PESTICIDE RESIDUES IN FOOD - 1982 Sponsored jointly by FAO and WHO EVALUATIONS 1982 Data and recommendations of the joint meeting of the FAO Panel of Experts on Pesticide Residues in Food and the Environment and the WHO Expert Group on Pesticide Residues Rome, 23 November - 2 December 1982 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome 1983 CHLORPYRIFOSExplanation Chlorpyrifos was reviewed by the Joint Meetings of 1972, 1974, 1975, 1977 and 1981 (FAO/WHO 1973, 1975, 1976, 1978, 1982)1/. An ADI of 0-0.001 mg/kg bw was established, based on plasma cholinesterase depression in humans. Additional reports on the toxicity of chlorpyrifos have been submitted, including a two-year chronic feeding/oncogenicity study in mice, a teratology study in mice, and a delayed neurotoxicity study in hens. These studies have been reviewed and summarized in this monograph addendum. EVALUATION FOR ACCEPTABLE DAILY INTAKE TOXICOLOGICAL STUDIES Special Study on Teratogenicity Groups of 40-47 pregnant CF-1 mice were given 0, 1, 10 or 25 kg bw/day of chlorpyrifos by gavage on days 6 through 15 of gestation. Administration of 25 mg/kg/day of chlorpyrifos resulted in severe maternal toxicity. Additional groups of 35-41 pregnant mice were gavaged with 0, 0.1, 1.0 and 10 mg chlorpyrifos/kg bw on days 6 through 15 of gestation, due to the maternal toxicity at 25 mg/kg body weight. On day 18 of gestation all pregnant animals were sacrificed and foetuses delivered by caesarean section. Maternal observations included cageside observations; body, liver and gravid uterine weights; food and water consumption; number and position of live, dead, and resorbed foetuses and evidence of implantation sites. Foetal body weights, crown-rump measurements, external alterations, together with visceral and skeletal alterations, were similarly determined for all foetuses. Separate groups of pregnant mice were also examined for clinical evidence of cholinesterase depression during selected periods of gestation, including ChE measurements of plasma and erythrocytes, as well as the ChE of a foetal homogenate on gestation day 15. 1/ See Annex 2 for WHO and FAO documentation. Evidence of maternal toxicity (including cholinesterase inhibition, decreased body weight, decreased food and water consumption and death) was observed among pregnant mice given 25 mg/kg of chlorpyrifos. Plasma and erythrocyte cholinesterase levels were significantly reduced among maternal mice at 1 mg/kg or greater and in foetuses at dose levels of 10 mg/kg or greater. Foetotoxicity, as evidenced by increased occurrence of minor skeletal variants (i.e. delayed ossification of skull bones and sternebrae) and decreased foetal body weight measurements, was noted at the 25 mg/kg dose level. Reproduction performance (as determined by implantation sites, resorption sites and live young) was not affected by chlorpyrifos at any dose level administered. Some malformations (exencephaly) were observed among litters of mice given 1 mg/kg chlorpyrifos; however, a dose-related teratogenic response was not observed nor repeated in the additional mice given the same dose. No evidence of teratogenic response was observed among mice given 0.1, 1, 10 or 25 mg/kg of chlorpyrifos, during the critical period of organogenesis (Deacon et al 1979). Special Study on Neurotoxicity Chicken Groups of adult hens (av. 14.5 months) were administered chlorpyrifos orally at dosage levels of 0, 25, 50, 100, 200 or 400 mg/kg bw, and the oral LD50 estimated to be 50 mg/kg bw. Separate groups of non-fasted adult hens (av. 17 months) were given single oral doses of 0, 50 and 100 mg chlorpyrifos/kg bw. A positive control (TOTP, 232 mg/kg) was also used. Ten birds comprised each test group. Atropine sulphate (30 mg/kg) was given to all birds prior to administration of TOTP or chlorpyrifos. At the conclusion of the study (21-24 days), all surviving hens were