VOL.: 22 (1980) (p. 55)
Sodium cyclamate has also been tested in mice by bladder insertion (implantation) in one experiment: it increased the incidence of bladder carcinomas. When administered in one experiment by subcutaneous injection to rats, no tumours were seen at the site of injection.
Calcium cyclamate has been tested by oral administration in one two-generation experiment in rats; no difference in tumour incidence was seen between treated and control animals. Two further experiments in rats showing a few bladder tumours and one in hamsters were considered to be inadequate for evaluation. When administered by subcutaneous injection to rats, tumours were produced at the site of injection.
The combination of sodium cyclamate with sodium saccharin in a ratio of 10:1 has been tested by oral administration in a multigeneration experiment in mice and in two experiments in rats. In one study in rats, transitional-cell carcinomas in the bladder were produced in male animals given the highest dose; in the other study in rats and in the study in mice, there was no difference in tumour incidence between treated and control animals.
In one study in rats fed sodium cyclamate after receiving a single instillation into the bladder of a low dose of N-nitroso-N-methylurea, transitional-cell neoplasms of the bladder were produced. No such tumours were observed in animals that received N-nitroso-N-methylurea alone.
Cyclohexylamine has been tested by oral administration in two experiments in mice, one of which was a multigeneration study, and in four experiments in rats; there were no differences in tumour incidence between treated and control animals. A further experiment in rats was considered to be inadequate for evaluation.
The limited number of mutagenicity studies published give no evidence that cyclamates cause point mutations. Both cyclamates and cyclohexylamine cause chromosome damage.
There is no evidence that cyclamates and cyclohexylamine are teratogenic.
In two studies of cancer mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus (who, as a group, have been shown to consume larger quantities of artificial sweeteners than the general population), lower mortality from cancer at all sites was observed as compared with the general population; there was no excess of bladder cancer in particular. in a further study, the frequency of the mention of diabetes mellitus in death certificates of persons who had died of bladder cancers was compared with that in those of controls who had died of other cancers (excluding those of the lung and pancreas); in the presence of diabetes mellitus, there was no increase in the risk of bladder cancer. As there are differences other than artificial sweetener use between diabetics and the general population, such studies cannot exclude a small carcinogenic effect of these sweeteners.
Seven case-control studies were considered by the Working Group. Only two of these studies examined confounding factors in detail. Of these two, one suggested that use of nine or more tablets of artificial sweeteners per day was positively associated with risk for bladder cancer in men, but not in women, although in these small groups the results may have been due to chance, to unsuspected confounding factors, or to residual effects of those confounding factors that were considered in the analysis and could be shown to reduce the magnitude of the association. The other study that considered confounding factors suggested that there was no effect of the use of artificial sweeteners on the incidence of bladder cancer; the observed relative risk was 1.0 (indicating no increase in risk), but a relative risk below 1.4 could not be excluded. The other five case-control studies also showed no association, although they were limited by some inadequacies in experimental design.
In six of the seven case-control studies, women with bladder cancer showed a tendency to consume less artificial sweeteners than female controls. This observation suggests that there is no association between use of artificial sweeteners and bladder cancer in women.
No adequate epidemiological data on cyclamates alone were available to the Working Group (see also monograph on saccharin).
For definition of the italicized terms, see Preamble Evaluation.
After the meeting of the Working Group, two epidemiological investigations (Morrison & Buring, 1980; Wynder & Stellman, 1980) were reported.
The study by Morrison and Buring evaluated the relation between cancer of the lower urinary tract and the use of artificial sweeteners in a case-control study of 592 patients with lower-urinary-tract cancer (94 per cent of whom had a bladder tumour) and 536 controls chosen from the general population of the study area. A history of use of artificial sweetenera and exposure to other known or suspected risk factors was determined by interview. In those who had used dietetic beverages and in those who had used sugar substitutes, the relative risk of lower-urinary-tract cancer was estimated as 0.9 (0.7 to 1.2), 95% confidence interval), as compared with 1 in nonusers of artificial sweeteners. Among men, the relative risk was 0.8 (0.6 to 1.1) in those who had used dietetic beverages and 0.8 (0.5 to 1.1) in those who had used sugar substitutes. Among women, the corresponding relative risks were 1.6 (0.9 to 2.7) and 1.5 (0.9 to 2.6). Increasing frequency or duration of use of artificial sweeteners was not consistently associated with increasing relative risk. This study suggests that, as a group, users of artificial sweeteners have little or no excess risk of cancer of the lower urinary tract [Authors' summary].
The study by Wynder and Stellman was a case-control study of 302 men and 65 women with bladder cancer and an equal number of controls matched for age, sex, hospital and hospital-room status. No association was found between the use of artificial sweeteners or diet-beverage consumption and bladder cancer. The relative risk of bladder cancer (95% confidence interval) among men was 0.9 (0.7-1.3) for artificial sweetener use and 0.8 (0.6-1.2) for diet-beverage consumption; among women, the relative risks were 0.6 (0.3-1.4) and 0.6 (0.3-1.3), respectively. These relative risk estimates did not vary appreciably when a number of potential confounding variables were controlled for, namely, history of diabetes, obesity, occupation, education, religion and coffee or tea consumption. No dose-response relationships between consumption of artificial sweeteners or diet beverages and quantity or duration of use were observed.
Subsequent evaluations: Suppl. 7 (1987); Vol. 73 (1999)
See Also: Toxicological Abbreviations Cyclamates (IARC Summary & Evaluation, Supplement7, 1987) Cyclamates (IARC Summary & Evaluation, Volume 73, 1999)