FAO, PL:CP/15 WHO/Food Add./67.32 EVALUATION OF SOME PESTICIDE RESIDUES IN FOOD The content of this document is the result of the deliberations of the Joint Meeting of the FAO Working Party and the WHO Expert Committee on Pesticide Residues, which met in Geneva, 14-21 November 1966.1 1 Report of a Joint Meeting of the FAO Working Party and the WHO Expert Committee on Pesticide Residues, FAO Agricultural Studies, in press; Wld Hlth Org. techn. Rep. Ser., 1967, in press DICHLORVOS IDENTITY Synonym DDVP Chemical name 2,2-dichlorovinyl dimethyl phosphate FormulaBIOLOGICAL DATA AND TOXICOLOGICAL EVALUATION Biochemical aspects Dichlorvos inhibits cholinesterase activity and thus causes parasympathomimetic effects. It requires no metabolic conversion, but inhibits the enzyme directly. Dichlorvos is broken down rapidly in the liver (Tracy, 1960; Tracy et al., 1960). Thus, the onset of poisoning is rapid, and if recovery occurs, it is prompt (Klotzsche, 1956; Durham et al., 1957; Gaines, 1960, Yamashita, 1962). In blood from a human female with pseudocholinesterase deficiency, 0.185 µg of dichlorvos caused 50 per cent inhibition of the erythrocyte esterase activity. The erythrocyte esterase activity in normal blood was inhibited by only 15 per cent by 0.3 µg of dichlorvos (Vigliani, 1966). Assays of whole blood from a cow given 1.0 mg/kg of dichlorvos either orally or subcutaneously did not show any cholinesterase inhibition; however, intravenous administration of the same dose produced 29 per cent inhibition after 1-2 hours with rapid recovery. In a goat given 1.52 mg/kg subcutaneously there was 44 per cent inhibition in 1/4 hour; 46 per cent in 1/2 hour; 41 per cent in 1 hour and 35 per cent in 2 hours, followed by rapid recovery (Casida et al., 1962). The compound is not stored in the body nor excreted in the milk to any appreciable extent in cows or rats, even when administered in doses that produced severe poisoning (Tracy, 1960; Tracy et al. 1960). With whole homogenates of liver, kidney, spleen and adrenals from rat and rabbit, the principal labelled metabolite of dichlorvos-35P was dimethylphosphate, 50-85 per cent, with the remaining radioactivity appearing in demethyl-dichlorvos, monomethyl phosphate and inorganic phosphate. In the plasma of both species, dimethyl phosphate accounted for 98 to 100 per cent of the dichlorvos hydrolyzed. When dimethyl 32P-phosphate was incubated with rat plasma or liver homogenate, all the radioactivity was recovered as unchanged dimethyl phosphate. Dichlorvos was hydrolyzed by the soluble and mitochondrial fractions of rat liver but not by the microsomes. Demethyl-dichlorvos was hydrolyzed by the soluble fraction only. In rat liver homogenate, 2-3 times more dichloroacetaldehyde than inorganic phosphate was produced from demethyl-dichlorvos. Inorganic phosphate was produced from monomethyl phosphate in both plasma and liver homogenate. The reaction was very slow. In soluble rat liver preparations, the dichloroacetaldehyde released by the hydrolysis of dichlorvos was reduced in the presence of DPNH to dichloroethanol. A very small amount may have appeared as dichloroacetate. It is possible that a pathway exists for conjugation of dichloroethanol with glucuronic acid (Hodgson & Casida, 1962). In rats given dichlorvos-32P, 10 mg/kg orally, rapid absorption, distribution and hydrolysis took place. Female rats treated every 1/2 hour with 4 mg/kg of dichlorvos-32P for 2 hours and sacrificed 1/2 hour after the last dose showed mainly hydrolysis products in the tissues. In mice given 4 doses of 10 mg/kg every 15 minutes, 95 per cent of the dichlorvos administered was hydrolyzed in the liver, kidney and small intestine. In male rats given dimethyl-32P-phosphate, 500 mg/kg orally, necropsy 90 hours after dosing indicated that almost the entire dose had been eliminated. The urine contained only unmetabolized dimethyl-32P-phosphate, which accounted for about 50 per cent of the radioactivity administered. The tissues were almost devoid of radioactivity. In a rat