sacrificed and subjected to gross and microscopic examinations. Axon and myelin degeneration were assessed in the sciatic nerve and spinal cord. There was no mortality in any group. Body weight was slightly, but not statistically, depressed in the positive control (TOTP). There were dose-dependent, acute cholinergic effects observed for the chlorpyrifos treated groups. Symptoms included transient signs of ataxia, CNS depression and paralysis, which recovered to normal within 2 to 4 days post-treatment. There were no signs of delayed neurotoxicity observed with chlorpyrifos. The positive control animals (TOTP) displayed delayed gross symptoms beginning on day 10 and continued through to sacrifice. There were slight to severe signs of ataxia in all birds, with partial paralysis in a few. Histologic evaluation revealed no evidence of neurotoxic effects in either the chlorpyrifos treated group or the negative control (atropine sulphate only). Evidence of delayed neurotoxicity was apparent in the TOTP group with the observation of swollen, degenerate, fragmented and demyelinated axons in the spinal cord, plus swollen neurollemma sheaths and vacuolation of the sciatic nerve. Based on the results of this study, it was concluded that chlorpyrifos does not induce delayed neurotoxic reactions in adult white leghorn hens when administered as a single acute oral dose (Rowe et al 1978). Special Study for Carcinogenicity Mouse Groups of CD-1 mice (56 male and 56 female/mice/group) were fed chlorpyrifos in the diet at dosage levels of 0, 0.5, 5 and 15 ppm for 105 weeks. These dose levels were approximately equivalent to 0, 0.05, 0.5 and 1.5 mg/kg/day over the entire treatment period. The animals were examined daily for mortality and adverse physical/behavioural condition. Periodic evaluation of food consumption and body weights were performed. At the conclusion of the study, or at death, organ weights and gross and microscopic examination of tissues and organs of all animals were performed. All mice were killed by CO2 inhalation and exsanguination via the axillary blood vessels. Peripheral blood smears were prepared from tail blood from all survivors at terminal sacrifice. There were no unusual behavioural changes and no significant effects on food consumption, body weight gain or mortality. Absolute and relative organ weights of selected organs were varied and unrelated to dose. Relative liver weights for both male and female mice were significantly decreased (p <0.05) at the low- and mid-dose, but not at the high dose. Histological examination revealed a significant difference between control and mid-dose males for the incidence of hyperplastic nodules of the liver. There was also a significant increase in the incidence of spindle cell hyperplasia of the adrenal gland for male mice at the low and mid-dose levels, and in female mice at the low dose only. Lesions observed in the lung included a significant increase of alveologenic adenomas in mid-dose male mice only. The histologic changes identified appear to be spontaneous in nature and without a demonstrated dose-response. Furthermore, type A and B nodules of the liver parenchyma, as well as the alveologenic carcinomas of the lung, occurred with equal frequency between treatment and control group animals. There were no other significant lesions or statistically increased hyperplastic and/or nodular lesions. The results of this study demonstrate that chlorpyrifos is not oncogenic in mice at dietary levels up to and including 15 ppm for a period of 105 weeks (Warner et al 1980). COMMENTS The Meeting evaluated substantial new data submitted on chlorpyrifos, including a mouse teratology study, a mouse carcinogenicity study and a hen neurotoxicity study. Chlorpyrifos was not teratogenic to mice at doses up to and including 25 mg/kg bw/day, although severe maternal toxicity and foetotoxicity were evident at that