PESTICIDE RESIDUES IN FOOD - 1980 Sponsored jointly by FAO and WHO EVALUATIONS 1980 Joint meeting of the FAO Panel of Experts on Pesticide Residues in Food and the Environment and the WHO Expert Group on Pesticide Residues Rome, 6-15 October 1980 PROPARGITE Explanation Propargite was reviewed by the 1977 Joint Meeting (FAO, 1978), and a temporary ADI for man was estimated to be 0-0.08 mg/kg bw. Propargite is moderately toxic when administered orally to rats. Propargite is readily absorbed, metabolized, and excreted rapidly from the body. The metabolic products are predominantly oxidative and/or hydrolytic reactions resulting in cleavage of the parent ester and of the ether moiety. The metabolic products are polar compounds, readily excreted or incorporated into natural constituents in the body. Propargite is not teratogenic, nor did it pose a problem with respect to reproduction in rats. In a series of long-term and short-term studies in rats and dogs, there were no unusual toxicological events that would raise questions relative to the safety of the use of propargite. In a long-term study in the rat, at 2,000 mg/kg, growth reduction and mortality was seen. These effects were accompanied by variations in the relative and absolute weight of several organs of the body noted in survivors at the conclusion of the study. There is no indication in the long-term rat study that propargite is a carcinogen. A no-effect level of 900 mg/kg (the highest level tested) was seen in the two-year dog study. It was considered at the previous Meeting that, as propargite is structurally related to `Aramite', a compound that is known to be a carcinogen in animal studies, the need for a more definitive carcinogenicity study was warranted. Further data relative to the oncogenic potential of propargite in mice were made available to the Meeting and were reviewed. These new data are considered in this monograph addendum. At the 1977 Meeting a number of temporary MRLs were recommended. In 1978 (FAO/WHO, 1979) additional information was reviewed with recommendations for new or revised temporary limits with some of these revised in 1979 (FAO/WHO, 1980) on the basis of new data. Propargite is scheduled for re-evaluation in 1981. However, additional information has been received on the metabolic fate of propargite in plants. This information, provided in response to information considered desirable in the 1977 Evaluations (1978), is reviewed in this addendum. Additional information on residues, use patterns, and national tolerances are also evaluated. DATA CONSIDERED FOR DERIVATION OF ACCEPTABLE DAILY INTAKE TOXICOLOGICAL STUDIES Special study on carcinogenicity Mouse In the preliminary dose range-finding study, groups of albino mice (10 male and 10 female mice/group) were administered propargite in the diet at dosage levels of 0, 600, 900, 1,350, 2,000 or 3,000 mg/kg for 30 days. Daily observations were made with respect to general appearance and behaviour and for gross signs of toxicity and mortality. Body weight and food consumption were recorded weekly and gross examination of major tissues and organs was performed on all animals. Mortality was observed at 3,000 mg/kg (all deaths were in one group of male mice housed together, but not in the other group of 5 males nor in the females). Growth was depressed at 3,000 mg/kg in both males and females and at 2,000 and above in females. Absolute and relative organ weight changes were observed at all dose levels, predominantly with respect to the liver. The principal investigators considered that the increased liver weight was a physiological response induced by the presence of propargite and did not constitute a toxicological response. It was concluded that a dosage not exceeding 1,000 mg/kg would be appropriate for a long- term carcinogenicity bioassay in mice (Gallo and Bailey, 1976). Groups of mice (60 male and 60 female, Charles River, CD-1 mice/group) were fed propargite in the diet at dosage levels of 0, 50, 160, 500 or 1,000 mg/kg for 18 months. Another group of animals (15 male and 15 female mice/group) were fed 0, 500 or 1,000 mg/kg in the diet for one year. Animals were observed daily for mortality and changes in appearance or behaviour. Growth and food consumption data were measured weekly for 28 weeks, after which data were recorded every other week. Data were recorded on individuals for 36 weeks and then by groups of animals corresponding to their caging. At 0, 52, and 78 weeks, haematology examinations were performed. At the conclusion of the study (either 52 or 78 weeks) all surviving