FAO Meeting Report No. PL/1965/10/2 WHO/Food Add/28.65 EVALUATION OF THE HAZARDS TO CONSUMERS RESULTING FROM THE USE OF FUMIGANTS IN THE PROTECTION OF FOOD The content of this document is the result of the deliberations of the Joint Meeting of the FAO Committee on Pesticides in Agriculture and the WHO Expert Committee on Pesticide Residues, which met 15-22 March 19651 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations World Health Organization 1965 1 Report of the second joint meeting of the FAO Committee on Pesticides in Agriculture and the WHO Expert Committee on Pesticide Residues, FAO Meeting Report No. PL/1965/10; WHO/Food Add./26.65. ACRYLONITRILE Compound Acrylonitrile Chemical name Acrylonitrile Synonyms Propene nitrile; vynyl cyanide; cyanoethylene Empirical formula CH2CHCN Structural formulaRelevant physical and chemical properties Physical state (atmospheric pressure 20°C): colourless, volatile liquid (some technical grades slightly yellow) Boiling-point: 77°C Odour: like mustard Flash Point: 0°C (open cup) Flammability limits in air: 3 to 17% by volume Solubility: Water: 7.5 g/100 ml Organic solvents: soluble in all common organic solvents Specific gravity (liquid): 0.800 Specific gravity (gas): 1.83 Uses Acrylonitrile is a potent, highly effective fumigant; however its high flammability and cost deter its use. Although it is not widely employed at present for the fumigation of foodstuffs, acrylonitrile is occasionally used to treat grain, dried fruit, walnuts and tobacco. It is also sometimes used as a "spot fumigant" in flour mills and bakeries. Residues Residues are similar to those resulting from the use of hydrogen cyanide. Effect of fumigant on treated crop The effects of acrylonitrile are similar to those of hydrogen cyanide. Commodities having a high moisture content absorb more fumigant than commodities with a low moisture content. Acrylonitrile, used alone or mixed with carbon tetrachloride, does not affect the germination of a wide range of vegetable, cereal and flower seeds (Glass and Crosier, 1949; Lindgren et al., 1954). It is, however, highly toxic to nursery stock and growing plants and seriously damages fresh fruit. BIOLOGICAL DATA Acrylonitrile is highly toxic and the intoxication can be induced by the oral, percutaneous or inhalation routes (in the form of vapours). Biochemical aspects On the basis of results with acrylonitrile in different species of animals, its toxicity is considered to be equivalent to that of hydrogen cyanide which is evolved from acrylonitrile in the organism (Dudley and Neal, 1942; Dudley et al., 1942; Levina, 1951). Hydrogen cyanide was demonstrated in the blood of rats after seven hours' exposure (100 ppm in air) but only in small amounts (1 micromole/100 ml). In dogs the blood concentration of cyanide was ten times greater after the same exposure. No hydrogen cyanide was found in the blood of rats after exposure to lower concentrations in the air (Brieger et al., 1952). From experiments in dogs, it was recommended that thiocyanate determinations in serum and urine be used to discover cases of dangerous absorption in workers exposed to acrylonitrile (Lawton et al., 1943). On the other hand, a number of authors have not confirmed that the effects of acrylonitrile are due to hydrogen cyanide (Benes and Cerna, 1959; Désgrez, 1911; Ghiringhelli, 1954; Lindgren et al., 1954; Paulet and Desnos, 1961; Sexton, 1950). After the administration of acrylonitrile to guinea-pigs, rats and rabbits very little cyanide was recovered from the urine, as thiocyanate, compared with the amounts excreted in cyanide poisoning (Benes and Cerna, 1959; Ghiringhelli, 1956; Paulet and Desnos, 1961). After subcutaneous injection of acrylonitrile (130 mg/kg) to guinea-pigs, the hydrogen cyanide concentration in blood was 0.128 mg % (average). This concentration is too low to be able to cause death in animals; for comparison the average HCN concentration in the blood of dogs after intoxication with inhaled HCN was 1.1 mg % and 0.85 mg % after oral HCN poisoning (Ghiringhelli, 1954; Gettler and Baine, 1938). The use of thiosulfate, nitrite and glucose as antidotes to the acute poisoning of animals with acrylonitrile has not been successful or convincing (Benes and Cerna, 1959; Ghiringhelli, 1954; Dudley and Neal, 1942). The combination of thiosulfate and nitrite had a certain anti-acrylonitrile effect in mice (Benes and Cerna, 1959). Furthermore, the rate of cyano-methaemoglobin formation in rats killed by acrylonitrile is lower than that in animals