FAO/PL:1969/M/17/1 WHO/FOOD ADD./70.38 1969 EVALUATIONS OF SOME PESTICIDE RESIDUES IN FOOD THE MONOGRAPHS Issued jointly by FAO and WHO The content of this document is the result of the deliberations of the Joint Meeting of the FAO Working Party of Experts and the WHO Expert Group on Pesticide Residues, which met in Rome, 8 - 15 December 1969. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION Rome, 1970 FOLPET IDENTITY Chemical name N-(trichloromethylthio)phthalimide Synonyms Phaltan(R) Structural formulaOther relevant chemical properties The pure material is a white, crystalline solid, m.p. 117°C. It is practically insoluble in water at room temperature and is only slightly soluble in organic solvents. The technical product is 90% pure. The impurities in the technical product consist of up to 4.5 percent phthalimide, up to 2.5 percent water, up to 2.5 percent calcium carbonate, and less than 1 percent unidentified products. It is formulated as 50 percent wettable powder (Ortho Phaltan 50 W); a 75 percent wettable powder is also formulated. Folpet is stable when dry but hydrolyses slowly in water at room temperature, rapidly at high temperatures or under alkaline conditions. EVALUATION FOR ACCEPTABLE DAILY INTAKE BIOCHEMICAL ASPECTS The hydrolysis products of folpet (I) are phthalimide (II), chloride ions, and various inorganic forms of sulphur. Phthalimide is further hydrolysed to phthalic acid (IV) and ammonia. No organochlorine or organosulphur products have been detected. In the presence of sulfhydryl compounds folpet is degraded extremely rapidly giving the same products as from hydrolysis. In blood, the sulphenimide bond of folpet is rapidly cleaved with the formation of phthalimide, the half life being about one minute. The hydrolysis therefore appears to proceed as follows (Dye, 1969):
Because the group attached to the imide nitrogen is the same in folpet as it is in captan, it is reasonable to assume that in the presence of sulfhydryl groups (e.g. as in cysteine) the trichloromethylthio group will break down to give chloride ions by a series of reactions similar to those described in the monograph on captan (Owens, 1969). Because the trichloromethylthio moiety is the same in both captan and folpet, the only difference in the two compounds being that the ring portion of folpet is aromatic, it has been assumed that all metabolic data for captan relative to the trichloromethylthio portion of the molecule will also be applicable to folpet (Dye, 1969) (see the monograph on captan). Special studies on reproduction Rat Four groups, each of 8 male and 16 female rats, were fed technical folpet (94.4 percent purity) at dietary levels of 0, 100, 500 and 1000 ppm (active ingredient) in a three-generation study. Parental animals were on the test diet for 79 days before mating and continuously thereafter. There were no adverse effects on body-weight gain or terminal organ-weights of parental animals, or on reproductive performance, fertility, lactation, litter-size or incidence of stillbirths in any test group. Pup survival at 5 and 21 days, and weanling weights in all test groups were comparable with the controls. Histopathology performed on parental animals of each generation and on F3b weanlings in the 0 and 1000 ppm groups revealed no changes which could be correlated with the ingestion of folpet (Kennedy et al., 1967a). Special studies on teratogenicity Chicken-egg Folpet was injected in dimethylsulphoxide solution into the yolk or air cell of fresh fertile chicken eggs at levels which varied from 3 to 20 mg/kg egg-weight. The eggs were incubated and non-viable embryos and hatched chicks were examined for gross abnormalities. In a total of 830 eggs injected with folpet the incidence of malformations was 8.19 percent. The metabolites of folpet, phthalimide (305 eggs) and phthalic acid (290 eggs) were also injected under similar conditions using dimethylsulphoxide as a solvent for phthalimide and ethanol for phthalic acid. A control group comprising over 1500 eggs was also injected with dimethylsulphoxide alone and another group of several thousand eggs with ethanol alone. The incidence of malformation