FAO/PL:1967/M/11/1 WHO/Food Add./68.30 1967 EVALUATIONS OF SOME PESTICIDE RESIDUES IN FOOD THE MONOGRAPHS The content of this document is the result of the deliberations of the Joint Meeting of the FAO Working Party of Experts and the WHO Expert Committee on Pesticide Residues, which met in Rome, 4 - 11 December, 1967. (FAO/WHO, 1968) FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION Rome, 1968 MGK 264 N-(2-ethylhexyl)-bicyclo-(2,2,1)hept-5-ene 2,3-dicarboximide IDENTITY Chemical name N-(2-ethylhexyl)-bicyclo-(2,2,1)hept-5-ene 2,3-dicarboximide N-(2-ethylhexyl)-5-norbornene-2,3-dicarboximide N-octyl bicycloheptene dicarboximide Synonyms Octacide 264, Van Dyke 264, ENT-8184 Empirical Formula C17H25NO2 Structural FormulaRelevant Physical and Chemical Properties MGK 264 is a colorless oily liquid and has a specific gravity of 1.050 ± .010 at 20°C, refractive index of 1.4985 ± .0010 at 25°C, boiling point above 150°C at 2 mm Hg., flash point above 177°C, and solidifies at less than -20°C. It is miscible with kerosene, white oils, benzol hydrocarbons, aliphatic alcohols, esters, ketones, halogenated hydrocarbons, and fluorinated hydrocarbon propellents. Composition of the Technical Products MGK 264 is practically pure N-(2-ethylhexyl)-5-norbornene-2,3-dicarboximide. It is formulated with pyrethrins and allethrin into oil-type sprays, emulsifiable concentrates, dusts and concentrates for pressurized and thermal aerosols. Baker (1963) reported the combination of MGK 264 and piperonyl butoxide was more effective in synergizing pyrethrins than either material alone. Consequently, formulations with MGK 264 usually contain 3.3 parts of MGK 264, 2 parts of piperonyl butoxide, and 1 part of pyrethrins. Aerosols containing 0.5, 1, and 1.67 per cent of pyrethrins, piperonyl butoxide, and MGK 264, respectively, are used in food storage and processing areas at the rate of 1 fl oz/1,000 cu ft (1.04. ml/m3). EVALUATION FOR ACCEPTABLE DAILY INTAKES Biochemical aspects No data available. Acute toxicity LD50 mg/kg Animal Route body-weight References Rat oral 3640 Shelanski et al., 1966 Rat oral 2800 Lehman, 1951 Rabbit dermal 470 Lehman, 1952 Short-term studies Rat. A three-generation reproduction study with two litters per generation, was conducted at dietary levels of 0, 35, 350 and 3500 ppm of MGK 264, using 10 males and 20 females per dose level in each generation. The animals were mated for the first time at about 100 days of age. Second litter animals were used for assembling second generation groups. The rate of weight gain was affected in both sexes at the high dose level in the second filial generation, and weight gain was non-significantly affected in the high-level males of the first generation. There was no effect on food consumption in the first and third generations, but consumption was lower than that of controls in all test groups in the second generation. There was an apparent adverse effect on fertility of the first generation females at the high dose level, but in the second generation fertility was significantly low only at the lowest test level. There was apparently some effect on litter growth indices of the high dose animals in the first and third generations and of the high and intermediate level animals in the second generation. No gross or microscopic pathology was found in weanlings selected for autopsy from all litters produced (Shelanski et al., 1966). MGK 264 has been incorporated into the diet of rats at 5000 ppm for 17 weeks without evidence of damage (Lehman, 1952). Swine. Groups of 3 males and 3 female dwarf pigs received 0, 25, 100 and 300 ppm of MGK-264 in the diet for 2 years. No effect, at any level was seen on appearance, behaviour, rate of weight gain, urine, blood picture, serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase activity, blood urea nitrogen and relative weights of spleen, kidneys and adrenals. Post-test gross and microscopic examination of major organs of the high level animals revealed no difference from controls (Harris, 1963). Long-term studies Rat. Groups of 10 males and 10 females were fed 0, 62.5, 250 and 1000 ppm for 2 years. Rate of body-weight gain, food consumption, morbidity and mortality and the results of