given demethyl-dichlorvos-32P, 500 mg/kg orally, about 14 per cent of the dose was eliminated in the urine in 90 hours, and the tissue distribution was similar to that of the rat which had received dichlorvos. A very high proportion of the radioactivity was found in bone, indicating rapid degradation to phosphoric acid. Metabolites in the urine were 86 per cent, phosphoric acid and 14 per cent demethyl-dichlorvos. From 67 to 100 per cent of the administered radioactivity was recovered with 1 week in the combined urine and faeces of cows, rats and a goat given various doses of dichlorvos-32P. Excretion of radioactivity in the faeces accounted for 11-15 per cent of the dose, except in cows treated orally, where about 50 per cent of the radioactivity was excreted. The excreted metabolites appeared to be demethyl-dichlorvos, dimethyl phosphate, monomethyl phosphate and inorganic phosphate. Most of the radioactivity in the milk of the cows and goat was due to hydrolysis products. The level of organosoluble radioactivity was significantly above background only within the first 2 hours. The highest excretion level was found at 12 hours in the cows (Casida, McBride & Niedermeier, 1962). Both single and repeated large doses cause a stress-attributed reduction in the eosinophil count of the peripheral blood of rats (Klotzsche, 1956). Experiments in rats showed that the liver is highly efficient in detoxicating dichlorvos (Gaines, 1966) and that the compound is absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract by the blood of the hepatic portal system (Laws, 1966). Acute toxicity Animal Route LD50 References mg/kg body-weight Mouse Oral 124 Yamashita, 1962 Mouse i.p. 28* Casida et al., 1962 Rat Oral 73 Klotzsche, 1956 Rat, male Oral 80 Durham et al., 1957 Gaines, 1960 Mattson et al., 1955 Rat, female Oral 56** Durham et al., 1957 Gaines, 1960 Mattson et al., 1955 Rat, female Oral 80*** Durham et al., 1957 Chick, male Oral 14.8 Sherman & Ross, 1961 * Technical grade; purity not stated. ** Based on 99 per cent pure material. *** Result of 2 tests on a technical preparation (90 per cent pure). Rat. Under laboratory conditions it was possible to produce concentrations ranging from 31 to 118 µg/l in an exposure chamber. Under the severest conditions of respiratory exposure, rats showed signs of poisoning within 2 hours and died in 4.5-17.5 hours (Durham et al., 1957). Domestic animals. Horses tolerated a single dose of 50 mg/kg dichlorvos in feed, but showed moderate acute poisoning when the insecticide was given by stomach-tube at 25 mg/kg (Jackson et al., 1960). An almost identical dose (27 mg/kg) given by stomach-tube caused severe but non-fatal poisoning in a cow (Tracy et al., 1960). Dichlorvos does not produce either immediate or delayed paralysis in hens (Durham et al., 1957). Man. Men withstood brief exposure (30-60 minutes) to concentrations as high as 6.9 µg/l without depression of cholinesterase activity or any other observed effect (Durham et al., 1959; Hayes, 1961). A single exposure for 8 hours at a concentration ranging from 0.9 to 3.5 µg/l produced slight inhibition of plasma cholinesterase activity in man (Witter et al., 1961). Slightly higher concentrations or longer periods of exposure, or both, produce measurable reduction of both the red cell and plasma enzyme activity in men, monkeys and rats (Hayes, 1961). Short-term studies Rat. Relatively small repeated doses lower the blood cholinesterase activity but much larger doses are required to produce illness. Thus, Durham et al. (1957) found that a dietary concentration of only 50 ppm soon produced detectable lowering of plasma and red cell cholinesterase activity in female rats, but a dietary level of 1000 ppm (about 50 mg/kg/day) was tolerated for 90 days without any diminution of growth or sign of intoxication. Male and female rats reproduced as well as controls when maintained on a dietary level of 100 ppm (Gaines, 1964). When dichlorvos is given by stomach-tube it is not so well tolerated as when the same dosage is