment was
added.

Phytotoxicity of glyphosate to the safflower (Carthamus
tinctorius) was not significantly reduced when the test compound
was added to drainage water with suspended particles instead of
distilled water (Bowmer et al., 1986). In these bioassays the
inhibition of root elongation was measured when the plants were
exposed to concentrations in unfiltered water of approximately
0.1-3 mg a.i./litre. The maximum concentration of adsorbed
glyphosate was 2500 mg/kg.

Although it had inhibitory effects at high concentrations,
Roundup had a stimulatory effect on the growth of common duckweed
(Lemna minor) and tubers of sago pondweed (Potamogeton
pectinatus) at lower concentrations (Hartman & Martin, 1985;
Lockhart et al., 1989). Enhancement of growth of common duckweed and
sago pondweed was found at 7-56 and 3 mg Roundup/litre,
respectively. These stimulatory effects may refer to hormesis.

9.1.2.2 Invertebrates

Appraisal

The data from laboratory toxicity tests show that formulations
are often more toxic than technical glyphosate to aquatic
invertebrates. The surprising result that addition of clay particles
to Daphnia test systems increased the toxicity of glyphosate is
probably due to ingestion of herbicide bounds to the particles. Few
studies have been conducted in the presence of sediment; the
reported toxicity of glyphosate is, therefore, difficult to relate
to the field situation.

The acute and chronic toxicity of technical grade glyphosate
and its formulations to aquatic invertebrates are summarized in
Tables 18-21. Technical grade glyphosate is slightly to very
slightly toxic, with LC₅₀ values of > 55 mg/litre and a 21-day
NOEC value of 100 mg/litre. Formulations of glyphosate are
moderately to very slightly toxic with 2-day EC₅₀ values of
5.3-5600 mg product/litre and 21-day MATC values of 1.4-4.9 mg
product/litre. The higher toxicity of Roundup to crustaceans is
mainly due to the presence of surfactants (Servizi et al., 1987).

In a laboratory in vitro test with the gills of Mytilus
californianus, a marine water mollusc, the active uptake of glycine
was inhibited by 23 and 67%, respectively, when a mixture of
¹⁴C-labelled and unlabelled glyphosate was applied at rates of
0.2-1.7 mg/litre (Swinehart & Cheney, 1987). This inhibition might
be an indication for Mg²⁺-moderated binding of glycine to the gill
surface, whereas glyphosate can compete with glycine uptake by
forming a metal complex.

Water fleas (Daphnia magna) were less sensitive to Roundup,
when the water was aerated than when it was unaerated. The 2-day
LC₅₀ value decreased from 37 (with aeration) to 24 mg (without
aeration) Roundup/litre (EG & G Bionomics, 1980f).

Addition of 50 mg/litre of inorganic bentonite clay decreased
the 2-day EC₅₀ value for mature water fleas (Daphnia pulex) from
16 to 7 mg Roundup/litre (Hartman & Martin, 1984). This higher
toxicity might have been due to ingestion of particle-adsorbed
glyphosate. Addition of bentonite also increased the toxicity in a
chronic experiment with populations of Daphnia pulex. Immature
water fleas were more sensitive to glyphosate than the adults under
all conditions. Populations in all treatments had recovered within
14 days after the application (Hartman & Martin, 1984).

No avoidance of glyphosate was found when mayfly nymphs
(Ephemerella walkeri) were tested at concentrations of 0.2-2 mg
Roundup/litre, whereas avoidance was demonstrated at 24 mg/litre
(Folmar et al., 1979).

9.1.2.3 Vertebrates

Appraisal

The toxicity tests for fish are generally performed without
sediment. As the bioavailability of glyphosate itself will be
reduced under most conditions due to sorption onto sediment, no
toxic effects are expected. Toxic effects, however, can be expected
due to surfactants in some formulations. To a lesser extent,
life-stage, pH, water hardness, temperature, and the presence of
feed all influence toxicity. No adverse effects on the
osmoregulatory mechanism were found.