was 3.93 percent for phthalimide, 3.10 percent for phthalic acid and less than 2.0 percent for the controls. Micromelia amelia and phocomelia accounted for most of the deformities (Varrett et al., 1969). Hamster Groups of 10 pregnant Syrian Golden hamsters were fed technical folpet at dietary levels approximately equivalent to 0, 125, 250, 500 or 1000 (eight animals only) mg/kg body-weight per day from gestation days 4 to 15 inclusive. On day 15 of gestation all animals were sacrificed and foetal examination was carried out. Maternal body-weight gains were decreased over the feeding period in the 250 and 500 mg/kg groups while at the highest level there was a weight loss recorded. There was an increase in the number of resorption sites at the two highest dose-levels compared with the control group. Growth appeared to be retarded in the foetuses from all test groups. The mean number of foetuses per litter was reduced at the two highest dose-levels. There were no gross or skeletal abnormalities attributable to folpet at any of the levels used (Arnold et al., 1968). A companion study, in which folpet was given by intubation, was carried out. Hamsters were given a single dose of 0 (11 pregnant females), 125 (9 pregnant females), 250 (5) or 500 (8) mg/kg body-weight, half of each group being intubated on day 7 and the remainder on day 8. A positive control group was given thalidomide, 1000 mg/kg body-weight, on day 7. In this experiment the number of foetal resorption sites in all groups was higher than normal. The high incidence was in the 125 mg/kg group (5.8 per litter) and the low incidence was in the 500 mg/kg group (2.5 per litter). The number of young per litter was lower in all test groups than in the control. There were no gross physical or skeletal anomalies in the test groups which could be associated with folpet treatment. No abnormalities were found in the group treated with thalidomide (Arnold et al., 1968). Monkey Groups of from four to six pregnant monkeys (Rhesus and stumptailed macque) were given oral doses of 10, 25 and 75 mg/kg body-weight of folpet daily on days 21 through 34 of gestation. Thalidomide was given as a positive control to groups of 9 or 11 monkeys at levels 5 and 10 mg/kg body-weight respectively. All foetuses from animals given folpet were grossly normal except for one Rhesus foetus each from the 25 and 75 mg/kg dose-levels which had 13 pairs of ribs. No abortions occurred at the 25 and 75 mg/kg levels of folpet but one abortion occurred at the 10 mg/kg level in day 54 of gestation. Abortions and foetal deformities occurred in the groups given thalidomide (Vondruska, 1969). Rabbit Groups of pregnant New Zealand albino rabbits were given folpet at dose-levels of 0, 18.75 (5 rabbits), 37.5 (5) or 75 (7) mg/kg body-weight on gestation days 6 to 18 inclusive. The dose was administered by gelatin capsule. Positive control animals were given thalidomide at various dose levels. On day 29 each doe was sacrificed and the young removed by Caesarean section. Folpet produced signs of toxicity in the dose. At the two higher dose levels there was a loss in body-weight over the period of treatment (days 6 to 18). Also at these dose-levels the incidence of foetal resorption was higher than in the negative control group. There appeared to be a compound-related effect on mortality. Examination of 80 embryos from folpet-treated rabbits revealed no gross abnormalities; internal structural formation was normal and well-defined skeletal development was observed. Thalidomide treatment in the positive controls resulted in malformed young (Kennedy et al., 1967c; Kennedy et al., 1968). Groups of pregnant New Zealand white rabbits were given folpet at dose levels of 75 or 150 mg/kg body-weight. Thalidomide was also given to a positive control group at the same dose-levels. Thalidomide but not folpet produced a teratological response (McLaughlin et al., 1969). Rat Pregnant female rats of the Charles River strain were given 0, 100 (10 animals) or 500 (5 animals) mg/kg body-weight of technical folpet by oral intubation on days 6 to 15 for the lower dose and days 8 to 10 for the higher dose-level. Trypan Blue