dose. It was also determined that 15 ppm of chlorpyrifos was not oncogenic when administered in the diet of mice for 105 weeks. A single acute oral dose of 100 mg/kg bw (twice the LD50) did not induce a delayed neurotoxic response in hens. However, the Meeting reiterated previously expressed JMPR opinions that a delayed neurotoxicity study in hens requires multiple dosing, such that doses are repeated 21 days apart for a total of two acute oral doses. In this context, the present study may not fully address the delayed neurotoxic potential of chlorpyrifos relative to residues in food. Chlorpyrifos is recognized to be an active cholinesterase inhibitor in several mammalian species, including humans. In all species evaluated, plasma ChE or pseudo-cholinesterase was inhibited at lower administered dose levels of chlorpyrifos than were RBC or brain ChE (where determined). Chlorpyrifos was reviewed by the Joint Meeting in 1972 (FAO/WHO 1973), which determined that chlorpyrifos inhibited the plasma ChE in humans at 0.03 mg/kg bw, but not at 0.014 mg/kg bw (Coulston et al 1972). This served as a basis for the ADI (0.0015 mg/kg), which was subsequently rounded off to 0.001 mg/kg bw at the recommendation of the Joint Meeting of 1977 (FAO/WHO 1978). However, appropriate statistical evaluation of the human cholinesterase determinations in the Coulston et al study (1972) (Park 1972) demonstrated 0.03 mg/kg to be a threshold level for inhibition of plasma ChE, which was without statistical significance when compared to current controls. Based upon repeated daily doses for a period of 21 days, it was concluded by Coulston et al and Park that a dose of 0.03 mg chlorpyrifos/kg bw has no significant toxicological effect in humans. This conclusion is supported by the evidence from studies in other mammalian species at comparable dose levels (McCollister et al 1971a,b; Coulston et al 1971). These same investigators determined that erythrocyte cholinesterase activity was inhibited at comparable levels in different species (e.g. 0.1 mg/kg for rat, dog and humans, and 0.08 mg/kg for monkey). Except for ChE depression, these levels were without significant effects noted on mortality, behaviour, food consumption growth, haematology, clinical chemistry, urinalysis, or gross and microscopic examination of selected tissues (where determined). The Meeting accordingly increased the ADI from 0.001 to 0.01 mg/kg body weight, based on the level causing no inhibition of RBC cholinesterase and not on the plasma cholinesterase. TOXICOLOGICAL EVALUATION Level Causing no Toxicological Effect Rat: 0.1 mg/kg bw/day Dog: 0.1 mg/kg bw/day Man: 0.1 mg/kg bw/day Estimate of Acceptable Daily Intake for Man 0 - 0.01 mg/kg bw. FURTHER WORK OR INFORMATION Desirable Data on the inhibition, reactivation and ageing of cholinesterase (in vitro). REFERENCES Coulston, F., Goldberg, L., Abraham, R., Benitz, K.F., Griffin, T.B. 1971 and Norvell, M. Final report on safety evaluation and metabolic studies on Dowco 179 (IN 151). Report from Insp. Exp. Pathol. Toxicol., Albany Medical College, submitted to the World Health Organization by Dow Chemical Company. (Unpublished) Coulston, F., Goldberg, L. and Griffin, T. Safety evaluation of 1972 Dowco 179 in human volunteers. Summary and tables 33 and 34, reviewed by JMPR 1972. Report from Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, submitted to the World Health Organization by Dow Chemical Company. (Unpublished) Deacon, M.M., Murray, J.S., Pilney, M.K., Dittenber, D.A., Hanley, 1979 T.R. Jr. and John, J.A. The effects of orally administered chlorpyrifos on embryonal and foetal development in mice. Report from Dow Chemical Company submitted to the World Health Organization by Dow Chemical Company. (Unpublished) McCollister, S.B., Kociba, R.J., Gehring, P.J. and Humiston, C.G. 1971a Results of two-year dietary feeding studies on DowcoR 179 in