animals were sacrificed and subjected to gross and microscopic examinations of tissues and organs. A statistical analysis was performed on all parameters to distinguish differences between control and test groups. There was no excessive mortality over the course of the study as a consequence of the presence of propargite in the diet. There was no effect of propargite on food consumption or growth. The appearance and behaviour characteristics of all treated animals were similar to those of controls. Haematological values were unaffected by propargite at any dose level. At the conclusion of the study, gross and microscopic examination revealed few significant compound-related effects. There was no effect of propargite on the distribution of either neoplastic or non-neoplastic lesions. A slight reduction in kidney weight was noted. An enlarged uterus was also reported in those animals fed 1000 mg/kg. These gross changes were not accompanied by pathological changes in the histological examination. In summary, there is no indication of a tumorigenic or carcinogenic effect of propargite in mice administered dietary levels up to 1,000 mg/kg for 18 months (Cox and Re, 1979). Special studies on mutagenicity Propargite was examined for its mutagenic potential in a series of in vitro microbiological assays utilizing Salmonella spp. and Saccharomyces spp. indicator organisms. Propargite was tested in the presence and absence of a liver microsomal enzyme preparation (S-9) obtained from Aroclor-induced rats. The concentration of propargite ranged from 0.001 to 5 mg per plate. The higher concentrations of propargite induced cellular toxicity, but in all cases there were sufficient doses available to evaluate propargite for its potential mutagenic effects. Propargite did not induce mutagenic activity in either of the microbial test systems and was considered to be nonmutagenic in these bioassays (Brusick and Weir, 1977). Special studies on teratogenicity Groups of female rats (20 pregnant rats/group) were administered propargite on days 6-15 of gestation at dosage levels of 0, 6, 25, 105, and 450 mg/kg/body weight/day. Propargite was administered as a corn oil suspension. A positive control included in the study was aspirin administered at a dose level of 250 mg/kg/body weight/day. All animals were sacrificed on day 20 of gestation and foetuses were removed and examined. The number of corpora lutea, implantation sites, resorption sites, and live and dead foetuses were observed. The foetuses were sexed and their body weight determined. All foetuses were examined for gross abnormalities and representatives were further examined for somatic and skeletal malformations. Maternal mortality in the high-dose group, administered 450 mg/kg, was evident early in the study and this dose level was terminated. Females at 105 mg/kg displayed signs of acute poisoning (blood nasal discharge, alopecia, urinary incontinence, and bloody vaginal discharge). While there were occasional toxic signs of poisoning in the lower dose levels, there were no differences in any of the treatment groups with respect to the maintenance of pregnancy, implantation sites, numbers of live or dead foetuses or resorption sites. Missing sternebrae and missing or reduced hyoid were significantly increased in the two highest-dosed test groups (25 and 105 mg/kg), and an increased incidence of incomplete closure of the skull was noted at the highest test group. There was an increased number of smaller pups and haemorrhagic abdomen was reported in more litters at the two higher dose groups than noted either in the lowest dose group or in the controls. There were no differences with respect to the average weight of live foetuses in any of the groups. Aspirin, the positive control, induced a significantly higher percentage of dams with resorption sites, fewer live foetuses/dam and a reduced foetal weight. The aspirin-treated parents gained less weight during the period of gestation and the foetuses showed an increased incidence of skeletal and soft tissue abnormalities compared to control foetuses. Such effects include missing sternebrae; incomplete ossification of vertebrae; incomplete closure of the skull; incomplete ossification of extremities, and missing and reduced hyoid. Propargite is not teratogenic in the rat under conditions of this assay. At a dose level of 25 mg/kg propargite-treated rats showed an increase in missing sternebrae and retarded hyoid development. These malformations are believed to be of questionable significance in evaluating the teratogenic potential of