FAO/PL:1967/M/11/1 WHO/Food Add./68.30 1967 EVALUATIONS OF SOME PESTICIDE RESIDUES IN FOOD THE MONOGRAPHS The content of this document is the result of the deliberations of the Joint Meeting of the FAO Working Party of Experts and the WHO Expert Committee on Pesticide Residues, which met in Rome, 4 - 11 December, 1967. (FAO/WHO, 1968) FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION Rome, 1968 THIRAM This pesticide was evaluated by the 1965 Joint Meeting of the FAO Committee on Pesticides in Agriculture and the WHO Expert Committee on Pesticide Residues (FAO/WHO, 1965). A re-evaluation of the toxicological data and an evaluation for tolerances is given in the following monograph addendum. EVALUATION FOR ACCEPTABLE DAILY INTAKES Comments In long-term studies in rats toxic effects were seen at a level of 300 ppm in the diet with questionable effects at 100 ppm. In a study that extended over three generations, a dietary level of 48 ppm was without toxicological affect. Chicks appear to be especially susceptible to thiram brut confirmation and extension of these experiments are needed. The biochemical investigations on the homologue, tetra ethyl thiuram disulfide, are considered relevant to the evaluation of thiram. It is known that tetra methyl thiuram disulfide in a dose of 0.5 to 1.5 per day can be taken by man for many weeks without ill-effect unless alcohol is consumed. While additional data are being obtained, a temporary ADI, based on the long-term studies in rat, is proposed. TOXICOLOGICAL EVALUATION Level causing no toxicological effect Rat. 48 ppm in the diet, approximately equivalent to 2.5 mg/kg body-weight per day. Dog. 5 mg/kg body-weight/day Estimate of temporary acceptable daily intake for man 0 - 0.025 mg/kg body-weight (alone or in combination with other dimethyl-dithiocarbamates). This value is based on experiments carried out with thiram and does not take account of chemical alterations after application. Further work required Studies of the compound in plants to determine the chemical nature of the residues, followed by appropriate toxicological studies. Results of the above work should be made available not later than 30 June 1971 after which a re-evaluation of this compound will be made. The re-evaluation may be made at an earlier meeting should relevant Information become available. EVALUATION FOR TOLERANCES USE PATTERN Pre-harvest treatments Thiram is used primarily as a pre-harvest spray to protect a number of agricultural products from plant pathogens. RESIDUES IN FOOD AT TIME OF CONSUMPTION A recent survey of five composite basic 2-week diets for males 14-19 years showed the presence of six dithiocarbamates with values ranging from 0.4 to 0.8 ppm (Duggan, Barry and Johnson, 1966). No residues were found in a more recent survey based upon the analyses of prepared foods (Duggan and Weatherwax, 1967), possibly because the residues decomposed rapidly as the foods were being prepared. METHODS OF RESIDUE ANALYSIS Residues have been determined by releasing either the dimethylamine (Barr, Clark and Jacks, 1957) or the carbon disulfide (Pease, 1957) on acid treatment of the sample and measuring the intensity of a coloured copper complex formed. Since the colour formation is critical an improved modification has been outlined (Cullen, 1964). Better recoveries from a variety of crops have resulted from changes in the order of the acid decomposition procedure (Gordon, Schuckert and Bornak, 1967). Methods using polarographic techniques have also been developed (Nangniot, 1966; Vogeler, 1967). NATIONAL TOLERANCES Thiram is registered for use in Canada on apples, celery, peaches, strawberries and tomatoes at a residue level of 7 ppm (FDD/Canada, 1967). The United States use at the same level also includes bananas (1 ppm in pulp), while no tolerance has been set for a number of agricultural pesticide chemical uses (USDA, 1967). The West German tolerance has been set at 3 ppm for leafy vegetables, and fruits. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TOLERANCES Although some progress has been reported, neither the chemical nature nor the mode of action of the residues of thiram in or on the plant have been ascertained and there is no specific method of analysis available. Accordingly, no tolerance figures can be recommended. FURTHER WORK Further work required by 30 June 1971 Further work is required on the metabolism of thiram in or on the plant to include the identification and mode of action of any critical intermediates. REFERENCES PERTINENT TO EVALUATION OF TOLERANCES Barr, H.E., Clark, P.J., Jacks, H. (1957) Determination of tetramethylthiuram disulfide and dimethyldithiocarbamate sprays on apples. New Zealand J. Sci. Tech. Sect. B 38: 425-532. Cullen, T.E. (1964) Spectrophotometric determination of dithiocarbamate residues in food crops. Anal. Chem. 36: 221-224. Duggan, R.E., Barry, H.C., Johnson, L.Y. (1966) Pesticide residues in total diet samples, Science 151: 101-104 Duggan, R.E., Weatherwax, J.R. (1967) Dietary intake of pesticide chemicals. Science 157: 1006-1010. FDD/Canada. (1967) Food and Drug Directorate, Canada. T. I. L. 290 15 September Gordon, C.F., Schuckert, R.J., Bornak, W.E. (1967) Improved method for the determination of ethylenebisdithiocarbamate residues in plants, fruits and vegetables. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 50: 1102-1108. Nangniot, P. (1966) L'application des methodes electrochimiques a l'etude des residus de pesticides. Mededel. Landbouwhogeschool Opzoekingstat. Staat Gent 31: 447-473. Pease, H.L. (1957) Determination of dithiocarbamate fungicide residues. J. Assoc. Off. Agric. Chem. 40: 1113-1118. USDA. (1967) Summary of registered agricultural pesticide chemical uses. 2nd ed., Suppl.III. Vegeler, von K. (1967) Kolorimetrische und polarographische bestimmungen von ruckstanden in und auf pflanzen nach anwendung von Antracol. Pflanzenschutz-Nachrichte Bayer.
See Also: Toxicological Abbreviations Thiram (ICSC) Thiram (FAO Meeting Report PL/1965/10/1) Thiram (Pesticide residues in food: 1984 evaluations) Thiram (Pesticide residues in food: 1992 evaluations Part II Toxicology) Thiram (IARC Summary & Evaluation, Volume 53, 1991)