absorbed from the diet gradually throughout the day. Female rats tolerated doses of 10 and 20 mg/kg in the diet but suffered severe, acute poisoning when given single doses of 30 mg/kg. Even at 30 mg/kg, the rats survived and the red cell cholinesterase activity and growth of their litters were normal (Tracy et al., 1960). Reproduction studies in rats fed 0, 0.1, 1.0, 10.0, 100 or 500 ppm in the diet through three successive generations did not show any significant effect on numbers, and sizes of litters, survival of young or growth of young being suckled while dichlorvos was still being fed to the dams. Dichlorvos appeared to be without teratogenic effect (Witherup et al., 1965). Dog. Dichlorvos given to dogs by capsule at rates equivalent to dietary levels of 5 and 15 ppm (0.13-0.37 mg/kg/day) produced no detectable effect; levels equivalent to 25 ppm and 50 ppm depressed brain cholinesterase activity to 88 and 33 per cent of control, respectively, and led to some increase in the activity and aggressiveness of the dogs (Blucher et al., 1962). Monkey. A dermal dose of 50 mg/kg produced cholinergic signs in a monkey 20 minutes after administration, and it died after 8 daily doses at this rate. Higher dosage rates produced even more rapid onset of illness, even though a single dose of 100 mg/kg was not fatal (Durham et al., 1957). Monkeys tolerated continuous exposure to concentrations ranging from 0.1-0.5 µg/l for 22 days without a definite change in cholinesterase activity. They showed a definite depletion by the 50th day of exposure (Durham et al., 1959), but the concentration of dichlorvos may have exceeded 0.5 µg/l sometime between the 22nd and 50th day (Hayes, 1961). Horse. Horses showed mild depression of red cell but not plasma cholinesterase activity when exposed continuously to concentrations ranging from 0.24-1.48 µg/l, but they returned to normal in spite of continuing exposure (Tracy et 1960). Man. Men showed no change in cholinesterase activity when exposed for 8-10 half-hour intervals, 4 nights per week, for 11 weeks to concentrations from 0.07 to 0.66 µg/l (average 0.25 µg/l). They did show a small but statistically significant depression of plasma enzyme activity, but not of red cell enzyme activity, when the schedule of dosing was maintained but the concentration increased to 0.40-0.55 µg/l (average 0.51 µg/l). The other parameters studied, including complex reaction time, airway resistance and vision, remained normal, (Rasussen et al., 1963). The tolerated inhaled dosage averaged 0.5 mg/man/day while the dosage that caused a slight fall of plasma cholinesterase was 1.1 mg/man/day. The compound produced no decrease in whole blood cholinesterase activity and no other indication of injury when used for malaria control (Funckes et al., 1963; Gratz et al., 1962). When 15 subjects were exposed for 8 months to concentrations of 0.1 mg/M3 and higher of dichlorvos in the air, 5 showed a slight reduction in plasma cholinesterase activity. When 36 subjects were exposed to concentrations of less than 0.1 mg/M3, none showed any reduction in plasma cholinesterase activity (Vigliani, 1966). Long-term studies No really long-term studies have been made of dichlorvos, nor do they appear indicated because of the rapid action and excretion of the compound. Comments Dichlorvos is rapidly metabolised in mammalian tissues to relatively non-toxic metabolites which are rapidly excreted. From the data available to date, the maximum level causing no significant toxicological effect in man is 0.01 mg/kg/day by inhalation. Continuous exposure of man to 0.1 mg/M3 caused some depression of plasma cholinesterase activity without clinical signs. It would be desirable to determine the maximum oral dose causing no inhibition of cholinesterase activity in man. In short-term experiments in dogs, the oral no-effect level was 0.37 mg/kg/day. TOXICOLOGICAL EVALUATION Level causing no toxicological effect Rat: 10 ppm in the diet equivalent to 0.5 mg/kg/day. Dog: 0.37 mg/kg/day. Estimate of acceptable daily