was given by subcutaneous injection, 50 mg/kg body-weight, on days 8 to 10 to a fourth group serving as a positive control. All rats were sacrificed on the twentieth day of gestation. Examination of a total of 169 foetuses revealed no significant increase in the incidence of abnormalities in the groups given folpet. Internal structural formation was normal, the young were present in normal numbers, and were well-formed, Trypan Blue treatments produced malformed young as expected (Kennedy et al., 1967b). A group of 10 pregnant female rats (Charles River and Sprague Dawley derived strain) was given oral doses of 100 mg/kg body-weight/day of folpet from day 6 to day 15 of gestation and another group of four pregnant rats was given oral doses of 500 mg/kg body-weight/day from day 8 to day 10. Examination of 120 foetuses in the 100 mg/kg group, 49 foetuses in the 500 mg/kg group and 200 foetuses from an untreated control group gave no evidence of abnormalities related to the administration of folpet (Kennedy et al., 1968). Studies on the metabolite phthalimide Rabbit (teratogenic study) Groups of 10 female Dutch Belted Rabbits were given 0 or 75 mg/kg body-weight of phthalimide (the hydrolytic metabolite of folpet), via gelatin capsule, on day 6 through 16. A treated control group received 75 mg/kg of thalidomide over the same period. On day 28 the rabbits were killed, the young removed by Caesarean section, and examined for abnormalities. No adverse effects of phthalimide were noted on the parental females or on the 24-hour survival rate of the young. No abnormalities, external, internal or skeletal, were seen in the test group but were present in the treated controls. Resorption of foetuses occurred in three of seven does in the thalidomide group and in one of ten in the phthalimide group. This animal lost 220 grams in weight between day 11 and 16. Three pups were aborted on day 25, and three resorption sites were present which accounted for all the implantation sites Acute toxicity LD50mg/kg Animal Route body-weight References Rat oral >10,000 Elsea, 1956 Rabbit percutaneous >22,600 Kay and Calandra, 1960 Short-term studies Dog Four groups of dogs (three males and three females per group) were given folpet at dose-levels of 0, 250, 1000 and 1500 mg/kg body-weight. The compound was given orally by capsule 5 days a week for 17 months. At 12 months 2-3 dogs (male and female) from each group were sacrificed for pathologic study. The remainder were sacrificed for pathological study after 17 months. Total mean weight-gain over the duration of the test was depressed in both sexes at the highest dose-level. None of the animals died during the test. Haematologic studies, urinalyses, liver function tests (bromosulphthalein retention), serum alkaline phosphatase and blood urea nitrogen determinations all showed no unusual findings. There were no gross or microscopic pathologic changes which could be correlated with the test material (Key and Calandra, 1961a). Rat Groups each comprising 10 male and 10 female rats were fed dietary levels of 0, 0.1, 0.32 and 1 percent of folpet for 12 weeks. Growth was normal except in the male rats fed the 1 percent level where there was a significant decrease. There were no gross abnormalities. Histopathological examination of liver, kidneys, adrenals, intestines, lungs and gonads of two male and two female animals of each group revealed no abnormalities (Weir, 1956). Long-term studies Rat Folpet was fed to four groups of rats at dietary levels of 0, 0.1, 0.32 and 1.0 percent for 17 months. Each test group consisted of 30 males and 30 females, with 60 rats of each sex in the control group. After 12 months on the test, 5 males and 5 females of each test group (10 of each in the controls), were killed for pathologic study. Body-weight data showed a slight adverse effect on growth of rats fed 1 percent folpet in their diet. An increase in spleen to body-weight ratio in this group, observed at 12 months was not present in the rats examined after 17 months on the diet. There were no effects on mortality, tumour incidence, haematologic studies, urinalysis, gross or histopathology that were