surviving potassium cyanide and much lower than in animals killed by it (Magos, 1962). Thiosulfate with phenobarbitol and commonly used stimulating preparations protected 70-90% of animals (rats, rabbits, mice) against doses of acrylonitrile exceeding the LD100 (Paulet and Desnos, 1961). In guinea-pigs, unmetabolized acrylonitrile was proved by a chromatographic method 24 and 30 hours after oral and subcutaneous detected administration (Benes and Cerna, 1959). Acute toxicity Animal Route LD50 mg/kg References body-weight Mouse oral 40-46 American Cyanamid, 1951 27 Benes & Cerna, 1959 subcutaneous 35 Benes & Cerna, 1959 Rat oral 78 Benes & Cerna, 1959 93 Smyth & Carpenter, 1948 Guinea-pig subcutaneous 130 Ghiringhelli, 1954 oral 50 Negherbon, 1959 Rabbit intravenous 69 Paulet & Desnos, 1961 Detailed investigation of acute poisoning with acrylonitrile after intravenous injection in dog and rabbit indicates considerable differences from cyanide intoxication. In the symptomatology nervous disorders dominate the picture. Electroencephalographic records show that the higher nervous centres are affected. Important physiological differences from cyanide poisoning are absence of polypnoea, increased oxygen consumption during the first phases of intoxication, and lowering of the HbO2 level in the mixed venous blood. Hyperglycaemia and a decrease in the plasma inorganic phosphate concentration were also found (Paulet and Desnos, 1961). Man. There are only few reports on the toxic effect of acrylonitrile on man. Accidental deadly poisonings are described in two children. In the first case it was an inhalation poisoning, in the second a percutaneous one (Grunske, 1949, Lorz, 1950). In industrial workers exposed to acrylonitrile vapours, in different cases light jaundice, anaemia, leucocytosis, headache or gastro-intestinal symptoms were observed (Wilson, 1944). In a small group of men working with a mixture of nitrites for a number of years, symptoms of liver and kidney irritations were reported; they disappeared, however, when the exposure was interrupted (Wilson and McCormick, 1949). The threshold limit value for acrylonitrile in air is 20 ppm (about 45 mg/m3) (Anon, 1964). Comment on experimental studies reported The acute toxicity and the mechanism of the toxic effect of acrylonitrile have been studied. Its mode of action is not known but it can be said that it is not similar to that of hydrogen cyanide. Evaluation On the basis of the toxicological investigations done hitherto, the acceptable daily intake of acrylonitrile for man cannot be evaluated. Further work required Biochemical studies on the effect of the fumigant on food. Additional toxicological studies are required before an acceptable daily intake level for man can be considered. REFERENCES Anon, (1964) Threshold limit values for 1964. Arch. environm. Hlth., 9, 545 American Cyanamid Co., New York (1951) The chemistry of acrylonitrile, Cyanamid's Nitrogen Chemicals Digest Benes, V. & Cerna, V. (1959) J. Hyg. Epidem. (Praha), 3, 106 Brieger, H., Rieders, F. & Hodes, W. A. (1952) Arch. industr. Hyg., 6, 128 Désgrez, A. (1911) C.R. Acad. Sci. (Paris), 153, 895 Dudley, H. C. & Neal, P. A. (1942) J. industr. Hyg., 24, 27 Dudley, H. C., Sweeney, T. R. & Miller, J. W. (1942) J. industr. Hyg., 24, 255 Gettler, A. O. & Baine, J. O. (1938) Amer. J. med. Sci., 195, 182 Ghiringhelli, L. (1954) Med. d. Lavoro, 45, 305 Ghiringhelli, L. (1956) Med. d. Lavoro, 47, 192 Glass, E. H. & Crosier, W. F. (1949) J. econ. Ent., 42, 646 Grunske, F. (1949) Dtsch. med. Wschr., 74, 1081 Lawton, A. H., Sweeney, T. R. & Dudley, H. C. (1943) J. industr. Hyg., 25, 13 Levina, E. N. (1951) Gig. i Sanit., 2, 34 Lindgren, D. L., Vincent, L. E. & Krohne, H. E. (1954) J. econ. Ent., 47, 923 Lorz, H. (1950) Dtsch. med. Wschr., 75, 1087 Magos, L. (1962) Brit. J. industr. Med., 19, 283 Negherbon, W. O. (1959) Handbook of Toxicology, vol. 3, Saunders, Philadelphia Paulet, G. & Desnos, J. (1961) Arch. int. Pharmacodyn., 131, 54 Sexton, W. A. (1950) Chemical constitution and biological activity, Von Nostrand Co. Inc., New York Smyth, H. F. & Carpenter, C. P. (1948) J. industr. Hyg., 30, 63 Wilson, R. H. (1944) J. Amer. med. Ass., 124, 701 Wilson, R. H. & McCormick, W. E. (1949) Industr. Med. Surg., 18, 243
See Also: Toxicological Abbreviations Acrylonitrile (EHC 28, 1983) Acrylonitrile (HSG 1, 1986) Acrylonitrile (ICSC) Acrylonitrile (WHO Food Additives Series 19) ACRYLONITRILE (JECFA Evaluation) Acrylonitrile (CICADS 39, 2002) Acrylonitrile (IARC Summary & Evaluation, Volume 71, 1999)