intake for man 0-0.004 mg/kg body-weight RESIDUES IN FOOD AND THEIR EVALUATION Use pattern (a) Pre-harvest treatment No information was available on the use of dichlorvos treatments applied to food crops prior to harvest. Its potentialities in this field seem limited by its lack of systemic properties and its short persistence. It is used on beef and dairy cattle and on goats, sheep and swine and in and around the buildings which house these animals. (b) Post-harvest treatments Strong & Spur (1961) showed that dichlorvos was active against a range of insect pests of stored produce. Experimental work has since been carried out on its application for the protection of cereals and cereal products during storage and for the control of insects in facilities where foods are stored, processed, handled or shipped. Trials have shown that 4 micrograms of dichlorvos vapour per litre of air for six hours will control common stored product insects. Durham et al. (1959) found that the tightness of the warehouse and the temperature influences the amount required to obtain the desired concentration in the air; but in fairly tight warehouses the necessary concentration can be obtained by releasing dichlorvos at 50 mg/m3. Dichlorvos was dispensed by Gillenwater & Harein (1964) from a specially designed heat volatilizer containing impregnated resin pellets. However, it could be applied as a pressurized aerosol formulation although higher levels of residues might result from such use, particularly in any foodstuffs situated close to the aerosol dispensers. Some tests have been conducted recently on dichlorvos impregnated resin strips which show considerable promise for future extension of its use in the control of insects in stored produce (Green et al., 1966). (c) Uses other than on food For the control, primarily, of flies and, mosquitos dichlorvos is being used both inside and outside of agricultural premises such as barns, feed lots, milk rooms, poultry houses, stables, corrals, holding pens and poultry pens and yards. It has been used for a number of years for the control of Ephestia elutella (Hübner) and Lasioderma serricorne (Fabricius) in tobacco warehouses and in processing areas. The insecticide is applied into the air spaces after working hours. Dichlorvos is also being used in the United States in sprays (0.5 per cent for the control of insect pests such as ants, bedbugs, cockroaches, flies, silverfish, spiders, ticks and wasps. Tolerances The use of dichlorvos in ways which might possibly leave residues in food is quite recent. There appear to be no legal or other tolerances. Residues resulting from supervised trials There is only a limited amount of data available on residues in food produced by dichlorvos. In a series of warehouse tests conducted in the United States packaged noodles, raisins, beans, peanuts, flour and sugar were exposed to 21 weekly treatments of dichlorvos applied as a vapour at the rate of 50 mg/m3 per treatment. In each treatment, the insecticide was vaporized slowly over a period of six hours. The highest residue found after 21 applications in composite samples of the various foods was 1.68 ppm in peanuts contained in burlap bags. The residues in the other foods were well below 1 ppm (Unpublished information received from US Department of Agriculture). Following the work of Strong & Spur (1961) which showed that dichlorvos was toxic to stored-product insects at very low concentrations, preliminary tests were conducted in the United Kingdom to assess its value for rapid disinfestation of grain where a long residual life is unnecessary or undesirable. Feed barley was treated with an emulsifiable formulation of dichlorvos as the grain was turned from one bin into another. A deposit of 4 ppm appeared effective in controlling the insects present but the insecticide disappeared very quickly. Resin strips measuring about 2-1/2" × 10" × 1/4" and containing about 18.6 per cent of dichlorvos by weight are under test to determine their effectiveness in providing continuous control