attributable to the feeding of folpet (Kay and Calandra, 1961b). COMMENT In the two species used in acute toxicity studies, an LD50 value was not obtained. The 17-month study on dogs and the 17-month rat study indicate a high tolerance, by these species, to chronic exposure to this material. These studies should, however, have been of at least two-years duration to determine if there may be a potential for carcinogenicity. Reproduction and teratogenicity studies on folpet, have been carried out on rats, hamsters, and two strains of rabbits. No evidence of teratogenic effects has been reported. As there are indications of toxic effects on the mothers in the teratogenicity studies with hamsters and rabbits, it is recommended that further studies be done on these two species. Because of the uncertainty regarding embryotoxicity, and since the long-term study in rats was only 17 months' duration, a temporary adi is recommended. TOXICOLOGICAL EVALUATION Level causing no significant toxicological effect Rat: 3,200 ppm in diet, equivalent to 160 mg/kg body-weight/day Dog: 1,000 mg/kg body-weight/day Estimate of temporary acceptable daily intake for man 0-0.16 mg/kg body-weight RESIDUES IN FOOD AND THEIR EVALUATION USE PATTERN Folpet is a protective fungicide used mainly for foliage application at about 0.1 percent active ingredient. Pre-harvest treatments Rates of application and intervals between treatment and harvest are: Citrus fruits - 0.12 percent active ingredients applied at 2/3 petal fall, 2 weeks after petal fall, on full flush growth in August and September. Use up to harvest. Other fruits - 0.09-0.12 percent active ingredient, applied as needed at 7-14 day intervals up to harvest. Avocados - 0.18 percent active ingredient, applied as needed at 2 to 3 week intervals up to harvest. Small fruits and berries - 1.1 to 2.2 kg a.i./ha, applied as needed at a 7 - 10 day intervals up to harvest. Cranberries - 5.0 kg a.i./ha, applied as needed at 10-14 day intervals up to 30 days of harvest. Vegetables - 1.1 to 4.5 kg a.i./ha, applied as needed at 7 to 10 day intervals up to harvest. Celery - Same schedule up to 7 days of harvest. Post-harvest treatments No post-harvest treatments are recommended. Other uses Ornamentals - 0.12 percent a.i., applied as needed at 7-10 day intervals. RESIDUES RESULTING FROM SUPERVISED TRIALS The residue data are from treatments made under commercial conditions in the U.S.A. (Table I). It is found that the residue patterns of folpet follow those of captan. Rain causes a loss of both compounds. The development of the wax as the fruit ripens tends to retain the residue. Generally the initial level of folpet is reduced by one half within a week or two. The residue levels of the fruit pulp and fruit juice are found much lower than those of the parent whole fruits. TABLE I Residues from field trials (Dye, 1969) Rate of Pre-harvest Folpet application Number of interval residue Crop (kg a.i. per ha) treatments (days) (ppm) Apples (0.1% to run-off) 1 0-3 2.2-10.5 Blueberries 2.8 (0.1%) 1-6 0-2 7.0-23.4 Cherries (0.1-0.2%) 3-5 0-1 3.7-8.9 Fresh currants 0.25-0.37 1-5 0-1 8.0-33.0 Grapes 2.7-3.4 (0.1%) 1-4 0-1 7.6-25.0 Grapefruits (0.1-0.2%) 1 0-1 2.4-5.9 Oranges (0.1-0.2%) 1 0-1 2.9-8.1 Raspberries 1.1-2.8 (0.1%) 1-3 0-1 4.6-13.9 Strawberries 0.3-2.8 1-8 0-1 1.7-5.7 Cantaloup, whole 2.3 1 0-1 0.6-1.1 Cucumber 2.3 1 0-1 0.8-1.9 Onion, bulb (0.1%) 7-8 0-7 0.4-1.2 Tomatoes 1.0-2.3 1 0-1 1.7-4.1 Watermelons, rind (0.2%) 14 0.0-0.3 pulp (0.2%) 14 0.0-0.1 FATE OF RESIDUES General comments The remarks under 'BIOCHEMICAL ASPECTS' earlier in this monograph, particularly those relating to the hydrolysis of folpet, pertain to the behaviour of residues in crops or foods both before and after consumption. In animals In animals folpet is expected to be subject to the similar degradative reactions as in plants but no actual data have been available for evaluation. In plants No published data are available from actual studies of the residues in plants. It is highly probable however that degradation products of hydrolysis as outlined above could be found; but this requires further confirmatory studies. In soil