propargite, as an increased number of incomplete vertebrae, missing or reduced hyoid, and an incomplete skull closure are indicative of retarded development rather than a teratogenic effect, probably reflective of the toxic maternal effect noted at the higher dose levels (Knickerbocker and Re, 1979). RESIDUES IN FOOD USE PATTERN The following represent current good agricultural practices in New Zealand. Crop Pest Application Rates Waiting Period Apples Mites 60 g ai/100 litres 14 days Berry fruit Mites 60 g ai/100 litres 3 days Stone fruit Mites 60 g ai/100 litres 2 days These good agricultural practices are generally comparable with those reviewed by the 1977 Joint Meeting (FAO/WHO, 1978) except for the New Zealand 2-day pre-harvest interval for stone fruit which is significantly less than 14-day interval, on which basis limits were recommended in 1977. RESIDUES RESULTING FROM SUPERVISED TRIALS Propargite residues resulting from supervised trials in New Zealand are given in Table 1. TABLE 1. Propargite Residues From Supervised Trials Pre-Harvest Residues Interval at Harvest Crops Application Details (days) (mg/kg) Apples 1 × 60 g ai/100 litres 5 2.5 Strawberries 2 × 30 g ai/100 litres 16 h 3.7 (3.6 kg ai/ha) 1 3.1 2 2.5 3 2.0 5 1.7 7 1.4 16 0.5 Peaches 1 × 33 g ai/100 litres 0 7.6 (2.0 kg ai/ha) 1 6.0 2 5.7 3 6.1 5 7.1 7 6.9 14 6.3 2 × 60 g ai/100 litres 1 2.0 (1.2 kg ai/ha) 3 1.26 7 0.88 14 1.0 Apples The residue is within the 5 mg/kg limit recommended by the 1979 Joint Meeting. Strawberries The residues are within the 7 mg/kg limit recommended by the 1977 Joint Meeting, which used a 3-day pre-harvest interval. Peaches The residues are consistent with the 7 mg/kg limit recommended by the 1977 Joint Meeting and the 14-day-pre-harvest interval on which it was based. Even at the 2-day pre-harvest interval, considered good agricultural practice in New Zealand, residues are consistent with the limit previously recommended. Propargite residues in raisins Summary data from residue trials in California, USA (Canada, 1980) are given in Table 2. TABLE 2. Propargite Residues in Raisins Application Rate Interval from kg ai/ha or last Application Propargite % ai Formulation (days) Residue (mg/kg) 0.054% Omite 30W 7, 8 1.3, 0.1 14 0.7, 0.3 0.11% Omite 30W 7, 8 0.9, 0.5 14 1.3, 0.6 1.8 Omite 30W 7,8 1.5, 0.1 14 1.1, 0.7 3.6 Omite 4D 7, 8 6.1, 0.5 14 0.4, 0.4 6 Omite 30W 7 0.9, 1.0 1.7, 2.2 1.4, 1.2 3.6 Omite 4D 7 2.9, 5.5 5.2, 5.9 0.3, 1.1 These data indicate that propargite residues on raisins will not exceed the currently proposed 10 mg/kg limit on grapes if applications are within the recommended 1.7-3 kg ai/ha or 0.054% application rates and the 21-day recommended interval is observed. FATE OF RESIDUES In plants Previous studies have shown that propargite is the principle residue in plants and that residue loss is, at least in part, by volatilisation. There are data supporting the view that propargite is generally "non-systemic". It has been suggested that the principal metabolic degradation products in plants are propargyl alcohol and tert-butylphenoxy cyclohexanol with the possibility of further degradation to butylphenol and cyclohexanediol. However, this postulated metabolic pathway was not confirmed by detection of residues of these products in plants. Three additional studies on the metabolism of propargite in plants have been submitted. In one study mature red kidney bean plants were treated two times under greenhouse conditions with a 14C-phenyl labelled-propargite Comite(R) formulation (Curtiss and Fuller, 1979) at rates equivalent to field usage rates of 1.4-2.1 kg active/ha. There was a 30-day interval between treatments and from last treatment until harvest. Total residues in the dried pod at harvest were 36.9 ± 6.85 mg/kg, of which approximately 60% was extractable with acetone and methanol. Of these extractables 64.1% was shown by TLC/LSC to be propargite, 19% was unidentified as materials remaining at the origin, 6.7% was a compound with an Rf similar to that of the glycol ether [i.e.