of flying and crawling insects. The initial generation of dichlorvos by these strips is approximately 40 mg/hr/strip and will produce a dichlorvos concentration in the air of 1 mg/l at 30 per cent R.H. The emission rate falls and after 30 days an almost constant rate of 3.0-4.0 mg of dichlorvos is emitted producing a concentration of the insecticide in the air of 0.075-0.1 µg/l of air. About 0.1 µg/l of dichlorvos is produced for about two-thirds of the active life of the strips. Residues in food moving in commerce No information was available. Fate of residues Fragmentary data indicate that dichlorvos residues appearing in foods from good agricultural practices are of a very low level and they disappear quite rapidly when the treated foods are aired. Green & Tyler (1966) found barley sprayed with dichlorvos at the rate of 4 ppm while being turned from one bin to another had 1.9 ppm (average) by analysis during treatment, 0.93 ppm after one week, 0.25 ppm after six weeks, 0.22 ppm after 10 weeks, and none could be detected 15 weeks later. A variety of foods were exposed in a room in which were hung dichlorvos resin strips at the rate of 1 strip/1000 cu. ft for seven weeks. The dichlorvos concentration in the air reached 0.33 µg/l after 24 hours and decreased to 0.03 µg/l after eight weeks. Residues of dichlorvos in the various foods increased to maximum levels ranging from 3.4 ppm for whole apples after 28 days' exposure down to 0.03 ppm in sugar after 56 days. Whole apples, bacon and cheese had dichlorvos residues greater than 1 ppm; banana (skin), currants (covered with paper), dried milk (polyethylene bag) and surface samples of wheat, cocoa beans and flour in hessian sacks had residues of 0.1-1 ppm; and eggs, oranges, sugar, banana (edible part) had dichlorvos residues below 0.1 ppm. On removal to an insecticide-free room, 20-70 per cent of the residue was lost after four days, and 60-100 per cent after 10 days (Unpublished information). Dichlorvos was added to rice at levels of 4.5 ppm and 19 ppm, and to flour at 4.5 ppm and 14 ppm. Then the food was placed in sealed containers and stored for 65 hours at room temperature. As in home practice, the rice was washed with cold water and then cooked for 20-30 minutes until edible. There was 98 per cent less dichlorvos in the rice after washing and cooking. The biscuits made from the treated flour had 80 per cent and 60 per cent less dichlorvos, respectively (Unpublished information). Residues in meats were followed by exposure to dichlorvos labelled with P32: the effects of cooking on such residues were investigated. Dichlorvos penetrated only into the surface layers of the samples and the residues in fat were generally lower than in the other samples. Following the frying and boiling of steak containing dichlorvos residues, the latter were completely destroyed and it was possible to detect only products of hydrolysis (Miller & Aitken, 1965). Also after the usual conservation of plums by thermalsterilization, dichlorvos residues disappeared completely (Benes, personal communication). Geisabühler & Haselbach (1963) concluded that the milling process does not result in any considerable decrease of residues in wheat treated with dichlorvos. During storage however the decomposition of the residues proceeds much more quickly in milled wheat products than it does in whole grains. No dichlorvos could be detected in samples of white flour after one month of storage at room temperature. Methods of residue analysis The method which has been used for determining dichlorvos residues in foods was developed by Shell Development Company. It is a spectrophotometric method based on enzyme inhibition. It has a sensitivity 0.10 ppm of dichlorvos. Gas-liquid-chromatographic methods have been developed for orgophosphorus compounds. It appears promising that this type of analysis could be perfected for the determination of dichlorvos residues. