FAO Meeting Report No. PL/1965/10/2 WHO/Food Add/28.65 EVALUATION OF THE HAZARDS TO CONSUMERS RESULTING FROM THE USE OF FUMIGANTS IN THE PROTECTION OF FOOD The content of this document is the result of the deliberations of the Joint Meeting of the FAO Committee on Pesticides in Agriculture and the WHO Expert Committee on Pesticide Residues, which met 15-22 March 19651 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations World Health Organization 1965 1 Report of the second joint meeting of the FAO Committee on Pesticides in Agriculture and the WHO Expert Committee on Pesticide Residues, FAO Meeting Report No. PL/1965/10; WHO/Food Add./26.65. ETHYLENE DIBROMIDE Compound Ethylene dibromide Chemical name Ethylene bromide Synonym 1,2-dibromoethane, ethylene dibromide, glycol dibromide Empirical formula C2H4Br2 Structural formulaRelevant physical and chemical properties Physical state (atmospheric pressure, 20°C): colourless liquid Boiling-point: 131.6°C Odour: characteristic chlorororm-like odour Lowest concentration in air which is detectable by odour: 25 ppm Flash point: non-flammable Solubility: Water: 0.431 g/100 ml Organic solvents: soluble in most common organic solvents Specific gravity (liquid): 2.17 Specific gravity (gas): 6.49 Uses Ethylene dibromide is frequently used for the fumigation of fresh fruit and stored cereals, millets and pulses and as a soil fumigant. It is also used in combination with other fumigants like ethylene dichloride, carbon tetrachloride and methyl bromide. Residues Ethylene dibromide has poor powers of penetration into bulked foodstuffs. It is physically absorbed and can be largely dispersed by aeration if sufficient time is allowed. Fruits with thick skins and some cereals are likely to retain small amounts of the fumigant almost indefinitely although except for avocados, pears and bananas, only insignificant amounts are to be found in the flesh. A portion of the compound may be converted into other forms of bromide, probably inorganic (Monro, 1961). Upon treating grain or cereal meal with ethylene dibromide only a small portion of the fumigant undergoes reaction, mainly with the protein, leading to the formation of inorganic bromide. The greater part of it remains unchanged, and being absorbed largely in the fat and to some extent in the starch, is slow to volatilize and disperse (Olomucki and Bondi, 1955). On wheat and wheat products, ethylene bromide is strongly absorbed, remains unchanged at ordinary temperatures and is very resistant to dispersion by airing, residues of the unaltered compound thus persisting. On heating, however, as in baking, most of the fumigant is lost by volatilization, but some breaks down to ethylene glycol which may react with the -SCH3 of the methionine in the wheat protein, while some is converted to hydrogen bromide which can cause splitting of the starch granule sheaths (Bridges, 1956). Analytical methods for determining these residues have been devised (Houser, 1961). When wheat, whole or ground, was subjected artificially to fumigation with ethylene dibromide at 0.5 lb and 1.0 lb per 1000 ft3 for 24 hours, more than 95% of unchanged ethylene dibromide could be recovered after 10 days, most of it being retained in the bran. Very little of it was converted to ionized bromide. The residues in whole grain after 10 days' aeration were 5.8 ppm and in the milled samples after 35 days' aeration were 4.5 ppm ethylene dibromide (Sinclair et al., 1962). Effect of fumigant on treated crop In addition to the residues of unchanged ethylene dibromide and of some inorganic bromide there may be a very slight change in the nature of the foodstuff protein, probably because of interaction with its methionine component (Olomucki and Bondi, 1955). BIOLOGICAL DATA Biochemical aspects The fate of ethylene dibromide absorbed from the mammalian alimentary tract has apparently not been determined. After uptake by the pulmonary route, however, some of the compound is excreted through the lungs and some of it is changed in the body with the formation of organic bromides (von Oettingen, 1955). Toxicological studies 1. The fumigant Acute toxicity Animal Route LD50 mg/kg Reference body weight Mouse, female oral 420 Rowe et al., 1952 Rat, male " 146 " Rat, female " 117 " Chick " 79 " Guinea-pig " 110 " Rabbit, female " 55 " A 43-year-old woman who took a single dose of ethylene dibromide amounting to 4.5 ml died 54 hours later after symptoms of vomiting, diarrhoea and anuria. At autopsy there was massive centro-lobular necrosis of the liver and proximal tubular damage in the kidney (Olmstead, 1960). Short- and long-term studies A total of 19 rats and guinea-pigs was fed ethylene dibromide in oil or 50% alcohol for about 4 months and there were no abnormal signs in those