periodic examinations of blood and urine were not different between the groups. Gross and microscopic examination of animals dying during the test and of all survivors at the end of two years showed no difference between the groups in distribution of tumours or lesions (Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, 1964) Comments Two year studies on rats and swine were carried out and not even relatively high doses caused toxicological effect, suggesting a low order of toxicity of the compound. In a three-generation study in rats doses of 36 mg/kg/day or less produced no effects upon growth or reproduction indices. No biochemical data are available. Also the effects of combinations with other agents, with which MGK 264 is used, are not known. TOXICOLOGICAL EVALUATION The toxicological data are inadequate to serve as a basis for an estimation of the acceptable daily intake for man. Further work required Biochemical studies on the qualitative and quantitative aspects of metabolism of the compound. Feeding studies in combination with other agents, with which it is combined in practice. EVALUATION FOR TOLERANCES USE PATTERN Pre-harvest treatments MGK 264 combined with pyrethrins and piperonyl butoxide is used as a cattle spray to control or repel horn flies, stable flies, horse flies, houseflies, mosquitoes, and gnats. An oil or water solution containing 2 per cent of MGK 264 is applied at the rate of 2 oz/animal (59 ml/animal). Post-harvest treatments MGK is primarily a synergist for pyrethrins and allethrin and is used in sprays, dusts, and aerosols for the control of household and stored product insects in institutions, restaurants, dairies, creameries, cheese factories, bakeries, canneries, meat packing plants, flour mills, peanut mills, grain bins, food warehouses, bottling plants, food markets, and other facilities where food and animal feed are stored, processed, handled, transported, or marketed. It has no direct application to food. Therefore, any MGK 264 residue in food is through exposure to the insecticide while it is being used as a premise treatment or by contact with treated surfaces. When used according to good agricultural practices in formulations for the control of insects in storage, processing, and marketing facilities, MGK 264 may leave residues as high an 10 ppm in foods exposed to the treatment. It is believed to be a rather stable compound although no supporting data are available. Other uses MGK 264 is used in sprays and aerosols for the control of flies, mosquitoes, gnats, fleas, roaches, and carpet beetles in homes and industrial buildings. RESIDUES RESULTING FROM SUPERVISED TRIALS In a test conducted by McLaughlin Gormley King in the United States (unpublished), dried apricots, dried peaches, and dried pears were exposed to 1, 5 and 10 treatments at 2- or 3-day intervals to aerosol formulations containing 0.5 per cent of pyrethrins, 1 per cent of piperonyl butoxide, 1.67 per cent of MGK 264, and 96.83 per cent of light petroleum distillate applied each time at the rate of 2.5 fl oz/ 1,000 cu ft (2.61 ml/m3). The residues on all three dried fruits after 1, 5, and 10 treatments, respectively, were 0.5 to 0.9 ppm, 0.92 to 1.30 ppm, and 1.21 to 1.90 ppm of pyrethrins; 3.7 to 5.2 ppm, 4.5 to 5.4 ppm, and 4.8 to 7.7 ppm of piperonyl butoxide; and 1.8 to 2.6 ppm, 3.0 to 4.3 ppm, and 6.9 to 7.2 ppm of MGK 264. The MGK 264 residue in dried apricots was not determined because of interference. A number of packaged foods were exposed to aerosol treatments using an oil formulation containing 0.5 per cent of pyrethrins, 1 per cent of piperonyl butoxide, and 1.67 per cent of MGK 264 applied at 1 fl oz/1,000 on ft (1.04 mg/m3) and at 10 times this rate. The MGK residues at the 1- and 10-fl oz (1.04- and 10.45-ml) dosages, respectively, were 0.006 and 0.57 ppm in sugar in cloth bags, 0.007 and 0.014 ppm in sugar in paper bags, 0.016 and 0.094 ppm in beans in burlap bags, 0.007 and 0.148 ppm in flour in cloth bags, 0.000 and 0.0317 ppm in salt in cloth bags, and 0.000 and 0.006 ppm in brown mustard in burlap spice bags (McLaughlin Gormley King (unpublished)). Flour in uncovered containers, in partially covered containers, and in paper bags was exposed