beagle dogs. Report T35.12.44793-18, from Dow Chemical Company, submitted to the World Health Organization by Dow Chemical Company. (Unpublished) 1971b Results of two-year dietary feeding studies on DowcoR179 in rats. Report NBT35.12-44793-21, from Dow Chemical Company submitted to the World Health Organization by Dow Chemical Company (Unpublished) Park, C. Analysis of plasma and red blood cell cholinesterase levels 1972 in humans ingesting DOWCO 179. Report from Dow Chemical Company submitted to the World Health Organization by Dow Chemical Company. (Unpublished) Rowe, L.D., Warner, S.D. and Johnston, R.V. Acute delayed 1978 neurotoxicologic evaluation of chlorpyrifos in White Leghorn hens. Report from Dow Chemical Company submitted to the World Health Organization by Dow Chemical Company. (Unpublished) Warner, S.D., Gerbig, C.G., Strebing, R.J. and Molello, J.A. Results 1980 of a two-year toxicity and oncogenicity study of chlorpyrifos administered to CD-1 mice in the diet. Report from Dow Chemical Company, submitted to the World Health Organization by Dow Chemical Company. (Unpublished) CHLORPYRIFOS Explanation Chlorpyrifos was evaluated in 1972, 1974, 1975 and 1977 (FAO/WHO 1973, 1975, 1976, 1978)1/. Use patterns for chlorpyrifos have undergone significant changes since 1972 with less emphasis on previous animal applications, the development of "spot-on" animal treatments and the emergence of more feed uses. At the 1982 meeting of the CCPR, a question was raised concerning the recommended limit in milk in view of these changing use patterns. New information was made available to the Meeting on a survey of international uses on dairy cattle, residues in meat from "spot-on" treatment, residues in meat and milk from ingestion of treated feed, metabolic fate in lactating goats, an improved method of analysis for milk and cream and national maximum residue limits. RESIDUES IN FOOD AND THEIR EVALUATION USE PATTERN In Animals A survey of uses of chlorpyrifos in animals was conducted by Dow Chemical Co. in each geographic region in late 1981. This survey was aimed specifically at clarifying whether dairy cattle are treated with chlorpyrifos and, if so, whether such use is likely to lead to residues greater than 0.1 mg/kg on a fat basis in milk or milk products in international trade. Table 1 summarizes recommendations for treatment of cattle with chlorpyrifos in each country where it has been used. 1/ See Annex 2 for FAO and WHO documentation. Table 1. Survey of Uses of Chlorpyrifos in Cattle: A. Developed Countries Country Product Use Comment Australia DURSBAN 1/24E For ticks and lice in cattle, Do not use on lactating cattle or in all states 250 g/litre as dip at 1 litre/1 000 litres dairy cows later than 3 weeks before 1970-71 of water (0.025% a.i.), or as calving. Do not spray later than 3 spray at 200 ml/200 litres weeks before slaughter, or dip later using at least 5 litres per than 3 days before slaughter of meat animal. animals. all states DURSBAN JS For louse control in cattle, Do not use in lactating dairy cattle 1977 50% a.i. w/v apply as a "one-shot" treatment or in dry dairy cows within 3 weeks using 3 ml/100 kg bw (1.5 g before calving. Do not use later than a.i./100 kg bw) as spot-on to 21 days before slaughter for meat rump. animals. New Zealand DURSBAN 10E For cattle lice control, use Do not use on dairy cows "in milk". 1971? License No. 1454 62.5 - 125 ml/100 litres of Treat dairy cows not later than 3 water weeks before calving. Treat beef cattle not later than 3 weeks before slaughtering. 1977? DURSBAN JS For control of cattle lice, use Do not use on dairy cows "in milk". (400 g a.i./litre) 15-30 ml/100 litres, of water Spray no later than 3 weeks before License No. 2941 applied as a saturating spray, calving for dry dairy cattle or or 2 ml/50 kg live weight (1.6 before slaughter for meat animals. g/100 kg bw) as a spot-on Apply spot-on no later than 5 weeks treatment. before calving or slaughter. 