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TOLERANCES No tolerances are recommended at this time because of insufficient information on the specific uses of dichlorvos on foods and the resulting residues. Recommendations for tolerances should be considered at the next joint meeting. Further work or information Information is required on: (a) range of commodities likely to be treated, (b) occurrence of residue levels resulting from good pest control practices, (c) rate of disappearance through normal aging, processing, cooking, etc., and (d) chemical nature of terminal residues occurring in foods from good pest control practices. REFERENCES PERTINENT TO BIOLOGICAL DATA Blucher, W., Budd, E. R., Dewey, M. L., Eisenlord, G., Hine, C. H., Loquvam, G. L., Powers, M. T. & Riggs, C. W. (1962) Unpublished report from the Hine Laboratories, San Francisco, California Casida, J. E., McBride, L. & Niedermeier, R. P. (1962) J. Agr. Food Chem., 10, 370 Durham, W. F., Gaines, T. B., McCauley, R. H., Sedlak, V. A., Mattson, A. M. & Hayes, W. J., jr (1957) A. M. A. Arch. industr. Hlth, 15, 340 Durham, W. F., Hayes, W. J., jr & Mattson, A. M. (1959) A. M. A. Arch. industr. Hlth., 20, 202 Funckes, A. J., Miller, S. & Hayes, W. J., jr (1963) Bull. Wld Hlth Org., 29, 243 Gaines, T. B. (1960) Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 2, 68 Gaines, T. B. (1964) Unpublished report Gaines, T. B. (1966) Nature (Lond.) 209, 88 Gratz, N. G., Bracha, P. & Carmichael, A. G, (1962) WHO/Vector Control/11 Hayes, W. J., jr (1961) Bull. Wld Hlth Org., 24, 629 Hodgson, E. & Casida, J. E. (1962) J. Agr. Food Chem., 10, 208 Jackson, J. B., Drummond, R. O., Buck, W. B. & Hunt, L. M. (1960) J. econ. Ent., 53, 602 Klotzsche, C. (1956) Z. Angew. Zool., 1, 87 Mattson, A. M., Spillane, J. T. & Pearce, G. W. (1955) J. Agr. Food Chem., 2, 319 Rasmussen, W. A., Jensen, J. A., Stein, W. J. & Hayes, W. J., jr (1963) Aerospace Med., 34, 594 Sherman, M. & Ross, E. (1961) Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 3, 521 Tracy, R. L. (1960) Soap Chem. Spec., 36, 74 Tracy, R. L., Woodcock, J. G. & Chodroff, S. (1960) J. econ. Ent., 53, 593 Vigliani, E. C. (1966) Unpublished report to Shell Chemical Co. Witherup, S., Caldwell, J. S. & Hull, L. (1965) Unpublished report from the Kettering Laboratory, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio Witter, R. F., Gaines, T. B., Short, J. G., Sedlak, V. A. & Maddock, D. R. (1961) Bull. Wld Hlth Org., 24, 635 Yamashita, K. (1962) Industr. Med. Surg., 31, 170 REFERENCES PERTINENT TO AGRICULTURAL DATA Durham, W. F., Hayes, W. J. & Mattson, A. M. (1959) Toxicological Studies of DDVP in Tobacco Warehouses. Arch. industr. Hlth, 20: 202-10 Geissbühler, H. & Haselbach, C. (1963) On the behaviour of DDVP upon storage and processing of insecticide treated cereals. (Report for CIBA, Basle) Battelle Inst. Geneva, 30 October Gillenwater, H. B. & Harein, P. K. (1964) A dispenser designed to provide large quantities of insecticide vapor. J. Econ. Ent., 57 (5): 762-3 Green, A. A., Kane, J. & Gradidge, J. M. G. (1966) Experiments in the Control of Ephestia elutella using Dichlorvos Vapour. J. Stored Proc. Res., 2: 147-157 Green, A. A. & Tyler, P. S. (1966) A field comparison of malathion, dichlorvos and fenitrothion for the control of Oryzaephilus infesting stored barley. J. Stored Prod. Res., 1: 273-295 Millar, K. R. & Aitken, W. M. (1965) Residues in meat following exposure to P32 labelled dichlorvos vapour in an enclosed space. N.Z. J. Agric. Res., 8 (2): 350-362 Strong, H. G. & Spur, D. E. (1961) Evaluation of Insecticides as protectants against pests of stored grain and seeds. J. Econ. Ent., 54 (2); 235-238
See Also: Toxicological Abbreviations Dichlorvos (EHC 79, 1988) Dichlorvos (HSG 18, 1988) Dichlorvos (ICSC) Dichlorvos (FAO Meeting Report PL/1965/10/1) Dichlorvos (FAO/PL:1967/M/11/1) Dichlorvos (FAO/PL:1969/M/17/1) Dichlorvos (AGP:1970/M/12/1) Dichlorvos (WHO Pesticide Residues Series 4) Dichlorvos (Pesticide residues in food: 1977 evaluations) Dichlorvos (Pesticide residues in food: 1993 evaluations Part II Toxicology) Dichlorvos (IARC Summary & Evaluation, Volume 53, 1991)