Toxicological evaluation of some food additives including anticaking agents, antimicrobials, antioxidants, emulsifiers and thickening agents WHO FOOD ADDITIVES SERIES NO. 5 The evaluations contained in this publication were prepared by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives which met in Geneva, 25 June - 4 July 19731 World Health Organization Geneva 1974 1 Seventeenth Report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives, Wld Hlth Org. techn. Rep. Ser., 1974, No. 539; FAO Nutrition Meetings Report Series, 1974, No. 53. OXIDIZED STARCHES Explanation Whatever oxidizing agent is used only minor modifications of the starch molecule are achieved in normal manufacturing practice. These are equivalent to the introduction of 1% w/w of carboxyl (-COOH) or 0.5% w/w of keto (-CO) groups or, 3.6 carboxyl and 2.9 carbonyl groups per 100 glucopyranose units. No chlorine is introduced into the molecule and the final products usually contain only residues of sodium chloride, sodium sulfate and sulfur dioxide. BIOLOGICAL DATA BIOCHEMICAL ASPECTS Early comparative experiments pointed to inhibition of amylolysis (Tremolières et al., 1959). In vitro digestibility by pancreatin or saliva was used to compare slightly and highly oxidized corn starch with unmodified corn starch and a reference starch. Maltose production after a fixed interval of enzyme action was taken as a measure of digestibility. The oxidized starch was 10-15% less digestible by pancreatin than unmodified starch but there was no obvious difference as regards salivary digestion (Shuman & Mertz, 1959). The digestibility of oxidized wheat starch (conditions not stated) was examined in rats by matched-feeding techniques using the modified starch as the sole source of carbohydrate at a level of 63.7% (dry basis) of the diet. The degree of assimilation by and the general effects on groups of six rats over a feeding period of 28 days were assessed from consideration of body weight changes, faecal residues, digestibility coefficients for starch and postmortem appearance of the animals and their gastrointestinal tracts. The digestibility coefficients were calculated from the starch content of ingested food and residues found in faeces and postmortem gastrointestinal contents. Body weight gain and digestibility coefficients were practically indistinguishable from those obtained for wheat starch or corn starch. Nothing abnormal was noted on postmortem examination (Booher et al., 1951). Other studies, in three groups of three rats each, used corn starch oxidized with 3.9, 4.5, or 5.5% hypochlorite calculated as chlorine. This corresponds to the introduction of 0.57%, (2.04 COOH groups per 100 glucopyranose units), 0.8%, (2.86 COOH groups per 100 glucopyranose units) and 0.9% (3.57 COOH groups per 100 glucopyranose units) carboxyl groups. To 5 g basal diet were added 1, 2 or 4 g modified or control starch and this diet was fed to rats for 10 days. Comparison of digestibilities showed an apparent decrease with increasing oxidation but no effect on caloric values. No tissue damage was associated with the diarrhoea and caecal enlargements observed in groups receiving 2 g or 4 g starch in their feed. Liver, kidney, heart and spleen weights were normal. Diarrhoea and caecal enlargement are known to occur in rats fed starches of poor digestibility or other carbohydrates (White, 1963). The digestibility of oxidized starches at levels of 2.5, 6 and 43.2% calculated as chlorine, equivalent to a carboxyl content of 0.32% (1.15 COOH per 100 glucopyranose units), 0.9% (3.81 COOH per 100 glucopyranose units) or 1.46% (5.23 COOH per 100 glucopyranose units), was studied in groups of six male and six female rats. The animals were kept for seven days on 5 g basal diet and then given either 1 g or 2 g starch supplements for 21 days. Poor weight gain with diarrhoea were noted only with the highly oxidized material at both dietary levels. One rat from each of the high dietary level groups was examined. Marked caecal dilatation was seen only in animals fed the heavily oxidized starch. It is to be noted that this very highly oxidized starch is a commercially unacceptable product (Whistler & Belfort, 1961). TOXICOLOGICAL STUDIES Rat Starch treated at a level of 0.375% chlorine was fed to weanling albino rats at 70% of their diet for 10 weeks with corn starch as control. Feeding was either unrestricted or by paired-feeding technique. No toxic effects were noted. No details of this work, carried out in 1944-1945, were available (Garton Sons & Co. Ltd., 1967). A corn starch oxidized with 5.5% chlorine using sodium hypochlorite (carboxyl content 0.90) was fed to groups of 15 male and 15 female rats at dietary levels of 0, 5, 10 or 25% for 90 days. No adverse effects were noted regarding general health, growth, food intake and efficiency, haematology, serum chemistry and urine analyses. Diarrhoea was not observed. The amount of faeces dry matter/unit food consumed was slightly increased at 25% of the oxidized starch in both sexes. In this group the relative weight of the caecum was slightly increased, the effect being significant in females only. The other organ-to-body weight ratios showed slightly increased adrenal weights of females on the test diets, but the differences with the controls were not dose-related. No other gross changes were observed at autopsy. The histopathological examination has not yet been completed (Til et al., 1973). Comments: The digestibility of hypochlorite-oxidized starch has been investigated in vivo and found to be similar to that of unmodified starch. The longest of the short-term studies reported extended only over 10 weeks and was carried out with an inadequately defined sample. Studies with highly oxidized starches (1.4% or more carboxyl groups) are not applicable because these products are not acceptable for food additive use. Provided the chemical change is limited to the introduction of no more than 1 carboxyl group per 25 anhydro-glucose units, the biological effects of the modified starch do not appear to be deleterious. EVALUATION Estimate of acceptable daily intake for man Temporarily not limited.* FURTHER WORK OR INFORMATION Required Results of histopathological studies by 1974. REFERENCES Booher, L. E., Behan, I. & McMeans, E. (1951) J. Nutr., 45, 75 Garton Sons & Co. Ltd. (1967) Unpublished report Shuman, A. C. & Mertz, E. T. (1959) Unpublished report No. 4 of Shuman Chemical Lab. Inc. to Corn Industries Research Foundation Til, H. P. et al. (1973) Unpublished report No. R 4081 by Centraal Instituut voor Voedingsonderzoek TNO Tremolières, J., Bernier, J. J. & Lowy, R. (1959) Nutritio et Dieta, 1, 100 Whistler, R. L. & Belfort, A. M. (1961) Science, 133, 1599 White, T. A. (1963) Cereal Science Today, 8, 48 * See relevant paragraph in the seventeenth report, pages 10-11.
See Also: Toxicological Abbreviations Oxidized starches (FAO Nutrition Meetings Report Series 46a) Oxidized starches (WHO Food Additives Series 1) Oxidized starches (WHO Food Additives Series 6)