Toxicological evaluation of some food additives including anticaking agents, antimicrobials, antioxidants, emulsifiers and thickening agents WHO FOOD ADDITIVES SERIES NO. 5 The evaluations contained in this publication were prepared by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives which met in Geneva, 25 June - 4 July 19731 World Health Organization Geneva 1974 1 Seventeenth Report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives, Wld Hlth Org. techn. Rep. Ser., 1974, No. 539; FAO Nutrition Meetings Report Series, 1974, No. 53. AGAR Explanation This substance has been evaluated for acceptable daily intake by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (see Annex 1, Ref. No. 7) in 1963. The previously published monograph has been revised and is reproduced in its entirety below. BIOLOGICAL DATA BIOCHEMICAL ASPECTS No information available. TOXICOLOGICAL STUDIES Acute toxicity LD50 values have not been found in the literature. Subcutaneous implantation or injection into rats produced a foreign-body giant-cell reaction (Tedeschi & Mangiantini, 1956; Zbinden & Studer, 1957). Short-term studies Rat Four groups of six rats received diets containing 5%, 10%, 20% and 30% of agar respectively for 10 weeks. The group receiving the 10% diet gained weight about 20% faster than the controls; the other groups gained weight at the same rate as the controls. The rats fed diets containing 20% and 30% of agar required significantly more feed and water per gram of weight gain than the control group (Nilson & Schaller, 1941). Six weanling male rats fed a diet containing 25% of agar for four weeks showed growth retardation during the third week. The dry weight of the cleaned stomach and caecum was found moderately increased. Colon and rectum were more than twice as heavy as in the controls (Fischer, 1957). OBSERVATIONS IN MAN For the last 50 years agar has been used as a mild laxative for human subjects in daily doses of 4-15 g (Sollmann, 1957). Comments: Agar is consumed traditionally as food though not as a nutrient. The effect on weight gain observed in rats was probably due to the lack of utilization of agar, or to its laxative effects, or both. The evaluation is based on human data where doses above 5 g only cause a laxative effect. Further work is desirable to investigate potential storage of macro molecules in the body. EVALUATION Estimate of acceptable daily intake for man Not limited.* REFERENCES Fischer, J. E. (1957) Amer. J. Physiol., 188, 550 Nilson, H. W. & Schaller, J. W. (1941) Food Res., 6, 461 Sollmann, T. (1957) A Manual of Pharmacology, Philadelphia & London, Saunders, p. 207 Tedeschi, G. G. & Mangiantini, M. T. (1956) Arch. Sci. biol., 40, 504 Zbinden, G. & Studer, A. (1957) Schweiz. Z. allg. Path., 20, 469 * See relevant paragraph in the seventeenth report, pp. 10-11.
See Also: Toxicological Abbreviations AGAR (JECFA Evaluation)