1978 Ridlice For cattle, ectoparasites as Do not use on lactating dairy cattle 50% a.i. w/v one-shot application, use 3 ml/ or within 5 weeks before calving or License No. 3485 100 kg bw (1.5 g a.i./100 kg bw) slaughter. as spot-on to top of rump. Table 1. (con't) Country Product Use Comment U.S.A. DURSBAN 24E For control of fever ticks in For use under supervision of qualified 1972 2 lb a.i./gal2/ beef cattle, use 1 ounce of state or federal personnel responsible 23.7% a.i., w/v product in 8 gallons of water for quarantine programmes. Withdrawal EPA Reg No. (0.025% a.i.), and apply 3/4 to period of 2 weeks before slaughter. 464-450 1 gallon as spray treatment; or No more than 6 applications at 21-day use 1/2 gallon of product per intervals per season. 500 gallons of water (0.025% a.i.) for dip treatment.2/ U.S.A. 1979 DURSBAN 44 For lice control in beef cattle Do not treat dairy cows during 43.2% a.i. w/v and non-lactating dairy cattle, lactation. Do not treat dry dairy cows EPA Reg. No. apply to back as a "spot-on" or replacement heifers within 60 days 464-542 treatment using 2 ml/100 lb bw before freshening. Do not slaughter (2 g a.i. 100 kg bw) or 16 ml meat animals for 14 days after initial maximum per animal. treatment, or after a second treatment applied 45 days or more after the first treatment. Do not slaughter for 21 days after second treatment applied 30 days after first treatment. Canada Temp. 1979 DURSBAN 44 Temporary registration for louse Do not treat within 14 days before Expired 1980 43.2% a.i. control in beef cattle slaughter. Argentina DURSBAN 24E Control of ticks on cattle by Do not slaughter cattle within 3 1969 240 g a.i./litre spraying and dipping using 336 weeks of treatment. Reg. No. 1307 g a.i./1 000 litres of water. 1975 DURSBAN 18A Dip or spray treatment for Preslaughter interval of 2 days for 180 g a.i./litre cattle. meat animals (previously 2 weeks) Table 1. (con't) Country Product Use Comment Brazil DURSBAN 1E Tickicide for cattle as spray Withdrawal period of 14 days after 1969, 1973 13% a.i. w/v or dip at 1:500 - 1:300 treatment. Reg. No. 973 dilution 1975 DURSBAN 24E Control of ticks on cattle by Preslaughter limitation of 14 days 240 g a.i./litre spraying and dipping at after treatment. Also 48 hours NBR 96/75 1:1 000 - 1:600 dilution limitation on use of milk after treatment. Colombia DURSBAN 24E Control of ticks on cattle by Do not slaughter cattle within 3 1972 240 g a.i./litre spraying and dipping using weeks of treatment. 336 g a.i./1 000 litres of water. Costa Rica DURSBAN 24E " " Expired 240 g a.i./litre 1976 Reg. No 255 Dominican DURSBAN 24E " " Republic 240 g a.i./litre 1975 Ecuador DURSBAN 24E " " 1975 240 g a.i./litre El Salvador DURSBAN 24E Control of ticks on cattle by Do not slaughter cattle within 3 1975 240 g a.i./litre spraying and dipping using weeks of treatment. 336 g a.i./1 000 litres of water. Table 1. (con't) Country Product Use Comment Mexico DURSBAN 24E " " 1969 240 g a.i./litre Reg.No. 0-0480-015 Nicaragua DURSBAN 24E " " 1975 240 g a.i./litre Panama DURSBAN 24E " " 1975 240 g a.i./litre Reg.No. 15130 Trinidad DURSBAN 24E " " 1972 240 g a.i./litre Venezuela DURSBAN 24E " Not to be used for 20 hours before 1972 240 g a.i./litre milking or 15 days before slaughter of meat animals. 