(2-[4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)phenoxy]cyclohexanol)] and the remaining 10.5% was unidentified. Thus about 40% of the total residue was unextractable, and about 30% of the extracted residue was unidentified, that is 57% of the total residue was unidentified. At a limit of detection of 0.05 mg/kg there were no residues of significance in the dried beans, thus supporting the view that residues are surface residues with little or no translocation from foliar applications. In another study (Henderson, 1979) Redhaven peaches were topically treated with (phenyl-14C) formulated Omite(R) with a solution concentration of 2600 mg/kg (0.26%) active or about 2 times the maximum rate reported as good agricultural practice (FAO/WHO, 1978). Application was by micro-syringe in the field at a rate of 1.3 mg propargite to each of nine peaches. This would be 7 mg/kg on a fruit basis if a 190 gm fruit were used. This approximates zero day residues of 1.3-10.5 mg/kg reported for a 0.1% application field trial application rate on nectarines (FAO/WHO, 1978). Samples were analyzed by TLC/LSC at 0, 10, and 21 days after treatment. The peels and pulp were analyzed separately with results reported on a whole fruit basis. Extraction was by multiple blendings with acetone, which was subsequently filtered. Recoveries were said to be 98.8%. Analysis was on silica gel TLC plates developed with cyclohexane: ethylacetate (9:10) with unlabelled propargite visualized under UV light. The 14C radioactivity of each segment of the plate was determined by LSC and unextractable residues by combustion. The recovery of applied 14C with time was 97.2, 96.67 and 71.3 percent at 0, 10 and 21 days respectively with the extractable portion only decreasing from 98 percent at zero day to 92.5 percent at 21 days. Less that 3% of residual 14C material was in the pulp, again supporting the view that propargite is generally non-systemic. The distribution of residual 14C is shown in Table 3. TABLE 3. Percentage Distribution of Residual 14C Extractable Unextractable Time Total (days) Propargite Unidentified Unidentified 0 94.0 4.1 2 6 10 76.1 20.6 3.3 23.9 21 82.5 10 7.5 17.5 These data support other studies showing that propargite, per se, is the principal residue on plants and that there are substantial unidentified residues. The TLC/LSC profiles at 0 and 21 days indicate that any one component of the unidentified residue on peaches would be less than about 10% of the total extractables, although this can not be concluded from the 10-day profile. There was no analysis for the glycol ether, which was tentatively identified in the bean study using a similar TLC system. In another study (Henderson, 1979) a 5000 mg/kg solution of propargite was topically applied to apples at 55.5 mg/kg level on a fruit basis to investigate whether residues of propargyl alcohol would result. Residues were analyzed by flame ionization gas chromatography at 0, 12 and 21 days after peeling and extraction with DMSO. Detection limits were said to be 1.1 mg/kg propargyl alcohol with 84% recoveries. No free propargyl alcohol residues were detected at 0, 12 or 21 days. RESIDUES IN COMMERCE OR AT CONSUMPTION Residues reported in apples in New Zealand commerce and based on biased sampling from crops known to be treated are as follows: 1977 Apples 12 samples N.D. - 1.5 mg/kg mean = 0.77 mg/kg These levels are well within the 5 mg/kg limit proposed by the 1975 Joint Meeting. NATIONAL TOLERANCES REPORTED TO THE MEETING Country Commodity Tolerance (mg/kg) New Zealand pome fruit, berry fruit and stone fruit 3 Federal Republic of Germany hops (dried) 30 citrus fruit, tea (dry manufactured) 5 fruit (except citrus) 3 cucumber, sugarbeet 0.5 beans (dried), cotton seed, peanuts, maize grain, potatoes, almonds, walnut 0.1 EVALUATION COMMENTS AND APPRAISAL At the 1977 Meeting (FAO/WHO, 1978a, b) a temporary ADI for man was estimated to be 0-0.08 mg/kg bw/day. Data have been provided in response to a request to provide a satisfactory carcinogenicity bioassay. A long-term mouse carcinogenicity study showed that although there were increases in liver and other organ weights, propargite was not carcinogenic. Propargite is rapidly absorbed, degraded, and excreted from mammalian systems and does not appear to bioaccumulate. It has a low order of acute toxicity, is not a mutagen or a teratogen, nor does it affect reproduction in the rat. Propargite has shown no organ or tissue-specific effect when fed to rodents. Administration of propargite to rats and dogs for two years failed to induce any abnormal effects attributable to propargite. However, in a short-term teratology study, delayed maturation of foetuses at a dosage level of 25 mg/kg was observed. Three new studies on the metabolism of propargite in plants have been submitted. In two of these 14C-phenyl labelled propargite was applied to bean plants and peaches respectively and in the other apples were fortified with unlabelled propargite. The first two studies support earlier studies, which have indicated that propargite, per se, is the principal residue and that residues