The instability of the compound would not permit build-up in soils. However, no experimental data were available for confirmation. In storage and processing No general quantitative estimates about the effect of washing on the folpet residues can be made. It is, however, believed that a relatively high portion of residues could be removed. This is supported by a single figure on oranges on which washing reduced a residue of 8.1 ppm down to 1.1 ppm (Dye, 1969). Peeling of fruits is also expected to reduce folpet residues even more than washing but lack of data does not allow definite conclusions to be drawn. In refrigerated storage as well as in frozen products folpet residues are expected to be very stable. Any special treatment, e.g. blanching, before such storage however may reduce the folpet residues. Data are not available for final evaluation. The only figures available concerned frozen cherries which contained a folpet residue about 10 percent of the residue level of unprocessed cherries (Dye, 1969). Juice extracted from folpet treated grapes have contained small amounts of folpet. The residues in juice in most instances were less than 1 ppm although there were few figures up to 5 ppm (Dye, 1969). The possible occurrence of folpet in grape juice is of practical importance because folpet can cause slight suppression of fermentation and produce a poor flavour in wines (Chalkov and Vanev, 1968). The canning process is expected to be very destructive to folpet residues. The only data available are for canned cherries which were found to contain a residue less than the detection limit of the analytical method although the unprocessed cherries had residues up to 5.6 ppm (Dye, 1969). METHODS OF RESIDUE ANALYSIS A method of residue analysis (Anon., 1960) is based on extraction with benzene, clean-up with activated carbon, and reaction with resorcinol to give a yellow product which is measured in a colorimeter. This method, however, cannot distinguish between folpet and captan, but gives the sum of these two compounds. Folpet does not migrate into plant tissues; surface stripping is considered adequate for removing residues. A method is developed to distinguish between folpet and captan (Anon., 1961). The sensitivity of the method is not satisfactory. Polarographic methods have been set up for determining derivatives of folpet and captan (Anon., 1962a; 1962b; Nangniot, 1966). Gas chromatographic methods developed for captan (Kilgore et al., 1967); Bevenue and Ogata, 1968; Pomerantz and Ross, 1968) and detecting residues an low as 0.01 ppm can be used for folpet as well. Folpet has been determined with sufficient accuracy at a residue level of 2 ppm in red and white wines by an electron capture gas chromatographic method (Matta, 1968) using pentane for extraction and Florisil for cleanup. For regulatory purposes the GLC method has to be further developed. NATIONAL TOLERANCES Tolerance Country (ppm) Crop Canada 30 Celery Canada 25 Apples, avocados, blackberries, blueberries, boysenberries, cantaloups, cherries, citrus fruits, cranberries, crabapples, cucumber, currants, dewberries, garlic, gooseberries, grapes, honeydew melons, huckleberries, leeks, lettuce, loganberries, muskmelons, onions, pumpkins, raspberries, shallots, strawberries, summer squash, tomatoes, watermelons, winter squash (continued) Tolerance Country (ppm) Crop Germany (Fed.Rep.) 15 Fruits, grapes, hops Hungary 10 Fruits, grapes Netherlands 20 All crops United States of America 50 Celery, cherries, leeks, lettuce, onions (green), shallots United States of 25 Apples, avocados, blackberries, America blueberries, boysenberries, crabapples, cranberries, currants, dewberries, gooseberries, grapes, huckleberries, loganberries, raspberries, strawberries, tomatoes United States of 15 Cucumbers, garlic, melons, America onions (dry bulb), pumpkins, summer squash, winter squash United States of 15 Citrus fruits (interim America tolerance) APPRAISAL Folpet is used to control fungus diseases on tree fruits, citrus fruits, avocadoes, small fruits and berries, vegetables and ornamentals. Concentration of the foliage sprays is recommended to about 0.1 percent