receiving about 40-50 mg per kg per day, but no pathological tests or autopsy examinations appear to have been undertaken (Aman et al., 1946). An experiment was also carried out in which fumigants in solution were administered directly into the crops of adult hens, the solvent being a mixture of equal parts of water and ethyl alcohol. Individually caged birds in groups of 10 were fed a standard ration ad libitum and were given, respectively, 1 mg, 2 mg, 4 mg and 20 mg ethylene dibromide per bird per day for 8 weeks. The controls received solvent only. At 8 and 20 mg per day both egg production rate and eggg size were diminished and at 2 and 4 mg per day egg size alone was depressed. At 1 mg per day there was no apparent difference from controls (Fuller and Morris, 1962). When the experiment was extended to groups of 24 pullets which were treated for 12 weeks, rested for 8 weeks and treated again for 12 weeks it was found that levels of 21 mg and 8 mg per day of ethylene dibromide affected egg production and the lowest intake studied, namely, 0.5 mg per day, depressed egg size. At autopsy, the birds receiving 8 mg ethylene dibromide per day and showing lowered productivity were found to have an excessive number of incompletely developed ovarian follicles, but no abnormality in the brain, liver and kidneys (Fuller and Morris, 1962). Two-week-old chicks, in groups of 24, were fed for two weeks on a ration to which ethylene dibromide in ethanol and olive oil had been added at the rates of 20, 40 and 80 ppm. Estimates made from chemical analyses suggested that these amounts would be reduced by evaporation and by conversion to inorganic bromide to somewhat less than 10, 20 and 40 ppm by the time the ration was consumed. At 10 and 20 ppm no change was observed in the chicks over the two weeks, but at 40 ppm there was retardation of growth rate, even when a correction was made for food intake (Morris and Fuller, 1963). Six-month-old pullets in groups of 10 were given ethylene dibromide either directly by injection into the crop, or indirectly in the diet after fumigation, daily intakes being 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 8 mg per day. At 8 mg per day by both routes of administration, egg production was depressed, while egg weight was reduced at all levels down to 0.5 mg per bird, whether by crop or diet (Fuller and Morris, 1963). 2. The fumigated foodstuff When chickens were fed for five days, pigs for 12 days and heifers for one week on grain previously fumigated with a gaseous mixture containing 7.2% ethylene dibromide none of them showed any deleterious effects (Rowe et al., 1954). Twenty-five adult hens, in groups of five, were given a ration made up of 50% sorghum. In those groups receiving grain containing sorbed ethylene dibromide in amounts ranging from 50 to 320 ppm, there was a decrease in egg weight proportional to the level of the fumigant. Moreover, in those receiving the highest amount, egg laying ceased completely in six and a half weeks and, in those receiving 200 ppm, it ceased within eight weeks. Even as little as 50 ppm had a depressive effect on egg size within three weeks. Further, those hens in which laying was arrested failed to resume when returned to a normal ration (Bondi et al., 1955). In another experiment with six-month-old hens in groups of 24 the sorghum, making up 50% of the grain fed, contained 10-15 ppm ethylene dibromide and 20 ppm residual bromide, 20-30 ppm ethylene dibromide and 50 ppm residual bromide and no free ethylene dibromide but 120 ppm residual bromide. The fourth group was a control. Over 16 weeks the group receiving only the residual bromide behaved the same as the controls, but those receiving ethylene dibromide showed a decrease in egg size proportional to dose. But when these birds were returned to a normal diet the egg size was regained (Bondi et al., 1955). In an experiment carried out with two groups each of five hens, all of which were laying small eggs (40% below normal) by being fed grain containing ethylene dibromide, the administration to one group of follicle stimulating hormone intravenously led to a partial recovery in egg size. Moreover, there was no reaction between ethylene dibromide and follicle stimulating hormone in sorghum. It is therefore postulated that the ethylene dibromide acts on the formation or release of pituitary follicle stimulating hormone (Olomucki, 1957). A group of laying hens that was fed for 23 days with oats fumigated with ethylene dibromide several months previously showed some diminution of egg size compared with controls and when the grain had been treated the day before with Dowfume EB5 (containing 63.6% carbon tetrachloride, 29.2% ethylene dichloride and 7.2% ethylene dibromide by weight) at 10 times