1/ Trademark of The Dow Chemical Company; 2/ 1 gallon = 3.8 litres; 3/ 1 lb (16 oz) = 0.45 kg. Labels approved recently in Australia, New Zealand and the U.S. recommends a one-shot "spot-on" treatment rather than dipping or spraying. Limitations specify withdrawal intervals prior to slaughter of meat animals, and state that the product is not to be used on dairy cattle during lactation, nor within a stated interval prior to freshening or calving. In Canada, temporary approval expired in 1980 for use of chlorpyrifos to control lice in cattle and pigs. In Europe, only one recommendation was noted, as a dip for sheep using a mixture of chlorpyrifos and gamma HCH (Rycovet 365 Dip, Glasgow, June 1978). Recommendations for chlorpyrifos in Latin America generally do not differentiate between beef animals and dairy animals. However, the use of these products has been declining steadily, and the total sold in 1981 amounted to less than 40 000 kg active ingredient for the entire region. Records of Dow Chemical Co. indicate that less than 1 000 kg was sold in Brazil in each of 1979, 1980 and 1981, and none was sold in Venezuela in 1981. Although it is difficult to estimate how much chlorpyrifos is actually used in lactating animals, the rate of milk production under present agricultural practice in developing countries is inadequate even for local consumption. Thus, it is highly unlikely that minor use of chlorpyrifos in cows in certain Latin American countries would result in residues in milk products in international trade. RESIDUES RESULTING FROM SUPERVISED TRIALS In Meat Cattle were treated once with DURSBAN 44 Insecticide at the rate of 2 ml/100 lb of body weight (equivalent to 20 mg chlorpyrifos per kg bw) applied as a "spot-on" to the top midline just posterior to the withers. Groups of three cattle each were sacrificed the day after treatment and at 7-day intervals through 35 days after application. The maximum residue of chlorpyrifos was 1.4 mg/kg in fat at 7 days after treatment (Table 2). Residues in muscle were much lower than in fat, and did not exceed 0.6 mg/kg chlorpyrifos at any sampling. Thus residues from "spot-on" treatment are not likely to exceed the recommended limit of 2 mg/kg for chlorpyrifos in carcase meat on a fat basis (McKellar and Dishburger 1976). Table 2. Summary of Average Residues of Chlorpyrifos and 3,5,6-Trichloro-2-Pyridinol in Tissues of Cattle1/ Days from Average Residue Found, mg/kg (range, mg/kg) Treatment Chlorpyrifos 3,5,6-Trichloro-2-Pyridinol to Sampling Muscle Liver Kidney Fat Muscle Liver Kidney Fat 1 0.02 0.01 0.07 0.28 ND 0.74 0.52 0.10 (0.01-0.03) (0.01) (0.06-0.08) (0.03-0.46) (0.52-0.97) (0.45-0.56) (<0.05-0.18) 7 0.04 0.04 0.12 1.1 0.09 1.0 0.86 0.19 (0.01-0.06) (0.01-0.08) (0.09-0.18) (0.95-1.4) (<0.05-0.15) (0.67-1.5) (0.46-1.4) (0.08-0.24) 14 0.01 0.02 0.11 0.80 ND 0.59 0.52 0.07 (ND-0.01) (0.02-0.03) (0.08-0.16) (0.61-0.99) (0.47-0.69) (0.48-0.58) (0.06-0.08) 21 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.05 ND 0.42 0.29 0.14 (0.01) (<0.01-0.01) (0.06-0.10) (ND-0.14) (0.31-0.53) (0.14-0.57) (0.09-0.24) 24 0.01 ND 0.07 0.47 ND 0.20 0.10 <0.05 (0.01) (0.03-0.09) (0.34-0.71) (0.11-0.27) (0.06-0.13) (ND-0.05) 35 ND ND 0.03 0.20 ND 0.13 0.05 ND (0.01-0.05) (0.02-0.34) (0.05-0.23) (0.04-0.07) 1/ All animals received a single treatment of Dursban spot-on (M-4110) at a rate of 2 ml/45 kg body weight. Values corrected for control and recovery. ND = No detectable differences between treated and control samples. Groups of three cattle were fed chlorpyrifos for 30 days at levels of 3, 10, 30 and 100 ppm on a daily, dry matter intake basis. Residues of chlorpyrifos were mainly in the fat, reaching maxima of 4.70 mg/kg in renal fat at 100 fed and 1.09 mg/kg in renal fat at 30 ppm fed. The residues of chlorpyrifos declined to less than 2 mg/kg in fat within 7 days after discontinuation of feeding 100 ppm in the total diet of the cattle for 30 days (Table 2). The oxygen analogue of chlorpyrifos was shown to be unstable in liver and kidney, and no residue was found in any tissue at any feeding level. The pyridinol metabolite was not detected in muscle at feeding levels of 3 and 10 ppm chlorpyrifos, but was present in liver and kidney at all feeding levels, reaching maxima of 2.61 mg/kg in liver at 100 ppm fed and 1.67 mg/kg in liver at 30 ppm fed (Dishburger et al 1977). In Milk Lactating cows were fed a complete ration containing chlorpyrifos