active ingredient. Folpet in nonphytotoxic, though some injuries are reported on pears and apples. It in stable when dry, but hydrolyses slowly in water at room temperature, rapidly at higher temperatures or under alkaline conditions. National tolerances established for the residues of folpet in various commodities vary from 10 to 50 ppm. Folpet is formulated as 50 percent and 75 percent wettable powder. The residue data available to the Meeting were from treatments made under commercial conditions in the U.S.A. A large variety of crops were covered. It is found that the residue patterns of folpet follow those of captan. The wash-off effect of rain may be pronounced. Generally the initial level of folpet is reduced by one half within a week or two. The residue levels of the fruit pulp and fruit juice are found much lower than those of the entire parent fruits. The effect of processing on the residues may be pronounced. The main degradation mechanisms of folpet in plants are postulated to be the same as those of captan resulting from the reaction with sulfhydryl compounds, mainly phthalimide, to phthalic acid, free chlorine ion, and inorganic sulphur compounds. The degradation products of folpet in plants are assumed to be the same as in animals. The documentation of folpet refers to a colorimetric analysis of residues of folpet. The method uses a colour reaction with resorcinol and is not specific for folpet. (It reacts with captan, too). For differentiating folpet and captan, UV spectrometry can be applied. Good agricultural practice was considered to produce residue levels determined one day after application as indicated under the following headings: RECOMMENDATION FOR TOLERANCES, TEMPORARY TOLERANCES OR PRACTICAL RESIDUE LIMITS TEMPORARY TOLERANCES (effective to 1973) Apples 10 ppm Blueberries 25 ppm Cantaloups, whole fruit 2 ppm Cherries 15 ppm Citrus fruits 10 ppm Cucumbers 2 ppm Currants, fresh 30 ppm Grapes 25 ppm Onions 2 ppm Raspberries 15 ppm Strawberries 5 ppm Tomatoes 5 ppm Water melons 2 ppm Insufficient information was available to enable evaluation of residues or tolerances to be suggested for blackberries, cranberries and celery. FURTHER WORK OR INFORMATION REQUIRED (before 30 June 1973) 1. Long-term studies of sufficient duration to test for possible carcinogenic effects. 2. Additional studies on the effects of the compound on reproductive physiology. 3. Further studies on metabolism, especially on the trichloromethylthio-moiety. 4. Further data on the nature of terminal residues in plants as well as on the magnitude of the degradation product: magnitude in relation to the parent compound or toxicological importance. 5. Further data on the degradation mechanisms of folpet. 6. Data on the necessary rates and frequencies of application, pre-harvest intervals and the resultant residues, from countries other than the U.S.A. 7. Data on residue levels in raw agricultural products moving in commerce. 8. Qualitative and quantitative data on fate of residues in washing, blanching, storing and thermal processing of the treated crops. DESIRABLE 1. Information on the fate of the compound in soil. 2. Evaluation of the analytical methods by collaborative studies taking into account the possible presence of structurally related compounds, e.g. captan and captafol. REFERENCES Anon. (1960) The analysis of residues of captan and folpet. Residue method RM-1. Chevron Chemical Co. Unpub. Rept. Anon. (1961) The determination of and differentiation between residues of Phaltan and captan. Residue method RM-1A. Chevron Chemical Co. Unpub. Rept. Anon. (1962a) Centre de recherches de phytopharmacie à Gembloux (Belgique) Résultats inédits Anon. (1962b) Institut agronomique de l'etat (Gembloux-Belgique). Résultats inédits Arnold, D., Kodras, R. and Fancher, O.E. (1968) Teratogenicity study on Phaltan Golden Syrian hamsters Unpub. Rept. of Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories, submitted by Chevron Chemical Co. Bevenue, A., and Ogata, J.N. (1968) The examination of mixtures of captan and Phaltan by gas chromatography. J. Chromatog. 