are primarily surface residues with little evidence of translocation. The nature of unidentified residues, which may be from 6 to 50% of the total residue depending on the commodity and time from application, is still largely unknown. Although not entirely conclusive, the study on peaches does suggest that no one component of these unidentified residues is likely to be greater than about 10% of total extractable residues. However, this cannot be concluded in the bean study where 19% of the extractables remained at the origin of the TLC. The bean plant study gives some indication of possible residues of the glycol ether (2-[4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)phenoxy] cyclohexanol in bean pods at about 7% of extractable residues. If confirmed, this would disprove earlier suggestions that residues of this compound are too volatile to result in residues. On the other hand, at a detection limit of 1.1 mg/kg, there is no evidence of terminal residues of free propargyl alcohol from the use of propargite on apples. This does support, but does not prove, suggestions that this compound may be too volatile for residues. New or revised information was provided on use patterns, residues from supervised trials residues in commerce, and national tolerances of New Zealand. Except in the case of raisins this information is consistent with limits previously recommended and does not require revisions in those recommendations. In the case of raisins, the residue data show that residues on raisins from good agricultural practices will not exceed the existing 20 mg/kg limit on grapes. There is therefore no need for a separate limit on raisins, which was based on a concentration factor of 2.5 times the 10 mg/kg level for grapes. Level causing no toxicological effect Rat: 300 mg/kg in the diet equivalent to 15 mg/kg bw/day Dog: 900 mg/kg in the diet equivalent to 47 mg/kg bw/day based on actual dietary intake. Estimate of temporary acceptable daily intake for man 0-0.08 mg/kg bw/day The meeting concludes that the separate 25 mg/kg level for propargite on raisins should be withdrawn since residues are adequately covered by the 10 mg/kg limits on grapes. FURTHER WORK OR INFORMATION Required (by 1982) Clarification of the delayed maturation effects observed in the teratology study in the rat. Desirable 1. Further confirmation of the postulated degradation pathway in plants with particular attention to the characterization of unidentified residues (free or conjugated) and the possibility of residues of the glycol ether. 2. Additional data from supervised trials in countries other than the U.S.A. 3. Information on the occurrence of residues in commodities in commerce. REFERENCES Brusick, D.J. and Weir, R.J. Mutagenicity evaluation of D104 - Final Report. (1977) Unpublished report (No. 2683) from Litton Bionetics, submitted to the World Health Organization by Uniroyal Chemical. Canada. Propargite residues in raisins. Data provided to FAO by the Canadian Inter-departmental Codex Committee on pesticide residues, (1980). Cox, G.E. and Re, T.A. Chronic oncogenic evaluation of Omite(R) in CD-1 mice following 78 weeks of dietary treatment. (1979) Unpublished report from Food and Drug Research Laboratories, Inc., submitted to the World Health Organization by Uniroyal Chemical. Curtiss, K. and Fuller, G.B. The metabolic fate of propargite in red kidney bean plants, Project No. 7918. (1979) Unpublished report submitted by Uniroyal Chemical, Inc. Gallo M.A. and Bailey, D.A. Range finding study with Omite(R) in albino mice. (1976) Unpublished report from Food and Drug Research Laboratories, Inc., submitted to the World Health Organization by Uniroyal Chemical, Inc. Henderson, S.K. Degradation of Omits (phenyl-14C) on Redhaven Peaches, Project Number 7952. (1979) Unpublished report submitted by Uniroyal Chemical, Inc. Henderson, S.K. Analysis of Apples treated with Omite(R) for propargyl alcohol, Report Number 7948. (1979) Unpublished report submitted by Uniroyal Chemical, Inc. Knickerbocker, M. and Re, T.A. Teratological evaluations of Omite(R) technical in Sprague-Dawley rats. (1979) Unpublished report from Food and Drug Research Laboratories, Inc., submitted to the World Health Organization by Uniroyal Chemical.
See Also: Toxicological Abbreviations Propargite (Pesticide residues in food: 1977 evaluations) Propargite (Pesticide residues in food: 1978 evaluations) Propargite (Pesticide residues in food: 1979 evaluations) Propargite (Pesticide residues in food: 1982 evaluations) Propargite (JMPR Evaluations 1999 Part II Toxicological)