at levels from 0.3 to 30 ppm for 2 weeks at each level. At 30 ppm in the total diet, maximum residues of chlorpyrifos were 0.01 mg/kg in milk and 0.10 mg/kg in cream. The oxygen analogue was not detected in any sample of milk or cream at any dietary level of chlorpyrifos. The pyridinol metabolite was detected at 0.01 mg/kg in milk of cows fed 30 ppm chlorpyrifos, but does not concentrate in fat. Thus, residues resulting from ingestion of feedstuffs containing chlorpyrifos residues amounting to no more than 10 - 15 mg/kg in the total diet should not exceed the current recommendation of 0.1 mg/kg for chlorpyrifos in milk on a fat basis (McKellar et al 1976). FATE OF RESIDUES In Animals An additional metabolic study has been conducted using 14C-ring labelled chlorpyrifos in lactating goats. The material was administered via capsule twice daily at doses equivalent to 16 and 25 ppm in the daily feed for 10 days. The majority of the total 14C activity was recovered in the urine (80.3%), with small amounts in the faeces (3.6%), gut (0.9%) tissues (0.8%) and milk (0.1%). Most of the radioactivity in the urine was excreted as the ß-glucuronide conjugate of 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol with small amounts of free pyridinol metabolite. About 75% of the 14C activity in the fat was chlorpyrifos (0.1 mg/kg) with most of the remaining 14C activity hydrolysable to the pyridinol metabolite. The results of this study validate the methodology used in earlier animal residue studies (Glas 1981). METHODS OF RESIDUE ANALYSIS The analytical method used for analysis of beef tissues from the "spot-on" treatment, was the procedure developed in 1972 for determination of chlorpyrifos residues in chicken tissues and eggs. Analysis is by gas chromatography using flame photometric detection. The validated lower level of sensitivity is 0.01 mg/kg chlorpyrifos in muscle, liver, kidney and fat of beef animals, as well as the chicken muscle, liver, kidney and eggs (McKellar and Dishburger 1976; Wetters 1972). An improved analytical method for the determination of chlorpyrifos in milk and cream has lower limits of detection at 0.01 and 0.05 mg/kg in these matrices, respectively. The samples are extracted with hexane, the extract partitioned into acetonitrile, cleaned up on deactivated silica gel and analysed by gas chromatography with flame photometric detection (Jeffries 1980). NATIONAL MAXIMUM RESIDUE LIMITS Maximum residue limits reported to the Meeting for chlorpyrifos in foods of animal origin are summarized in Table 3. The Codex MRLs included for comparison are in terms of chlorpyrifos alone, since the pyridinol hydrolysis product is of low mammalian toxicity and is excreted rapidly in the urine and faeces of animals (FAO/WHO 1973b, p. 162 and 194). U.S. tolerances include its pyridinol metabolite, expressed as chlorpyrifos, and were increased recently to include the estimated contribution from ingestion of feedstuffs treated with chlorpyrifos. The tolerances in feedstuffs, which do not exceed 15 mg/kg in any case, also represent maximum total residues of chlorpyrifos and its pyridinol hydrolysis product, expressed as chlorpyrifos, without differentiation as to the contribution due to each component (U.S. Code of Federal Regulations 1982). APPRAISAL New information on current uses of chlorpyrifos on animals and on residues in milk from ingestion of treated feed indicate that such uses should not result in residues in excess of the proposed CCPR MRLs of 2 mg/kg in carcase meat of cattle (for fat-soluble pesticides, a portion of carcase fat is analysed and the MRLs apply to carcase fat) and of 0.1 mg/kg in milk and milk products (both on a fat basis). Because chlorpyrifos residues in whole milk from cows fed up to Table 3. Maximum Residue Limits for Chlorpyrifos1/ in Food Products of Animal Origin Cattle Codex 2.0 mg/kg in carcase meat (carcase