The acute and chronic toxicity of technical grade glyphosate
and its formulations to fish are summarized in Tables 18-21.
Technical grade glyphosate is moderately toxic with 4-day LC₅₀
values of 10 to > 1000 mg/litre, a 21-day NOEC value of
52 mg/litre, and an MATC value of > 26 mg/litre. Formulations of
glyphosate have comparable toxicity with 4-day LC₅₀ values of 2.4
to > 1000 mg product/litre, and 21-day NOEC values of 0.8-2.4 mg
product/litre. Toxicity may vary substantially, depending on the
species, the test compound and test conditions. In general,
technical grade glyphosate is less toxic than the formulations. This
difference is mainly due to a higher toxicity of surfactants in the
formulations (Folmar et al., 1979; Servizi et al., 1987; Mitchell
et al., 1987; Wan et al., 1989).

Table 18. Aquatic organisms: acute toxicity of technical grade glyphosate in a static test system

Organism A Test pH Hardness Temperature Experimental Parameter Concentration Reference
water (mg CaCO₃/ (°C) duration (mg/litre)
litre) (days)

Molluscs

Crassostrea - n.w.^a n.r. n.r. 25 2 EC₅₀ > 10b Bionomics
virginica, eggs (1973a)

Echinodermata

Tripneustes - n.w.^a 7.7-8.2 n.r. 20 4 EC₅₀ > 1000c E G & Bionomics
esculentes (1978d)

Crustaceans

Daphnia magna, - w.w. 7.8-8.0 > 250 19 2 LC₅₀ 780 ABC Inc.
first instar (1978a)
Uca pugilator - a.m.^a n.r. n.r. 21 4 LC₅₀ 934 Bionomics
(1973b)
Palaemonetes - a.m.^a n.r. n.r. 21 4 LC₅₀ 281 Bionomics
vulgaris (1973b)
Mysidopsis bahia - n.w.^a 6.4-8.3 n.r. 20 4 LC₅₀ > 1000 E G &
Bionomics
(1978c)

Insects

Chironomus plumosus, - r.w. n.r. 40 22 2 EC₅₀ 55^d Folmar et al.
fourth instar (1979)

Table 18 (contd).

Organism A Test pH Hardness Temperature Experimental Parameter Concentration Reference
water (mg CaCO₃/ (°C) duration (mg/litre)
litre) (days)

Fish

Ictalurus - r.w. n.r. 40 22 4 LC₅₀ 130 Folmar et al.
punctatus (1979)
Salmo gairdnerii, - divers 6.3-8.2 5.3-148 n.r. 4 LC₅₀ 10-197 Wan et al.
0.4 cm, 0.5 g (1989)
Salmo gairdnerii, - r.w. 4.4-7.2 45 12 4 LC₅₀ 86 ABC Inc.
0.4 cm, 0.6 g (1978b)
Oncorhynchus keta, - divers 6.3-8.2 5.3-148 n.r. 4 LC₅₀ 10-148 Wan et al.
0.4 cm, 0.5 g (1989)
O. kisutch, A divers 6.3-8.2 5.3-148 n.r. 4 LC₅₀ 27-174 Wan et al.
0.4 cm, 0.5 g (1989)
O. tshawytsha, - divers 6.3-8.2 5.3-148 n.r. 4 LC₅₀ 19-211 Wan et al.
0.4 cm, 0.5 g (1989)
O. gorbusha, - divers 6.3-8.2 5.3-148 n.r. 4 LC₅₀ 14-190 Wan et al.
0.4 cm, 0.5 g (1989)
Lepomis - r.w. n.r. 40 22 4 LC₅₀ 140 Folmar et al.
macrochirus (1979)
L. macrochirus, - r.w. 6.6-7.0 45 21 4 LC₅₀ 120 ABC Inc.
0.3 cm, 1.0 g (1978c)
Pimephales - r.w. n.r. 40 22 4 LC₅₀ 97 Folmar et al.
promelas (1979)
Rasbora - r.w. n.r. 25 21 4 LC₅₀ 168 HRC (1977)
heteromorpha,
0.1-0.3 cm
Cyprinodon - n.w.e 7.6-8.3 n.r. 20 4 LC₅₀ > 1000 E G & Bionomics
variegatus, (1978b)
0.7-1.0 cm

^a salinity 20-35%
^b based on abnormal development of oyster larvae
^c based on immobility, drooping spines, and retracted podia
^d based on immobilisation
^e salinity 18%
A = actual concentrations are measured; - = nominal concentration; a.m. = artificial medium;
r.w. = reconstituted water; w.w. = well water; n.w. = natural surface water;
n.r. = not reported

Table 19. Aquatic organisms: acute toxicity of formulations with glyphosate