the recommended dose, egg output and size declined rapidly in 10 days (Bierer and Vickers, 1959). Five groups, each of 16 pullets six months of age, were fed for 19 days on: (i) a protein laying ration, plus non-fumigated oats; (ii) a protein laying ration, plus oats fumigated at the rate of 1.1 ml/kg; (iii) a protein laying ration, plus oats fumigated at the rate of 3.3 ml/kg; (iv) a commercial, all-mash ration, non-fumigated; (v) a commercial, all-mash ration, the corn component of which had been fumigated previously at the rate of 1.1 ml/kg. The fumigant was a commercial mixture containing carbon tetrachloride 64%, ethylene dichloride 29% and ethylene dibromide 7%. After fumigation the grain was allowed to air for two weeks. In those groups which received fumigated oats, egg size was seriously and significantly depressed, more so at the heavy dosage (when production was totally arrested) than at the lower dosage. A smaller but still significant depression of egg production was observed in the birds on the mash ration containing fumigated oats subsequently ground (Caylor and Laurent, 1960). Comments on the experimental studies reported 1. When ethylene dibromide is used as a fumigant on food products a little of the compound may be converted to inorganic bromides by reaction with the foodstuff, but the major part remains absorbed in the unchanged form for some time. 2. As far as can be judged from the experimental studies here reported, the quantity of inorganic bromide is usually insufficient to be of any serious consequence when food products previously fumigated with ethylene dibromide are consumed. 3. Similarly, there is little reason to believe that the limited changes brought about chemically in the foodstuff by the action of ethylene dibromide on its components are responsible for any significant changes in its food value or for the production of any toxic substances. 4. On the other hand, the deleterious effects observed experimentally with the feeding of fumigated rations to animals can be attributed, in all probability, to the residue of unchanged etnylene dibromide. 5. The feeding studies carried out with ethylene dibromide, either fed directly or as a residue after fumigation, are principally concerned with poultry. This is a species which seems particularly sensitive to the compound, for the other experiments on animals, though limited, give little indication of toxicity. 6. This action of ethylene dibromide on poultry may be due to interference with the hormonal balance. Evaluation On the available toxicological evidence ethylene dibromide should be used for fumigation of foodstuffs only on condition that no residue (the sensitivity of the present analytical method being 1 ppm) of the unchanged compound will reach the consumer. The small residue of inorganic bromide is unlikely to make any significant contribution to the total bromide content of the foodstuff. Further work required Further investigation of the effect of processing and cooking on residual ethylene dibromide in food. Feeding studies should be carried out on two mammalian species to determine the effect of long-term feeding of ethylene dibromide with particular reference to reproduction. REFERENCES Aman, J., Farkas, L. & Ben-Shamai, M. H. (1946) Ann. appl. Biol., 33, 389 Bierer, B. W. & Vickers, C. L. (1959) J. Amer. vet. med. Ass., 134, 452 Bondi, A., Olomucki, E. & Calderon, M. (1955) J. Sci. Food Agric., 6, 600 Bridges, R. G. (1956) J. Sci. Food Agric., 7, 305 Caylor, J. F. & Laurent, C. K. (1960) Poultry Sci., 39, 216 Fuller, H. L. & Morris, G. K. (1962) Poultry Sci., 41, 645 Fuller, H. L. & Morris, G. K. (1963) Poultry Sci., 42, 508 Heuser, S. G. (1961) J. Sci. Food Agric., 12, 103 Monro, H. A. U. (1961) Manual of fumigation for insect control, FAO, Agric. Studies, 56 Morris, G. K. & Fuller, H. L. (1963) Poultry Sci., 42, 15 von Oettingen, W. F. (1955) The halogenated aliphatic, olefinic, cyclic, aromatic and aliphatic-aromatic hydrocarbons, including the halogenated insecticides, their toxicity and potential dangers, Public Health Service Publ. No. 414 Olmstead, E. V. (1960) Arch. environm. Hlth, 21, 525 Olomucki, E. (1957) Nature (Lond.), 180, 1358 Olomucki, E. & Bondi, A. (1955) J. Sci. Food Agric., 6, 592 Rowe, V. K., Hollingsworth, R. L. & McCollister, D. D. (1954) J. Agric. Food Chem., 2, 1318 Rowe, V. K., Spencer, H. C., McCollister, D. D., Hollingsworth, R. L. & Adams, E. M. (1952) Arch. industr. Hyg., 6, 158 Sinclair, W. B., Lindgren, D. L. & Forbes, R. (1962) J. econ. Ent., 55, 836
See Also: Toxicological Abbreviations Ethylene dibromide (ICSC) Ethylene dibromide (FAO/PL:CP/15) Ethylene dibromide (FAO/PL:1967/M/11/1) Ethylene dibromide (FAO/PL:1968/M/9/1) Ethylene Dibromide (IARC Summary & Evaluation, Volume 71, 1999)