36:529-31 Chalkov, I. and Vanev, S. (1968) Determination of the effect of some new fungicides, used to control gray rot in grapes under field conditions, on the enzymic activity of yeasts. Lozarstvo Vinar (Sofia) 17:33-40 (Chem. Abstr. 69:34 908 s, 1968) Dye, D.F. (1969) Folpet. Unpub. Summary Rept. submitted to FAO and WHO by Chevron Chemical Co. Elsea, J.R. (1956) Phthalimide captan analog. Acute oral administration. Unpub. Rept. of Hazleton Laboratories submitted by Chevron Chemical Co. Kay, J.H. and Calandra, J.C. (1960) Acute percutaneous and eye irritation studies on Phaltan. Unpub. Rept. of Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories submitted by Chevron Chemical Co. Kay, J.H. and Calandra, J.C. (1961a) Chronic oral toxicity of Phaltan. Pure bread beagle dogs, (with addendum report. Pathological findings). Unpub. Rept. of Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories submitted by Chevron Chemical Co. Kay, J.H. and Calandra, J.C. (1961b) Chronic oral toxicity of Phaltan. Albino rats. Unpub. Rept. of Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories submitted by Chevron Chemical Co. Kennedy, G., Fancher, O.E. and Calandra J.C. (1967a) Three generation reproduction study in albino rats-Phaltan. Final Rept. Unpub. Rept. of Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories submitted by Chevron Chemical Co. Kennedy, G., Fancher, O.E. and Calandra, J.C. (1967b) Rat teratogenicity study. Captan, Difolatan and Phaltan. Unpub. Rept. of Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories submitted by Chevron Chemical Co. Kennedy, G., Jackson, G., Fancher, O.E. and Calandra, J.C. (1967c) Rabbit teratogenicity study. Captan and Phaltan. Unpub. Rept. of Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories submitted by Chevron Chemical Co. Kennedy, G., Fancher, O.E. and Calandra, J.C. (1968) An investigation of the teratogenic potential of captan, folpet and Difolatan. Toxicol. appl. Pharmacol. 13:42-430 Kilgore, W.W., Winterlin, W. and White, R. (1967) Gas chromatographic determinations of captan residues. J. Agr. Food Chem. 15:1035-37 Matta, M. (1968) Gas chromatographic determination of chlorinated pesticide residues in wine. Vini Ital. 10:171-4 (Chem. Abstr. 69:66469 r, 1968) McLaughlin, J., Jr., Reynaldo, E.F., Lamar, J.K. and Marliac, J.P. (1969) Teratology studies in rabbits with captan, folpet and Thalidomide. Toxicol. appl. Pharmacol. 14:641 Nangniot, P. (1966) L'application des méthodes électrochimiques à l'étude des résidus de pesticides. Meded Rijksfac. Landbouwwetensch. 31:447-73 Owens, R. G. (1969) Metabolism of fungicides and related compounds. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 100:144-52 Palazzolo, R., Fancher, O.E. and Calandra, J.C. (1966) Rabbit reproduction study. Phthalimide. Unpub. Rept. of Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories submitted by Chevron Chemical Co. Pomerantz, I.H. and Rose, R. (1968) Captan and structurally related compounds: thin-layer and gas-liquid chromatography. J. Assoc. Offic. Anal. Chem. 51:1058-62 Varrett, M.J., Mutchler, M.K., Scott, W.F., Reynaldo, E.F. and McLaughlin, J. (1969) Teratogenic effects of captan and related compounds in the developing chick embryo. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 160:334-43 Vondruska, J.F. (1969) Teratologic investigation of Phaltan in Macaca mulatta (Rhesus monkey) and Macaca arctoides (stumptailed macque). Unpub. Rept. of Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories submitted by Chevron Chemical Co. Weir, R.J. (1956) N-trichloromethylthiophthalimide, recrystallized phthalimide, (phthalimide analog of captan). Subacute feeding-rats. Supplement to report dated 23 July, 1956. Unpub. Rept. submitted by Hazleton Laboratories to California Spray - Chemical Co.
See Also: Toxicological Abbreviations Folpet (HSG 72, 1992) Folpet (ICSC) Folpet (WHO Pesticide Residues Series 3) Folpet (WHO Pesticide Residues Series 4) Folpet (Pesticide residues in food: 1984 evaluations) Folpet (Pesticide residues in food: 1986 evaluations Part II Toxicology) Folpet (Pesticide residues in food: 1990 evaluations Toxicology) Folpet (Pesticide residues in food: 1995 evaluations Part II Toxicological & Environmental)