to one and two space treatments of an oil formulation containing 0.4 per cent of pyrethrins, 0.5 per cent of piperonyl butoxide, and 0.5 per cent of MGK 264 applied at 2-, 4-, and 16-fl oz/1,000 cu ft (2.09-, 4.18-, and 16.71-ml/m3). The top 1-1/2 inches (3.81 cm) of flour in the uncovered container had less than 1 ppm of pyrethrins, 1.5 ppm of piperonyl butoxide, and 1.5 ppm of MGK 264. In the top 1/2 inch (1.27 cm) of flour in the partially covered container the maximum residue of each of these materials was 0.1 ppm. In the top 1/4 Inch (0.64 cm) of bagged flour; only a trace of the three materials was present (McLaughlin Gormley King (unpublished)). Spray containing 0.100 per cent of pyrethrins, 0.200 per cent of piperonyl butoxide, and 0.333 per cent of MGK 264 applied to surfaces at the rate of 1 gal/1,000 sq ft (40.7 mg/m2) leaves a residue, when fresh, of 3 mg of pyrethrins, 6 mg of piperonyl butoxide, and 10 mg of MGK 264 per square foot (107.6 mg/m2). If a cubic foot (0.028 m3) of flour resting on the treated surface absorbed all of the residue, it would contain 0.2 ppm of pyrethrins, 0.4 ppm of piperonyl butoxide, and 0.66 ppm of MGK 264 (McLaughlin Gormley King (unpublished)). Three fatty foods were exposed to aerosol treatments using 1 fl oz/1,000 cu ft (1.04 ml/m3) (recommended dosage) and 10 fl oz/1,000 cu ft (10.45 ml/m3) of an oil concentrate containing 0.5 per cent of pyrethrins, 1 per cent of piperonyl butoxide and 1.67 per cent of MGK 264. Packaged oleomargarine, bacon, and Brazil nuts exposed to the 1-fl-oz (1.04-ml) treatment had no detectable residue of any of the three spray ingredients; those exposed to the 10-fl-oz (10.45-ml) treatment had 0 to 0.395 ppm of Pyrethrins I, 0 to 0.0587 ppm of Pyrethrins II, 0.0 ppm piperonyl butoxide, and 0 to 0.516 ppm of MGK 264. The unwrapped food directly exposed to the 1-fl-oz (1.04-ml) treatment had 0.233 to 0.257 ppm of Pyrethrins I, 0.178 to 0.272 ppm of Pyrethrins II, 0.753 to 1.103 ppm of piperonyl butoxide, and 1.429 to 2.575 ppm of MGK 264; those exposed to the 10-fl-oz (10.45-ml) treatment had 1.565 to 2.345 ppm of Pyrethrins I, 1.048 to 2.306 ppm of Pyrethrins II, 3.79 to 7.59 ppm of piperonyl butoxide, and 7.500 to 16.35 ppm of MGK 264. The Brazil nuts in all cases had the highest residues (McLaughlin Gormley King (unpublished)). RESIDUES IN FOOD MOVING IN COMMERCE No information available. FATE OF RESIDUES No information available other than on the stability of the compound. METHODS OF RESIDUE ANALYSIS A gas chromatography method utilizing a modified electron capture cell and a paper chromatographic cleanup for removing interfering materials, waxes, and oils are described by Bruce (1967). The method is accurate to picogram quantities of MGK 264. NATIONAL TOLERANCES United States Processed foods 10 ppm RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TOLERANCES No tolerances are recommended because no acceptable daily intake has been estimated, and no data are available on rate of disappearance of MGK 264 and its metabolites in foods after aging, processing, and cooking. FURTHER WORK Further work required before tolerances can be recommended Data on the following are required: Rate of disappearance of residues in food during storage, processing, marketing, and cooking. Levels of residues in/on food while in commercial channels. Total diet studies. REFERENCES PERTINENT TO EVALUATION FOR ACCEPTABLE DAILY INTAKES Harris, L.E. (1963) Unpublished report submitted by McLaughlin Gormley King Company Lehman, A.S. (1951) Quarterly Bulletin Ass. Food and Drug Off. U.S., 15, 122 Lehman, A.J. (1952) ibid., 16, 3 : 47 Shelanski, M.V., Gittes, H.R. and Benhayem, S. (1966) Toxicol. appl. Pharmacol., 9, 555. Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (1964) Unpublished report submitted by McLaughlin Gormley King Company. REFERENCES PERTINENT TO EVALUATION FOR TOLERANCES Baker, G.J. (1963) The "dual synergist system" of piperonyl butoxide and MGK 264. Pyrethrum Post 7 : 16-18. Bruce, W.N. (1967) Detector cell for measuring quantities of organophosphorus insecticides, pyrethrin synergists, and other compounds by gas chromatography. J. Agr. Food Chem. 15 : 178-186.
See Also: Toxicological Abbreviations