fat). Australia 2.0 mg/kg in fat of meat of cattle. Canada 1.0 mg/kg (temporary) in meat and meat by-products (fat basis) and in fat, liver and kidney. New Zealand 1.5 mg/kg in meat fat in any food. U.S. 2.0 mg/kg in fat, meat and meat by-products. Eggs Codex 0.01 mg/kg (on shell-free basis). U.S. 0.1 mg/kg. Goats U.S. 1.0 mg/kg in fat, meat and meat by-products. Pigs Australia 0.1 mg/kg in fat of meat of pigs. U.S. 0.5 mg/kg in fat, meat and meat by-products. Horses U.S. 1.0 mg/kg in fat, meat and meat by-products. Milk Codex 0.1 mg/kg (on a fat basis) including milk products. Switzerland 0.005 mg/kg in whole milk. U.S. 0.5 mg/kg in fat (reflecting 0.02 mg/kg in whole milk). Poultry Codex 0.1 mg/kg in carcase meat (carcase fat). U.S. 0.5 mg/kg in fat, meat and meat by-products. Sheep Codex 0.2 mg/kg in carcase meat (carcase fat). New Zealand 1.5 mg/kg in meat fat in any food. U.S. 1.0 mg/kg in fat, meat and meat by-products. Table 3. (con't) Turkeys Codex 0.2 mg/kg in carcase meat (skin and carcase fat). U.S. 0.2 mg/kg in fat, meat and meat by-products. 1/ Tolerances in Canada and the U.S. include residues of 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol expressed as chlorpyrifos. 30 mg/kg in the total diet reached the measurable level of 0.01 mg/kg and, in consideration of the current CCPR approach to the establishment of limits for fat-soluble pesticides in milk, the MRL for milk should be changed to 0.01 mg/kg for chlorpyrifos (the limit of determination) in whole milk, from which the MRL for milk products containing more than 2% fat would be calculated on a fat basis, assuming 4% fat in raw milk. RECOMMENDATIONS The recommended maximum residue limit for milk and milk products on a fat basis is deleted and replaced with a new maximum residue limit for milk. The limit applies to chlorpyrifos only. Commodity Limit (mg/kg) Milk 0.01* * at or about the limit of determination. REFERENCES Dishburger, H.J., McKellar, R.L., Pennington, J.Y. and Rice, J.R. 1977 Determination of residues of chlorpyrifos, its oxygen analogue, and 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol in tissues of cattle fed chlorpyrifos. Journal of Agricultural Food Chem. 25(6): 1325-1329. Glas, R.D. The metabolic fate of 14C-chlorpyrifos fed to lactating 1981 goats. Report GH-C 1408R, Dow Chemical Co, (Unpublished) Jeffries, T.K. Determination of residues of chlorpyrifos in milk and 1980 cream. Method ACR 80.5. Dow Chemical Co. (Unpublished) McKellar, R.L. and Dishburger, H.J. Determination of residues of 1976 chlorpyrifos and 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol in tissues of cattle receiving a single treatment of DURSBAN spot-on. Report GH-C-930, Dow Chemical Co. (Unpublished) McKellar, R.L., Dishburger, H.J., Rice, J.R., Craig, L.F. and Pennington, J. Residues of chlorpyrifos, its oxygen analogue, and 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol in milk and cream from cows fed chlorpyrifos. Journal of Agricultural Food Chem. 24(2): 283-286. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. Title 40: Section 180.342 for 1982 chlorpyrifos tolerances in raw agricultural commodities; Section 193.85 for chlorpyrifos tolerances in processed foods; Section 561.98 for chlorpyrifos residues in processed feeds. Wetters, J.H. Determination of residues of 0,0-diethyl 0-(3,5,6- 1972 trichloro-2-pyridyl) phosphorothioate in chicken tissues and eggs by gas chromatography with flame photometric detection. Method ARC 72.3. Dow Chemical Co. (Unpublished)
See Also: Toxicological Abbreviations Chlorpyrifos (ICSC) Chlorpyrifos (WHO Pesticide Residues Series 2) Chlorpyrifos (WHO Pesticide Residues Series 5) Chlorpyrifos (Pesticide residues in food: 1977 evaluations) Chlorpyrifos (Pesticide residues in food: 1981 evaluations) Chlorpyrifos (Pesticide residues in food: 1983 evaluations) Chlorpyrifos (JMPR Evaluations 1999 Part II Toxicological)